Different effects between the current capability of and changes in self-management strategies on improving health behavior and psychological health after 6 months: evidence from a prospective cohort study of patients with cancer.

PURPOSE: We aimed to examine different effects of the current capability of and changes in self-management strategies on improving health behavior and psychological health (satisfaction of life, depression, and anxiety) after 6 months in cancer patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted, including 540 cancer patients. We measured cancer patients' self-management strategies' capability with Smart Management Strategies for Health (SMASH) Assessment Tool (SAT) baseline scores and changes with SMASH change scores based on a clinically meaningful 10% change of the scores. We conducted adjusted multivariate multiple logistic regression analyses using the stepwise selection method between SMASH baseline and health behavior, satisfaction with life (SWL), depression, and anxiety and between SMASH changes and health behavior, SWL, depression, and anxiety. RESULTS: 256 cancer patients completed both the first and second surveys. While various SMASH capabilities positively affected each health behavior, SWL, depression, and anxiety, the positive-reframing strategy at baseline only affected all health behavior, SWL, and depression. However, based on SMASH changes, using the positive-reframing strategy a lot for 6 months adversely affected some physical health behaviors' practice (balanced diet and stop smoking and drinking). Changes in the life value pursuing strategy only positively affected HB (proactive living) and anxiety. CONCLUSION: SMASH baseline and change scores were generally associated with practicing cancer patients' health behaviors, lower depression, and anxiety. However, it is necessary to consider that excessively using the positive-reframing strategy would interfere with practicing a balanced diet and stopping smoking and drinking behaviors.

Self-Management Strategy Clustering, Quality of Life, and Health Status in Cancer Patients Considering Cancer Stages.

BACKGROUND: In the cancer-care continuum, self-management can help cancer patients regardless of their treatment plan or cancer stage. However, research examining self-management strategy clusters considering cancer stages is lacking. Thus, we examined self-management strategy clusters considering cancer stages and the effects of self-management strategy clusters on quality of life (QoL) and overall health status. METHOD: A total of 256 patients who completed both baseline and second surveys for a 6-month period ultimately participated in this prospective cohort study. To identify the interrelationship between self-management strategies measured by the Smart management strategies for health assessment tool (SAT), we conducted cluster analysis using a principal component analysis in varimax rotation and the k-mean clustering method. We also performed multivariate-adjusted analyses in QoL and overall health status comparisons by dividing the cancer stage into early (I, II) and advanced (III, IV). RESULTS: All patients experienced two domains of self-management strategies concurrently. However, self-management strategy clusters differed by cancer stage, and the effect of self-management strategy clusters on quality of life and overall health status also differed. Self-management strategy clusters effectively improved the quality of life and overall health status of the entire cohort of patients, even in patients with advanced-stage cancer. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the pattern of using self-management strategies might differ by cancer stage. The strategy cluster positively affected QoL and overall health status in cancer patients. Identifying the self-management clusters of cancer patients with different cancer stages may have clinical implications for supporting their health management.

Stronger association of perceived health with socio-economic inequality during COVID-19 pandemic than pre-pandemic era.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has changed peoples' routine of daily living and posed major risks to global health and economy. Few studies have examined differential impacts of economic factors on health during pandemic compared to pre-pandemic. We aimed to compare the strength of associations between perceived health and socioeconomic position (household income, educational attainment, and employment) estimated before and during the pandemic. METHODS: Two waves of nationwide survey [on 2018(T1;n = 1200) and 2021(T2;n = 1000)] were done for 2200 community adults. A balanced distribution of confounders (demographics and socioeconomic position) were achieved across the T2 and T1 by use of the inverse probability of treatment weighting. Distributions of perceived health [= (excellent or very good)/(bad, fair, or good)] for physical-mental-social-spiritual subdomains were compared between T1 and T2. Odds of bad/fair/good health for demographics and socioeconomic position were obtained by univariate logistic regression. Adjusted odds (aOR) of bad/fair/good health in lower household income(< 3000 U.S. dollars/month) were retrieved using the multiple hierarchical logistic regression models of T1 and T2. RESULTS: Perceived health of excellent/very good at T2 was higher than T1 for physical(T1 = 36.05%, T2 = 39.13%; P = 0.04), but were lower for mental(T1 = 38.71%, T2 = 35.17%; P = 0.01) and social(T1 = 42.48%, T2 = 35.17%; P < 0.001) subdomains. Odds of bad/fair/good health were significantly increased at T2 than T1 for household income (physical-mental-social; all Ps < 0.001) and educational attainment (social; P = 0.04) but not for employment (all Ps > 0.05). AORs of bad/fair/good health in lower household income were stronger in T2 than T1, for mental [aOR (95% CI) = 2.15(1.68-2.77) in T2, 1.33(1.06-1.68) in T1; aOR difference = 0.82(P < 0.001)], physical [aOR (95% CI) = 2.64(2.05-3.41) in T2, 1.50(1.18-1.90) in T1; aOR difference = 1.14(P < 0.001)] and social [aOR (95% CI) = 2.15(1.68-2.77) in T2, 1.33(1.06-1.68) in T1; aOR difference = 0.35(P = 0.049)] subdomains. CONCLUSIONS: Risks of perceived health worsening for mental and social subdomains in people with lower monthly household income or lower educational attainment became stronger during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to pre-pandemic era. In consideration of the prolonged pandemic as of mid-2022, policies aiming not only to sustain the monthly household income and compulsory education but also to actively enhance the perceived mental-social health status have to be executed and maintained.

Importance of worthwhile life and social health as predictors of suicide ideation among cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: We identify the most associative factors among existential well-being, health-related quality of life, and health behaviors' sub-factors for cancer patients' suicidal ideation (SI) to develop practical intervention tools for general cancer patients in South Korea. PARTICIPANTS: We surveyed 766 cancer patients from two hospitals in South Korea. The eligibility criteria were as follows: 18 years of age or older, diagnosed with cancer, aware of the stage, and capable of understanding the purpose of the study. METHODS: We performed a multidimensional multivariate analysis to find the factors that are most associated with SI for cancer patients. RESULTS: The results showed that life worthwhile (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 3.946; 95% CI, 1.64-9.48), social functioning (aOR, 2.817; 95% CI, 1.19-6.65), and living with loved ones (aOR, 0.353; 95% CI, 0.15-0.84) were the most predictive factors for SI. CONCLUSION: To prevent SI in cancer patients, it might be necessary to help them feel that their lives are worthwhile while helping them maintain a high degree of social health. IMPLICATIONS FOR PSYCHOSOCIAL PROVIDERS OR POLICY: It is important to help cancer patients value their life and lead the high-quality social life to reduce their SI.

Efficacy of Health Coaching and an Electronic Health Management Program: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: For chronic disease management, self-management strategies are essential to achieve sustained improvement. OBJECTIVE: Our study evaluated the efficacy of health coaching and a self-management strategy-based electronic program on self-management strategies for patients with osteoporosis, chronic respiratory disease, or arthritis. DESIGN: Three-arm randomized controlled trial, pilot study PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four participants INTERVENTIONS: The first intervention group (n = 53) received a self-management strategy-based electronic program and 12 weeks of health coaching (20 sessions). The second intervention group received the information and communications technology (ICT) program; the control group received usual care and an educational booklet about self-management of chronic diseases. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the difference in the change of the mean of self-management strategy scores. Secondary outcomes included depression (PHQ-9), physical activity (Godin Leisure Exercise Questionnaire), and health habit maintenance (transtheoretical model) after 12 weeks in the program. KEY RESULTS: The combination of health coaching and ICT was superior to control group (change 18.5 vs. - 2.6, adjusted difference = 24.5, p < 0.001); however, the ICT alone group was not superior to the control group (change 8.0 vs. - 2.6, adjusted difference = 8.0, p = 0.156). As a result of evaluating the change in the percentage of people with positive stage changes in the transtheoretical model of health habits, regular exercise (p = 0.008), a balanced diet (p = 0.005), helping others (p = 0.001), and living with loved ones (p = 0.038) showed significant differences. There was no significant difference in the changes in percentage of patients with depressive symptoms in comparison with control group; however, there was in comparison with control group among groups (p = 0.033). Compared to the control group, the proportion of patients who achieved an exercise amount of 12.5 MET or higher was significantly higher (p = 0.028) in the health coaching and ICT group. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ICT + health coaching led to improvement in self-management as well as in increasing exercise, and several healthy behaviors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03294057.

Impact of family caregivers' awareness of the prognosis on their quality of life/depression and those of patients with advanced cancer: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: A caregiver's prognostic awareness can affect clinical decisions for the patient. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of family caregivers' prognostic awareness on the quality of life (QOL) and emotional state of both patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted from December of 2016 to January of 2018. A total of 159 patients with advanced cancer and an equal number of caregivers participated. The investigation tools used include the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C15-Palliative, the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and evaluation was performed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Covariance analysis with a general linear modeling was used to compare changes in quality of life scores according to the caregivers' awareness of the prognosis. RESULTS: Mean patient overall QOL score increased in the group of caregivers who were aware of prognosis and decreased in the caregivers who were not aware of the prognosis (p = 0.018). The changes over time in the patients' QOL scores associated with symptoms improved with caregiver awareness (pain, p = 0.017; dyspnea, p = 0.048; appetite loss, p = 0.045). The percentage of depressed patients was smaller after 3 months in the group with caregivers aware of the prognosis (baseline to 3 months p = 0.028). Caregivers who did not understand their patients' prognosis exhibited better existential well-being (p = 0.036), and the incidence of depression was lower in this group at 3 months (p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: Caregivers' prognostic awareness may improve the quality of life and mood in patients with advanced cancer; however, this awareness may harm the quality of life and mood of the caregivers. These results may aid in developing in-depth interventions regarding prognosis for both patients and their caregivers.

Effect of Changes in Patient's Self-management Strategies on Clinical Outcomes: Evidence from a Cohort Study of Patients with Diabetes, Hypertension, and Hyperlipidemia.

BACKGROUND: Self-management has become the dominant care model for chronic disease management. This study aimed to investigate the effect of changes in self-management strategies on the clinical outcomes of chronic diseases. METHODS: Two hundred ninety-seven patients with one or more chronic disease (diabetes, dyslipidemia, or hypertension) were registered and followed in this prospective cohort study. We compared differences in the changes in clinical outcomes from baseline to 6 months according to the improvement of self-management strategies by analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Diabetic patients with improved self-management strategies showed a significantly greater change in HbA1c levels compared to patients without improvement of self-management strategies (group difference in HbA1c = 0.51%). In hypertensive patients, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) showed a significant decline in the patients with improved self-management strategies (group difference in systolic BP = 6.2 mmHg and in diastolic BP = 5.5 mmHg). Clinical outcomes improved significantly when self-management strategies improved in people with a poor self-management strategy at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that improvements in self-management strategies are associated with an improvement in clinical outcomes among patients with chronic diseases, especially for those with an initially poor self-management strategy.

The Association of the Health Management Strategy with Subjective Health and Well-being Outcomes in General Population.

BACKGROUND: People face many obstacles to overcoming crisis in life and proactively manage life crises. This study aimed to evaluate the association of self-management strategy with subjective health and well-being for the general South Korean population. METHODS: We recruited 1,200 respondents using an equal-probability sampling method from March to May 2018. A questionnaire including life version of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool (SAT-Life), the five Health Status Questionnaire, Short Form-12, McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQOL), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) was administered to participants. RESULTS: In multiple stepwise logistic regression model adjusted with basic demographic variables (age, sex, region, education and monthly income level), core strategy was independently associated with physical, mental, social, spiritual, and general health status (adjusted odds ratios [aORs], 1.97-2.92). Preparation strategy was independently associated with physical, mental, spiritual, and general health status (aORs, 2.36-3.31). Implementation strategy was independently associated with physical, social, spiritual, and general health status (aORs, 2.22-2.42). Core strategy and implementation strategy were independently associated with higher Physical Component Score (aORs, 2.21-2.29) and higher Mental Component Score (aORs, 1.68-1.76). Core strategy and preparation strategy were independently associated with lower PHQ-9 (aORs, 2.63-3.74). Pearson's correlation coefficients between scores on SAT-Life and the other factors (MQOL social support, MQOL spiritual well-being, and SWLS) explain having significant correlations ranging from 0.41-0.43. CONCLUSION: Self-management strategies of health might be encouraged to manage subjective health and well-being outcomes.

Self-management strategies and comorbidities in chronic disease patients: associations with quality of life and depression.

Self-management strategies are essential for improving prognosis in chronic illnesses. This study aimed to investigate the association between comorbidity and self-management strategies. A total of 700 patients with one or more chronic diseases including diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, osteoporosis, chronic lung disease, chronic kidney disease and arthritis were enrolled. A questionnaire including the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool Short Form (SAT), the Short Form-12, the McGill Quality of Life questionnaire, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was administered to participants. The trend of each SAT according to number of comorbidities was evaluated, and the difference in quality of life and depression according to self-management strategies was examined in the model classified by the number of diseases. Self-management strategy scores tended to decrease as the number of comorbidities increased from one to four (p-value: 0.001 to 0.008). Regardless of the number of comorbidities, the MQOL score was higher in the good self-management strategy group (p: <0.001 to 0.016). The prevalence of mild depression was higher in patients with low self-management strategy, but the differences were not significant. Based on these findings, self-management strategies should be evaluated multidimensionally, and patients should be encouraged to develop effective self-management strategies to manage multiple chronic diseases.

Efficacy of health coaching and a web-based program on physical activity, weight, and distress management among cancer survivors: A multi-centered randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of health coaching and a web-based program on survivor physical activity (PA), weight, and distress management among stomach, colon, lung and breast cancer patients. METHODS: This randomised, controlled, 1-year trial conducted in five hospitals recruited cancer survivors within 2 months of completing primary cancer treatment who had not met ≥1 of these behavioural goals: (i) conducting moderate PA for at least 150 minutes/week or strenuous exercise for over 75 minutes per week or, in the case of lung cancer patients, low or moderate intensity exercise for over 12.5 MET per week, (ii) maintaining normal weight, and (iii) attaining a score >72 in the Post Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI). Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the control group, a web-only group, or a health coaching + web group. The primary endpoint was based on a composite of PA, weight, and PTGI score at 12 months. RESULTS: Patients in the health coaching + web group (difference = 6.6%, P = .010) and the web-only group (difference = 5.9%, P = .031) had greater overall improvements across the three-outcome composite than the control group. The health coaching + web group had greater overall improvement in PTGI (difference = 12.6%; P < .001) than the control group, but not in PA and weight. CONCLUSION: The web-based program, with or without health coaching, may improve health behaviours including PA, weight, and distress management among cancer survivors within 2 months of completing primary cancer treatment. The web-based program with health coaching was mainly effective for reducing psychological distress.

Association of illness understanding with advance care planning and end-of-life care preferences for advanced cancer patients and their family members.

PURPOSE: Little has been determined regarding the association between patients' and families' illness understanding and preferences for medical care. We aimed to evaluate the association of illness understanding with advance care planning (ACP) and preferences for end-of-life care, such as aggressive care, early palliative care (EPC), and hospice care, among advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers. METHODS: Patients were recruited for a prospective cohort study at outpatient and inpatient facilities in nine university hospitals in Korea (n = 150), and their primary family caregivers were also asked to participate (n = 101). Data on ACP and end-of-life care preferences were collected only at baseline in the cohort study with optional questions and were used to analyze these study results. RESULTS: Patients with illness understanding were more likely to have documented physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLSTs) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] of 4.94) and to have discussed ACP with their families (aOR 2.15) than those who did not. Being expected to live for several months, they were unlikely to prefer active treatment. Caregivers understanding patients' illness were more likely to write advance directives (ADs) and to discuss ACP; furthermore, they had already discussed ACP with family members. They did not prefer active treatment or life-sustaining treatments when their family members were expected to die within a few weeks. There was no significant association between illness understanding and preferences for EPC. CONCLUSION: Accurately recognizing an incurable disease is associated with preferences for more ACP and less aggressive care but not with preferences for EPC or hospice care among both advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers.

Depression and suicidal ideation: association of physical, mental, social, and spiritual health status.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine if multidimensional (physical, mental, social, spiritual) health status could predict the presence of depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation in the general population. METHODS: We administered a population-based, cross-sectional survey to 1200 participants from the general Korean population. The survey included the 5 Health Status Questionnaire (5HSQ) for self-rated health status, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depression, and a question from the PHQ-9 for suicidal ideation. Multiple logistic regression was performed to estimate the association of significant socio-demographic factors and self-rated health status with depression and suicidal ideation. RESULTS: Physical health status was associated with depression in both men and women (men: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.44-9.00; women: aOR, 2.05; 95% CI 1.13-3.72) while spiritual health status only affected men (aOR, 5.50; 95% CI 2.59-11.65) and mental health status only women (aOR, 3.92; 95% CI 2.03-7.54). Social health status was associated with suicidal ideation in men (aOR, 4.87; 95% CI 2.74-19.99) while mental health status was associated with suicidal ideation in women (aOR, 4.31; 95% CI 1.90-9.76). CONCLUSION: Physical, mental, social, and spiritual self-rated health statuses were all found to be associated with an individual's predisposition to depression and suicidal ideation with notable differences between men and women.

Efficacy of an Electronic Health Management Program for Patients With Cardiovascular Risk: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: In addition to medication, health behavior management is crucial in patients with multiple risks of cardiovascular mortality. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the efficacy of a 3-month Smart Management Strategy for Health-based electronic program (Smart Healthing). METHODS: A 2-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of Smart Healthing in 106 patients with at least one indicator of poor disease control and who had hypertension, diabetes, or hypercholesterolemia. The intervention group (n=53) took part in the electronic program, which was available in the form of a mobile app and a Web-based PC application. The program covered 4 areas: self-assessment, self-planning, self-learning, and self-monitoring by automatic feedback. The control group (n=53) received basic educational material concerning disease control. The primary outcome was the percentage of participants who achieved their clinical indicator goal after 12 weeks into the program: glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <7.0%, systolic blood pressure (SBP) <140 mmHg, or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <130 mg/dL. RESULTS: The intervention group showed a significantly higher success rate (in comparison with the control group) for achieving each of 3 clinical indicators at the targeted goal levels (P<.05). Only the patients with hypertension showed a significant improvement in SBP from the baseline as compared with the control group (72.7% vs 35.7%; P<.05). There was a significant reduction in HbA1c in the intervention group compared with the control group (difference=0.54%; P≤.05). In the intervention group, 20% of patients with diabetes exhibited a ≥1% decrease in HbA1c (vs 0% among controls; P≤.05). CONCLUSIONS: A short-term self-management strategy-based electronic program intervention may improve clinical outcomes among patients with cardiovascular risks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03294044; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03294044.

The Attitudes of Physicians and the General Public toward Prognostic Disclosure of Different Serious Illnesses: a Korean Nationwide Study.

BACKGROUND: Although international guidelines recommend palliative care approaches for many serious illnesses, the palliative needs of patients with serious illnesses other than cancer are often unmet, mainly due to insufficient prognosis-related discussion. We investigated physicians' and the general public's respective attitudes toward prognostic disclosure for several serious illnesses. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 928 physicians, sourced from 12 hospitals and the Korean Medical Association, and 1,005 members of the general public, sourced from all 17 administrative divisions in Korea. RESULTS: For most illnesses, most physicians (adjusted proportions - end-organ failure, 99.0%; incurable genetic or neurologic disease, 98.5%; acquired immune deficiency syndrome [AIDS], 98.4%; stroke or Parkinson's disease, 96.0%; and dementia, 89.6%) and members of the general public (end-organ failure, 92.0%; incurable genetic or neurologic disease, 92.5%; AIDS, 91.5%; stroke or Parkinson's disease, 92.1%; and dementia, 86.9%) wanted to be informed if they had a terminal prognosis. For physicians and the general public, the primary factor to consider when disclosing terminal status was "the patient's right to know his/her condition" (31.0%). Yet, the general public was less likely to prefer prognostic disclosure than physicians. Particularly, when their family members were patients, more than 10% of the general public did not want patients to be informed of their terminal prognosis. For the general public, the main reason for not disclosing prognosis was "psychological burden such as anxiety and depression" (35.8%), while for the physicians it was "disclosure would have no beneficial effect" (42.4%). CONCLUSION: Most Physicians and the general public agreed that disclosure of a terminal prognosis respects patient autonomy for several serious illnesses. The low response rate of physicians might limit the generalizability of the results.

Erratum: Correction of the Text in the Article "Table": Discordance between Physician and the General Public Perceptions of Prognostic Disclosure to Children with Serious Illness: a Korean Nationwide Study.

This corrects the article on e327 in vol. 33, PMID: 30505258.

Comparison of quality of life and health behaviors in survivors of acute leukemia and the general population.

We aimed to compare the health-related quality of life and health behaviors of acute leukemia (AL) survivors with that of the general population from two cohorts. AL survivors (n = 149) completed a set of questionnaires to evaluate quality of life, mental status, and health behaviors. AL survivors had more physical and mental difficulties (problems with usual activities, 15% vs. 5%, p < 0.001; anxiety or depression, 24% vs. 9%, p < 0.001; pain, 35% vs. 20%, p = 0.002) and more financial difficulties (p < 0.001) than the general population. Survivors who received stem cell transplantation (SCT) had significantly worse problems with role functioning, fatigue, pain, dyspnea, and insomnia, and had higher depression scores than chemotherapy group (p = 0.024). In terms of health behaviors, AL survivors had lower rates of smoking and drinking and higher influenza vaccination rates than the general population. However, only 17% of survivors had been recommended to receive screening for other cancers from health-care providers, and 67% thought their risk for other cancers was equal or lower than that of the general population. Cancer screening rates were even lower in the SCT group than in the chemotherapy group (p = 0.041). Our study indicates that clinicians should establish more appropriate survivorship care plans.

Correction to: Priorities of a "good death" according to cancer patients, their family caregivers, physicians, and the general population: a nationwide survey.

While recently extending that research, however, we discovered that 236 members of the general population were mistakenly duplicated by the investigating agency (Word Research) and 1241 were reported rather than 1005. Here, we present corrections and discuss the relevant data.

Regional Differences in Colorectal Cancer Mortality Between 2000 and 2013 in Republic of Korea.

OBJECTIVE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most common site for cancer death in the Republic of Korea. The aim of this study was to describe the trends of colorectal cancer mortality by region. METHODS: CRC mortality trends in Republic of Korea were described by region using a Joinpoint regression model in both sexes. The annual percent changes (APCs) were calculated for each segment. Visualization of the changes in mortality rate of colorectal cancer death rates by 16 geographic areas in both sexes between 2000-2004 and 2009-2013 were also conducted. RESULTS: CRC mortality rates of men showed decreasing trend after increase in Daegu, Gyeongsangnam-do, and Chungcheongbuk-do between 2000 and 2013 based on the joinpoint model, while Gwangju, Jeollabuk-do, Jeollanam-do, and Gyeongsangbuk-do showed increase in CRC mortality during the same period. For women, CRC mortality of Seoul, Incheon, Daejeon, and Gyeongsangnam-do started to decrease in 2005, 2003, 2007, and 2006, respectively. The mortality rate for CRC in the eastern regions, which had relatively low rates of CRC among men in 2000 through 2004, reached a level similar to that in the northwestern regions of 2009 through 2013, while the highest CRC mortality rates in women was observed in Chungcheongbuk-do. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction in CRC mortality varied across 16 metropolitan cities and provinces in men, and the visualization pattern showed that the east side of South Korea had the least progress in mortality reduction.

Correction to: The impact of caregiver's role preference on decisional conflicts and psychiatric distresses in decision making to help caregiver's disclosure of terminal disease status.

In the original publication of the article, the incorrect grant number HC13C1391 was published in the acknowledgement section. The correct grant number is HC15C1391.

Public support for health taxes and media regulation of harmful products in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: Public health policy is inevitably associated with either a strong presence or lack of public support. We investigated factors associated with both the public support of and opposition to health taxes and the media regulation regarding advertising harmful products in Korea. METHODS: We interviewed 1200 respondents that were recruited using an equal-probability sampling method in accordance with the 2016 Korean census. Our investigation examined the extent of support and opposition towards health taxes and the media regulation of advertising that targets the consumption of tobacco, alcohol, and unhealthy foods according to socioeconomic characteristics, health habits, body mass index (BMI), and exposure to the advertising of harmful products. The study was conducted using a univariate and stepwise multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: The majority (71.8%) of the respondents were supportive of imposing health taxes in general. Despite a high prevalence of tobacco and alcohol consumption among the respondents, they strongly supported media regulation of tobacco (72.3%), alcohol (63.7%), and eating broadcasts (51.9%) food advertising (44.0%). Those that were non-smokers, earned a high-income, were married, or had a child were likely to support at least one kind of regulation regarding alcohol and smoking related advertising. An exposure to excessive advertising of unhealthy products was associated with increase of respondents supporting the media regulation. Those who regarded the media as being influential seemed to be more supportive of health taxes or media regulation. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated strong public support among the respondents for health taxes and the media regulation regarding the advertising of unhealthy products. Based on our data, we are optimistic that countries whose population show a high rate of tobacco, alcohol or unhealthy food consumption may launch public policy in addressing these factors.