Association between the intraoperative fluid balance during cardiac surgery and postoperative sequential organ failure assessment score: a post hoc analysis of the BROTHER study, a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Although intraoperative intravenous fluids are commonly administered to reverse intraoperative hypotension during cardiac surgery, the appropriate volume remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the intraoperative fluid balance and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score in patients undergoing cardiac surgery to determine the impact of intraoperative intravenous fluids on their organs. This was a post hoc analysis using data from a multicenter, retrospective, observational study across 14 intensive care units (ICUs) in Japan. Adult patients admitted to ICUs after elective coronary artery bypass grafting or valve surgery from January 1 to December 31, 2018 were enrolled. We compared patients with intraoperative fluid balance < 20 ml/kg to those with fluid balance ≥ 20 ml/kg and conducted a multiple regression analysis for the SOFA score within 24 h of ICU admission. Of the 1567 included patients, 870 met the eligibility criteria. A total of 725 patients (83%) had an intraoperative fluid balance of ≥ 20 ml/kg. In the univariate analysis, the SOFA score (interquartile range) was 7 (6-8) and 7 (6-9) in the intraoperative fluid balance < 20 ml/kg and ≥ 20 ml/kg groups, respectively (p = 0.017). Multiple regression analysis showed a positive association between intraoperative fluid balance and SOFA score within 24 h of ICU admission [standardized coefficient 0.0065 (95% confidence interval 0.0036-0.0095), p < 0.001]. Intraoperative fluid balance in patients undergoing cardiac surgery was significantly associated with higher SOFA scores within 24 h of ICU admission.

The epidemiology of postoperative dobutamine and phosphodiesterase inhibitors after adult elective cardiac surgery and its impact on the length of hospital stay: a post hoc analysis from the multicenter retrospective observational study.

The optimal administration of inotrope after cardiac surgery is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the impact of postoperative inotrope on clinical outcomes in adult elective cardiac surgery patients. Data from the Blood Pressure and Relative Optimal Target after Heart Surgery in Epidemiologic Registry study were analyzed, employing propensity score considering the hospital of admission. The primary outcome was the length of hospital stay evaluated using quantile regression. Secondary outcomes were kidney injury progression, renal replacement therapy, atrial fibrillation, mortality, mechanical ventilation duration, and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Among 870 patients from 14 ICUs in Japan, 535 received inotropes within 24 h of ICU admission, with usage rates ranging from 40 to 100% among facilities. After propensity score matching, 218 patients were included in each group. The inotrope group had a significantly longer hospital stay compared to the control group (16 days vs. 14 days; median difference 1.78 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-3.24]; p = 0.018). However, no significant differences were observed in the secondary outcomes, except for mechanical ventilation duration. The results of the sensitivity analysis using a mixed-effects quantile regression analysis considering the hospital of admission for length of hospital stay in the original cohort were consistent with the results of the propensity analyses (median difference in days, 2.35 [95% CI, 0.35-4.36]; p = 0.022). The use of inotropes within 24 h of ICU admission in adult elective cardiac surgery patients was associated with an extended hospitalization period of approximately 2 days, without offering any prognostic benefit. Clinical trial registration: UMIN-CTR, https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.htm , UMIN000037074.

Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound for shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Circulatory failure is classified into four types of shock (obstructive, cardiogenic, distributive, and hypovolemic) that must be distinguished as each requires a different treatment. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used in clinical practice for acute conditions, and several diagnostic protocols using POCUS for shock have been developed. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS in identifying the etiology of shock. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, Clinicaltrial.gov, European Union Clinical Trials Register, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) until June 15, 2022. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and assessed study quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Meta-analysis was conducted to pool the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS for each type of shock. The study protocol was prospectively registered in UMIN-CTR (UMIN 000048025). RESULTS: Of the 1553 studies identified, 36 studies were full-text reviewed, and 12 studies with 1132 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.91] and 0.98 [95% CI 0.92-0.99] for obstructive shock, 0.78 [95% CI 0.56-0.91] and 0.96 [95% CI 0.92-0.98] for cardiogenic shock, 0.90 [95% CI 0.84-0.94] and 0.92 [95% CI 0.88-0.95] for hypovolemic shock, and 0.79 [95% CI 0.71-0.85] and 0.96 [95% CI 0.91-0.98] for distributive shock, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for each type of shock was approximately 0.95. The positive likelihood ratios for each type of shock were all greater than 10, especially 40 [95% CI 11-105] for obstructive shock. The negative likelihood ratio for each type of shock was approximately 0.2. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of the etiology for each type of shock using POCUS was characterized by high sensitivity and positive likelihood ratios, especially for obstructive shock.

High versus low blood pressure targets for cardiac surgery while on cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery is performed worldwide. Most types of cardiac surgery are performed using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Cardiac surgery performed with CPB is associated with morbidities. CPB needs an extracorporeal circulation that replaces the heart and lungs, and performs circulation, ventilation, and oxygenation of the blood. The lower limit of mean blood pressure to maintain blood flow to vital organs increases in people with chronic hypertension. Because people undergoing cardiac surgery commonly have chronic hypertension, we hypothesised that maintaining a relatively high blood pressure improves desirable outcomes among the people undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of higher versus lower blood pressure targets during cardiac surgery with CPB. SEARCH METHODS: We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search of databases was November 2021 and trials registries in January 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a higher blood pressure target (mean arterial pressure 65 mmHg or greater) with a lower blood pressure target (mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg) in adults undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Primary outcomes were 1. acute kidney injury, 2. cognitive deterioration, and 3. all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were 4. quality of life, 5. acute ischaemic stroke, 6. haemorrhagic stroke, 7. length of hospital stay, 8. renal replacement therapy, 9. delirium, 10. perioperative transfusion of blood products, and 11. perioperative myocardial infarction. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included three RCTs with 737 people compared a higher blood pressure target with a lower blood pressure target during cardiac surgery with CPB. A high blood pressure target may result in little to no difference in acute kidney injury (risk ratio (RR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 2.08; I² = 72%; 2 studies, 487 participants; low-certainty evidence), cognitive deterioration (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.50; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 389 participants; low-certainty evidence), and all-cause mortality (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.30 to 5.90; I² = 49%; 3 studies, 737 participants; low-certainty evidence). No study reported haemorrhagic stroke. Although a high blood pressure target may increase the length of hospital stay slightly, we found no differences between a higher and a lower blood pressure target for the other secondary outcomes. We also identified one ongoing RCT which is comparing a higher versus a lower blood pressure target among the people who undergo cardiac surgery with CPB. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: A high blood pressure target may result in little to no difference in patient outcomes including acute kidney injury and mortality. Given the wide CIs, further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of a higher blood pressure target among those who undergo cardiac surgery with CPB.

Clinical Utility of Surgical Lung Biopsy for Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical lung biopsy (SLB) is performed in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); however, its clinical utility remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: We categorized the pathological diagnoses and investigated the predictive value for short-term mortality. METHOD: Three electronic databases (MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched for the included studies. The QUADAS-2 was used to evaluate the risk of bias and its applicability. The types and populations of pathological diagnoses were investigated. The pooled sensitivity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were estimated at a fixed specificity. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies that enrolled 758 patients were included. The pathological diagnoses were as follows: diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) 29.9%; infection 24.7%; interstitial lung disease 17.2%; malignancy 3.6%; cardiovascular disease 3.6%; drug toxicity 2.3%; connective tissue disease 2.2%; allergic disease 1.1%; and nonspecific diagnosis 15.4%. To predict short-term mortality, 13 studies that enrolled 613 patients used DAD as an index test and recorded a mortality rate of 56.9% (349 of 613 patients). A total of 3 studies that used index tests other than DAD were excluded. The pooled sensitivity, fixed specificity, LR+, LR-, and DOR were 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.56), 0.69, 1.48 (95% CI: 0.92-1.81), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.63-1.03), and 1.90 (95% CI: 0.89-2.86), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SLB is unlikely to provide a specific diagnosis and should not be recommended for confirming DAD or predicting ARDS prognosis.

Adverse events during intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Intrahospital transport of critically ill patients is often necessary for diagnostic procedures, therapeutic procedures, or admission to the intensive care unit. The aim of this study was to investigate and describe safety and adverse events during intrahospital transport of critically ill patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic search was performed of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies published up to June 3, 2020, and of the International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing trials. We selected prospective and retrospective cohort studies published in English on intrahospital transport of critically ill patients, and then performed a meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the incidence of all adverse events that occurred during intrahospital transport. The secondary outcomes were death due to intrahospital transport or life-threatening adverse events, minor events in vital signs, adverse events related to equipment, durations of ICU and hospital stay, and costs. RESULTS: A total of 12,313 intrahospital transports and 1898 patients from 24 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Among 24 studies that evaluated the primary outcome, the pooled frequency of all adverse events was 26.2% (95% CI: 15.0-39.2) and the heterogeneity among these studies was high (I2 = 99.5%). The pooled frequency of death due to intrahospital transport and life-threatening adverse events was 0% and 1.47% each, but heterogeneity was also high. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that adverse events can occur during intrahospital transport of critically ill patients, and that the frequency of critical adverse events is relatively low. The results of this meta-analysis could assist in risk-benefit analysis of diagnostic or therapeutic procedures requiring intrahospital transport of critically ill patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000040963.

Epidemiology of constipation in critically ill patients and its impact on in-hospital mortality: a retrospective observational study.

PURPOSE: There are several causes for delayed constipation in critically ill patients. Constipation in critically ill patients is reportedly associated with poor outcomes. However, a consistent definition for constipation and reports on the prognosis of critically ill patients with constipation are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to determine the epidemiology of constipation during critical illness, and assess the association between constipation and in-hospital mortality based on the two definitions of constipation used in previous studies. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study comprised adult patients in a general intensive care unit (ICU) during 2011-2018. We retrieved the information regarding their bowel movements and assessed the impact of constipation on the in-hospital mortality based on the previous definitions (absence of defecation for 72 and 144 h). RESULTS: Among the 1933 adult ICU patients included, the proportion of patients with constipation decreased with a longer duration of constipation (72 h: 67%, 144 h: 36%). In-hospital mortality in the constipation group was much lower than that in the non-constipation group in the univariable analysis (72 h, 27% vs. 13%; 144 h, 31% vs. 21%). However, constipation was not associated with in-hospital mortality in the multivariable analysis (adjusted odds ratio: 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.64-1.30 and adjusted odds ratio: 1.14, 95% confidence interval: 0.70-1.85 at 72 and 144 h, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Constipation in critically ill patients was not associated with in-hospital mortality based on any definition of constipation used in previous studies. Further prospective studies are necessary to validate our findings.

Clinical prediction scores and early anticoagulation therapy for new-onset atrial fibrillation in critical illness: a post-hoc analysis.

PURPOSE: This study sought to describe the epidemiology of anticoagulation therapy for critically ill patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) according to CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores and to assess the efficacy of early anticoagulation therapy. METHOD: Adult patients who developed NOAF during intensive care unit stay were included. We compared the patients who were treated with and without anticoagulation therapy within 48 h from AF onset. The primary outcome was a composite outcome that included mortality and ischemic stroke during the period until hospital discharge. RESULTS: In total, 308 patients were included in this analysis. Anticoagulants were administered to 95 and 33 patients within 48 h and after 48 h from NOAF onset, respectively. After grouping the patients into four according to their CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED bleeding scores, we found that the proportion of anticoagulation therapy administered was similar among all groups. After adjustment using a multivariable Cox regression model, we noted that early anticoagulation therapy did not decrease the composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47‒1.23). However, in patients without rhythm control drugs, early anticoagulation was significantly associated with better outcomes (adjusted HR 0.46; 95% CI; 0.22‒0.87, P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: We found that clinical prediction scores were supposedly not used in the decision to implement anticoagulation therapy and that early anticoagulation therapy did not improve clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with NOAF. Trial registration UMIN-CTR UMIN000026401. Registered 5 March 2017.

Antihypertensive treatment for hypertensive patients with heart failure using real-world Japanese data: subanalysis of the Retrospective study of antihypertensives for lowering blood pressure (REAL) study.

The number of patients with heart failure (HF) is rapidly increasing. Although hypertension is related to onset of HF, antihypertensive treatment status for these patients has not been fully examined. We conducted a claims-based study to discern the treatment status of Japanese hypertensive patients with HF. Two Japanese databases (2008-2016) from acute care hospitals and health insurance societies were used to analyze prescription rates for antihypertensive drug class or category of diuretics in all hypertensive patients and the subset of patients with HF. Totals of hypertensive patients and those with HF in each database in 2015 were 4,191,666 and 1,404,008 patient-months, and 1,382,732 and 148,194 patient-months, respectively. In the acute care hospitals database, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) (55.0-56.5%) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (49.4-54.7%) were prescribed most. ß-blockers (38.7-48.0%) and diuretics (42.3-45.6%) were prescribed more for hypertensive patients with HF than for all hypertensive patients (21.5-24.8% and 25.5-26.7%, respectively). Loop diuretics were also prescribed more often for hypertensive patients with HF (68.3-76.0% from acute care hospitals and 47.8-55.8% from health insurance societies) than for all hypertensive patients (56.7-61.7% and 16.4-18.3%). The size of medical institution had a greater effect on drug selection than patient age in both patient groups. Given recommendations in guidelines for hypertensive patients with HF, the differences in drug choice in comparison with all hypertensive patients appear reasonable. However, some deviations, such as the high rate of CCBs in frontline and preference for angiotensin II receptor blockers over angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, did not appear to follow guidelines.

Predictors for sustained new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: a retrospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Although new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently observed in the intensive care unit (ICU), the incidence and predictors for sustained new-onset AF have not been investigated, except for cardiac surgery patients. We have evaluated potential predictors for sustained new-onset AF in a mixed ICU. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we screened non-cardiac surgery patients who were admitted to the ICU between January 2010 and December 2013 and had been hospitalized for > 24 h in the ICU. We collected information about heart rhythm 6 h after the onset of AF. We compared detailed patient characteristics between patients with sinus rhythm (SR) and those with sustained AF at 6 h after the onset of AF. Additionally, we applied variable selection using backward elimination based on Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC). Calibration was performed based on the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. RESULTS: New-onset AF occurred in 151 of 1718 patients and 99 patients converted to SR at 6 h. Backward elimination identified predictors as follows (AIC = 175.3): CHADS2 score, elective surgery, infection on ICU admission, serum potassium > 4.0 mmol/L, male sex, mechanical ventilation, and diagnostic grouping. The model showed good calibration for sustenance of AF at 6 h after the onset using the Hosmer-Lemeshow Chi-square value of 4.36 (degrees of freedom = 4, p = 0.360) indicating a good fit. CONCLUSIONS: These predictors might be useful in future interventional studies to identify patients who are likely to sustain new-onset AF.

Disease burden and treatment satisfaction in patients with prurigo nodularis in Japan.

Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder with a high disease burden. In this cross-sectional, web-based survey, Global Questions (GQ), the Numerical Rating Scales (NRS) for pruritus, burning sensation and sleep disturbance, the Short-Form-8 (SF-8) Health Survey, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI), and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9) scores were used to assess the current disease burden and treatment satisfaction among patients with PN in Japan. In total, 97 patients were included (55.7% male, median age 51 years, median duration of PN 36 months). Based on GQ scores, 35.1% of patients had mild disease, 50.5% moderate, and 14.4% severe disease. Disease burden increased as the severity of PN increased, as indicated by worsening of pruritus NRS scores and quality of life (DLQI, PHQ-9, WPAI presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment scores). Patients with comorbid atopic dermatitis (AD) also had more intense pruritus than those without AD. Mean ± standard deviation TSQM-9 scores for effectiveness, convenience, and global satisfaction were 54.7 ± 18.1%, 62.4 ± 15.2%, and 57.4 ± 15.9%, respectively. TSQM-9 scores were lowest in patients receiving the most intensive guideline-directed treatment (i.e., topical corticosteroids + systemic oral corticosteroids or cyclosporine), highlighting an unmet need for more effective treatment options for patients with PN. In summary, Japanese patients with PN reported increased disease burden and reduced treatment satisfaction with increased disease severity, despite the use of guideline-recommended therapies.

Changing clinical practice and prognosis for severe respiratory failure over time: A nationwide inpatient database study.

BACKGROUND: Severe respiratory failure requires numerous interventions and its clinical implementation changes over time. We aimed to clarify the clinical practice and prognosis of severe respiratory failure and its changes over time. METHODS: In a nationwide Japanese administrative database from 2016 to 2019, we identified nonoperative patients with severe respiratory failure without congestive heart failure as the main diagnosis who received mechanical ventilation (MV) for more than four days. We examined trends in patient characteristics, adjunctive interventions, and prognosis. RESULTS: Among 66,905 patients included in this study, patients received antibiotics (90%), high-dose corticosteroids (14%), low-dose corticosteroids (18%), and 51% were admitted to the critical care unit. Hospital mortality was 35%. Median mechanical ventilation lasted 10 days. Tracheostomy occurred in 23% of cases. Median critical care and hospital stays were 10 and 25 days, respectively. Among survivors, 23% had mechanical ventilation dependency at hospital discharge. Large relative changes in adjunctive therapies included fentanyl (30%-38%), rocuronium (4.4%-6.7%), vasopressin (3.8%-6.0%), early rehabilitation (27%-38%), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (0.7%-1.2%), dopamine (15%-10%), and sivelestat (8.6%-3.5%). No notable changes were seen in mechanical ventilation duration, tracheostomy, critical care unit stay, hospital stay, or ventilator dependency at discharge, except for a slight reduction in hospital mortality (36%-34%). CONCLUSIONS: Several adjunctive therapies for severe respiratory failure changed from 2016 to 2019, with an increase in evidence-based practices and a slight decrease in hospital mortality.

[Triage DOA screening in a case of methamphetamine and its analogue poisoning].

CASE REPORT: A 20-year-old woman presented with the chest pain, nausea, respiratory strange feeling, and a large quantity of sweating. On the stimulant zone of 8 groups of drugs of Triage DOA screening it showed an equivocal positivity while all of the other zones gave negative results. She denied taking drugs. No injection scar was found. And she was then hospitalized because little was known about her symptoms. When the unconscious patient was discovered at rest room inside hospital the next day, she was transferred to emergency and critical care center. In the same screening test positivity on the stimulant zone was observed, and furthermore both amphetamine and methamphetamine were detected by GCMS analysis. For 4 days positivity on the stimulant zone lasted. From the fact of disturbance of consciousness, restlessness, excitation and tachycardia, respiration disorder, and the pupil dilatation drug poisoning was deeply suspected. DISCUSSION: While the stimulant zone of Triage DOA showed the equivocal positivity when 7 hours has elapsed until she became aware of abnormality and hospitalized, in the same screening of 30 hours later positivity was verified clearly. Several problems derived from the detection method, pharmacokinetic factors and pharmacodynamic aspect were discussed as for the difference of the results detected.

Chemotherapy-induced leukopenic septic shock treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A case report.

We present a case of chemotherapy-induced leukopenic septic shock treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Although the indication for VA-ECMO for septic shock in immunosuppressed states remains controversial, her relatively young age and a slightly increasing leukocyte count led to VA-ECMO induction and resulted in recovery.

Complications of a lung biopsy for severe respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the complications of lung biopsy in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF), including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The primary outcomes were biopsy-related death, respiratory failure, cardiac complications, bleeding, and other major complications. We used the McMaster Quality Assessment Scale of Harms (McHarm) to evaluate the risk of bias. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled frequencies. RESULTS: Thirteen studies (consisting of 574 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Furthermore, most of the included studies had a high or unclear risk of bias in half of the items in McHarm. All included studies evaluated surgical lung biopsies. The median overall hospital mortality was 53% (range: 17%-90%). The pooled frequencies of biopsy-related death, respiratory failure, cardiac complication, bleeding, and other major complications were 0.00% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.00%-0.21%), 1.30% (95% CI: 0.00%-5.69%), 1.03% (95% CI: 0.00%-3.73%), 1.46% (95% CI: 0.16%-3.56%), and 4.26% (95% CI: 0.00%-13.0%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study will be valuable information in considering the indications of lung biopsy in patients with ARF, including ARDS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN 000040650).

Respiratory failure due to diaphragm paralysis after brachial plexus injury diagnosed by point-of-care ultrasound.

A man in his fifties was injured in a traffic accident and diagnosed with traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage, liver injury, and fractures of the rib, right clavicle, right scapula and right femur. He also presented with motor and sensory disturbances of the right upper extremity and was suspected of having a brachial plexus injury. After undergoing mechanical ventilation due to multiple traumas, he was extubated. However, he developed acute respiratory failure and required reintubation. Respiratory symptoms were not clear until just before reintubation. The diagnosis of right diaphragm paralysis was made using point-of-care ultrasound with no other findings that could cause respiratory failure. MRI led to the diagnosis of brachial plexus injury, which likely caused diaphragm paralysis. Point-of-care ultrasound provided a clear visualisation and rapid bedside diagnosis of diaphragm paralysis, which can be challenging to diagnose while ruling out other causes of respiratory failure.

Diagnostic accuracy of urinary antigen tests for legionellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Urinary antigen tests (UATs) have been used for the early detection of legionellosis and have demonstrated moderate sensitivity and high specificity. However, the most recent systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2009 evaluated the accuracy of UATs; since then, UAT accuracy may have changed owing to advances and developments in UAT technology and epidemiological changes in the frequency of Legionella species that cause legionellosis. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to update the accuracy of UATs for legionellosis among patients with suspected pneumonia. METHODS: Overall, 1326 studies were screened, 21 of which fulfilled the eligibility criteria for quality assessment and meta-analysis. Data from 5772 patients, including 1368 (23.7%) with the target condition (i.e., suspected legionellosis), were included in the analysis. The overall quality of the included studies, which was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool, was unclear. RESULTS: The calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.85) and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.99-1.00), respectively. Subpopulation analysis revealed that the accuracy of UATs for sensitivity and specificity for Legionella pneumophilia serogroup 1 was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.91) and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.99-1.00), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the sensitivity and specificity of UATs were moderate and high, respectively, which is comparable to the results reported in 2009. Therefore, UATs may be a useful method for the early detection of legionellosis caused by Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The review protocol was prospectively registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000041080).

Diagnostic accuracy of urinary antigen tests for pneumococcal pneumonia among patients with acute respiratory failure suspected pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Urinary antigen tests have been used for the rapid identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae infection in patients with pneumonia, thereby leading to earlier targeted therapy than when using conventional diagnostic culture methods. This study aimed to update the knowledge on the diagnostic accuracy of urinary antigen tests for S. pneumoniae among patients with acute respiratory failure suspected of pneumonia based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search was performed using MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies published up to 3 June 2020. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies (in English) that reported on the diagnostic performance of urinary antigen tests versus culture or smear diagnostic methods in adult patients with clinically diagnosed pneumonia were selected and analysed. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and a bivariate random effects model was applied to perform a meta-analysis of the selected studies. RESULTS: A total of 2179 studies were screened, of which 30 met the eligibility criteria for quality assessment and meta-analysis. Overall, data from 12 366 patients, including 1548 patients (12.5%) with the target condition and suspected pneumococcal pneumonia, were included in the analysis. The overall quality of the included studies was determined to be serious. The calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity were of 0.66 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.69) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.93), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The urinary antigen test is useful for achieving a definitive diagnosis of S. pneumoniae infection in patients with pneumonia.

Predictive value of computed tomography for short-term mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review.

The best available evidence and the predictive value of computed tomography (CT) findings for prognosis in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are unknown. We systematically searched three electronic databases (MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov). A total of 410 patients from six observational studies were included in this systematic review. Of these, 143 patients (34.9%) died due to ARDS in short-term. As for CT grade, the CTs used ranged from 4- to 320-row. The index test included diffuse attenuations in one study, affected lung in one study, well-aerated lung region/predicted total lung capacity in one study, CT score in one study and high-resolution CT score in two studies. Considering the CT findings, pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 62% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30-88%), 76% (95% CI 57-89%), 2.58 (95% CI 2.05-2.73), 0.50 (95% CI 0.21-0.79), and 5.16 (95% CI 2.59-3.46), respectively. This systematic review revealed that there were major differences in the definitions of CT findings, and that the integration of CT findings might not be adequate for predicting short-term mortality in ARDS. Standardisation of CT findings and accumulation of further studies by CT with unified standards are warranted.

Safety and harms of bronchoalveolar lavage for acute respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This review aimed to investigate whether bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is safe in patients with severe acute respiratory failure (ARF). METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and other databases up to June 2, 2021 for studies that examined BAL for severe ARF. We included all cohort studies and randomized or non-randomized trials, while we excluded case-control studies, case reports, and case series. We evaluated the quality of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: We included 17 studies (1085 patients) in the meta-analysis. The integrated frequency of death was 0.000% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.000-0.045%, I2 = 0.0%). The pooled risk of severe complications of respiratory system, cardiovascular system, and major bleeding was 1.32% (95% CI: 0.000-4.41%, I2 = 84.8%), 0.040% (95% CI: 0.000-0.71%, I2 = 9.3%), and 0.000% (95% CI: 0.000-0.27%, I2 = 0.0%), respectively. In the subgroup analysis with mechanical ventilation during BAL, there were few severe complications of the respiratory system (3/717 patients in 13 studies) and almost no heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that severe complications of BAL for severe ARF are probably rare, particularly in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. After considering the risks and benefits, it would be worthwhile to consider performing BAL in patients with severe ARF of unknown etiology to pursue its cause. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000040600).