Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMJ Open ; 14(3): e077727, 2024 Mar 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553068

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for premature rupture of membranes (PROM) in pregnant women. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP) and China Biology Medicine Disc were searched from inception to October 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Cross-sectional, case-control and cohort studies published in English or Chinese that reported the risk factors for PROM were eligible for inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently extracted the data and evaluated the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and American Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality tools. Analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 software, and heterogeneity was assessed using χ2 tests and I2 statistics. The sensitivity analyses included a methodological transition between fixed-effect and random-effect models and the systematic stepwise exclusion of studies. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies involving 18 174 participants with 18 risk factors were included. The significant risk factors were low Body Mass Index (BMI) (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.32 to 3.61), interpregnancy interval (IPI) <2 years (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.98 to 4.50), previous abortion (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.76 to 3.14), previous preterm birth (OR 5.72, 95% CI 3.44 to 9.50), prior PROM (OR 3.95, 95% CI 2.48 to 6.28), history of caesarean section (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.72 to 5.43), gestational hypertension (OR 3.84, 95% CI 2.36 to 6.24), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.44 to 3.23), abnormal vaginal discharge (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.45 to 3.27), reproductive tract infection (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.70 to 2.75), malpresentation (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.78 to 2.85) and increased abdominal pressure (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.97). The sensitivity analysis showed that the pooled estimates were stable. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis indicated that low BMI, IPI <2 years, previous abortion, previous preterm birth, prior PROM, history of caesarean section, gestational hypertension, GDM, abnormal vaginal discharge, reproductive tract infection, malpresentation and increased abdominal pressure might be associated with a greater risk of PROM. Associations between smoking status, short cervical length, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and PROM require further investigation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022381485.

2.
Cancer Nurs ; 2023 Nov 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37976150

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Caregivers of patients with cancer are susceptible to profound psychological distress and low quality of life owing to the substantial demands of caregiving. The comprehensive needs of caregivers are closely linked to their quality of life. However, little is known about the relationship between these factors. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether comprehensive needs mediate the relationships between psychological stress and quality of life in caregivers of patients with cancer. METHODS: A cross-sectional design was used to recruit 382 participants through convenience sampling. Psychological stress, comprehensive needs, and quality of life were measured using a questionnaire. RESULTS: Psychological stress was associated with higher comprehensive needs (r = 0.30, P < .01) and lower quality of life (r = -0.20, P < .01). Comprehensive needs were negatively associated with quality of life (r = -0.28, P < .01). Mediation analysis findings revealed that both the indirect effect of psychological stress on quality of life via comprehensive needs (ß = -0.10; P < .001) and its direct effect on quality of life (ß = -0.16; P < .01) were statistically significant, suggesting a partial mediatory effect of comprehensive needs between psychological stress and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that reducing psychological stress can improve quality of life by promoting satisfaction with comprehensive needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Interventions that help reduce psychological stress and meet the comprehensive needs of caregivers of patients with cancer can improve their quality of life.

3.
Heliyon ; 9(10): e20289, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37771525

RESUMO

Mental health issues among nursing professionals have been increasingly reported during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. However, there is a paucity of research on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among nurses working in Medical Alliances. In this study, we aimed to investigate the risk factors associated with PTSD in the Regional Medical Alliance (MA) in Shantou (China) during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 1286 nurses from four MA hospitals participated in the study from February to March 2020. Our findings revealed that the incidences of PTSD, depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders among nurses from MA were 15.6%, 35.5%, 18.3%, and 36.4%, respectively. Moreover, PTSD was positively correlated with depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders. In addition, the results of logistic regression analysis showed that working in a tertiary hospital, older age, more severe depression, more severe anxiety, and prevalent sleep disorders were independent risk factors for PTSD among nurses. Therefore, mental health interventions targeting high-risk nurses in MA with an incidence of PTSD are urgently needed.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa