Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Trends Genet ; 37(6): 491-493, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33771351

RESUMO

The Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has deepened gender and racial diversity problems in academia. Mentorship shows women and other under-represented groups where the ladders to success are, and helps them avoid the chutes, a revised leaky pipeline metaphor. Here, we identify tangible strategies that will improve gender equity, including increasing active mentorship by male academics.


Assuntos
Academias e Institutos , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Mulheres , Academias e Institutos/tendências , COVID-19 , Emprego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mentores , Universidades
2.
PLoS One ; 16(7): e0254087, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34270574

RESUMO

In recent years, political activists have taken to social media platforms to rapidly reach broad audiences. Despite the prevalence of micro-blogging in these sociopolitical movements, the degree to which virtual mobilization reflects or drives real-world movements is unclear. Here, we explore the dynamics of real-world events and Twitter social cohesion in Syria during the Arab Spring. Using the nonlinear methods cross-recurrence quantification analysis and windowed cross-recurrence quantification analysis, we investigate if frequency of events of different intensities are coupled with social cohesion found in Syrian tweets. Results indicate that online social cohesion is coupled with the counts of all, positive, and negative events each day but shows a decreased connection to negative events when outwardly directed events (i.e., source events) were considered. We conclude with a discussion of implications and applications of nonlinear methods in political science research.


Assuntos
Comportamento Cooperativo , Mídias Sociais , Blogging , Síria
3.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0244531, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33382791

RESUMO

In this paper we explore whether countries led by women have fared better during the COVID-19 pandemic than those led by men. Media and public health officials have lauded the perceived gender-related influence on policies and strategies for reducing the deleterious effects of the pandemic. We examine this proposition by analyzing COVID-19-related deaths globally across countries led by men and women. While we find some limited support for lower reported fatality rates in countries led by women, they are not statistically significant. Country cultural values offer more substantive explanation for COVID-19 outcomes. We offer several potential explanations for the pervasive perception that countries led by women have fared better during the pandemic, including data selection bias and Western media bias that amplified the successes of women leaders in OECD countries.


Assuntos
COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Liderança , Pandemias , Saúde Pública , SARS-CoV-2 , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa