Overlap between birth trauma and mistreatment: a qualitative analysis exploring American clinician perspectives on patient birth experiences.

INTRODUCTION: Research exploring the mistreatment of birthing people in the United States is emerging rapidly within the context of increasingly poor maternal health outcomes that include unacceptable racial disparities. Previous research has explored overlap between psychological birth trauma and mistreatment using patient descriptions of birth experiences, but no previous studies have explored these issues from the perspectives of clinicians. The aim of this study was to explore whether maternity care providers' descriptions of patient birth trauma overlap with categories of mistreatment from a globally accepted typology. METHODS: Content analysis was performed on a qualitative data set of 28 semi-structured interviews about patient birth trauma, completed in 2018-2019 with U.S. maternity care clinicians, including obstetricians, family physicians, midwives and labor/delivery nurses. The interviews were part of a larger study exploring maternity clinician perspectives and experiences of patient birth trauma. For this analysis Krippendorff's method of categoric distinction was used, with categories from a globally recognized typology of maternity patient mistreatment. RESULTS: Clinicians' descriptions of their experiences with patient birth trauma mapped onto all seven mistreatment categories, although no interview questions specifically asked about mistreatment. In more than 30 hours of interviews, transcribed to more than 800 pages, the word mistreatment appears only once, suggesting that some healthcare providers may use the phrase "birth trauma" as a euphemism to describe mistreatment. Eighteen of 28 interviews included at least one description that fit into a mistreatment category. "Failure to meet professional standards of care" was the category with the most mapped clinician statements, followed by "Stigma and discrimination" and "Poor rapport between women and providers." CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes new insight into maternity clinicians' conceptualization of patient trauma and how their descriptions of birth trauma overlap with mistreatment. Clinicians implicitly connected mistreatment with some patient experiences of birth trauma, even when they were not specifically asked about mistreatment. Findings point to a need for further research into mistreatment, including routinized "everyday care" that may include mistreatment, particularly for marginalized and historically excluded birthing people. Future research also must explore the potential role of mistreatment in poor and inequitable U.S. birth outcomes.

Many people giving birth in the United States experience poor health outcomes, and there is a wide racial disparity, with people of color more likely to experience poor outcomes. In recent research, birthing people reported that they were mistreated during their labor and delivery, including being shouted at, scolded, or threatened. Mistreatment accounts were more frequent among women of color. Previous research has looked at patient reports about their birth experiences to explore whether their descriptions of psychological trauma include overlap with mistreatment, but no other studies have looked at descriptions of birth trauma from the perspectives of medical clinicians. The objective of this study was to explore whether maternity care providers' descriptions of patient birth trauma overlap with categories of mistreatment from a globally accepted list. This study analyzed the content of 28 semi-structured interviews about patient birth trauma, completed in 2018­2019 with obstetricians, family physicians, midwives and labor/delivery nurses. In the interviews, participant descriptions of patient birth trauma fit into all seven mistreatment categories. Participant descriptions included examples of patients receiving medical procedures or treatments without first giving consent, nurses avoiding the rooms of patients who do not speak English, and other forms of mistreatment. Participants were not asked specifically about mistreatment, but they described birth trauma by giving examples of mistreatment, which suggests that some healthcare providers may use the phrase "birth trauma" when talking about "mistreatment." This study shows a need for further research into mistreatment, including routine "everyday care" that may include mistreatment.

Experiences of Community Doulas Working with Low-Income, African American Mothers.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to learn from doulas the components of their services that might best serve low-income, African American (AA) women and to show the significance of doulas in helping these women have healthy, positive, birth experiences. Methods: Ten doulas were recruited from a local community doula program and through word-of-mouth referrals from participants and completed in-depth interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Atlas.ti software to identify emerging themes. Thematic saturation was achieved in interviews. Results: Several themes emerged from the interviews including: (1) The influence of similarities of race, culture, and lived experience on doula care; (2) How doulas often provide birthing persons with support and resources beyond birth; and (3) How doulas recognize the institutional biases that exist in the health care system and try to mediate their effect on birthing persons. Conclusions: These themes highlight how doulas can support birthing persons to mitigate the negative effects of social determinants of health, specifically racism and classism, and highlight potential avenues for doulas to consider when working with birthing persons who have low income and are AA.