Risks in the analogue and digitally-supported medication process and potential solutions to increase patient safety in the hospital: A mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: In hospital medication errors are common. Our aim was to investigate risks of the analogue and digitally-supported medication process and any potential solutions. METHODS: A mixed methods study including a structured literature search and online questionnaires based on the Delphi method was conducted. First, all risks were structured into main and sub-risks and second, risks were grouped into risk clusters. Third, healthcare experts assessed risk clusters regarding their likelihood of occurrence their possible impact on patient safety. Experts were also asked to estimate the potential for digital solutions and solutions that strengthen the competence of healthcare professionals. RESULTS: Overall, 160 main risks and 542 sub-risks were identified. Main risks were grouped into 43 risk clusters. 33 healthcare experts (56% female, 50% with >20 years professional-experience) ranked the likelihood of occurrence and the impact on patient safety in the top 15 risk clusters regarding the process steps: admission (n = 4), prescribing (n = 3), verifying (n = 1), preparing/dispensing (n = 3), administering (n = 1), discharge (n = 1), healthcare professional competence (n = 1), and patient adherence (n = 1). 28 healthcare experts (64% female, 43% with >20 years professional-experience) mostly suggested awareness building and training, strengthened networking, and involvement of pharmacists at point-of-care as likely solutions to strengthen healthcare professional competence. For digital solutions they primarily suggested a digital medication list, digital warning systems, barcode-technology, and digital support in integrated care. CONCLUSIONS: The medication process holds a multitude of potential risks, in both the analogue and the digital medication process. Different solutions to strengthen healthcare professional competence and in the area of digitalization were identified that could help increase patient safety and minimize possible errors.

Vaginal Microbial Colonization after Antibiotic Treatment in Women with Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes: An Observational Cohort Study.

Preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM) stands as a primary contributor to preterm deliveries worldwide, closely linked to consequential infectious peripartum complications, including chorioamnionitis and early-onset neonatal sepsis. As a prophylactic measure, individuals following pPROM routinely undergo antibiotic treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the vaginal microbial colonization after antibiotic treatment following pPROM. Therefore, we retrospectively assessed the impact of antibiotic treatment on the maternal vaginal microbial colonization in 438 post-pPROM patients delivering before 29 gestational weeks. Vaginal samples were collected for microbiological analysis before and after antibiotic administration and analysed for seventeen pre-defined microbial groups. We observed eradication in eleven microbial groups, including beta-hemolytic streptococci group B and Gardnerella vaginalis. No significant reduction was found for the remaining groups, including Escherichia (E.) coli. Moreover, we found a notable increase in resistant bacteria after antibiotic treatment. In conclusion, broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatment exhibited substantial efficacy in eradicating the majority of pathogens in our cohort. However, certain pathogens, notably E. coli, showed resilience. Given E. coli's prominent role in infectious peripartum complications, our findings underline the challenges in antibiotic management post-pPROM and the need to establish international guidelines, particularly regarding emerging concerns about antibiotic resistances.