Accuracy and Safety of the 15-Day CareSens Air Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.

Background: We evaluated the accuracy and safety of the CareSens Air, a novel real-time continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS), during 15 days of use in adults with diabetes. Methods: Adults with either type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes requiring intensive insulin therapy participated at four sites in South Korea. All participants wore the sensor for 15 days. Participants were scheduled for four 8-h clinic sessions on Day 1, 5 ± 1, 10 ± 1, and 15. Accuracy was evaluated based on the proportion of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) values within 15% of YSI values ≥100 mg/dL or within 15 mg/dL of YSI values <100 mg/dL (%15/15), along with the %20/20, %30/30, and %40/40 agreement rates. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) between the CGM and YSI values was calculated. Results: Data from 83 participants (83 sensors, 10,029 CGM-YSI matched pairs) were analyzed. The overall MARD was 10.42%, and the overall %15/15, %20/20, %30/30, and %40/40 accuracy were 78.55%, 89.04%, 96.47%, and 98.87%, respectively. The consensus error grid analysis showed that 99.92% of CGM values fell into Zone A or B (Zone A: 89.83%, Zone B: 10.09%). The %20/20 accuracy of CGMS was 88.11% on Day 1, 90.11% on Day 3-5, 92.09% on Day 8-10, and 85.63% on Day 15. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: The CareSens Air demonstrated accurate performance across the wide glycemic range and was well tolerated during the 15-day sensor use period.

A phase 4 randomized active-controlled clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of sustained-release pregabalin with immediate-release pregabalin in type 2 diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathic pain.

AIMS: The objective of this study was to demonstrate that sustained-release (SR) pregabalin is non-inferior to immediate-release (IR) pregabalin in attenuating diabetic peripheral neuropathic (DPN) pain along with patient satisfaction and compliance. METHODS: This was an 8-week, randomized, active-controlled, open-label, phase 4 study. Eligible subjects who had been on IR pregabalin for 4 weeks were randomized to 1:1 ratio to either continue with twice-daily IR pregabalin (75 mg), or to switch to once-daily SR pregabalin (150 mg). Primary efficacy endpoint was the change in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores after 8 weeks of treatment compared to baseline in both SR and IR pregabalin groups. RESULTS: Among 130 randomized subjects, 125 patients were included in full analysis set. For the change in VAS pain score, the least squares (LS) mean were -17.95 (SR pregabalin) and -18.74 (IR pregabalin) and the LS mean difference between both groups was 0.79, with the upper limit of the 95 % confidence interval [-5.99, 7.58] below the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 9.2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the new once-daily SR pregabalin formulation is not different to the twice-daily IR pregabalin in alleviating DPN pain, indicating its potential as a promising treatment for DPN pain with a comparable safety profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05624853.