Associations between asthma trigger reports, mental health conditions, and asthma morbidity among world trade center rescue and recovery workers.

Aim: There is limited information regarding asthma triggers in World Trade Center (WTC) rescue and recovery workers (RRW) or how mental health conditions affect the perception of triggers. Methods: We included 372 WTC workers with asthma. The Asthma Trigger Inventory (ATI) assessed triggers along five domains: psychological, allergens, physical activity, infection, and pollution. We administered the Structured Clinical Interview to diagnose post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depression and panic disorder (PD). The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) measured asthma control and quality of life, respectively. Linear regression models were fitted to examine the association of ATI total and subdomain scores with mental health conditions as well as the percent of ACQ and AQLQ variance explained by ATI subscales. Results: The most common triggers were air pollution (75%) and general allergens (68%). PTSD was significantly associated with psychological triggers (partial r2=0.05, p < 0.01), physical activity (partial r2=0.03, p < 0.01) and air pollution (partial r2=0.02, p = 0.04) subscales while PD was significantly associated with air pollution (partial r2=0.03, p = 0.03) and general allergens (partial r2=0.02, p = 0.03). ATI subscales explained a large percentage of variance in asthma control (r2=0.37, p < 0.01) and quality of life scores (r2=0.40, p < 0.01). Psychological subscale scores explained the largest portion of the total variability in ACQ (partial r2= 0.11, p = 0.72) and AQLQ (partial r2=0.14, p = 0.64) scores. Conclusion: RRW with mental health conditions reported more asthma triggers and these triggers were associated with asthma morbidity. These data can help support interventions in RRW with asthma.

Post-traumatic stress disorder dimensions and asthma morbidity in World Trade Center rescue and recovery workers.

OBJECTIVE: Using data from a cohort of World Trade Center (WTC) rescue and recovery workers with asthma, we assessed whether meeting criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), sub-threshold PTSD, and for specific PTSD symptom dimensions are associated with increased asthma morbidity. METHODS: Participants underwent a Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual to assess the presence of PTSD following DSM-IV criteria during in-person interviews between December 2013 and April 2015. We defined sub-threshold PTSD as meeting criteria for two of three symptom dimensions: re-experiencing, avoidance, or hyper-arousal. Asthma control, acute asthma-related healthcare utilization, and asthma-related quality of life data were collected using validated scales. Unadjusted and multiple regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between sub-threshold PTSD and PTSD symptom domains with asthma morbidity measures. RESULTS: Of the 181 WTC workers with asthma recruited into the study, 28% had PTSD and 25% had sub-threshold PTSD. Patients with PTSD showed worse asthma control, higher rates of inpatient healthcare utilization, and poorer asthma quality of life than those with sub-threshold or no PTSD. After adjusting for potential confounders, among patients not meeting the criteria for full PTSD, those presenting symptoms of re-experiencing exhibited poorer quality of life (p = 0.003). Avoidance was associated with increased acute healthcare use (p = 0.05). Sub-threshold PTSD was not associated with asthma morbidity (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: There may be benefit in assessing asthma control in patients with sub-threshold PTSD symptoms as well as those with full PTSD to more effectively identify ongoing asthma symptoms and target management strategies.

Metformin Improves Survival in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Pre-Existing Diabetes: A Propensity Score Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a highly lethal disease. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is both a risk factor for and a sequela of PDAC. Metformin is a commonly prescribed biguanide oral hypoglycemic used for the treatment of type II DM. We investigated whether metformin use before PDAC diagnosis affected survival of patients with DM, controlling confounders such as diabetic severity. METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (SEER)-Medicare linked database to identify patients with PDAC diagnosed between 2007 and 2011. The diabetic TO comorbidity severity index (DCSI) controlled for DM severity. Inverse propensity weighted Cox Proportional-Hazard Models assessed the association between metformin use and overall survival adjusting for relevant confounders. RESULTS: We identified 1,916 patients with PDAC and pre-existing DM on hypoglycemic medications at least 1 year before cancer diagnosis. Of these, 1,098 (57.3%) were treated with metformin and 818 (42.7%) with other DM medications. Mean survival for those on metformin was 5.5 months compared with 4.2 months for those not on metformin (P<0.01). After adjusting for confounders including DCSI, Charlson score, and chronic kidney disease (CKD), patients on metformin had a 12% decreased risk of mortality compared with patients on other medications (hazard ratio (HR): 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81-0.96, P<0.01). In stratified analysis, differences persisted regardless of the Charlson score, the DCSI score, the presence of kidney disease, or the use of insulin/other hypoglycemic medications (P<0.01 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Metformin is associated with increased survival among diabetics with PDAC. If confirmed in a prospective study, then these results suggest a possible role for metformin as an adjunct to chemotherapy among diabetics with PDAC.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer ≥4 cm in size: an SEER-Medicare analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stage I patients with tumors size ≥4 cm is not well established in the elderly. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 3289 patients with stage I NSCLC (T2N0M0 and tumor size ≥4 cm) who underwent lobectomy from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database diagnosed from 1992 to 2009. Overall survival and rates of serious adverse events (defined as those requiring admission to hospital) were compared between patients treated with resection alone, platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy, or postoperative radiation (PORT) with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Propensity scores for receiving each treatment were calculated and survival analyses were conducted using inverse probability weights based on the propensity score. RESULTS: Overall, 84% patients were treated with resection alone, 9% received platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy, and 7% underwent PORT with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjusted analysis showed that adjuvant chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR), 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.98] was associated with improved survival compared with resection alone. Conversely, the use of PORT with or without adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 1.91; 95% CI 1.64-2.23) was associated with worse outcomes. Patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had more serious adverse events compared with those treated with resection alone, with neutropenia (odds ratio, 21.2; 95% CI 5.8-76.6) being most significant. No significant difference was observed in rates of fever, cytopenias, nausea, and renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with reduced mortality and increased serious adverse events in elderly patients with stage I NSCLC and tumor size ≥4 cm.

Risk factors for respiratory failure among hospitalized patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute inflammatory polyneuropathy that can lead to respiratory failure. In this study, we evaluate early clinical risk factors for respiratory failure at the time of hospital admission. METHODS: We studied a retrospective cohort of patients with GBS admitted to a tertiary care center. The potential risk factors studied were sociodemographic characteristics, GBS symptoms, overall and cervical muscle weakness (Medical Research Council [MRC] scores), electromyography findings, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis findings. Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated and exact logistic regression analysis (adjusted OR) performed to assess the association between baseline risk factors and respiratory failure. RESULTS: Overall, 13 of 113 (12%) patients included in the study developed respiratory failure. Unadjusted analyses showed that involvement of any cranial nerve (OR: 14.7; 95% CI, 1.8-117.1), facial palsy (OR: 17.3; 95% CI, 2.2-138.0), and bulbar weakness (OR: 10.7; 95% CI, 2.3-50.0) were associated with increased risk of respiratory failure. Lower MRC sum scores (for scores <30, OR: 14.0; 95% CI, 1.54-127.2) and neck MRC scores (for scores ≤3, OR: 21.0; 95% CI, 3.5-125.2) were associated with higher likelihood of respiratory failure. Adjusted analyses showed that presence of bulbar weakness (OR: 7.6; 95% CI, 1.3-43.0) and low neck MRC scores (scores ≤3, OR: 9.2; 95% CI, 3.5-125.2, vs scores >3) were independently associated with respiratory failure. CONCLUSIONS: Bulbar and neck muscle weakness at admission are clinical predictors of increased risk of respiratory failure in patients with GBS. These findings could guide the adequate management of high-risk patients.

Prognosis in HIV-infected patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a population-based study to evaluate whether non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prognosis was worse in HIV-infected compared with HIV-uninfected patients. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry linked to Medicare claims, we identified 267 HIV-infected patients and 1428 similar controls with no evidence of HIV diagnosed with NSCLC between 1996 and 2007. We used conditional probability function (CPF) analyses to compare survival by HIV status accounting for an increased risk of non-lung cancer death (competing risks) in HIV-infected patients. We used multivariable CPF regression to evaluate lung cancer prognosis by HIV status adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: Stage at presentation and use of stage-appropriate lung cancer treatment did not differ by HIV status. Median survival was 6 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 5-8 months) among HIV-infected NSCLC patients compared with 20 months (95% CI: 17-23 months) in patients without evidence of HIV. Multivariable CPF regression showed that HIV was associated with a greater risk of lung cancer-specific death after controlling for confounders and competing risks. CONCLUSION: NSCLC patients with HIV have a poorer prognosis than patients without evidence of HIV. NSCLC may exhibit more aggressive behaviour in the setting of HIV.

Decision Regret among Patients with Early-stage Lung Cancer Undergoing Radiation Therapy or Surgical Resection.

AIMS: Clinical equipoise exists regarding early-stage lung cancer treatment among patients as trials comparing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and surgical resection are unavailable. Given the potential differences in treatment effectiveness and side-effects, we sought to determine the associations between treatment type, decision regret and depression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicentre, prospective study of patients with stage IA-IIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with planned treatment with SBRT or surgical resection was conducted. Decision regret and depression were measured using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS) and Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) at 3, 6 and 12 months post-treatment, respectively. Mixed linear regression modelling examined associations between treatment and decision regret adjusting for patient sociodemographics. RESULTS: Among 211 study participants with early-stage lung cancer, 128 (61%) patients received SBRT and 83 (39%) received surgical resection. The mean age was 73 years (standard deviation = 8); 57% were female; 79% were White non-Hispanic. In the entire cohort at 3 months post-treatment, 72 (34%) and 57 (27%) patients had mild and severe decision regret, respectively. Among patients who received SBRT or surgery, 71% and 46% of patients experienced at least mild decision regret at 3 months, respectively. DRS scores increased at 6 months and decreased slightly at 12 months of follow-up in both groups. Higher DRS scores were associated with SBRT treatment (adjusted mean difference = 4.18, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 7.54) and depression (adjusted mean difference = 3.49, 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 6.47). Neither patient satisfaction with their provider nor decision-making role concordance was associated with DRS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Most early-stage lung cancer patients experienced at least mild decision regret, which was associated with SBRT treatment and depression symptoms. Findings suggest patients with early-stage lung cancer may not be receiving optimal treatment decision-making support. Therefore, opportunities for improved patient-clinician communication probably exist.

Lung cancer physicians' referral practices for palliative care consultation.

BACKGROUND: Integration of palliative care with standard oncologic care improves quality of life and survival of lung cancer patients. We surveyed physicians to identify factors influencing their decisions for referral to palliative care. METHODS: We provided a self-administered questionnaire to physicians caring for lung cancer patients at five medical centers. The questionnaire asked about practices and views with respect to palliative care referral. We used multiple regression analysis to identify predictors of low referral rates (<25%). RESULTS: Of 155 physicians who returned survey responses, 75 (48%) reported referring <25% of patients for palliative care consultation. Multivariate analysis, controlling for provider characteristics, found that low referral rates were associated with physicians' concerns that palliative care referral would alarm patients and families [odds ratio (OR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.98], while the belief that palliative care specialists have more time to discuss complex issues (OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.56-6.02) was associated with higher rates of referral. CONCLUSIONS: Although palliative care consultation is increasingly available and recommended throughout the trajectory of lung cancer, our data indicate it is underutilized. Understanding factors influencing decisions to refer can be used to improve integration of palliative care as part of lung cancer management.

Risk factors for respiratory failure among hospitalized patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute inflammatory polyneuropathy that can lead to respiratory failure. In this study, we evaluate early clinical risk factors for respiratory failure at the time of hospital admission. METHODS: We studied a retrospective cohort of patients with GBS admitted to a tertiary care center. The potential risk factors studied were sociodemographic characteristics, GBS symptoms, overall and cervical muscle weakness (Medical Research Council [MRC] scores), electromyography findings, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis findings. Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated and exact logistic regression analysis (adjusted OR) performed to assess the association between baseline risk factors and respiratory failure. RESULTS: Overall, 13 of 113 (12%) patients included in the study developed respiratory failure. Unadjusted analyses showed that involvement of any cranial nerve (OR: 14.7; 95% CI, 1.8-117.1), facial palsy (OR: 17.3; 95% CI, 2.2-138.0), and bulbar weakness (OR: 10.7; 95% CI, 2.3-50.0) were associated with increased risk of respiratory failure. Lower MRC sum scores (for scores <30, OR: 14.0; 95% CI, 1.54-127.2) and neck MRC scores (for scores ≤3, OR: 21.0; 95% CI, 3.5-125.2) were associated with higher likelihood of respiratory failure. Adjusted analyses showed that presence of bulbar weakness (OR: 7.6; 95% CI, 1.3-43.0) and low neck MRC scores (scores ≤3, OR: 9.2; 95% CI, 3.5-125.2, vs scores >3) were independently associated with respiratory failure. CONCLUSIONS: Bulbar and neck muscle weakness at admission are clinical predictors of increased risk of respiratory failure in patients with GBS. These findings could guide the adequate management of high-risk patients.

Risk factors for respiratory failure among hospitalized patients with Guillain–Barré syndrome / Factores de riesgo de insuficiencia respiratoria en pacientes hospitalizados con síndrome de Guillain-Barré

Background Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute inflammatory polyneuropathy that can lead to respiratory failure. In this study, we evaluate early clinical risk factors for respiratory failure at the time of hospital admission.Methods We studied a retrospective cohort of patients with GBS admitted to a tertiary care center. The potential risk factors studied were sociodemographic characteristics, GBS symptoms, overall and cervical muscle weakness (Medical Research Council [MRC] scores), electromyography findings, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis findings. Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated and exact logistic regression analysis (adjusted OR) performed to assess the association between baseline risk factors and respiratory failure. Results Overall, 13 of 113 (12%) patients included in the study developed respiratory failure. Unadjusted analyses showed that involvement of any cranial nerve (OR: 14.7; 95% CI, 1.8–117.1), facial palsy (OR: 17.3; 95% CI, 2.2–138.0), and bulbar weakness (OR: 10.7; 95% CI, 2.3–50.0) were associated with increased risk of respiratory failure. Lower MRC sum scores (for scores <30, OR: 14.0; 95% CI, 1.54–127.2) and neck MRC scores (for scores ≤3, OR: 21.0; 95% CI, 3.5–125.2) were associated with higher likelihood of respiratory failure. Adjusted analyses showed that presence of bulbar weakness (OR: 7.6; 95% CI, 1.3–43.0) and low neck MRC scores (scores ≤3, OR: 9.2; 95% CI, 3.5–125.2, vs scores >3) were independently associated with respiratory failure. Conclusions Bulbar and neck muscle weakness at admission are clinical predictors of increased risk of respiratory failure in patients with GBS. These findings could guide the adequate management of high-risk patients. (AU)

Introducción El síndrome de Guillain-Barré es una polineuropatía inflamatoria aguda que puede causar insuficiencia respiratoria. Evaluamos los factores de riesgo clínicos en el momento de la hospitalización. Métodos Realizamos un estudio de una cohorte retrospectiva de pacientes con síndrome de Guillain-Barré hospitalizados en un centro de tercer nivel. Analizamos las características sociodemográficas, síntomas de la enfermedad, fuerza muscular general y cervical (escala del Medical Research Council [MRC]), hallazgos electromiográficos, y resultados del análisis del líquido cefalorraquídeo. Calculamos el odds ratio (OR) sin ajustar y realizamos una regresión logística exacta (OR ajustada) para evaluar la asociación entre los factores de riesgo y la insuficiencia respiratoria. Resultados Trece de los 113 pacientes incluidos (12%) presentó insuficiencia respiratoria. Los análisis no ajustados mostraron una asociación entre mayor riesgo de insuficiencia respiratoria y la afectación de cualquier par craneal (OR: 14,7; IC 95%, 1,8-117,1), parálisis facial (OR: 17,3; IC 95%, 2,2-138,0) y debilidad bulbar (OR: 10,7; IC 95%, 2,3-50,0). Unas puntuaciones más bajas en la MRC-total (puntuaciones <30, OR: 14,0; IC 95%, 1,54-127,2) y en la MRC-cervical (puntuaciones <3, OR: 21,0; IC 95%, 3,5-125,2) se asociaron con una mayor probabilidad de presentar insuficiencia respiratoria. En los análisis ajustados, la presencia de debilidad bulbar (OR: 7,6; IC 95%, 1,3-43,0) y una puntuación baja en la MRC-cervical (puntuaciones ≤3, OR: 9,2; IC 95%, 3,5-125,2, frente a puntuaciones >3) se asociaron de forma independiente con la insuficiencia respiratoria. Conclusiones La presencia de debilidad bulbar y cervical en el momento de la hospitalización es un factor de riesgo de insuficiencia respiratoria en pacientes con síndrome de Guillain-Barré. Estos hallazgos pueden servir de guía para el manejo de los pacientes con mayor riesgo de presentar dicha complicación. (AU)

Risk factors for respiratory failure among hospitalized patients with Guillain–Barré syndrome / Factores de riesgo de insuficiencia respiratoria en pacientes hospitalizados con síndrome de Guillain-Barré

Background Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute inflammatory polyneuropathy that can lead to respiratory failure. In this study, we evaluate early clinical risk factors for respiratory failure at the time of hospital admission.Methods We studied a retrospective cohort of patients with GBS admitted to a tertiary care center. The potential risk factors studied were sociodemographic characteristics, GBS symptoms, overall and cervical muscle weakness (Medical Research Council [MRC] scores), electromyography findings, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis findings. Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated and exact logistic regression analysis (adjusted OR) performed to assess the association between baseline risk factors and respiratory failure. Results Overall, 13 of 113 (12%) patients included in the study developed respiratory failure. Unadjusted analyses showed that involvement of any cranial nerve (OR: 14.7; 95% CI, 1.8–117.1), facial palsy (OR: 17.3; 95% CI, 2.2–138.0), and bulbar weakness (OR: 10.7; 95% CI, 2.3–50.0) were associated with increased risk of respiratory failure. Lower MRC sum scores (for scores <30, OR: 14.0; 95% CI, 1.54–127.2) and neck MRC scores (for scores ≤3, OR: 21.0; 95% CI, 3.5–125.2) were associated with higher likelihood of respiratory failure. Adjusted analyses showed that presence of bulbar weakness (OR: 7.6; 95% CI, 1.3–43.0) and low neck MRC scores (scores ≤3, OR: 9.2; 95% CI, 3.5–125.2, vs scores >3) were independently associated with respiratory failure. Conclusions Bulbar and neck muscle weakness at admission are clinical predictors of increased risk of respiratory failure in patients with GBS. These findings could guide the adequate management of high-risk patients. (AU)

Introducción El síndrome de Guillain-Barré es una polineuropatía inflamatoria aguda que puede causar insuficiencia respiratoria. Evaluamos los factores de riesgo clínicos en el momento de la hospitalización. Métodos Realizamos un estudio de una cohorte retrospectiva de pacientes con síndrome de Guillain-Barré hospitalizados en un centro de tercer nivel. Analizamos las características sociodemográficas, síntomas de la enfermedad, fuerza muscular general y cervical (escala del Medical Research Council [MRC]), hallazgos electromiográficos, y resultados del análisis del líquido cefalorraquídeo. Calculamos el odds ratio (OR) sin ajustar y realizamos una regresión logística exacta (OR ajustada) para evaluar la asociación entre los factores de riesgo y la insuficiencia respiratoria. Resultados Trece de los 113 pacientes incluidos (12%) presentó insuficiencia respiratoria. Los análisis no ajustados mostraron una asociación entre mayor riesgo de insuficiencia respiratoria y la afectación de cualquier par craneal (OR: 14,7; IC 95%, 1,8-117,1), parálisis facial (OR: 17,3; IC 95%, 2,2-138,0) y debilidad bulbar (OR: 10,7; IC 95%, 2,3-50,0). Unas puntuaciones más bajas en la MRC-total (puntuaciones <30, OR: 14,0; IC 95%, 1,54-127,2) y en la MRC-cervical (puntuaciones <3, OR: 21,0; IC 95%, 3,5-125,2) se asociaron con una mayor probabilidad de presentar insuficiencia respiratoria. En los análisis ajustados, la presencia de debilidad bulbar (OR: 7,6; IC 95%, 1,3-43,0) y una puntuación baja en la MRC-cervical (puntuaciones ≤3, OR: 9,2; IC 95%, 3,5-125,2, frente a puntuaciones >3) se asociaron de forma independiente con la insuficiencia respiratoria. Conclusiones La presencia de debilidad bulbar y cervical en el momento de la hospitalización es un factor de riesgo de insuficiencia respiratoria en pacientes con síndrome de Guillain-Barré. Estos hallazgos pueden servir de guía para el manejo de los pacientes con mayor riesgo de presentar dicha complicación. (AU)

Effect of local therapy for the treatment of superficial esophageal cancer in non-operative candidates.

Surgical resection is the current standard treatment for patients with early stage cancer of the esophagus. In a subset of these patients, comorbidities prohibit the operative risks of a potentially curative esophagectomy. Such patients may be candidates for local endoscopic treatment. We sought to look at a large cohort of patients with clinically localized esophagus cancer to determine whether high-risk patients survive significantly longer after endoscopic therapy than those who receive no local treatment. T0 or T1, N0 esophageal cancer (EC) patients who did not receive surgery or radiation were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry (1998-2003). The patients were assigned into two groups: local endoscopic therapy (excisional biopsy, photodynamic, local destruction, thermal laser, polypectomy, electrocautery, or cryoablation) versus no endoscopic therapy. Differences in survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and a multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusting for potential confounders was used to analyze the effect of local therapy on survival. The study cohort included 166 T0 or T1, N0 EC patients. (75% male; 50% >70 years old). Tumors were adenocarcinoma (60%), squamous cell carcinoma (24%), and other (16%). The 4-year disease-specific survival rate was 84% for patients receiving local therapy compared with 64% for patients receiving no therapy (P < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, patients receiving local therapy had a significantly lower hazard of EC-related death (P = 0.04). There was no difference in survival curves for deaths secondary to causes other than EC. Local endoscopic therapy significantly prolonged survival in high-risk patients with clinical T0 or T1, N0 EC and is a reasonable alternative for those patients who are not candidates for potentially curative esophagectomy.

Evaluation of clinical parameters to predict Mycobacterium tuberculosis in inpatients.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory isolation has been recommended for all patients with suspected tuberculosis (TB) to avoid transmission to other patients and health care personnel. In implementing these guidelines, patients with and without TB are frequently isolated, significantly increasing hospital costs. The objective of this study was to derive a clinical rule to predict the need for respiratory isolation of patients with suspected TB. METHODS: To identify potential predictors of the need for isolation, 56 inpatients with sputum cultures positive for TB were retrospectively compared with 56 controls who were isolated on admission to the hospital based on clinically suspected TB but whose sputum cultures tested negative for TB. Variables analyzed included TB risk factors, clinical symptoms, and findings from physical examination and chest radiography. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that the following factors were significantly associated with a culture positive for TB: presence of TB risk factors or symptoms (odds ratio [OR], 7.9 [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.4-24.2]), a positive purified protein derivative tuberculin test result (OR, 13.2 [95% CI, 4.4-40.7]), high temperature (OR, 2.8 [95% CI, 1.1-8.3]), and upper-lobe disease on chest radiograph (OR, 14.6 [95% CI, 3.7-57.5]). Shortness of breath (OR, 0.2 [95% CI, 0.12-0.53]) and crackles noted during the physical examination (OR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.15-0.57]) were negative predictors of TB. A scoring system was developed using these variables. A patient's total score of 1 or higher indicated the need for respiratory isolation, accurately predicting a culture positive for TB (98% sensitivity [95% CI, 95%-100%]; 46% specificity [95% CI, 33%-59%]). CONCLUSION: Among inpatients with suspected active pulmonary TB, a prediction rule based on clinical and chest radiographic findings accurately identified patients requiring respiratory isolation.

Specific binding of the adenovirus capsid to the nuclear envelope.

Adenovirus (Ad) vectors used for gene therapy are efficient in entering the infected cell and targeting their genome to the nucleus. To study the mechanism of the interaction between Ad and the nuclear envelope we have established an in vitro assay using rat liver nuclei incubated with serotype 5 Ad vector. Binding of either fluorophore (Cy3)-labeled Ad5 (Cy3-AdGFP) or [3H]Ad5 was blocked by excess unlabeled Ad5, indicating that the interaction was specific. Binding reached equilibrium within 30 min, exhibited temperature dependence with more binding occurring at 37 degrees C than at 4 degrees C and appeared to be irreversible. Prior treatment of nuclei with glutaraldehyde or proteolysis of nuclei with trypsin inhibited the Cy3-AdGFP association with nuclei, and pretreatment of Cy3-AdGFP with human anti-Ad5 serum, but not naive human serum, inhibited Cy3-AdGFP, suggesting a requirement for direct interaction between Ad5 and nuclei. Addition of excess unlabeled Ad serotype 2 or Ad serotype 7 competed for binding with Cy3-AdGFP, indicating that the capsid determinant of nuclear binding was conserved among group B and C Ad serotypes. These data suggest that the Ad capsid and nuclear envelope contain specific domains that mediate binding of the two entities and that binding mechanisms to the nuclear envelope might be a common final pathway of different Ad serotypes.

Comparison of biopsy techniques in assessment of solitary pulmonary nodules.

A wide variety of diagnostic tests are available to evaluate solitary pulmonary nodules, ranging from noninvasive to invasive. Given the virulence of lung cancer, those techniques that can provide cytological and pathological information are often chosen. However, the choice of which procedure to perform is complicated by numerous factors, including the sensitivity and specificity of the test, as well as the prevalence of disease. Additional considerations also include complications, availability and expertise in performing procedures, and overall cost of the diagnostic algorithm. Rather than make specific recommendations for diagnostic workup, it is more appropriate to consider that this will vary from institution to institution based on the above factors.

Extent of lymph node resection does not increase perioperative morbidity and mortality after surgery for stage I lung cancer in the elderly.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Pathologic evaluation of > 10 lymph nodes (LNs) is considered necessary for accurate lung cancer staging. However, physicians have concerns about increased risk in perioperative mortality (POM) and morbidity with more extensive LN sampling, particularly in the elderly. In this study, we compared the outcomes in elderly patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing extensive (> 10 nodes) and limited (≤ 10 nodes) LN resections. METHODS: Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry linked to Medicare records, we identified 4975 patients ≥ 65 years of age with stage I NSCLC who underwent a lobectomy between 1992 and 2002. Risk of perioperative morbidity and POM after the evaluation of ≤ 10 vs. >10 LNs was compared among patients after adjusting for propensity scores. RESULTS: Multiple regression analysis showed similar POM between the two groups (OR, 1,01; 95% CI, 0,71-1,44). Other postoperative complications were similar across groups except for thromboembolic events, which were more common among patients undergoing resection of > 10 LNs (OR, 1,72; 95% CI, 1,12-2,63). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that evaluation of > 10 LNs, which allows for more accurate staging, appears to be safe in the elderly patients undergoing lobectomy for stage I NSCLC without compromising postoperative recovery.