Use of deep artificial neural networks to identify stroke during triage via subtle changes in circulating cell counts.

BACKGROUND: The development of tools that could help emergency department clinicians recognize stroke during triage could reduce treatment delays and improve patient outcomes. Growing evidence suggests that stroke is associated with several changes in circulating cell counts. The aim of this study was to determine whether machine-learning can be used to identify stroke in the emergency department using data available from a routine complete blood count with differential. METHODS: Red blood cell, platelet, neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, eosinophil, and basophil counts were assessed in admission blood samples collected from 160 stroke patients and 116 stroke mimics recruited from three geographically distinct clinical sites, and an ensemble artificial neural network model was developed and tested for its ability to discriminate between groups. RESULTS: Several modest but statistically significant differences were observed in cell counts between stroke patients and stroke mimics. The counts of no single cell population alone were adequate to discriminate between groups with high levels of accuracy; however, combined classification using the neural network model resulted in a dramatic and statistically significant improvement in diagnostic performance according to receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Furthermore, the neural network model displayed superior performance as a triage decision making tool compared to symptom-based tools such as the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) when assessed using decision curve analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that algorithmic analysis of commonly collected hematology data using machine-learning could potentially be used to help emergency department clinicians make better-informed triage decisions in situations where advanced imaging techniques or neurological expertise are not immediately available, or even to electronically flag patients in which stroke should be considered as a diagnosis as part of an automated stroke alert system.

Bioinformatic analysis of brain-specific miRNAs for identification of candidate traumatic brain injury blood biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: Detection of brain-specific miRNAs in the peripheral blood could serve as a surrogate marker of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Here, we systematically identified brain-enriched miRNAs, and tested their utility as TBI biomarkers in the acute phase of care. METHODS: Publically available microarray data generated from 29 postmortem human tissues were used to rank 1,364 miRNAs in terms of their degree of brain-specific expression. Levels of the top six ranked miRNAs were then prospectively measured in serum samples collected from 10 Patients with TBI at hospital admission, as well as from 10 controls. RESULTS: The top six miRNAs identified in our analysis (miR-124-3p, miR-219a-5p, miR-9-5p, miR-9-3p, miR-137, and miR-128-3p) were enriched 70 to 320-fold in brain relative to other tissues, and exhibited dramatically greater brain specificity compared to several miRNAs previously proposed as biomarkers. Furthermore, their levels were elevated in serum from patients with TBI compared to controls, and could collectively discriminate between groups with 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Interestingly, subsequent informatic pathway analysis revealed that their target transcripts were enriched for components of signaling pathways active in peripheral organs involved in common post-TBI complications. CONCLUSIONS: The six candidate miRNAs identified in this preliminary study have promise as blood biomarkers of TBI, and could also be molecular contributors to systemic physiologic changes commonly observed post-injury.

Procedural Pain in the Adult Neurological Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study Examining Arterial Line Insertion.

BACKGROUND: This was a retrospective chart review of procedural pain assessments and interventions during arterial catheter insertion in an adult neurological intensive care unit where patients with impaired consciousness are common. Overall, pain assessment was well documented (100%) by Registered Nurses, but not specific to arterial line insertion. Nurse practitioners commonly placed arterial lines and used local analgesia in over 75% of the documented procedures. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to examine healthcare providers' pain-related practices documented during arterial catheter insertion, one of the most painful procedures in a neurological intensive care unit. Secondary purposes were determining whether patient characteristics, procedure-related factors, or provider licensure were associated with pain assessment or procedural pain interventions. DESIGN: A retrospective records review design was used. METHODS: 120 electronic patient medical records were reviewed during a one-year period. RESULTS: 100 charts met inclusion criteria. Nurses assessed all pain within 4 hours following the procedure in all charts but procedure-specific pain assessments were documented in 4% of charts. Pain-related interventions for arterial line insertion were local analgesic (76% of charts) and other procedure-specific interventions (10%). Significant associations occurred between procedure specific pain assessments and decreased number of insertion attempts (p = .006) and between pain interventions and number of insertion attempts (p = .003). No provider documented procedural pain assessment regarding arterial line insertion. Associations between patient characteristics and pain interventions were significant for patient ethnicity (F = 8.967, p = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Overall pain assessment was documented (100%) but not specific to arterial line insertion. Although arterial line insertion can be extremely painful, patients were rarely assessed for such pain by any clinician; 14% did not receive any preprocedural analgesia. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The lack of procedural pain assessment in this vulnerable population indicates a need for increased pain management education for clinicians and further investigations to determine whether sufficient analgesia is provided to reduce procedural pain during arterial line insertion.

Patient reported symptom outcomes during medication titration for adult heart failure management.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This project used the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) tools to evaluate heart failure patient's experiences of dyspnea, fatigue, and physical mobility during initiation and up titration of drugs in an outpatient setting. BACKGROUND: Investigating patient reported outcome may improve adherence to GDMT. Theoretical support for this study is found in the University of California, Theory of Symptom Management. DESIGN: Exploratory, repeated measures design. METHODS: Patients (n = 21) completed three PROMIS questionnaires for dyspnea, fatigue and physical mobility when GDMT was started or up titrated, and again at a follow up appointment within 30 days (+/- 14 days) of the baseline measures. Patients were asked open- ended queries regarding the usefulness of these questionnaires in identifying and managing symptoms. Provider input was sought on usefulness of the tools in clinical practice and decision making. RESULTS: Dyspnea change scores significantly decreased (p = .001), physical mobility scores significantly increased (p = .017), and fatigue scores did not change (p = .319). Duration of HF diagnosis was associated with dyspnea change scores. Patients reported PROMIS tools were easy to use, while providers felt the tools were easy for patients to use but were too long and time intensive for usual office practice. CONCLUSIONS: Dyspnea and physical mobility improved with up titration of GDMT but fatigue did not change. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: PROMIS tools could be helpful in tracking selected symptom changes during GDMT HF medication initiation or up titration for HF management if reformulated into shorter format.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU.

OBJECTIVE: To update and expand the 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the ICU. DESIGN: Thirty-two international experts, four methodologists, and four critical illness survivors met virtually at least monthly. All section groups gathered face-to-face at annual Society of Critical Care Medicine congresses; virtual connections included those unable to attend. A formal conflict of interest policy was developed a priori and enforced throughout the process. Teleconferences and electronic discussions among subgroups and whole panel were part of the guidelines' development. A general content review was completed face-to-face by all panel members in January 2017. METHODS: Content experts, methodologists, and ICU survivors were represented in each of the five sections of the guidelines: Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption). Each section created Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome, and nonactionable, descriptive questions based on perceived clinical relevance. The guideline group then voted their ranking, and patients prioritized their importance. For each Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome question, sections searched the best available evidence, determined its quality, and formulated recommendations as "strong," "conditional," or "good" practice statements based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation principles. In addition, evidence gaps and clinical caveats were explicitly identified. RESULTS: The Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) panel issued 37 recommendations (three strong and 34 conditional), two good practice statements, and 32 ungraded, nonactionable statements. Three questions from the patient-centered prioritized question list remained without recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: We found substantial agreement among a large, interdisciplinary cohort of international experts regarding evidence supporting recommendations, and the remaining literature gaps in the assessment, prevention, and treatment of Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) in critically ill adults. Highlighting this evidence and the research needs will improve Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) management and provide the foundation for improved outcomes and science in this vulnerable population.

Patient Safety Events during Critical Care Transport.

OBJECTIVE: Patient safety events (PSEs) occurring during interfacility transport have not been studied comprehensively in critical care transport (CCT) teams in the United States. The purpose of this research was to investigate the type and frequency of PSEs during CCT between hospitals; to explore the impact of patient stability, vulnerability, complexity, predictability, and resiliency; and to examine if the nurse factors of licensure or experience and transport factors of duration or mode of transport influence the frequency of PSEs. The study was conducted at a large hospital-based quaternary health care system in the Midwestern United States. METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive correlational study using chart review. The study selected 50 sequential qualifying cases with PSEs and randomly selected control cases reviewed at a single site over a 5-month period. RESULTS: The rate of PSEs was 27.7 events per 1,000 patient contacts. Of 9 reported adverse event types, new or recurrent hypoxia had the greatest frequency. Hypoxia, when present at the time of initial CCT contact, was associated with the PSE occurrence (P = .046). Duration of transport was a significant predictor of PSEs (P = .025). CONCLUSION: Pretransport hypoxia and duration of transport are independent predictors for intratransport PSEs, particularly intratransport hypoxia.

Comfort and Fluid Retention in Adult Patients Receiving Hemodialysis.

Successful hemodialysis treatments for patients with renal failure depend on patient adherence to prescribed treatment regimens. Lack of adherence may contribute to patient discomfort between hemodialysis treatments. This article reports a descriptive, correlational feasibility study that utilized Kolcaba's Comfort Theory as a framework. The purpose of the study was to determine a potential relationship between comfort and fluid retention (a proxy for adherence) in adults with end stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis. A convenience sample of 51 patients receiving hemodialysis was studied. Comparisons of patient weight gain between hemodialysis treatment sessions measured fluid retention by proxy. Results indicated no significant relationship between the variables of comfort and adherence to fluid restrictions. However, this finding has potential to support clinical practice to minimize weight gain to sustain comfort. Awareness of comfort as a consideration for adherence to prescribed treatment regimens may help nurses coach individuals to improve treatment adherence.

The nurse response to abnormal vital sign recording in the emergency department.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To examine what occurs after a recorded observation of at least one abnormal vital sign in the emergency department. The aims were to determine how often abnormal vital signs were recorded, what interventions were documented, and what factors were associated with documented follow-up for abnormal vital signs. BACKGROUND: Monitoring quality of care, and preventing or intervening before harm occurs to patients are central to nurses' roles. Abnormal vital signs have been associated with poor patient outcomes and require follow-up after the observation of abnormal readings to prevent patient harm related to a deteriorating status. This documentation is important to quality and safety of care. DESIGN: Observational, retrospective chart review. METHODS: Modified Early Warning Score was calculated for all recorded vital signs for 195 charts. Comparisons were made between groups: (1) no abnormal vital signs, (2) abnormal vital sign present, but normal Modified Early Warning Score and (3) critically abnormal Modified Early Warning Score. RESULTS: About 62·1% of charts had an abnormal vital sign documented. Critically abnormal values were present in 14·9%. No documentation was present in 44·6% of abnormal cases. When interventions were documented, it was usually to notify the physician. The timing within the emergency department visit when the abnormalities were observed and the degree of abnormality had significant relationships to the presence of documentation. CONCLUSIONS: It is doubtful that nurses do not recognise abnormalities because more severely abnormal vital signs were more likely to have documented follow-up. Perhaps the interruptive nature of the emergency department or the prioritised actions of the nurse impacted documentation within this study. Further research is required to determine why follow-up is not being documented. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: To ensure safety and quality of patient care, accurate documentation of responses to abnormal vital signs is required.

Standardized Rehabilitation and Hospital Length of Stay Among Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Physical rehabilitation in the intensive care unit (ICU) may improve the outcomes of patients with acute respiratory failure. OBJECTIVE: To compare standardized rehabilitation therapy (SRT) to usual ICU care in acute respiratory failure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Single-center, randomized clinical trial at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, North Carolina. Adult patients (mean age, 58 years; women, 55%) admitted to the ICU with acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation were randomized to SRT (n=150) or usual care (n=150) from October 2009 through May 2014 with 6-month follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: Patients in the SRT group received daily therapy until hospital discharge, consisting of passive range of motion, physical therapy, and progressive resistance exercise. The usual care group received weekday physical therapy when ordered by the clinical team. For the SRT group, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) days of delivery of therapy were 8.0 (5.0-14.0) for passive range of motion, 5.0 (3.0-8.0) for physical therapy, and 3.0 (1.0-5.0) for progressive resistance exercise. The median days of delivery of physical therapy for the usual care group was 1.0 (IQR, 0.0-8.0). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Both groups underwent assessor-blinded testing at ICU and hospital discharge and at 2, 4, and 6 months. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were ventilator days, ICU days, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score, 36-item Short-Form Health Surveys (SF-36) for physical and mental health and physical function scale score, Functional Performance Inventory (FPI) score, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, and handgrip and handheld dynamometer strength. RESULTS: Among 300 randomized patients, the median hospital LOS was 10 days (IQR, 6 to 17) for the SRT group and 10 days (IQR, 7 to 16) for the usual care group (median difference, 0 [95% CI, -1.5 to 3], P = .41). There was no difference in duration of ventilation or ICU care. There was no effect at 6 months for handgrip (difference, 2.0 kg [95% CI, -1.3 to 5.4], P = .23) and handheld dynamometer strength (difference, 0.4 lb [95% CI, -2.9 to 3.7], P = .82), SF-36 physical health score (difference, 3.4 [95% CI, -0.02 to 7.0], P = .05), SF-36 mental health score (difference, 2.4 [95% CI, -1.2 to 6.0], P = .19), or MMSE score (difference, 0.6 [95% CI, -0.2 to 1.4], P = .17). There were higher scores at 6 months in the SRT group for the SPPB score (difference, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.04 to 2.1, P = .04), SF-36 physical function scale score (difference, 12.2 [95% CI, 3.8 to 20.7], P = .001), and the FPI score (difference, 0.2 [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.4], P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients hospitalized with acute respiratory failure, SRT compared with usual care did not decrease hospital LOS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00976833.

An official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice guideline: the diagnosis of intensive care unit-acquired weakness in adults.

RATIONALE: Profound muscle weakness during and after critical illness is termed intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICUAW). OBJECTIVES: To develop diagnostic recommendations for ICUAW. METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert committee generated diagnostic questions. A systematic review was performed, and recommendations were developed using the Grading, Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Severe sepsis, difficult ventilator liberation, and prolonged mechanical ventilation are associated with ICUAW. Physical rehabilitation improves outcomes in heterogeneous populations of ICU patients. Because it may not be feasible to provide universal physical rehabilitation, an alternative approach is to identify patients most likely to benefit. Patients with ICUAW may be such a group. Our review identified only one case series of patients with ICUAW who received physical therapy. When compared with a case series of patients with ICUAW who did not receive structured physical therapy, evidence suggested those who receive physical rehabilitation were more frequently discharged home rather than to a rehabilitative facility, although confidence intervals included no difference. Other interventions show promise, but fewer data proving patient benefit existed, thus precluding specific comment. Additionally, prior comorbidity was insufficiently defined to determine its influence on outcome, treatment response, or patient preferences for diagnostic efforts. We recommend controlled clinical trials in patients with ICUAW that compare physical rehabilitation with usual care and further research in understanding risk and patient preferences. CONCLUSIONS: Research that identifies treatments that benefit patients with ICUAW is necessary to determine whether the benefits of diagnostic testing for ICUAW outweigh its burdens.

The factors that affect the frequency of vital sign monitoring in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: Vital signs are an important component of the nursing assessment and are used as early warning signs of changes in a patient's condition; however, little research has been conducted to determine how often vital signs are monitored in the emergency department. Additionally, it has not been determined what personal, social, and environmental factors affect the frequency of vital sign monitoring. The purpose of this study was to examine what factors may influence the time between recording vital signs in the emergency department. METHODS: We performed a descriptive, retrospective chart review of 202 randomly selected adult ED patients' charts from representative times to capture a variety of ED levels of occupancy in an urban, Midwestern, teaching hospital. Descriptive and hierarchical regression analyses were used. RESULTS: The strongest predictor of the increased time between vital signs from the personal health factors was lower patient acuity (Emergency Severity Index). This relationship remained strong even when social factors and environmental factors were included. Increased length of stay and fewer routes of medications also had significant relationships to the increased time between vital sign monitoring. DISCUSSION: These findings are clinically important because greater time between vital sign recordings can lead to errors of omission by not detecting changes in vital signs that could reveal changes in the patient's condition. The findings of this study provide direction for future research focusing on determining whether higher frequency of vital signs surveillance contributes to higher quality care and linking quality of care to missing vital signs/inadequate monitoring.

American Association of Nurse Practitioners Research Agenda, 2023-2028.

ABSTRACT: This report highlights the 2023-2028 American Association of Nurse Practitioners Research Agenda (AANP-RA), which focuses on the research goals of AANP as an organization and is based on its mission and strategic plan. The purpose of the AANP Research Agenda is to outline research priorities that advance the AANP Strategic Plan and concurrently address gaps in nursing science. American Association of Nurse Practitioners supports research studies that are rigorously designed and conducted using quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods approaches, as well as implementation science with the potential to positively impact both NP practice and patient health outcomes. The AANP-RA strategy is guided by the PEARL acronym: examining NP Practice, Education, policy Advocacy, Research, and Leadership. A discussion of each area is presented along with suggested topics.

Mechanisms for muscle health in the critically ill patient.

Human skeletal muscles are continually remodeled to match the function required of them. Diameter, strength, and vascular supply are altered when a muscle group experiences contraction and resistance. The purpose of this article is to describe selected muscle signaling pathways that contribute to muscle remodeling. Multiple factors affect the cellular and molecular remodeling of muscles and at least 2 of them-exercise and protein/calorie delivery-are under the direct care of intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians. Activating signaling pathways may promote preservation of muscle mass and function. Interventions to prevent muscle atrophy have potential to reduce ICU-acquired weakness and positively affect quality of life in survivors after ICU hospitalization. Exploring information generated by genomic and proteomic investigations about muscle signaling pathways can help the ICU clinician evaluate the benefits and risks of interventions to maintain muscle health early in critical illness.

Ease of intubation with the Parker Flex-Tip or a standard Mallinckrodt endotracheal tube using a video laryngoscope (GlideScope).

Two endotracheal tubes (ETTs) are available for use in operative suites for intubation: the Parker Flex-Tip (PFT, Parker Medical) and the standard Mallinckrodt (Covidien). To the authors' knowledge, no study has compared these 2 ETTs with each other when the anesthesia provider uses the GlideScope video laryngoscope (Verathon) for intubation. The purpose of the study was to determine if there are differences related to ease of intubation reported by anesthesia providers who use the PFT tube compared with the standard tube while using the GlideScope. The study was a randomized block intervention design. The sample consisted of 58 observed intubations in an operating room setting. Data analysis was completed with a 2-factor analysis of covariance using 2 covariates. The PFT tube in suboptimal conditions demonstrated a significantly greater ease of intubation, as measured by decreased time for ETT insertion and greater ease of ETT insertion score. The number of redirections at the glottis to intubate the trachea once the glottis was visualized was not statistically different. Based on the findings from this study, anesthesia providers may want to consider the use of the PFT tube when using the GlideScope to promote ease of intubation.

Evaluation of an educational program: a report from the hemodialysis unit in Zagaxig University hospitals, Egypt.

The knowledge and performance of hemodialysis nursing staff at Zagazig University Hospitals, Egypt, were evaluated using a quasi-experimental design. Participants received an educational program developed from international standards and national guidelines. The number of nurses who achieved satisfactory knowledge and performance scores increased significantly post-intervention, and were sustained for three months after the intervention. A strong, positive correlation was also found between the participants' knowledge and their performance.

The role of inflammation in ICU-acquired weakness.

A pilot observational study by Weber-Carstens and colleagues contributes to a mechanistic explanation of the puzzling and complex phenomena of ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW). The authors suggest systemic, inflammatory-mediated pathology is the most significant risk factor for ICU-AW. While this finding is somewhat equivocal, it provides important direction for future investigations and illustrates the challenges of interpreting significance in small observational studies.

One Team's Experience with Integrating Flexible Visitation in the Medical Intensive Care Unit.

Integration of flexible visitation into a large health system requires concentrated effort. Evaluating impact on patient, family, and staff outcomes is important to facilitate changes and ensure visiting policy success. The medical intensive care unit staff participated in a collaborative quality improvement effort to encourage flexible visitation. The integration of flexible visitation spanned an 18-month period, timed to accompany a transition to a new setting with rooms designed to support visitor presence. This article details these efforts, outcomes, and important gaps for future work evaluating integration of flexible visitation in critical care.

Using enteral sterile water feeds for hypernatremia in extremely low birth-weight infants.

Extremely low birth-weight infants are prone to fluid and electrolyte imbalance due to multiple etiologies. Hypernatremia can occur in this gestational age group during the first week of life. One therapy that many NICUs initiate to treat hypernatremia is enteral sterile water feeds (SWFs). The use of free water is an adjunct therapy in place of large volumes of intravenous fluids. This article presents a review of renal physiology and 3 case studies of infants, less than 27 weeks' gestational age and less than 1000-g birth weight, treated with SWFs for hypernatremia. Commonalities and differences in treatment are addressed. There is limited evidence-based research using enteral SWFs for the treatment of hypernatremia.

Validity and Reliability of the Transport Triage Tool.

BACKGROUND: Standards for interfacility transport in the United States recommend that each transport request be triaged to ensure that each patient is transported by an appropriate mechanism and by the appropriate clinicians in order to meet the patient's intratransport needs. No instrument currently exists to meet that need. The Transport Triage Tool, a novel instrument, has been designed to determine the clinician (paramedic, registered nurse, or advanced practice registered nurse) who will best meet the patient's needs during transport. OBJECTIVE: To assess psychometric elements-that is, validity and reliability-of the Transport Triage Tool when used by health care professionals in determining which clinician is appropriate for interfacility transport. METHODS: A 3-step process was used to initially evaluate the reliability and validity of this tool when assigning a lead clinician during transport. Content and predictive validity were evaluated. Both intrarater and interrater agreement were used to examine reliability. RESULTS: Predictive validity was supported by an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.847 and a Youden index of 0.31. Percentage agreement and Cohen κ were reasonable across all periods of testing. CONCLUSIONS: The Transport Triage Tool has acceptable predictive validity and reliability; however, this preliminary evaluation indicates that further refinement is needed. Large tertiary centers that offer variations in transport team composition may be able to use the Tool in its present form to train and evaluate individuals who make decisions regarding interfacility transport, although additional testing and evaluation are recommended.