The impact of postoperative cognitive impairment on mid-term survival after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation is the definitive therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure. Antecedent studies reported that a substantial proportion of heart transplant recipients developed postoperative cognitive impairment in the long term. However, no studies have explored the association between postoperative cognitive impairment and survival after heart transplantation. METHODS: The data of 43 adult patients who underwent heart transplantation were consecutively enrolled and assessed using the MMSE and MoCA neuropsychological tests. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival analyses. Primary component analysis was performed to integrate MoCA subtests into the "Attention factor," "Naming factor," and "Orientation factor." RESULTS: About 30% of the patients were diagnosed with short-term postoperative cognitive impairment. The impairment group was older and had lower baseline cognitive performances, larger LV diameter, worse MMSE decline and higher ratio of significant MoCA decline. Postoperative cognitive impairment was significantly associated with worse survival (P = .028). Multivariate Cox analyses showed that higher postoperative MoCA score was significantly associated with lower mid-term post-transplant mortality (HR = .744 [.584, .949], P = .017), in which "Attention factor" contributed to this association most (HR = .345 [.123, .970], P = .044) rather than "Naming factor" or "Orientation factor." Notably, preoperative cognitive impairment was closely related with postoperative cognitive impairment and also indicated the worse post-transplant survival (P = .015). CONCLUSION: Postoperative as well as preoperative cognitive impairments were associated with a worse mid-term survival after heart transplantation, indicating that neuropsychological assessments before and after heart transplantation should be routinely performed for heart transplant recipients for better risk stratification.

Association of fasting blood glucose variability with all-cause mortality in heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Fasting blood glucose (FBG) variability, an emerging marker of glycemic control, has been shown to be related to the risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in subjects with or without diabetes. However, whether FBG variability is independently associated with a higher all-cause mortality in heart transplant recipients remains unknown. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including 373 adult recipients who survived for at least 1 year after heart transplantation with a functioning graft and measured FBG more than three times within first year after transplantation. Multivariable adjusted Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the association between FBG variability and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Patients were categorized into three groups according to the coefficient of variation of FBG level: ≤7.0%, 7.0%-13.5%, and >13.5%. During a median follow-up of 44.4 months (interquartile range [IQR], 22.6-63.3 months), 31 (8.3%) participants died. In univariate analyses, FBG variability was associated with an increased all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67, 5.38; p < .001). This association remained materially unchanged in the multivariable model adjusted for components of demographics, cardiovascular history and lifestyle, hospital information, immunosuppressive therapy, and post-transplant renal function (HR: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.43, 5.28; p = .004). CONCLUSIONS: After heart transplantation, high FBG variability is strongly and independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. Our findings suggest that FBG variability is a novel risk factor and prognostic marker for heart transplantation recipients in outpatient clinic.

Preoperative Levosimendan Administration in Heart Transplant Patients with Severe Hepatic and Renal Impairment: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The cardio-renal syndrome and hepatic impairment play a critical role in end-stage heart failure (HF). Levosimendan is an effective inotropic agent used to maintain cardiac output similar to classic cardiotonic like dobutamine/dopamine. This current research aims to investigate the clinical outcomes of levosimendan and dobutamine/dopamine in Chinese heart transplant awaiting patients with severe hepatic or renal impairment. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 568 heart transplant awaiting individuals with severe hepatic or renal impairment who treated with levosimendan or dobutamine/dopamine in our institution between January 2015 and December 2020. Univariate Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were applied. The primary endpoint was defined as death included inhospital mortality and the mortality at 30 days, 90 days, 180 days and 1 year after heart transplantation. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in mortality rate at 30, 90, 180 days and 1 years after heart transplantation between the levosimendan and non-levosimendan groups, or between subgroups of patients with severe hepatic impairment or renal impairment. The results were consistent before and after propensity score matching. CONCLUSIONS: In the population with advanced heart failure awaiting heart transplantation, levosimendan did not increase short- or long-term mortality rates after surgery compared to dobutamine/dopamine, regardless of their hepatic or renal function. Severe hepatic or renal impairment were not necessarily considered a contraindication for levosimendan in these patients.

Cinnamaldehyde protects donor heart from cold ischemia-reperfusion injury via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.

With the growing shortage of organs, improvements in donor organ protection are needed to meet the increasing demands for transplantation. Here, the aim was to investigate the protective effect of cinnamaldehyde against ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in donor hearts exposed to prolonged cold ischemia. Donor hearts were harvested from rats pretreated with or without cinnamaldehyde, then subjected to 24 h of cold preservation and 1 h of ex vivo perfusion. Hemodynamic changes, myocardial inflammation, oxidative stress, and myocardial apoptosis were evaluated. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway involved in the cardioprotective effects of cinnamaldehyde was explored through RNA sequencing and western blot analysis. Intriguingly, cinnamaldehyde pretreatment remarkably improved cardiac function through increasing coronary flow, left ventricular systolic pressure, +dp/dtmax, and -dp/dtmax, decreasing coronary vascular resistance and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. Moreover, our findings indicated that cinnamaldehyde pretreatment protected the heart from IRI by alleviating myocardial inflammation, attenuating oxidative stress, and reducing myocardial apoptosis. Further studies showed that the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway was activated after cinnamaldehyde treatment during IRI. The protective effects of cinnamaldehyde were abolished by LY294002. In conclusion, cinnamaldehyde pretreatment alleviated IRI in donor hearts suffering from prolonged cold ischemia. Cinnamaldehyde exerted cardioprotective effects through the activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.

Donor circadian clock influences the long-term survival of heart transplantation by immunoregulation.

AIMS: Circadian clocks play important role in immunoregulation. We aimed to investigate cardiac circadian clock specific pathways and compare cardiac grafts procured at different timing on survival after transplantation to explore novel criteria for donor selection. METHODS AND RESULTS: In primate heart, phase set enrichment analysis (PSEA) showed rhythmic transcripts were enriched in antigen processing and presentation during activation of circadian rhythm. Digital sorting of immune cell composition and single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) in unused donor transcriptomes showed the pathway, positive regulation of circadian rhythm significantly correlates with allograft rejection and antigen presentation pathways as well as with increased compositions of matured dendritic cell, CD4+ T cell, and naive B cell. Single-centre retrospective cohort of 390 adult heart transplants between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020 was used to generate a propensity score matching (PSM) cohort. Survival curve differed significantly showing inferior long-term survival when donor hearts were procured at activation group (12 pm to 12 am) compared to repression group (12 am to 12 pm) (6-year survival: 64.2% vs. 75.8%, P = 0.0065). Activation group was also associated with significantly higher rates of in-hospital death, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and usage of mechanical circulatory support after heart transplantation compared to repression group. Furthermore, tendency for post-transplant free of rejection rates was higher in repression group compared to activation group (acute rejection, Gehan-Breslow P = 0.11 and 0.04; chronic rejection, Log rank P = 0.077 and 0.15, in full and PSM cohorts, respectively). Adjusted Cox regression analysis showed that activation group was associated with 2.20 times increased hazard of death (hazard ratio: 2.20; 95% confidence interval: 1.23-3.95; P = 0.008) compared to repression group. CONCLUSIONS: Circadian immunity may represent donor-related risk factors for cardiac allograft rejection through activating genes related to antigen presentation pathway and immune cells oscillation at specific time of day. Molecular circadian clock should be considered during retrieval of cardiac allografts in order to maximize graft durability.

Clinical outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical pulmonary valve replacement: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) has currently been a well-established alternative operation method to surgical pulmonary valve replacement (SPVR) in patients with pulmonary valve dysfunction in the form of stenosis and/or regurgitation. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the main clinical outcomes after TPVR and SPVR. METHODS: We systematically searched the references of relevant literatures from PubMed and the Cochrane Library published between January 2000 and December 2018 and followed The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) for this study. RESULTS: Eleven studies with 4,364 patients were included in the study. Compared with SPVR, TPVR results in a significant decreased in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR): 0.18; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03-0.98] and mortality at the longest reported follow-up time point (OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.22-0.87), though 30-day mortality (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.11-1.33) has no significant difference between groups. Days of hospital stay [(mean difference (MD): -4.38; 95% CI: -6.24--2.53] is shorter with TPVR than SPVR. Besides, rates of 30-day readmission (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.50-0.91) and recurrent pulmonary regurgitation (OR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.07-0.42) are lower with TPVR, whereas postprocedural infective endocarditis (IE) (OR: 4.56; 95% CI: 2.03-10.26) are higher with TPVR. SPVR carries a decreased risk of re-operation (OR: 2.19; 95% CI: 0.62-7.76) though without statistically significance. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, TPVR is associated with a significantly decreased mortality, a shorter length of hospital-stay, a lower rate of 30-day readmission and recurrent pulmonary regurgitation as compared to SPVR throughout the follow-up duration, whereas SPVR results in a significantly lower rate of postprocedural IE than TPVR. In addition, SPVR carries a decreased risk of re-operation with statistically insignificance.