The association between circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

PURPOSE: The relationship between circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and pancreatic cancer has been well studied but remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the association between circulating 25(OH)D and pancreatic cancer by using a meta-analytic approach. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Wed of Science databases were searched through October 15, 2022. A random or fixed-effects model was used to estimate the pooled odds ratio (OR), risk ratio (RR), hazard ratio (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 16 studies including 529,917 participants met the inclusion criteria, of which 10 reported incidence and 6 reported mortality. For the highest versus lowest categories of circulating 25(OH)D, the pooled OR of pancreatic cancer incidence in case-control studies was 0.98 (95% CI 0.69-1.27), and the pooled HRs of pancreatic cancer mortality in cohort and case-control studies were 0.64 (95% CI 0.45-0.82) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.62-0.95), respectively. The leave-one-out sensitivity analyses found no outliers and Galbraith plots indicated no substantial heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Evidence from this meta-analysis suggested that high circulating 25(OH)D levels may be associated with decreased mortality but not incidence of pancreatic cancer. Our findings may provide some clues for the treatment of pancreatic cancer and remind us to be cautious about widespread vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of pancreatic cancer.

A novel immunodiagnosis panel for hepatocellular carcinoma based on bioinformatics and the autoantibody-antigen system.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignancy with a dismal survival rate. The novel autoantibodies panel may provide new insights for the diagnosis of HCC. Biomarkers screened by two methods (bioinformatics and the antigen-antibody system) were taken as candidate tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect the corresponding autoantibodies in 888 samples of verification and validation cohorts. The verification cohort was used to verify the autoantibodies. Samples in the validation cohort were randomly divided into a train set and a test set with the ratio of 6:4. A diagnostic model was established by support vector machines within the train set. The test set further verified the model. Eleven TAAs were selected (AAGAB, C17orf75, CDC37L1, DUSP6, EID3, PDIA2, RGS20, PCNA, TAF7L, TBC1D13, and ZIC2). The titer of six autoantibodies (PCNA, AAGAB, CDC37L1, TAF7L, DUSP6, and ZIC2) had a significant difference in any of the pairwise comparisons among the HCC, liver cirrhosis, and normal control groups. The titer of these autoantibodies had an increasing tendency. Finally, an optimum diagnostic model was constructed with the six autoantibodies. The AUCs were 0.826 in the train set and 0.773 in the test set. The area under the curve (AUC) of this panel for diagnosing early HCC was 0.889. The diagnostic ability of the panel reduced with the progress of HCC. The positive rate of the panel in diagnosing alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-negative patients was 75.6%. For early HCC, the sensitivity of the combination of AFP with the panel was 90.9% and superior to 53.2% of AFP alone. The novel immunodiagnosis panel combining AFP may be a new approach for the diagnosis of HCC, especially for early-HCC cases.

Combination of an Autoantibody Panel and Alpha-Fetoprotein for Early Detection of Hepatitis B Virus-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

The purpose of this study was to identify biomarkers associated with hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HBV-HCC) and to develop a new combination with good diagnostic performance. This study was divided into four phases: discovery, verification, validation, and modeling. A total of four candidate tumor-associated autoantibodies (TAAb; anti-ZIC2, anti-PCNA, anti-CDC37L1, and anti-DUSP6) were identified by human proteome microarray (52 samples) and bioinformatics analysis. Subsequently, these candidate TAAbs were further confirmed by indirect ELISA with two testing cohorts (120 samples for verification and 663 samples for validation). The AUC for these four TAAbs to identify patients with HBV-HCC from chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients ranged from 0.693 to 0.739. Finally, a diagnostic panel with three TAAbs (anti-ZIC2, anti-CDC37L1, and anti-DUSP6) was developed. This panel showed superior diagnostic efficiency in identifying early HBV-HCC compared with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), with an AUC of 0.834 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.772-0.897] for this panel and 0.727 (95% CI, 0.642-0.812) for AFP (P = 0.0359). In addition, the AUC for this panel to identify AFP-negative patients with HBV-HCC was 0.796 (95% CI, 0.734-0.858), with a sensitivity of 52.4% and a specificity of 89.0%. Importantly, the panel in combination with AFP significantly increased the positive rate for early HBV-HCC to 84.1% (P = 0.005) and for late HBV-HCC to 96.3% (P < 0.001). Our findings suggest that AFP and the autoantibody panel may be independent but complementary serologic biomarkers for HBV-HCC detection. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: We developed a robust diagnostic panel for identifying patients with HBV-HCC from patients with CHB. This autoantibody panel provided superior diagnostic performance for HBV-HCC at an early stage and/or with negative AFP results. Our findings suggest that AFP and the autoantibody panel may be independent but complementary biomarkers for HBV-HCC detection.

Polymorphisms of nucleotide excision repair genes associated with colorectal cancer risk: Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Background: Reduced DNA repair capacity in nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathways owing to genetic variant may influence cancer susceptibility. According to published studies, variants of NER genes associations with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk were inconclusive. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to explore the possible association. A trial sequence analysis (TSA) analysis was performed to control the risk of false positive or false negative. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Network (CNKI), Wanfang Database and Scientific and Technical Journal Database (VIP) were searched to identify relative studies until April 2022. The association was assessed by odds ratio (OR) in Allele, homozygous, heterozygous, dominant, recessive, and over-dominant models. In addition, Begg's and Egger's tests, sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and TSA analysis were performed. Results: A total of 29 studies were eventually included in the meta-analysis, including 12,153 CRC patients and 14,168 controls. It showed that excision and repair cross complementary group 1 (ERCC1) rs11615 CC genotype decreased the risk of CRC, compared with TT genotype (CC vs. TT: OR = 0.816, 95% CI = 0.673-0.990, p = 0.039). For ERCC1 rs3212986, the significant impact was detected on increased the risk of CRC in the allele (OR = 1.267, 95% CI = 1.027-1.562, p = 0.027), homozygous (OR = 1.805, 95% CI = 1.276-2.553, p = 0.001), dominant (OR = 1.214, 95% CI = 1.012-1.455, p = 0.037) and recessive (OR = 1.714, 95% CI = 1.225-2.399, p = 0.002) models, especially in the Asian population. The results revealed the association of ERCC2 rs1799793 A allele with a higher risk of CRC (A vs. G: OR = 1.163, 95% CI = 1.021-1.325, p = 0.023). It also showed that ERCC5 rs17655 increased CRC risk in the allele (OR = 1.104, 95% CI = 1.039-1.173, p = 0.001), homozygous (OR = 1.164, 95% CI = 1.018-1.329, p = 0.026), heterozygous (OR = 1.271, 95% CI = 1.018-1.329, p < 0.001), dominant (OR = 1.241, 95% CI = 1.135-1.358, p < 0.001) and over-dominant (OR = 0.828, 95% CI = 0.762-0.900, p < 0.001) models, especially among Asians. Conclusion: This meta-analysis based on current evidence suggests that the significant association was observed between ERCC1 rs11615, ERCC1 rs3212986, ERCC2 rs1799793, and ERCC5 rs17655 and CRC susceptibility. However, given the limited sample size and the influence of genetic background, studies of a larger scale and well-designed are required to confirm the results.

TSPAN1, TMPRSS4, SDR16C5, and CTSE as Novel Panel for Pancreatic Cancer: A Bioinformatics Analysis and Experiments Validation.

Pancreatic cancer is a lethal malignancy with a poor prognosis. This study aims to identify pancreatic cancer-related genes and develop a robust diagnostic model to detect this disease. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was used to determine potential hub genes for pancreatic cancer. Their mRNA and protein expression levels were validated through reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemical (IHC). Diagnostic models were developed by eight machine learning algorithms and ten-fold cross-validation. Four hub genes (TSPAN1, TMPRSS4, SDR16C5, and CTSE) were identified based on bioinformatics. RT-PCR showed that the four hub genes were expressed at medium to high levels, IHC revealed that their protein expression levels were higher in pancreatic cancer tissues. For the panel of these four genes, eight models performed with 0.87-0.92 area under the curve value (AUC), 0.91-0.94 sensitivity, and 0.84-0.86 specificity in the validation cohort. In the external validation set, these models also showed good performance (0.86-0.98 AUC, 0.84-1.00 sensitivity, and 0.86-1.00 specificity). In conclusion, this study has identified four hub genes that might be closely related to pancreatic cancer: TSPAN1, TMPRSS4, SDR16C5, and CTSE. Four-gene panels might provide a theoretical basis for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.