The Involvement of Lumican in Human Ovulatory Processes.

Based on a previous global transcriptome sequencing project, we hypothesized that Lumican (LUM) might play a role in ovulatory processes. We sought to determine LUM gene expression under various conditions in human preovulatory follicles. The in vitro expression of LUM mRNA in mural (MGCs) and cumulus (CGCs) granulosa cells was characterized using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Immunohistochemical staining was used to identify human LUM expression in follicles at different developmental stages. Cell signaling studies were performed by treating human MGCs with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and both, different stimulators and inhibitors to determine their effect on LUM expression by using qRT-PCR. Cell confluence studies were carried out to study the correlation between LUM expression and follicle cell proliferation. Follicular MGCs and CGCs of women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures due to endometriosis were analyzed for differences in LUM expression patterns by qRT-PCR. LUM mRNA expression was significantly higher in MGCs as compared to CGCs. In CGCs, LUM mRNA was higher in mature metaphase II (MII) oocytes than in germinal vesicle (GV) and metaphase I (MI) oocytes. LUM expression was significantly upregulated in response to hCG in cultured MGCs. Immunohistochemistry of human ovaries revealed LUM was mostly present in MGCs of large preovulatory and postovulatory follicles and absent from primordial follicles. Using pharmacological activators and inhibitors, we demonstrated that LUM induction by luteinizing hormone (LH)/hCG is carried through the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) pathway. LUM expression was induced in high-density cell cultures in a confluence-dependent manner. MGCs from follicles of subjects with endometriosis exhibited reduced mRNA transcription levels compared to control subjects. Our study confirms that LUM is a newly discovered ovulatory gene. LUM might play an important role during the preovulatory period up until ovulation as well as in endometriosis infertility. A better understanding of LUM's role might provide potential new treatment paradigms for some types of female infertility.

Day 5 vitrified blastocyst transfer versus day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfer in oocyte donation program.

The superiority of day 5 blastocysts compared to day 6 blastocysts in fresh cycle transfers was previously demonstrated and attributed mainly to endometrial asynchrony. Data from frozen blastocysts transfers showed conflicting results, possibly due to heterogeneous patient population and embryo quality. The aim of this study was to compare clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) between transfers of vitrified day 5 blastocysts and day 6 blastocysts in oocyte donation, blastocyst-only cycles. In a retrospective, multi-center study, with a single oocyte donation program, a total of 1840 frozen embryo transfers (FET's) were analyzed, including 1180 day 5 blastocysts and 660 day 6 blastocysts transfers. Day 5 blastocyst transfers had better embryonic development and significantly higher CPRs (34.24% vs. 20.15%, P < 0.0001), higher LBRs (26.89% vs. 14.77%, P < 0.0001), less cycles to LBR (1.83 ± 0.08 vs. 2.39 ± 0.18, P = 0.003) and shorter time to LBRs (76.32 ± 8.7 vs. 123.24 ± 19.1 days, P = 0.01), compared to day 6 transfers, respectively. A multivariate stepwise logistic regression indicated, that day 5 transfer was an independent factor for CPRs (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.43-2.54, P < 0.001) and LBRs (OR 2.26; 95% CI 1.19-4.28, P = 0.01), regardless of embryo quality, compared to day 6. In conclusion, day 5 blastocysts in oocyte donation program have significantly higher CPRs and LBRs, and present shorter time to delivery, compared to day 6 blastocysts, regardless of embryo quality.