Professional Preferences and Perceptions of Cardiology Among Internal Medicine Residents: Temporal Trends Over the Past Decade.

Importance: Internal medicine residents' professional development preferences were discordant with their perceptions of cardiology in a survey circulated a decade ago; no contemporary data exist. This information is important for effective recruitment and retention of a highly talented and diverse future cardiology workforce. Objective: To identify residents' professional development preferences and cardiology perceptions, in relation to specialty choice, and compare the findings with those from a decade prior. Design, Setting, and Participants: The original survey from the 2010 study was updated and sent to US internal medicine programs. Respondents (ie, internal medicine residents) rated 38 professional development preferences and 20 cardiology perceptions. Data were collected in 2020 and compared with survey results from the prior 2010 study. Multivariable models were created for specialty choice using scaled independent variables dichotomized using the top 2 options; categorical variables were recoded into binary variables for analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Multivariable models were used to determine the association of demographic characterisitcs and survey responses with prospective career choice. Responses were examined by total group, by gender, by self-reported consideration of entering cardiology as a profession, and by comparison with a decade prior both as a group and by gender. Results: A total of 840 residents (mean [SD] age, 29.24 [2.82] years; 49.8% male; 55.4% White) completed the survey. The survey incorporated a 5-point Likert scale of 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important) for some of the questions, with additional questions on demographic characteristics. The most important professional development preferences by descending Likert score were as follows: positive role models (4.56), stimulating career (3.81), and family friendly (3.78). The cardiology perception statements with the highest agreement were as follows: interferes with family life during training (3.93) and having met positive role models or having positive views of cardiovascular disease as a topic (3.85). Multivariable analysis yielded a 22-element model predicting cardiology as career choice. Compared with the 2010 survey, the findings of this survey indicated increased importance of work-life balance components for both male and female residents, with a greater change in male residents. Contemporary residents were more likely than their predecessors to agree with negative perceptions of cardiology. Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study found that both male and female residents place a high value on support for optimal work-life balance; these preferences have intensified over the past decade and factor into career choice. Negative perceptions of cardiology persist and, in some aspects, are worsening. Improving the culture of cardiology may make this specialty a more attractive career choice for all.

Preventive health care among older women in an academic primary care practice.

PURPOSE: We sought to examine the use of preventive health services among older women and to assess how age and illness burden influence care patterns. METHODS: The charts of 299 women aged > or =80 and 229 women aged 65-79 years who did not have dementia or terminal illness at 1 academic primary care practice in Boston were reviewed between July and December 2005 to determine receipt of screening tests (e.g., mammography), counseling on healthy lifestyle (e.g., exercise), and/or geriatric health issues (e.g., incontinence), and immunizations. Illness burden was quantified using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). RESULTS: Women aged > or =80 were more likely than women aged 65-79 to have a CCI of > or =3 (24.0% vs. 16.7%) and were less likely to receive all screening tests. However, receipt of mammography (47.8%) and colon cancer screening (51.2%) was still common among women aged > or =80 and was not targeted to older women in good health. Women aged > or =80 were less likely to be screened for depression (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-0.8), osteoporosis (aRR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9), or counseled about exercise (aRR 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6-0.9) than younger women, but were more likely to receive counseling about falls (aRR 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.6) and/or incontinence (aRR 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6). However notes documenting discussions about mood (28.6%), exercise (40.0%), falls (28.8%), or incontinence (20.8%) were low among all women. CONCLUSION: In a comprehensive review of preventive health measures for elderly women, many in poor health were screened for cancer. Meanwhile, many older women were not screened for depression or counseled about exercise, falls, or incontinence. There is a need to improve delivery of preventive health care to older women.

The value older women in an academic primary care practice place on preventive health care services: implications for counseling.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine how women aged 80 years or older value different preventive health measures compared to women aged 65 to 79 years. DESIGN AND METHODS: We surveyed 107 women aged 80 years or older and 93 women aged 65 to 79 years; we randomly selected all of them from a large academic primary care practice. We measured perceived importance and priority placed on different preventive health measures, including screening tests; counseling on healthy lifestyle and geriatric health issues; immunizations; and recommendations for over-the-counter prevention medications. RESULTS: Of the 200 women, 28.5% were aged 80 to 84 and 25.0% were aged 85 years or older. The majority of the women were non-Hispanic White (65.5%), had private insurance (82.0%), and were in good health condition (52.0%). Women aged between 65 and 79 were more likely than women aged 80 or older to consider screening tests and exercise counseling essential or very important to maintaining their health. Women aged 80 or older did not value any preventive health measure more highly than did younger women. Women who were 65 to 79 years of age ranked mammography screening as their most valued preventive health measure, with five of their top six measures being screening tests. Women who were 85 years of age or older prioritized flu shots, recommendations for aspirin, and then mammography screening. IMPLICATIONS: Screening tests and exercise counseling are more highly valued by women aged 65 to 79 years than by women aged 80 years or older. Regardless of age, mammography screening is prioritized over other preventive health measures. Understanding how older women value different preventive health measures may help clinicians improve their preventive health counseling.

Chest Pain During Chemotherapy: A Case of Severe Myocardial Bridging.

A cancer patient presented with acute chest pain at rest 40 hours after IV fluorouracil infusion. Angiography showed evidence of myocardial bridging.

Factors influencing elderly women's mammography screening decisions: implications for counseling.

BACKGROUND: Although guidelines recommend that clinicians consider life expectancy before screening older women for breast cancer, many older women with limited life expectancies are screened. We aimed to identify factors important to mammography screening decisions among women aged 80 and older compared to women aged 65-79. METHODS: Telephone surveys of 107 women aged 80+ and 93 women aged 65-79 randomly selected from one academic primary care practice who were able to communicate in English (60% response rate). The survey addressed the following factors in regards to older women's mammography screening decisions: perceived importance of a history of breast disease, family history of breast cancer, doctor's recommendations, habit, reassurance, previous experience, mailed reminder cards, family/friend's recommendations or experience with breast cancer, age, health, and media. The survey also assessed older women's preferred role in decision making around mammography screening. RESULTS: Of the 200 women, 65.5% were non-Hispanic white and 82.8% were in good to excellent health. Most (81.3%) had undergone mammography in the past 2 years. Regardless of age, older women ranked doctor's recommendations as the most important factor influencing their decision to get screened. Habit and reassurance were the next two highly ranked factors influencing older women to get screened. Among women who did not get screened, women aged 80 and older ranked age and doctor's counseling as the most influential factors and women aged 65-79 ranked a previous negative experience with mammography as the most important factor. There were no significant differences in preferred role in decision-making around mammography screening by age, however, most women in both age groups preferred to make the final decision on their own (46.6% of women aged 80+ and 50.5% of women aged 65-79). CONCLUSION: While a doctor's recommendation is the most important factor influencing elderly women's mammography screening decisions, habit and reassurance also strongly influence decision-making. Interventions aimed at improving clinician counseling about mammography, which include discussions around habit and reassurance, may result in better decision-making.

Trends in outpatient transthoracic echocardiography: impact of appropriateness criteria publication.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the 2007 American College of Cardiology Foundation Transthoracic Echocardiography Appropriateness Criteria on trends in appropriateness is unknown. Therefore, we sought to identify the appropriateness of outpatient transthoracic echocardiography pre- and postpublication of this document. METHODS: The 2007 Appropriateness Criteria were used to classify outpatient echocardiographic studies at an academic medical center during October 2000 and October 2008. The patient's electronic medical record was used to identify echocardiographic indication and appropriateness. RESULTS: From October 2000 to October 2008, there was an 85% increase in outpatient echocardiographic volume. Using the Appropriateness Criteria, there was no significant change in inappropriate referrals (13% and 15%, P=.58). Sixty-five studies (12%) were referred for indications "not addressed" by the document, with an increase (7% to 15%, P=.012) from 2000 to 2008. In a second analysis, incorporating the 2008 Valve Guidelines, an increase was demonstrated in the total number of studies that could be classified, but there was no significant change in the proportion of inappropriate referrals (P=.50). There remained a significant increase (3% to 10%, P=.009) in the proportion of indications "not addressed" by either guideline. CONCLUSION: From October 2000 to October 2008, we experienced a near doubling of outpatient echocardiographic volume, with no significant change in the percent of inappropriate referrals despite interim publication of the Appropriateness Criteria document. In addition, there was an increase in echocardiographic referrals for "not addressed" indications. Future efforts are needed both to refine the Appropriateness Criteria to include unaddressed indications and to promote its effective implementation.

Asking for help: internal medicine residents' use of a medical procedure service.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the professional help-seeking behavior of residents as they perform procedures in the hospital. OBJECTIVE: To determine when residents seek formal supervision to perform inpatient medical procedures. DESIGN: We conducted a prospective cohort study of resident physicians' use of formal supervision through a medical procedure service (MPS) for placing central venous catheters (CVCs) and performing thoracenteses. We compared resident, procedure, and patient characteristics among MPS and non-MPS procedures. We performed bivariable and multivariable analyses to examine factors associated with use of the MPS. We also performed a subgroup analysis of non-MPS procedures to assess the influence of resident, procedure, and patient characteristics on the choice of informal supervision. SETTING: Boston teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Sixty-nine internal medicine residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Use of an elective MPS for formal faculty supervision. RESULTS: Among 191 procedures performed, 79 (41%) used the MPS. Residents were more likely to seek faculty supervision via the MPS among patients with 3 or more comorbidities (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.5). They were less likely to seek MPS supervision when procedures were performed urgently or emergently (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.8). There were few differences in the characteristics of unsupervised and informally supervised procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Resident physicians appear to seek formal assistance appropriately for procedures they perform on sicker patients. Additional research is needed to understand whether overconfidence or poor access to attending physicians is responsible for their failure to seek consultation with urgent and emergent cases.

Economic evaluation of bivalirudin with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition versus heparin with routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition for early invasive management of acute coronary syndromes.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the economic impact of several anticoagulation strategies for moderate- and high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients managed invasively. BACKGROUND: The ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial demonstrated that bivalirudin monotherapy yields similar rates of ischemic complications and less bleeding than regimens incorporating glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPI) for moderate- and high-risk NSTE-ACS. METHODS: In ACUITY, 7,851 U.S. patients were randomized to: 1) heparin (unfractionated or enoxaparin) + GPI; 2) bivalirudin + GPI; or 3) bivalirudin monotherapy. Patients assigned to GPI were also randomized to upstream GPI before catheterization or selective GPI only with percutaneous coronary intervention. Resource use data were collected prospectively through 30-day follow-up. Costs were estimated with standard methods including resource-based accounting, hospital billing data, and the Medicare fee schedule. RESULTS: At 30 days, ischemic events were similar for all groups. Major bleeding was reduced with bivalirudin monotherapy compared with heparin + GPI or bivalirudin + GPI (p < 0.001). Length of stay was lowest with bivalirudin monotherapy or bivalirudin + catheterization laboratory GPI (p = 0.02). Despite higher drug costs, aggregate hospital stay costs were lowest with bivalirudin monotherapy (mean difference range: $184 to $1,081, p < 0.001 for overall comparison) and at 30 days (mean difference range: $123 to $938, p = 0.005). Regression modeling demonstrated that hospital savings were primarily due to less major and minor bleeding with bivalirudin ($8,658/event and $2,282/event, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among U.S. patients in the ACUITY trial, bivalirudin monotherapy compared with heparin + GPI resulted in similar protection from ischemic events, reduced bleeding, and shorter length of stay. Despite higher drug costs, aggregate hospital and 30-day costs were lowest with bivalirudin monotherapy. Thus bivalirudin monotherapy seems to be an economically attractive alternative to heparin + GPI for patients with moderate- and high-risk NSTE-ACS. (Comparison of Angiomax Versus Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes [ACS]; NCT00093158).

Atrial fibrillation: modern concepts and management.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. In recent years, progress has been made in determining the genetic abnormalities that may lead to AF. New trials have shown that rate control and anticoagulation are acceptable as a primary treatment strategy in many patients who have a high risk of recurrence. Newer and safer antiarrhythmics are now available. Pacemaker and implantable cardiac defibrillator technology is rapidly evolving and may play a significant role in future treatment and prevention of AF. Direct thrombin inhibitors are likely to add a user-friendly option to the current standard therapy for stroke prevention.

Physicians' attitudes and the use of oral anticoagulants: surveying the present and envisioning future.

Atrial fibrillation has the highest prevalence in the elderly. While the elderly are at the highest risk for stroke and would benefit the most from anticoagulation, they are also the least likely to receive anticoagulation. In a pooled analysis of the primary prevention trials, warfarin reduced stroke by 68% compared with placebo, and aspirin reduced stroke by 18%. Age, history of hypertension, diabetes, heart failure or reduced left ventricular function, and previous transient ischemic events and stroke are independent risk factors for stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Less than 50% of the elderly who have clear-cut indications and no contraindications for warfarin receive anticoagulant therapy. This low use of warfarin is driven by many factors, but physicians' fear of hemorrhage is among the most important. Better adherence to evidence-driven guidelines, better patient and physician education, point-of-care monitoring of INR and the future development of user friendly anticoagulant drugs are likely to result in higher rates of anticoagulation use.