Standardized 3D-CT lung volumes for patients with acute exacerbation of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease.

OBJECTIVES: Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a progressive lung disease characterized by loss of lung volume, resulting in a leading cause of death in patients with RA. Crucially, acute exacerbation (AE) of ILD shows higher morbidity and mortality with rapid deterioration of the lungs. However, a quantitative assessment for physiological changes at AE has yet to be performed. This study hypothesized that quantitative assessments of lung volume (LV) accurately indicate disease severity and mortality risk in patients with AE-RA-ILD. METHODS: This multicentre cohorts study quantitatively assessed physiological changes of RA-ILD at diagnosis (n = 54), at AE (discovery-cohorts; n = 20, and validation-cohort; n = 33), and controls (n = 35) using 3D CT (3D-CT) images. LV was quantitatively measured using 3D-CT and standardized by predicted forced vital capacity. RESULTS: Patients with RA-ILD at diagnosis showed decreased LV, predominantly in lower lobes, compared with controls. Further substantial volume loss was found in upper- and lower lobes at AE compared with those at diagnosis. During AE, decreased standardized 3D-CT LV was associated with a worse prognosis in both cohorts. Subsequently, standardized 3D-CT LV was identified as a significant prognostic factor independent of age, sex and the presence of UIP pattern on CT by multivariate analyses. Notably, a composite model of age and standardized 3D-CT LV successfully classified mortality risk in patients with AE-RA-ILD. CONCLUSION: Volume loss at AE in patients with RA-ILD was associated with increased mortality. Assessing physiological change using standardized 3D-CT might help evaluate disease severity and mortality risk in patients with AE-RA-ILD.

Enhancing exercise tolerance in interstitial lung disease with high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy: A randomized crossover trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is characterized by dyspnoea on exertion and exercise-induced hypoxaemia. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy reduces the respiratory workload through higher gas flow and oxygen supplementation, which may affect exercise tolerance. This study aimed to examine the effects of oxygen and gas flow rates through HFNC therapy on exercise tolerance in ILD patients. METHODS: We conducted three-treatment crossover study. All ILD patients performed the exercises on room air (ROOM AIR setting: flow, 0 L/min; fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO2], 0.21), HFNC (FLOW setting: flow 40 L/min, FiO2 0.21), and HFNC with oxygen supplementation (FLOW + OXYGEN setting: flow 40 L/min, FiO2 0.6). The primary endpoint was the endurance time, measured using constant-load cycle ergometry exercise testing at a peak work rate of 80%. RESULTS: Twenty-five participants (10 men, 71.2 ± 6.7 years) were enrolled. The increase in exercise duration between the ROOM AIR and FLOW was 46.3 s (95% CI, -6.1 to 98.7; p = 0.083), and the FLOW and FLOW + OXYGEN was 91.5 s (39.1-143.9; p < 0.001). The percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2) at rest was significantly higher with the FLOW + OXYGEN setting than with the ROOM AIR and FLOW settings, and the difference persisted during exercise. At equivalent time points during exercise, the SpO2 with the FLOW setting was significantly higher than that with the ROOM AIR setting. CONCLUSION: Oxygen supplementation in HFNC therapy improved exercise tolerance and SpO2. We found that gas flow alone did not improve exercise tolerance, but improved SpO2 during exercise.

Association of the lung immune prognostic index with the survival of patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The lung immune prognostic index (LIPI), a simple index calculated from the blood lactate dehydrogenase level and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, is thought to be associated with host immune status. However, the utility of LIPI in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) is unknown. METHODS: In this multicentre, retrospective, observational study, an association between LIPI and the survival of patients with IIPs was evaluated. RESULTS: Exploratory and validation cohorts consisting of 460 and 414 patients with IIPs, respectively, were included (159 and 159 patients had idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [IPF], and 301 and 255 had non-IPF, respectively). In the exploratory cohort, patients with IPF and a low LIPI had significantly better survival than those with a high LIPI (median of 5.6 years vs. 3.9 years, p = 0.016). The predictive ability of LIPI for the survival of patients with IPF was validated in the validation cohort (median of 8.5 years vs. 4.4 years, p = 0.003). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, LIPI was selected as an independent predictive factor for the survival of IPF patients. There was no significant association between LIPI and survival of non-IPF patients in the exploratory and validation cohorts. CONCLUSION: The LIPI was a predictive factor for the survival of patients with IPF and could aid the management of IPF.

Prognostic significance of radiological pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis in Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) causes chronic respiratory infectious diseases with diverse clinical features and prognoses. Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is a rare disease characterised by pleural fibrosis with subjacent intra-alveolar fibrosis and alveolar septal elastosis, with unique chest high-resolution CT (HRCT) features (radiological PPFE). An association between recurrent respiratory infections and PPFE formation has been hypothesised; however, the clinical significance of PPFE in MAC lung disease remains unclear. METHODS: This retrospective, multicentre study investigated the prevalence of radiological PPFE in patients with MAC lung disease and its association with clinical features and outcomes. Radiological PPFE was diagnosed on the basis of HRCT findings. Prognostic factors were identified using Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray models. RESULTS: Of 850 consecutive patients with definite MAC lung disease, 101 (11.9%) exhibited radiological PPFE. Patients with radiological PPFE had unique characteristics, such as lower body mass index, lower survival rate (5-year cumulative survival rate, 63.1% vs 91.7%; p<0.001) and a higher incidence of respiratory-related death (5-year cumulative incidence, 31.1% vs 3.6%; p<0.001), than those without radiological PPFE. In the multivariable analysis, the presence of radiological PPFE was independently associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 4.78; 95% CI, 2.87 to 7.95; p<0.001) and respiratory-related death (adjusted HR, 3.88; 95% CI, 2.14 to 7.01; p<0.001). INTERPRETATION: This large-scale study demonstrated that in patients with MAC lung disease, radiological PPFE was common, a phenotype associated with unique clinical features and poor prognosis, particularly respiratory-related death. The specific management of this subgroup should be established.

A predictive model for acute exacerbation of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias.

BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbation of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (AE-IIPs) induces permanent pulmonary dysfunction and is potentially lethal. The unpredictable occurrence of AE-IIPs remains an important clinical issue in the management of IIPs. METHODS: In this multicentre, retrospective, observational study, a predictive score for AE-IIPs was designed using clinical factors based on multivariate Fine-Gray analysis in patients with IIPs. RESULTS: Based on multivariate Fine-Gray analysis in an exploratory cohort of 487 patients with IIPs, the predictive score for AE-IIPs was determined as follows: 1 point each was added for honeycombing on high-resolution computed tomography (H), age >75 years (A) and lactate dehydrogenase level >222 U·L-1 (L); the total score ranged from 0 to 3 (HAL score). The HAL score discriminated the risk of AE-IIPs with a C-index of 0.62 (95% CI 0.56-0.67); this discrimination was verified in a validation cohort of 402 patients with IIPs with a C-index of 0.67 (95% CI 0.60-0.73). In a combined cohort, the estimated cumulative risks for AE-IIPs at 1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 years were 1.9%, 3.5%, 5.1%, 7.7% and 12.9%, respectively, in the total score 0 group; 4.7%, 8.3%, 12.0%, 17.7% and 28.4%, respectively, in the total score 1 group; and 8.0%, 14.2%, 19.7%, 28.7% and 43.0%, respectively, in the total score ≥2 group. Subgroup analysis revealed that the HAL score was applicable to patients with and without idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: The HAL score discriminated the risk of AE-IIPs and could aid in the management of IIPs.

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index is a predictor of tolerability of antifibrotic therapy and mortality risk in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterized by progressive lung fibrosis of unknown aetiology. Epidemiological studies have suggested that IPF progression may negatively affect nutritional status. Weight loss during antifibrotic therapy is also frequently encountered. The association of nutritional status and outcome has not been fully evaluated in IPF patients. METHODS: This retrospective multicohort study assessed nutritional status of 301 IPF patients receiving antifibrotic therapy (Hamamatsu cohort, n = 151; Seirei cohort, n = 150). Nutritional status was evaluated using the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI). The GNRI was calculated based on body mass index and serum albumin. The relationship between nutritional status and tolerability of antifibrotic therapy as well as mortality was explored. RESULTS: Of 301 patients, 113 (37.5%) had malnutrition-related risk (GNRI < 98). Patients with malnutrition-related risk were older, had increased exacerbations and worse pulmonary function than those without a GNRI status <98. Malnutrition-related risk was associated with a higher incidence of discontinuation of antifibrotic therapy, particulary due to gastrointestinal disturbances. IPF patients with malnutrition-related risk (GNRI < 98) had shorter survival than those without such risk (median survival: 25.9 vs. 41.1 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, malnutrition-related risk was a prognostic indicator of antifibrotic therapy discontinuation and mortality, independent of age, sex, forced vital capacity, or gender-age-physiology index. CONCLUSION: Nutritional status has significant effects on the treatment and outcome in patients with IPF. Assessment of nutritional status may provide important information for managing patients with IPF.

Impact of antifibrotic therapy on lung cancer development in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are at a high risk of lung cancer (LC). Antifibrotic therapy slows disease progression and possibly prolongs survival. However, whether antifibrotic therapy affects LC development in patients with IPF remains unknown. This multicentre retrospective study evaluated 345 patients with IPF. The incidence and prevalence of LC were significantly lower in patients with IPF receiving antifibrotic therapy than those not receiving. Subsequently, LC-related mortality was significantly lower in patients with IPF receiving antifibrotic therapy. These results suggest that antifibrotic therapy was possibly associated with a reduced risk of LC development in patients with IPF, which may be partly associated with its survival benefit.

Prospective nationwide multicentre cohort study of the clinical significance of autoimmune features in idiopathic interstitial pneumonias.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) show autoimmune features. Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) was recently proposed as a research concept in these patients. However, retrospective studies reported conflicting results of its prognosis. Therefore, this study was conducted to prospectively evaluate the clinical significance of autoimmune features in patients with IIP. METHODS: This nationwide multicentre study prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with IIP. At the diagnosis, we systematically evaluated 63 features suggestive of connective tissue diseases using a checklist including symptoms/signs and autoantibodies, which contained most items of the IPAF criteria and followed up with the patients. Clinical phenotypes were included in a cluster analysis. RESULTS: In 376 patients with IIP enrolled, 70 patients (18.6%) met the IPAF criteria. The proportion of patients with IPAF was significantly lower in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) than in non-IPF (6.0% vs 24.3%, respectively). During a median observation period of 35 months, patients with IPAF more frequently developed systemic autoimmune diseases and had less frequent acute exacerbation of IIPs than patients with non-IPAF. IPAF diagnosis was significantly associated with better survival and was an independent positive prognostic factor in total and patients with non-IPF. Cluster analysis by similarity of clinical phenotypes identified a cluster in which there was a higher number of women, and patients had more autoimmune features and a better prognosis than other clusters. INTERPRETATION: These observations suggest that some patients with IIP show autoimmune features with distinct characteristics and favourable prognosis. However, we were not able to determine the appropriate therapies for these patients.

Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis: three-dimensional computed tomography assessment of upper-lobe lung volume.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (iPPFE) is a rare interstitial lung disease characterised by predominant upper-lobe fibrosis involving the pleura and subpleural lung parenchyma. Despite its poor prognosis, there is no consensus on prognostic determinants of iPPFE to date. Because volume loss in the upper lobe is a distinct feature of iPPFE, we hypothesised that the lung volume of the bilateral upper lobes (upper-lobe volume) accurately indicates disease severity and mortality risk in iPPFE patients. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed two cohorts of 132 patients with iPPFE (69 in Hamamatsu cohort; 63 in Seirei cohort) and 45 controls. Each lobe volume was quantitatively measured using three-dimensional computed tomography at the time of iPPFE diagnosis and standardised using predicted forced vital capacity. RESULTS: The standardised upper-lobe volume in iPPFE patients was less than half that of controls, whereas the lower-lobe volume did not decrease. iPPFE patients with lower standardised upper-lobe volume had significantly shorter survival rates than those with higher volume (median survival: 6.08 versus 2.48 years, p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, the lower standardised upper-lobe volume was significantly associated with increased mortality adjusting for age, sex and forced vital capacity (HR 0.939). A composite scoring model, including age, sex and standardised upper-lobe volume, better predicted risk of death than the gender-age-physiology model. CONCLUSION: Assessment of upper-lobe volume provides useful information for managing iPPFE by evaluating disease severity and mortality risk in clinical practice.

Acute exacerbation of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: mortality and its prediction model.

BACKGROUND: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD), like those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), might develop an unexpected acute exacerbation (AE)-a rapidly progressing and deadly respiratory decline. Although AE incidence and risk factors in RA-ILD patients are known, their post-AE clinical course remains unknown owing to the rarity of AE-RA-ILD. This multicentre retrospective study evaluated post-AE mortality and prognostic variables in AE-RA-ILD patients and created a mortality prediction model for AE-RA-ILD. METHODS: This research comprised 58 patients with AE-RA-ILD and 96 with AE-IPF (a control disease). Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic variables. A prediction model was created with recursive partitioning (decision tree). RESULTS: The post-AE 90-day mortality rate in the overall AE-RA-ILD group was 48.3%; percent predicted forced vital capacity within 12 months before AE onset (baseline %FVC) and PaO2/FiO2 ratio at AE onset (P/F at AE) were independent predictors of mortality. Post-AE 90-day mortality rates were 40.6% and 43.8%, respectively, in AE-RA-ILD and AE-IPF patients propensity score-matched for age, sex, baseline %FVC and P/F at AE (P = 1.0000). In AE-RA-ILD patients, C-indices of baseline %FVC and P/F at AE to predict post-AE 90-day mortality were 0.604 and 0.623, respectively. A decision tree model based on these prognostic factors classified AE-RA-ILD patients into mild, moderate and severe groups (post-AE 90-day mortality rates: 20.8%, 64.0% and 88.9%, respectively; P = 0.0002); the C-index improved to 0.775. CONCLUSIONS: Post-AE mortality was high in AE-RA-ILD patients similar to AE-IPF patients. The discovered prognostic factors and our mortality prediction model may aid in the management of AE-RA-ILD patients.

Standardised 3D-CT lung volumes for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of lung physiology via pulmonary function tests (PFTs) is essential for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, PFTs require active participation, which can be challenging for patients with severe respiratory failure, such as during moments of acute exacerbation (AE) of IPF. Recent advances have enabled the re-construction of 3-dimensional computed-tomography (3D-CT) images. This study established a standardisation method and quantitative analysis of lung volume (LV) based on anthropometry using 3D-CT images. METHODS: This is a retrospective multi-center cohort study. The standardised 3D-CT LV in patients with IPF at diagnosis (n = 140) and during AE (cohort1; n = 61 and cohort2; n = 50) and those of controls (n = 53) were assessed. RESULTS: The standardised 3D-CT LVs at IPF diagnosis were less than those of control patients, especially in the lower lung lobes. The standardised 3D-CT LVs were correlated with forced vital capacity (FVC) and validated using the modified Gender-Age-Physiology (GAP) index. The standardised 3D-CT LVs at IPF diagnosis were independently associated with prognosis. During AE, PFTs were difficult to perform, 3D-CT analyses revealed reduced lung capacity in both the upper and lower lobes compared to those obtained at diagnosis. Lower standardised 3D-CT LVs during AE were independently associated with worse outcomes in the two independent cohorts. In particular, volume loss in the upper lobe at AE had prognostic values. CONCLUSIONS: A novel image quantification method for assessing pulmonary physiology using standardised 3D-CT-derived LVs was developed. This method successfully predicts mortality in patients with IPF and AE of IPF, and may be a useful alternative when PFTs cannot be performed.

Impact of end-of-life respiratory modalities on quality of dying and death and symptom relief in patients with interstitial lung disease: a multicenter descriptive cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory modalities applied at the end of life may affect the burden of distressing symptoms and quality of dying and death (QODD) among patients with end-stage interstitial lung disease (ILD); however, there have been few studies into respiratory modalities applied to these patients near death. We hypothesized that high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) might contribute to improved QODD and symptom relief in patients with end-stage ILD. OBJECTIVES: This multicenter study examined the proportion of end-of-life respiratory modalities in a hospital setting and explored its impact on QODD and symptom relief among patients dying with ILD. METHODS: Consecutive patients with ILD who died in four participating hospitals in Japan from 2015 to 2019 were identified and divided into four groups according to end-of-life respiratory modality: conventional oxygen therapy (COT), HFNC, non-invasive ventilation (NIV), and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). In addition, a mail survey was performed to quantify the QODD and symptom relief at their end of life from a bereaved family's perspective. QODD and symptom relief were quantified using the Good Death Inventory (GDI) for patients with a completed bereavement survey. The impact of end-of-life respiratory modalities on QODD and symptom relief was measured by multivariable linear regression using COT as a reference. RESULTS: Among 177 patients analyzed for end-of-life respiratory modalities, 80 had a completed bereavement survey. The most common end-of-life respiratory modality was HFNC (n = 76, 42.9%), followed by COT (n = 62, 35.0%), NIV (n = 27, 15.3%), and IMV (n = 12, 6.8%). Regarding the place of death, 98.7% of patients treated with HFNC died outside the intensive care unit. Multivariable regression analyses revealed patients treated with HFNC had a higher GDI score for QODD [partial regression coefficient (B) = 0.46, 95% CI 0.07-0.86] and domain score related to symptom relief (B = 1.37, 95% CI 0.54-2.20) than those treated with COT. CONCLUSION: HFNC was commonly used in patients with end-stage ILD who died in the hospital and was associated with higher bereaved family ratings of QODD and symptom relief. HFNC might contribute to improved QODD and symptom relief in these patients who die in a hospital setting.

Quality of dying and death in patients with interstitial lung disease compared with lung cancer: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: There is limited knowledge regarding the quality of dying and death (QODD) and end-of-life interventions in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Hence, differences in QODD and end-of-life interventions between patients with ILD and those with lung cancer (LC) remain poorly understood. METHODS: The primary aim of this study was to explore the differences in QODD and end-of-life interventions among patients dying with ILD versus those dying with LC. We performed a mail survey to quantify the QODD of a bereaved family's perspective using the Good Death Inventory (GDI) score. Moreover, we examined the end-of-life interventions by medical chart review. RESULTS: Of 361 consecutive patients analysed for end-of-life interventions, 167 patients whose bereaved families completed questionnaires were analysed for QODD. Patients with ILD had lower GDI scores for QODD than those with LC (p=0.04), particularly in domains related to 'physical and psychological distress relief' and 'prognosis awareness and participation in decision making' (p=0.02, respectively). In end-of-life interventions, patients with ILD were less likely to receive specialised palliative care services (8.5% vs 54.3%; p<0.001) and opioids (58.2% vs 73.4%; p=0.003). Additionally, lower frequencies of participation of patients with ILD in end-of-life discussion were also observed (40.8% vs 62.4%; p=0.007). CONCLUSION: Patients with ILD had lower QODD and poorer access to palliative care and decision making than those with LC. Additional efforts to improve QODD in patients with ILD, particularly in symptom relief and decision-making processes, are urgently warranted.

Prednisolone and tacrolimus versus prednisolone and cyclosporin A to treat polymyositis/dermatomyositis-associated ILD: A randomized, open-label trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of combination therapy with corticosteroids and CNI, TAC and CsA, for PM/DM-ILD has been described retrospectively. However, it remains unknown which CNI treatment regimens, TAC or CsA regimens, are more effective as initial treatments for patients with PM/DM-ILD. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicentre, open-label, randomized, 52-week phase 2 trial. Patients with PM/DM-ILD were randomly allocated to receive PSL plus TAC (TAC group) or PSL plus CsA (CsA group). The primary endpoint was PFS rate in the intention-to-treat population at 52 weeks. The secondary endpoints were OS rate at 52 weeks, changes in pulmonary function tests from baseline to 52 weeks and AE. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were randomly assigned to the TAC group (n = 30) and the CsA group (n = 28). The PFS rates at 52 weeks were 87% in the TAC group and 71% in the CsA group (P = 0.16). The OS rates at 52 weeks were 97% in the TAC group and 93% in the CsA group (P = 0.50). The %FVC at 52 weeks in the per-protocol populations significantly increased in both groups. None of the patients discontinued the treatment due to AE. CONCLUSION: PSL plus TAC treatment may achieve a better short-term PFS rate compared with PSL plus CsA treatment. Further studies must be conducted to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of such treatment.

Pneumothorax in Patients with Idiopathic Pleuroparenchymal Fibroelastosis: Incidence, Clinical Features, and Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is a rare form of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia that is characterized by predominantly upper lobe pleural and subpleural lung parenchymal fibrosis. Pneumothorax is one of the major respiratory complications in PPFE patients; however, its clinical features are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the complication of pneumothorax in patients with idiopathic PPFE. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study involving 89 patients who had been diagnosed with idiopathic PPFE was conducted. We investigated the cumulative incidence, clinical features, and risk factors of pneumothorax after the diagnosis of idiopathic PPFE. RESULTS: Pneumothorax developed in 53 patients (59.6%) with 120 events during the observation period (41.8 ± 35.0 months). The cumulative incidence of pneumothorax was 24.8, 44.9, and 53.9% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Most events of pneumothorax were asymptomatic (n = 85; 70.8%) and small in size (n = 92; 76.7%); 30 patients (56.6%) had recurrent pneumothorax. Chest drainage was required in 23 pneumothorax events (19.2%), and a persistent air leak was observed in 13 (56.5%). Patients with pneumothorax were predominantly male and frequently had pathological diagnoses of PPFE and prior history of pneumothorax and corticosteroid use; they also had significantly poorer survival than those without pneumothorax (log-rank test; p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that a higher residual volume/total lung capacity ratio was significantly associated with the development of pneumothorax after the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Pneumothorax is often asymptomatic and recurrent in patients with idiopathic PPFE, leading to poor outcomes in some cases.

Switching antifibrotics in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a multi-center retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are two antifibrotics used to treat idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF): pirfenidone and nintedanib. Antifibrotics slow disease progression by reducing the annual decline of forced vital capacity (FVC), which possibly improves outcomes in IPF patients. During treatment, patients occasionally switch antifibrotic treatments. However, prognostic implication of changing antifibrotics has not yet been evaluated. METHODS: This multi-center retrospective cohort study examined 262 consecutive IPF patients who received antifibrotic therapy. Antifibrotic agents were switched in 37 patients (14.1%). The prognoses were compared between the patient cohort that switched antifibrotics (Switch-IPF) and those without (Non-Switch-IPF) using propensity-score matched analyses. RESULTS: The median period between the initiation of antifibrotic therapy and the drug switch was 25.8 (12.7-35.3) months. The most common reasons for the switch were disease progression (n = 17) followed by gastrointestinal disorders (n = 12). Of the 37 patients that switched antifibrotics, only eight patients disrupted switched antifibrotics by their adverse reactions. The overall prognosis of the Switch-IPF cohort was significantly better than the Non-Switch-IPF cohort (median periods: 67.2 vs. 27.1 months, p < 0.0001). In propensity-score matched analyses that were adjusted to age, sex, FVC (%), history of acute exacerbation, and usage of long-term oxygen therapy, the Switch-IPF cohort had significantly longer survival times than the Non-Switch-IPF group (median 67.2 vs. 41.3 months, p = 0.0219). The second-line antifibrotic therapy showed similar survival probabilities than those in first-line antifibrotic therapy in multistate model analyses. CONCLUSION: Switching antifibrotics is feasible and may improve prognosis in patients with IPF. A further prospective study will be required to confirm clinical implication of switching the antifibrotics.

Efficacy of corticosteroid and intravenous cyclophosphamide in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Acute exacerbation (AE) is a leading cause of death in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Although optimal treatment for AE-IPF remains unclear, high-dose corticosteroids (CS) with/without immunosuppressants, including intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY), are often used as empirical therapy. However, the survival benefit of adding IVCY to CS therapy is unknown. We investigated the efficacy of this therapy in patients with AE-IPF. METHODS: Overall, 102 consecutive patients with IPF with a first idiopathic AE were included. Post-AE survival rates and treatment safety were retrospectively assessed. Efficacy of CS + IVCY therapy for the first AE was compared with that of CS monotherapy using a propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: The post-AE 90-day survival rate of the entire cohort was 64.7%. On the basis of the propensity scores, 26 matched patient pairs were made. Characteristics of matched patients with AE-IPF treated with CS (matched CS group) and those with CS + IVCY (matched CS + IVCY group) were well balanced. No significant between-group differences were observed in post-AE 90-day survival rates (84.6% vs 76.9%; P = 0.70), cumulative survival rates (P = 0.57 by log-rank test) or incidence of adverse events ≥ CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) v5.0 grade 3 (61.5% vs 65.4%; P = 1.00). CONCLUSION: The propensity score-matched analysis demonstrated that compared with CS monotherapy, CS + IVCY therapy did not significantly improve post-AE survival in patients with AE-IPF. Further studies are warranted to assess the efficacy of CS + IVCY therapy for AE-IPF.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for second primary lung cancer and intra-parenchymal lung metastasis in patients previously treated with surgery: evaluation of indications and predictors of decreased respiratory function.

BACKGROUND: The adaptation criteria for administration of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to patients with lung cancer who previously underwent surgery and subsequently developed a second primary lung cancer (SPLC) or intra-parenchymal lung metastasis (IPLM) are controversial, unlike the criteria for repeat surgery. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of SBRT for these patients. Factors associated with decreased respiratory function were also evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with 89 lesions who underwent SBRT between 2008 and 2017 were analyzed. Of these, 29 were diagnosed with SPLC while the remaining 40 had IPLM. The distribution of histological types was as follows: squamous cell carcinoma (n = 13 lesions); adenocarcinoma (n = 25); non-small cell carcinoma (n = 1); unknown histological type (n = 49). The prescribed doses to the planning target volume (PTV) were 50 Gy in five fractions for 85 lesions and 60 Gy in 10 fractions for four lesions at PTV mean. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up period of 55 months, the 4-year overall survival and local control rates were 50.3% and 87.6%, respectively. Six patients experienced grade 2 radiation pneumonitis and one experienced grade 3. Two patients experienced grade 5 pulmonary fibrosis. Decreased respiratory function was observed in 10 patients (15.1%). On multivariate analysis, the presence of pulmonary disease before SBRT was the only statistically significant factor associated with decreased respiratory function. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is safe and feasible in patients with SPLC or IPLM previously treated surgically. Pre-existing pulmonary disease was a predictive factor for decreased respiratory function.

Efficacy and Tolerability of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy for Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease with Do-Not-Intubate Orders: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy may provide effective respiratory management of hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a do-not-intubate (DNI) order. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of HFNC for these patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients requesting a DNI order for hypoxemic respiratory failure associated with ILD, comparing treatment with HFNC and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV). Outcomes measured were 30-day survival, in-hospital mortality, temporary interruption and discontinuation of the treatment at the patient's request, adverse events, oral intake, and communication ability at the end of life. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients (HFNC, n = 54; NPPV, n = 30) were analyzed. Neither 30-day survival (HFNC 31.5% vs. NPPV 30.0%; p = 0.86) nor in-hospital mortality (HFNC 79.6% vs. NPPV 83.3%; p = 0.78) differed significantly. The temporary interruption and discontinuation rates were significantly lower in the HFNC group than in the NPPV group (3.7 vs. 23.3%; p = 0.009 and 0 vs. 10%; p = 0.043, respectively), and that group had significantly fewer adverse events. Among patients who died in the hospital, those treated with HFNC had significantly better oral intake and ability to converse until just before death. CONCLUSION: HFNC had a survival rate equivalent to that of NPPV and was better tolerated by patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure associated with ILD who had a DNI order. HFNC allowed patients to eat and converse until just before death, suggesting that HFNC in these patients is a reasonable palliative treatment.

Persistent impairment on spirometry in chronic eosinophilic pneumonia: A longitudinal observation study (Shizuoka-CEP study).

BACKGROUND: Chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP) is characterized by the accumulation of eosinophils in the lung with unknown etiology. Although systemic corticosteroid administration leads to dramatic improvement, nearly half the patients with CEP experience relapse and some develop persistent impairment of pulmonary function. However, predictive factors for this persistent impairment have not been determined. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the occurrence of persistent impairment of pulmonary function in CEP and determine its predictive factors. METHODS: This observational study consisted of 133 consecutive patients with CEP who were followed for longer than 1 year. Spirometry was performed at the time of diagnosis and at follow-up. RESULTS: During the observational period (6.1 ± 4.1 years), relapse occurred in 75 patients (56.4%). Remarkably, 42 patients (31.6%) had a persistent pulmonary function defect (27 obstructive, 10 restrictive, and 4 obstructive and restrictive cases) at the last evaluation. Logistic analyses showed that the relapse was associated with neither persistent obstructive nor restrictive defects. Persistent obstructive defect was significantly associated with the comorbidity of asthma and obstructive defect at the initial CEP diagnosis, whereas persistent restrictive defect was significantly related to reticulation at high-resolution computer tomography and restrictive defect at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Persistent impairment of pulmonary function is common in CEP. Concurrent asthma and obstructive defects at diagnosis were predictors for persistent obstructive impairments, whereas reticulation at high-resolution computer tomography and restrictive defect at diagnosis predicted persistent restrictive impairment. Attention should be paid to these persistent impairments in the management of CEP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.htm Identifier: UMIN000019092 (principal investigator, Takafumi Suda, MD, PhD).