RESUMO
PURPOSE: To simulate the advantages of anatomical resection, a new strategy of anatomical thermal ablation was proposed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of anatomical thermal ablation (ATA) to treat subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma by comparing it with anatomical resection (AR) and non-anatomical resection (NAR). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled hepatocellular carcinoma patients with subcapsular tumor diameter ≤ 50 mm treated by ATA or surgical resection at our center from October 2015 to December 2018. ATA features ablation of the Glisson capsule, ablation of the liver parenchyma between the tumor and hepatic veins or inferior vena cava and then puncture from the surrounding part to the central part of the tumor. Outcome parameters were compared. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were grouped into ATA group, 95 patients into AR group and 41 patients into NAR group. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year local recurrence rates were 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% for ATA group, 0.0%, 1.4%, 1.4% for the AR group and 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% for the NAR group, respectively (P = 0.449). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year progression-free survival rates were 90.6%, 80.9%, and 74.6% for ATA group, 91.5%, 80.2%, and 80.2% for the AR group and 82.9%, 73.8%, and 73.8% for the NAR group, respectively (P = 0.608). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 100.0%, 95.2%, and 95.2% for the ATA group, 96.8%, 95.6%, and 95.6% for the AR group and 97.6%, 95.0%, and 95.0% for the NAR group, respectively (P = 0.970). No difference was found in major complication rate among these groups (P = 0.091). CONCLUSION: For subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma, ATA could be an alternative to surgical resection with its comparable treatment effect and safety.