Comparison of Haemonetics Cell Saver 5+ and manual density separation for optimum depletion of red blood cells and preservation of CD34+ cells in major ABO-incompatible bone marrow grafts.

BACKGROUND AIMS: The current approach for preventing hemolysis of red blood cells (RBCs) in major ABO-incompatible bone marrow (BM) grafts after infusion is to deplete RBCs from BM products before transplantation. Traditionally, manual density separation (MDS) using Ficoll-Hypaque (Cytiva Sweden AB, Uppsala, Sweden has been used to accomplish RBC depletion. This process yields good CD34+ cell recovery, but it requires open manipulation and is labor-intensive and time-consuming. We hypothesized that an alternative automated method using Haemonetics Cell Saver 5+ (Haemonetics Corporation, Boston, MA, USA) would offer equivalent RBC depletion and CD34+ cell recovery. Small marrow volumes from pediatric donors can be processed using Cell Saver (CS) without adding the third-party RBCs necessary for other automated methods. METHODS: This retrospective analysis comprised data from 58 allogeneic BM grafts. RBC depletion and CD34+ cell recovery from BM using MDS (35 grafts) were compared with CS (14 grafts). Nine products underwent RBC depletion using CS with Ficoll (CS-F) when RBC volume was less than 125 mL. RESULTS: Linear regression analysis of log transformation of CD34+ cell recovery adjusted for log transformation of both baseline CD34+ cell content and baseline total volume showed no significant difference between MDS and CS (estimated coefficient, -0.121, P = 0.096). All products contained an RBC volume of less than 0.25 mL/kg post-processing. CD34+ cell recovery with CS-F was comparable to MDS and CS and suitable for pediatric recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence that an automated method using Haemonetics Cell Saver 5+ achieves RBC depletion and CD34+ cell recovery comparable to MDS when adjusting for baseline factors.

Outcomes of Pediatric Patients With Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma Treated With Interval Compression.

BACKGROUND: Interval compression (IC), a regimen of alternating vincristine/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide/etoposide every 2 weeks, improves survival for localized Ewing sarcoma (ES), with uncertain effect on metastatic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the charts of pediatric patients with metastatic ES treated with IC at our center between January 2013 and March 2020. We calculated event-free survival and overall survival (OS) and used log-rank tests for univariate comparisons. RESULTS: We identified 34 patients 2.7 to 17.1 years of age (median: 11.6 y). Twenty-six patients (76%) had pulmonary metastases, and 14 (41%) had extrapulmonary metastases. All patients received local control therapy: surgery only (n=7, 21%), radiotherapy only (n=18, 53%), or both (n=9, 26%). The estimated 3-year OS and event-free survival were 62%±9% and 39%±9%, respectively. Patients with pulmonary-only and extrapulmonary metastasis had a 3-year OS of 88%±8% and 27%±13%, respectively ( P =0.0074). Age group (above vs. below 12 y), or primary tumor site did not affect survival, but local control therapy did (surgery only, 83%±15%; combined surgery and radiation, 30%±18%; radiation only, 15%±10%; P =0.048). CONCLUSION: IC yielded similar outcomes for patients with metastatic ES to other reported regimens. We suggest including this approach to other blocks of therapy.

EASIX and m-EASIX Predict CRS and ICANS in Pediatric and AYA Patients post CD19-CAR T cell Therapy.

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune-effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are complications of CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CD19-CAR) T-cell therapy. The Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) and modified EASIX (m-EASIX) scores have been retrospectively proven to be predictive of CRS and ICANS in adult CAR T cell recipients. However, these scores have not been evaluated in pediatric cohorts. We retrospectively report on 76 pediatric, adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) treated with CD19-CAR T cells at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital or John's Hopkins Hospital. Data included patient-, disease-, and treatment characteristics. EASIX and m-EASIX scores were calculated at days -5 pre, 0 and +3 post CAR T cell infusion. CRS and ICANS occurred in 47 and 17 patients, respectively. At all evaluated time points, compared to those with no/mild CRS/ICANS, median EASIX scores were higher for patients who developed severe CRS and any-grade ICANS, and median m-EASIX scores were higher in patients who developed severe CRS and severe ICANS. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that both scores were strong predictors of CRS, especially severe CRS, at all time points. Any grade and severe ICANS were best predicted by both scores at day +3. m-EASIX uniformly outperformed EASIX, except for predicting any grade ICANS. Our results validate the potential utility for EASIX and m-EASIX scores for predicting CAR T-cell related complications for pediatric and AYA patients.