Assessing pain in the postoperative period: Analgesia Nociception IndexTMversus pupillometry.

BACKGROUND: Potential methods for objective assessment of postoperative pain include the Analgesia Nociception Index™ (ANI), a real-time index of the parasympathetic tone, the pupillary light reflex (PLR), and the variation coefficient of pupillary diameter (VCPD), a measure of pupillary diameter (PD) fluctuations. Until now, the literature is divided as to their respective accuracy magnitudes for assessing a patient's pain. The VCPD has been demonstrated to strongly correlate with pain in an obstetrical population. However, the pain induced by obstetrical labour is different, given its intermittent nature, than the pain observed during the postoperative period. The aim of the current study was to compare the respective values of these variables at VAS scores ≥4. METHODS: After approval by the Ethics Committee, 345 patients aged on average 50 (SD 17) yr (range: 18-91 yr) of age were included. The protocols of general anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia were left to the anaesthetist's discretion. Some 40 min after tracheal intubation, VAS, ANI, PD, PLR, and VCPD values were recorded. RESULTS: VCPD correlates more strongly (r=0.78) with pain as assessed with the VAS than ANI (r=-0.15). PD and PLR are not statistically correlated with VAS. The ability of VCPD to assess the pain of patients (VAS≥4) is strong [area under the curve (AUC): 0.92, confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.95], and better than for ANI (AUC: 0.39, CI: 0.33-0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that VCPD could be a useful tool for monitoring pain in conscious patients during the postoperative period. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03267979.

Assessing Pain Using the Variation Coefficient of Pupillary Diameter.

Pupillary diameter (PD) varies under the influence of the sympathetic as well as parasympathetic systems, increasing proportionally with pain intensity. Such variations however, should not be confused with pupillary fluctuations, which refer to the fast and permanent PD fluctuations induced by the ongoing interplay between the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems, which we propose to measure using the variation coefficient of PD (VCPD). This study aimed first at correlating PD, PD increase during a contraction, and VCPD, with pain rated using a numeric rating scale (NRS) during obstetrical labor, and then at comparing such correlations with each other. Forty patients were included in the study, and 160 simultaneous ratings (NRS, PD, and VCPD) were taken: 40 in the presence of uterine contractions and 40 in the absence of such contractions, before and 20 minutes after epidural analgesia. VCPD correlates more strongly (r = .77) than PD increase (r = .42) with pain rated using a NRS. The ability of VCPD to predict the occurrence of NRS scores ≥4 during obstetrical labor is .97 (confidence interval, .93-1.0). When measured over 10 seconds during contraction, VCPD correlates more strongly than PD increase with pain rated using the NRS. Such stronger correlation allows for an easy assessment of antinociception-nociception balance. PERSPECTIVE: The VCPD allows for an objective assessment of pain in laboring women. It could allow for an easy assessment of pain in noncommunicating patients: newborns or very old patients, patients with serious psychological conditions, assessment during the immediate postoperative period, or in intensive care units.