Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 29(4): 2181-2189, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35128596

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act sought to improve access to health care for low-income individuals. This study aimed to assess whether expansion of Medicaid coverage increased rates of post-mastectomy reconstruction (PMR) for patients who had Medicaid or no insurance. METHODS: A retrospective analysis performed through the National Cancer Database examined women who underwent PMR and were uninsured or had Medicaid, private insurance, or Medicare, and whose race/ethnicity, age, and state expansion status were known. Trends in the use of PMR after passage of Medicaid expansion in 2014 were evaluated. RESULTS: In all states and at all time periods, patients with private insurance were about twice as likely to undergo PMR as patients who had Medicaid or no insurance. In 2016, only 28.7 % of patients with Medicaid or no insurance in nonexpansion states underwent PMR (p < 0.001) compared with 38.5 % of patients in expansion states (p < 0.001). Patients in expansion states also have higher levels of education, higher income, and greater likelihood of living in metropolitan areas. Additionally, patients in all states saw an increase in early-stage disease, with a concomitant reduction in late disease, but this change was greater in expansion states than in non-expansion states. CONCLUSIONS: Expansion states have larger proportions of patients undergoing PMR than non-expansion states. This difference stems from significant differences in income, education, comorbidities, race, and location. Large metropolitan areas have the largest number of patients undergoing PMR, whereas rural areas have the least.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Medicaid , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Mastectomia , Medicare , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 28(10): 5663-5667, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34268635

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inter-rater reliability between breast surgical oncologists and reconstructive surgeons using cosmesis scales, and the correlation between their observations and patients' own subjective assessments, is poorly understood. METHODS: Patients undergoing BCS in a prospective trial rated their cosmetic outcome on a Likert scale (poor/fair/good/excellent) at the postoperative and 1-year time points; photographs were also taken. Three breast surgical oncologists (not involved in these cases) and two reconstructive surgeons were asked to independently rate cosmesis using the Harvard/NSABP/RTOG scale. RESULTS: Overall, 55 and 17 patients had photographs and Likert self-evaluations at the postoperative and 1-year time points, respectively. There was poor agreement between surgeon and patient ratings postoperatively [kappas - 0.042 (p = 0.659), 0.069 (p = 0.226), and 0.076 (p = 0.090) for the breast surgical oncologists; and 0.018 (p = 0.689) and 0.112 (p = 0.145) for the reconstructive surgeons], and poor interobserver agreement between surgeons of the same specialty (kappa - 0.087, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.091 to - 0.082, p = 0.223 for breast surgical oncologists; and kappa - 0.150, 95% CI - 0.157 to - 0.144, p = 0.150, for reconstructive surgeons). At 1 year, the interobserver agreement between breast surgical oncologists was better (kappa 0.507, 95% CI 0.501-0.512, p < 0.001); however, there was still poor correlation between the reconstructive surgeons (kappa - 0.040, 95% CI - 0.049 to - 0.031, p = 0.772). Agreement between surgeon and patient ratings remained poor at this time point [kappas - 0.115 (p = 0.477), 0.177 (p = 0.245), and 0.101 (p = 0.475) for breast surgical oncologists; and 0.335 (p = 0.037) and -0.118 (p = 0.221) for reconstructive surgeons]. CONCLUSION: Despite gradation scales for measuring cosmesis after BCS, high levels of agreement between surgeons is lacking and these do not always reflect patients' subjective assessments.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
3.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 28(10): 5610-5616, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34426884

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Invasive apocrine carcinoma is a rare breast cancer that is frequently triple negative. Little is known about the characteristics of its molecular subtypes. We compared the incidence, demographics, and clinicopathologic features of this cancer with non-apocrine carcinomas stratified by molecular subtype. METHODS: Women with invasive apocrine cancer were retrospectively identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Clinicopathologic and demographic features were compared with non-apocrine carcinomas, both overall using data from 2004 to 2017 and stratified by molecular subtypes using data from 2010 to 2017. The life table method was used to determine the 7-year breast cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: Compared with non-apocrine cancers, apocrine cancers presented at a younger age, with larger, higher-grade tumors that were much more likely to be triple negative (50% vs. 11%) or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (28% vs. 15%) and less likely to be luminal (22% vs. 74%); however, the 7-year survival was the same at 85%. The characteristics varied dramatically by molecular type. Compared with non-apocrine triple-negative, apocrine triple-negative patients were less likely to be African American and were much older, with smaller, lower-grade tumors and much better survival (86% vs. 74%). In contrast, compared with luminal non-apocrine, apocrine luminal patients had larger, higher-grade tumors and worse survival (79% vs. 89%). CONCLUSIONS: Invasive apocrine carcinomas have more aggressive features than non-apocrine carcinomas but the breast cancer-specific survival is the same. Half of these apocrine tumors are triple negative but these have more favorable features and much better survival than non-apocrine triple-negative cancers.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 22(3): 473-5, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18367371

RESUMO

Ultrasound-guided thrombin injection (UGTI) has emerged as the preferred treatment modality for pseudoaneurysms occurring as a result of percutaneous femoral arterial interventions. UGTI is safe and effective, with few complications. Native arterial thrombosis has been rarely reported in the literature following UGTI and has usually been attributed to excessive thrombin injection. We report a case of femoral arteria thrombosis occurring following UGTI of a 4 cm postcatherization pseudoaneurysm with a wide, short neck successfully treated by surgical intervention. The large size of the neck of this pseudoaneurysm likely contributed to the development of this complication.


Assuntos
Falso Aneurisma/tratamento farmacológico , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/induzido quimicamente , Artéria Femoral/efeitos dos fármacos , Hemostáticos/efeitos adversos , Trombina/efeitos adversos , Trombose/induzido quimicamente , Ultrassonografia Doppler em Cores , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Falso Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagem , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/complicações , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/terapia , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemostáticos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Injeções Intralesionais , Isquemia/etiologia , Isquemia/terapia , Masculino , Trombectomia , Trombina/administração & dosagem , Terapia Trombolítica , Trombose/complicações , Trombose/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa