RESUMO
Real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) are increasingly used to support regulatory decision making, but regulatory agencies and stakeholders may apply different definitions for RWD and use different criteria to determine when analysis of such data are considered RWE in decisions on drug approvals. To explore this issue, we reviewed two prominent publications that operationalized the definitions of RWD and RWE when describing the use of RWE in drug approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Both publications considered noninterventional (observational) studies, RWD as a comparator arm for a single-arm trial, product-related literature reviews, and RWD to support clinical trial implementation (e.g., to identify potential participants) as generating RWE. In contrast, inconsistencies were identified regarding types of data sources and study designs that were considered as not generating RWE. For example, a lack of agreement existed regarding whether RWE is generated when RWD describe therapeutic contexts or are used in phase I/II interventional trials, open-label extension studies, or pharmacovigilance activities. These discrepancies highlight opportunities to develop a consistent understanding of the role of RWE in regulatory decision making for drug approvals among regulatory agencies and stakeholders.
Assuntos
Aprovação de Drogas , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estados Unidos , Humanos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMO
While rods in the mammalian retina regenerate rhodopsin through a well-characterized pathway in cells of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), cone visual pigments are thought to regenerate in part through an additional pathway in Müller cells of the neural retina. The proteins comprising this intrinsic retinal visual cycle are unknown. Here, we show that RGR opsin and retinol dehydrogenase-10 (Rdh10) convert all-trans-retinol to 11-cis-retinol during exposure to visible light. Isolated retinas from Rgr+/+ and Rgr-/- mice were exposed to continuous light, and cone photoresponses were recorded. Cones in Rgr-/- retinas lost sensitivity at a faster rate than cones in Rgr+/+ retinas. A similar effect was seen in Rgr+/+ retinas following treatment with the glial cell toxin, α-aminoadipic acid. These results show that RGR opsin is a critical component of the Müller cell visual cycle and that regeneration of cone visual pigment can be driven by light.