Prevalence and Outcomes of Multi-Drug Resistant Blood Stream Infections Among Nursing Home Residents Admitted to an Acute Care Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) colonization in nursing home residents has been well documented, but little is known about the impact of MDRO bloodstream infections (BSIs). The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, cost, and outcomes of MDRO-BSI vs. non-MDRO-BSI among nursing home residents. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: 960 bed tertiary academic medical center. PATIENTS: Persons ≥18 years old admitted to an acute care tertiary hospital from Skilled Nursing Facilities with a diagnosis of sepsis between 2015 and 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Retrospective analysis of prevalence and outcomes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among patients admitted to the study hospital with a diagnosis of sepsis during the study period, 7% were from nursing homes. The prevalence of MDRO-BSI was 47%. We identified 54 (50%) gram positive BSIs, 48 (45%) gram negative BSI and 5 (5%) fungal BSI. Thirty-one (57%) of the gram-positive infections and 14 (30%) of the gram-negative infections were with MDROs. The prevalence of BSI organisms were Staphylococcus aureus in 24%, Escherichia coli in 14%, Proteus mirabilis in 13%, Staphylococcus epidermidis in 8%, Enterococcus faecalis in 7%, and Klebsiella pneumoniae in 6%. We found that intensive care unit length of stay (7 days vs 5 days, P = .009), direct cost ($13,639 vs $9,922, P = .027), and total cost ($23,752 vs $17,900 P = .032) were significantly higher in patients with MDRO-BSI vs. non-MDRO-BSI. Patients with MDRO-BSI were twice as likely to receive inappropriate empiric antiinfective therapy (31% vs 16%, P = .006) and were more likely to die (49.1% vs 29.6%, P = .049). CONCLUSION: Nursing home residents have a high prevalence of MDRO-BSI, which is associated with higher risk of receiving inappropriate initial anti-infective therapy, higher cost, higher ICU LOS, and higher mortality. Our research adds new information about the prevalence of fungemia in this population.

Incidence of barotrauma in patients with COVID-19 (alpha- and beta-predominant period) requiring mechanical ventilation: Single-center retrospective study.

Objective: We sought to determine predictors, incidence, and interventions required for patients who developed barotrauma. Pneumothorax, subcutaneous emphysema, and pneumomediastinum have all been reported as complications related to COVID-19-positive patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Methods: In this retrospective study, clinical and imaging data from COVID-19 patients were collected and reviewed by two independent intensivists between January 4, 2020 and January 10, 2020. Data were used to identify COVID-19-positive patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation and the incidence of barotrauma. Two separate cohorts were created as non-injured (no barotrauma) and injured (barotrauma present). We then sought to identify the risk factors for barotrauma in the non-injured cohort on Days 0, 7, 10, and 14 after intubation and day of injury in the injured cohort. Results: Of the 264 patients with COVID-19, 55.8% were African American. The non-injured group was older (60 ± 15 versus 49 ± 16, p = 0.006), with male predominance in the injured group versus non-injured group (75% versus 55%). A total of 16 (6.5%) patients developed one or more complications of barotrauma, defined as subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax, or pneumomediastinum. Length of stay was longer for the injured group versus non-injured group (47 versus 25 days). Plateau pressure (p = 0.024), fraction of inspired oxygen (p < 0.001), and driving pressure (p = 0.001) were statistically significant in injured cohort. Mortality rate in non-injured versus injured was 49.4% versus 69%. Using random effect model, fraction of inspired oxygen (p = 0.003) and mean airway pressure (p = 0.010) were significant at the time of injury. When comparing alive versus deceased in the injured cohort, thoracostomy placement in alive versus deceased was 80% versus 54.5%. Conclusion: COVID acute respiratory distress syndrome patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation had a higher rate of barotrauma and were younger than those who did not develop barotrauma. Possible interventions to be considered to decrease barotrauma are decreased driving pressure goal and universal use of esophageal balloon manometry.

Impact of an Early Warning System Protocol, for Patients Admitted to the Medical Floors with SARS-COV2 Pneumonia, on ICU Admission.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 placed a significant burden on the global healthcare system. Strain in critical care capacity has been associated with increased COVID-19-related ICU mortality. This study evaluates the impact of an early warning system and response team implemented on medical floors to safely triage and care for critically ill patients on the floor and preserve ICU capacity. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study, comparing outcomes between intervention and control hospitals within a US eight-hospital urban network. Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia between April 13th, 2020 and June 19th, 2020 were included in the study, which was a time of a regional surge of COVID-19 admissions. An automated, electronic early warning protocol to identify patients with moderate-severe hypoxemia on the medical floors and implement early interventions was implemented at one of the eight hospitals ("the intervention hospital"). RESULTS: Among 1024 patients, 403 (39%) were admitted to the intervention hospital and 621 (61%) were admitted to one of the control hospitals. Adjusted for potential confounders, patients at the intervention hospital were less likely to be admitted to the ICU (HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.53, 1.000, P = .0499) compared to the control hospitals. Patients admitted from the floors to the ICU at the intervention hospital had shorter ICU stay (HR for ICU discharge: 1.74; 95% CI 1.21, 2.51, P = .003). There was no significant difference between intervention and control hospitals in need for mechanical ventilation (OR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.38, 2.31; P = .88) or hospital mortality (OR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.52, 1.18; P = .25). CONCLUSION: A protocol to conserve ICU beds by implementing an early warning system with a dedicated response team to manage respiratory distress on the floors reduced ICU admission and was not associated with worse outcomes compared to hospitals that managed similar levels of respiratory distress in the ICU.

Evaluation of the Recommended 30 cc/kg Fluid Dose for Patients With Septic Shock and Hypoperfusion With Lactate Greater Than 4 mmol/L.

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines recommend fluid administration of 30 cc/kg ideal body weight (IBW) for patients with sepsis and lactate greater than 4 mmol/L within 3 hours of identification. In this study, we explore the impact of fluid dose on lactate normalization, treatment cost, length of stay, and mortality in patients with lactate greater than 4. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective observational study. SETTING: Eight-hospital urban healthcare system in Northeastern United States. PATIENTS: Patients with sepsis, initial lactate value greater than 4 mmol/L, and received appropriate antibiotics within 3 hours. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We stratified patients into five groups based on the dose of fluid administered within 3 hours after sepsis identification. The groupings were less than 15 cc/kg IBW, 15.1-25 cc/kg IBW, 25.1-35 cc/kg IBW, 35.1-50 cc/kg IBW, and greater than 50 cc/kg IBW. We used the group that received a fluid dose of 25.1-35 cc/kg IBW, as a reference group. The mean age was 66 years, and 56% were male. Three hundred seventy-one (25%) received less than 15 cc/kg of IBW of crystalloid fluid, 278 (17%) received 15-25 cc/kg of IBW, 316 (21%) received 25.1-35 cc/kg of IBW, 319 (21%) received 35.1-50 cc/kg of IBW, and 207 (14%) received greater than 50 cc/kg of IBW. After multilinear regression, there was no significant difference in lactate normalization between the reference group and any of the other fluid groups. We also found no statistically significant difference in the observed/expected cost, or observed/expected length of stay, between the reference group and any of the other fluid groups. Mortality was higher among patients who received greater than 50 cc/kg IBW when compared to the recommended dose. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with sepsis and lactate value greater than 4 mmol/L, high or low fluid doses were not associated with better lactate clearance or patient outcomes. Greater than 50 cc/kg IBW dose of fluids within 3 hours is associated with higher mortality.

Incidence and Impact of Ventilator Associated Multidrug Resistant Pneumonia in Patients with SARS-COV2.

Introduction: Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) is associated with significant cost, morbidity, and mortality. There is limited data on the incidence of VAP, appropriate antibiotic timing, and the impact of multidrug resistant VAP in intubated Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) patients. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at 2 tertiary urban academic centers involving 132 COVID-19 patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). The epidemiology of VAP, the impact of prior empiric antibiotic administration on the development of Multidrug Resistant Organism (MDRO) infections, and the impact of VAP on patient outcomes were studied. Results: The average age of the patients was 60.58% were males, 70% were African-Americans and two-thirds of patients had diabetes, hypertension, or heart disease. The average Body Mass Index (BMI) was 32.9. Forty-one patients (27%) developed VAP. Patients with VAP had a significantly higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score prior to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. Sixty percent received empiric antibiotics before initiation of IMV, mostly on hospital admission, and 81% received empiric antibiotics at the time of intubation. The administration of empiric antibiotics was not associated with a higher prevalence of VAP. The prevalence of VAP was 22 per 1000 days on ventilation. No difference in mortality was seen between VAP and non-VAP groups at 49% and 57% respectively (p = 0.4). VAP was associated with increased ICU length of stay (LOS), 30 vs. 16 days (p < 0.001), and longer hospital LOS 35 vs. 17 days (p < 0.001). 40% of VAPs were caused by MDROs. The most common organism was Staphylococcus aureus (28%), with almost half (48%) being methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Conclusion: VAP was a common complication of patients intubated for COVID-19 pneumonia. Most patients received empiric antibiotics upon the hospital and/or ICU admission. There was a 40% incidence of multidrug resistant pneumonia. Patients who developed VAP had almost twice as long hospital and ICU LOS.

Pediatric sepsis phenotypes for enhanced therapeutics: An application of clustering to electronic health records.

OBJECTIVE: The heterogeneity of pediatric sepsis patients suggests the potential benefits of clustering analytics to derive phenotypes with distinct host response patterns that may help guide personalized therapeutics. We evaluate the relative performance of latent class analysis (LCA) and K-means, 2 commonly used clustering methods toward the derivation of clinically useful pediatric sepsis phenotypes. METHODS: Data were extracted from anonymized medical records of 6446 pediatric patients that presented to 1 of 6 emergency departments (EDs) between 2013 and 2018 and were thereafter admitted. Using International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 discharge codes, 151 patients were identified with a sepsis continuum diagnosis that included septicemia, sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock. Using feature sets used in related clustering studies, LCA and K-means algorithms were used to derive 4 distinct phenotypic pediatric sepsis segmentations. Each segmentation was evaluated for phenotypic homogeneity, separation, and clinical use. RESULTS: Using the 2 feature sets, LCA clustering resulted in 2 similar segmentations of 4 clinically distinct phenotypes, while K-means clustering resulted in segmentations of 3 and 4 phenotypes. All 4 segmentations identified at least 1 high severity phenotype, but LCA-identified phenotypes reflected superior stratification, high entropy approaching 1 (eg, 0.994) indicating excellent separation between estimated phenotypes, and differential treatment/treatment response, and outcomes that were non-randomly distributed across phenotypes (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared to K-means, which is commonly used in clustering studies, LCA appears to be a more robust, clinically useful statistical tool in analyzing a heterogeneous pediatric sepsis cohort toward informing targeted therapies. Additional prospective studies are needed to validate clinical utility of predictive models that target derived pediatric sepsis phenotypes in emergency department settings.

A Multimodal Sepsis Quality-Improvement Initiative Including 24/7 Screening and a Dedicated Sepsis Response Team-Reduced Readmissions and Mortality.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if a hospitalwide sepsis performance improvement initiative improves compliance with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-mandated sepsis bundle interventions and patient outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis comparing 6 months before and 14 months after intervention. SETTING: Tertiary teaching hospital in Washington, DC. SUBJECTS: Patients admitted with a diagnosis of sepsis to a tertiary hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of a multimodal quality-improvement initiative. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 4,102 patients were diagnosed with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock during the study period, 861 patients (21%) were diagnosed during a 6-month preintervention period, and 3,241 (79%) were diagnosed in a 13-month postintervention period. Adjusted for patient case-mix, the prevalence of simple sepsis increased by 12%, but it decreased for severe sepsis and septic shock by 5.3% and 6.9%, respectively. Compliance with all sepsis bundle interventions increased by 31.1 percentage points (p < 0.01). All-cause hospital readmission and readmission due to infection were both reduced by 1.6% and 1.7 percentage points (p < 0.05). Death from any sepsis diagnosis was reduced 4.5% (p < 0.01). Death from severe sepsis and septic shock both was reduced by 5% (p < 0.01) and 6.5% (p < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After the implementation of multimodal sepsis performance initiatives, we observed a higher prevalence of sepsis secondary to screening but a lower prevalence of severe sepsis and septic shock, an improvement in compliance with the sepsis bundle interventions bundle, as well as reduction in hospital readmission and all- cause mortality rate.