The impact of various simulated arthrodesis angles of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the ring and middle finger on grip strength.

INTRODUCTION: Arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint at 40° angle has been proposed by many authors. A smaller angle of arthrodesis results in weaker grip strength of the hand from the quadriga effect. However, arthrodesis at 40° compromises other aspects of hand function including poor aesthetic appearance. This paper aims to quantify the decrease in grip strength at 40°, 20°, and 0° of arthrodesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Grip strengths of the hand were measured using a BASELINE dynamometer at settings II, III, and IV. Baseline grip strength of the subjects were first measured without wearing a splint. Thereafter, subjects wore thermoplastic splints to simulate arthrodesis of the middle and ring finger PIP joint at 40°, 20°, and 0°, and grip strengths were measured again. The grip strength of the hand with simulated arthrodesis was then calculated as a ratio of the baseline. RESULTS: There were 50 subjects yielding 100 sets of results. The results show that average grip strength ratio of the hand decreases progressively from 40° and 20° and to 0° of arthrodesis for both the middle and ring finger. However, the difference in grip strength ratio between 40° and 20° of arthrodesis was minimal. Simulated arthrodesis of the middle finger affected the grip strength ratio more than arthrodesis of the ring finger, and compromised gripping of a smaller handle more than a wider one. CONCLUSION: The decrease in grip strength from 40° to 20° simulated fusion of PIP joint was minimal. Therefore, in so far as grip strength loss is concerned, arthrodesis of the PIP joint at an angle less than 40° can be considered for patients with individual functional and aesthetic concerns.

Sustaining a national surgical training programme during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted all segments of daily life, with the healthcare sector being at the forefront of this upheaval. Unprecedented efforts have been taken worldwide to curb this ongoing global catastrophe that has already resulted in many fatalities. One of the areas that has received little attention amid this turmoil is the disruption to trainee education, particularly in specialties that involve acquisition of procedural skills. Hand surgery in Singapore is a standalone combined programme that relies heavily on dedicated cross-hospital rotations, an extensive didactic curriculum and supervised hands-on training of increasing complexity. All aspects of this training programme have been affected because of the cancellation of elective surgical procedures, suspension of cross-hospital rotations, redeployment of residents, and an unsustainable duty roster. There is a real concern that trainees will not be able to meet their training requirements and suffer serious issues like burnout and depression. The long-term impact of suspending training indefinitely is a severe disruption of essential medical services. This article examines the impact of a global pandemic on trainee education in a demanding surgical speciality. We have outlined strategies to maintain trainee competencies based on the following considerations: 1) the safety and wellbeing of trainees is paramount; 2) resource utilization must be thoroughly rationalized; 3) technology and innovative learning methods must supplant traditional teaching methods; and 4) the changes implemented must be sustainable. We hope that these lessons will be valuable to other training programs struggling to deliver quality education to their trainees, even as we work together to battle this global catastrophe.