Detection of acute infections during HIV testing in North Carolina.

BACKGROUND: North Carolina has added nucleic acid amplification testing for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to standard HIV antibody tests to detect persons with acute HIV infection who are viremic but antibody-negative. METHODS: To determine the effect of nucleic acid amplification testing on the yield and accuracy of HIV detection in public health practice, we conducted a 12-month observational study of methods for state-funded HIV testing. We compared the diagnostic performance of standard HIV antibody tests (i.e., enzyme immunoassay and Western blot analysis) with an algorithm whereby serum samples that yielded negative results on standard antibody tests were tested again with the use of nucleic acid amplification. A surveillance algorithm with repeated sensitive-less-sensitive enzyme immunoassay tests was also evaluated. HIV infection was defined as a confirmed positive result on a nucleic acid amplification test or as HIV antibody seroconversion. RESULTS: Between November 1, 2002, and October 31, 2003, 109,250 persons at risk for HIV infection who had consented to HIV testing presented at state-funded sites. There were 606 HIV-positive results. Established infection, as identified by standard enzyme immunoassay or Western blot analysis, appeared in 583 participants; of these, 107 were identified, with the use of sensitive-less-sensitive enzyme immunoassay tests, as recent infections. A total of 23 acutely infected persons were identified only with the use of the nucleic acid amplification algorithm. With all detectable infections taken into account, the sensitivity of standard antibody testing was 0.962 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.944 to 0.976). There were two false positive results on nucleic acid amplification tests. The specificity and positive predictive value of the algorithm that included nucleic acid amplification testing were greater than 0.999 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.999 to >0.999) and 0.997 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.988 to >0.999), respectively. Of the 23 acute HIV infections, 16 were detected at sexually transmitted disease clinics. Emergency measures for HIV prevention protected 48 sex partners and one fetus from high-risk exposure to HIV. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of nucleic acid amplification testing to an HIV testing algorithm significantly increases the identification of cases of infection without impairing the performance of diagnostic testing. The detection of highly contagious, acutely infected persons creates new opportunities for HIV surveillance and prevention.

Frequent detection of acute HIV infection in pregnant women.

BACKGROUND: Universal prenatal HIV antibody testing, which does not detect acute HIV, is standard for pregnant women in the United States. Unrecognized HIV acquisition during pregnancy may result in higher rates of perinatal transmission. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of acute (antibody-negative) HIV infection in pregnant women and to assess the potential for prompt initiation of antiretroviral therapy to prevent perinatal transmission. METHODS: From 1 November 2002 to 30 April 2005, all publicly funded HIV testing sites participated in North Carolina's Screening and Tracing Active Transmission (STAT) Program, which retested all specimens that were HIV antibody negative for HIV RNA using specimen pooling. All patients with acute HIV infection were immediately traced for evaluation, confirmatory testing, counseling, and referral services. For this study, all pregnant women with acute HIV were immediately initiated onto antiretroviral therapy and followed prospectively for pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, 443 women were HIV positive by antibody testing; 15 were HIV antibody negative but positive by RNA assay and of these five were pregnant at the time of testing. The pregnant women received antiretroviral drugs and delivered HIV-uninfected infants. Maternal testing records of all six HIV-infected infants born in North Carolina showed three mothers with chronic HIV infection and three HIV antibody negative at private prenatal testing facilities. CONCLUSIONS: In resource-rich settings, a substantial proportion of residual perinatal transmission may be from HIV acquisition during pregnancy. Standard antibody tests miss acute HIV infection and so algorithms that include pooled HIV RNA testing may improve its detection and represent a further opportunity to prevent perinatal transmission.

Shielding lotions.

Unlike traditional moisturizers, shielding lotions help keep out irritants such as latex allergens and antibacterial soaps while locking in the skin's natural moisture.