Colonic replacement of the esophagus: towards standardization of the technique.

Since we have started colonic replacement of the esophagus in children, several successive modifications have led to evolution of the surgical technique aiming to decrease complications and achieve the best functional outcome. Currently, our surgical group has reached a single standardized technique that has been applied to all cases included in this report. A colonic flap (including the transverse colon) is prepared based on the left colic vessels. The proximal end of the colonic flap is transferred upwards passing at first behind the stomach and then anteriorly through the lesser omentum to traverse the thoracic cavity via a previously prepared retrosternal tunnel. The proximal end of the colonic flap is anastomosed to the proximal esophagus in the neck (end to end anastomosis). Most specifically, the distal end of the colonic flap is anastomosed to the posterior wall of the body of the stomach in order to prevent regurgitation of gastric contents into the colonic flap. The retro-sternal colon bypass is among the successful options to replace the esophagus in children. Adding a posterior cologastric anastomosis to the procedure greatly prevents gastric regurgitation that can be responsible for short- and long-term complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: This is a case series with no comparison group (level IV evidence).

Anatomical alterations following the 'PSARP' procedure: Correlating MRI findings with continence scores.

PURPOSE: To identify anatomical aberrations following PSARP procedure by using MRI, while correlating MRI findings to clinical outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2014 and December 2017, we conducted our study on male patients with rectourethral fistula who underwent PSARP. Postoperative pelvic MRI studies were performed and correlated to their clinical continence scores (Rintala, and Krickenbeck classification). RESULTS: The study included 31 patients. Fourteen patients were retrieved from the hospital records and accepted to participate in the study; while the remaining 17 were collected from the fecal incontinence clinic. Their age ranged from 40 to 156 months (mean 83) We divided patients in the study into two groups according to their Rintala continence scores: (Group A) 15 patients with low scores (10 or less); and (Group B) 16 patients with higher scores (more than 10). We detected wider pelvic hiatus (hiatus/PC ratio) and more obtuse anorectal angle in group A than B. CONCLUSION: Several anatomical alterations can be detected by MRI following the PSARP procedure that include abnormalities in the striated muscle sphincter (attenuation/deficiency), deviated neorectum, and presence of excessive perirectal fat. A widened pelvic hiatus and/or obtuse anorectal angle may correlate with poor fecal continence in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: This is a case control study (level III evidence).

Posterior Cologastric Anastomosis: An Effective Antireflux Mechanism in Colonic Replacement of the Esophagus.

BACKGROUND: The colon may be used to replace a portion of the esophagus in pediatric patients, but prevention of gastrocolic reflux is a concern. We report our experience with the retrosternal colon bypass, and the effect of combining the procedure with a posterior cologastric anastomosis on prevention of gastrocolic reflux. METHODS: The study included 35 consecutive pediatric patients who underwent retrosternal colon bypass during the period of 2010 through 2014. In standard practice, the cologastric anastomosis is performed at the anterior gastric wall. Lately, we modified our technique by shifting the cologastric anastomosis to the back of the stomach away from the anterior adhesions around the gastrostomy. In follow-up, a gastrogram was performed to check for gastrocolic reflux. RESULTS: The indication for esophageal replacement was postcorrosive esophageal stricture in 19 patients and long gap esophageal atresia in 16 patients. Their mean ages were 51 and 16 months, respectively. No gastrocolic reflux was detected with the posterior cologastric anastomosis, whereas reflux was always present with the anterior cologastric anastomosis. We had two mortalities and one major morbidity (hematemesis and failure to thrive) that were related to regurgitation of gastric contents into the colonic conduit. The last patient was successfully managed by transferring the cologastric anastomosis from the front to the back of the stomach, with marked symptomatic and radiologic improvement. CONCLUSIONS: After colonic replacement of the esophagus, the gastrocolic reflux represents a functional problem that may lead to serious complications. Combining a posterior cologastric anastomosis with retrosternal colon bypass is an effective way to avoid this problem.

The double urethra: revisiting the surgical classification.

AIM: The aim of this article was to describe our experience with 14 patients with double urethra. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined the patients' records including their clinical presentations, investigations, operative findings, and outcome. In addition to Effmann's classification, we used a newly proposed classification that depends on the orientation of the double urethral channels. RESULTS: During the last 15 years, 18 patients were diagnosed to have double urethra at our pediatric surgical unit. We excluded four patients with 'Y-type' urethral duplication. The remaining 14 patients were divided into either sagittal or collateral duplication. Their age at presentation ranged from the neonatal period to 9 years. The sagittal urethral duplication included 12 male patients. All patients had two urethral channels, one above the other. The dorsal urethral channel was always characterized by poor function and ectopic course. The ventral channel was always the more functioning urethra, with a normal course from the urinary bladder to end either at an orthotopic meatus (subgroup A), or more proximally in a hypospadiac location (subgroup B). The collateral urethral duplication included two patients. Both patients were associated with duplication of the urinary bladder and the external genitalia as a part of caudal duplication syndrome. In this group, both urethrae had comparable function, lying side by side, and each draining a separate urinary bladder. CONCLUSION: The double urethra is a diverse spectrum comprising different pathologies. Our proposed classification system of duplicated urethras is clinically relevant as it guides surgical management and allows prognostication of outcome.