A 21st Century Problem: Cannabis Toxicity in a 13-Month-Old Child.

BACKGROUND: Cannabis is one of the most abused drugs worldwide, with more than 20 million users in the United States (US). As access to cannabis products increases with expanding US legislation and decriminalization of marijuana, emergency physicians must be adept in recognizing unintentional cannabis toxicity in young children, which can range from altered mental status to encephalopathy and coma. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 13-month-old female presenting with self-limiting altered mental status and lethargy, with a subsequent diagnosis of tetrahydrocannabinol exposure on confirmatory urine gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Considering caretakers rarely report possible cannabis exposure, history-taking must review caretakers' medicinal and recreational drug exposures to prevent inadvertently missing the diagnosis. In the young child with altered mental status, prompt urine screening for cannabinoid detection can prevent further invasive and costly diagnostic investigations, such as brain imaging and lumbar puncture.

Neck pain and stiffness in a toddler with history of button battery ingestion.

BACKGROUND: Button batteries within the gastrointestinal system are dangerous and must be suspected after any foreign body ingestion. Common complications include esophageal perforation, fistula formation, and esophageal scarring. OBJECTIVES: Spondylodiscitis resulting from button battery ingestion is extremely rare and, to our knowledge, has been described in the literature only once to date. CASE REPORT: We will describe a case in which a 14-month-old girl developed spondylodiscitis of T1/T2 after an uncomplicated clinical course involving the ingestion and removal of an esophageal button battery. Discussion will include mechanisms in which button batteries cause harm and notable differences between the previously reported case and ours. CONCLUSIONS: We present this case to increase awareness of spondylodiscitis in patients with neck pain or stiffness and a history of button battery ingestion.

Adenosine for wide-complex tachycardia: efficacy and safety.

OBJECTIVES: : To determine whether adenosine is useful and safe as a diagnostic and therapeutic agent for patients with undifferentiated wide QRS complex tachycardia. The etiology of sustained monomorphic wide QRS complex tachycardia is often uncertain acutely. DESIGN: : A retrospective observational study. SETTING: : Treatment associated with emergency visits at nine urban hospitals. PATIENTS: : Consecutive patients treated with adenosine for regular wide QRS complex tachycardia between 1991 and 2006. INTERVENTIONS: : Treatment with adenosine infusion. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: : Measured outcomes included rhythm response to adenosine, if any, and all adverse effects. A positive response was defined as an observed change in rhythm including temporary atrioventricular conduction block or tachycardia termination. A primary adverse event was defined as emergent electrical or medical therapy instituted in response to an adverse adenosine effect. A rhythm diagnosis was made in each case. The characteristics of adenosine administration as a test for a supraventricular as opposed to ventricular tachycardia were determined, and the adverse event rates were calculated. A total of 197 patients were included: 104 (90%) of 116 (95% confidence interval, 83%-95%) and two (2%) of 81 (95% confidence interval, 0.3%-9%) supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia patients demonstrated a response to adenosine, respectively. The odds of supraventricular tachycardia increased by a factor of 36 (95% confidence interval, 9-143) after a positive response to adenosine. The odds of ventricular tachycardia increased by a factor of 9 (95% confidence interval, 6-16) when there was no response to adenosine. The rate of primary adverse events for patients with supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia was 0 (0%) of 116 (95% confidence interval, 0%-3%) and 0 (0%) of 81 (95% confidence interval, 0%-4%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: : Adenosine is useful and safe as a diagnostic and therapeutic agent for patients with regular wide QRS complex tachycardia.