The coin toss of B cells in rejection and tolerance: danger versus defense.

Transplantation is the preferred therapy for the end stage organ disease. Since the introduction of organ transplantation into medical practice in 1953 [1], significant progress has been achieved in patient and graft survival rates due to improvements in surgical techniques and more targeted immunosuppressive medications [2]. Nevertheless, current gaps in the management of the transplant patient stem from an incomplete understanding about the heterogeneity of the injury response in organ transplantation, at different rates and different time points after transplantation, as well as our inability to monitor the immunologic threshold of risk versus safety in each individual patient. Recent advances in immunology/transplantation biology with the advent of high throughput "omic" assays such as gene microarrays, proteomics, metabolomics, antibiomics, chemical genomics and functional imaging with nanoparticles, offers us unique methods to interrogate and decipher the variability and unpredictability of the immune response in organ transplantation (Fig. 1) [3]. Recent studies using these applications [3-8] have uncovered a critical and pivotal role for specific B cell lineages in organ injury [9] and organ acceptance [10,11] (Fig. 2). The availability of specific therapies against some of these defined B cell populations provides for an exciting new field of B cell targeted manipulation that can both abrogate the allospecific injury response, as well as promote allospecific graft accommodation and health.

Characterization of intra-graft B cells during renal allograft rejection.

Intra-graft CD20(+) B-cell clusters are found during acute rejection of renal allografts and correlate with graft recovery following rejection injury. Here using archived kidney tissue we conducted immunohistochemical studies to measure specific subsets of pathogenic B cells during graft rejection. Cluster-forming CD20(+) B cells in the rejected graft are likely derived from the recipient and are composed of mature B cells. These cells are activated (CD79a(+)), and present MHC Class II antigen (HLADR(+)) to CD4(+) T cells. Some of these clusters contained memory B cells (CD27(+)) and they did not correlate with intra-graft C4d deposition or with detection of donor-specific antibody. Further, several non-cluster forming CD20(-) B-lineage CD38(+) plasmablasts and plasma cells were found to infiltrate the rejected grafts and these cells strongly correlated with circulating donor-specific antibody, and to a lesser extent with intra-graft C4d. Both CD20(+) B cells and CD38(+) cells correlated with poor response of the rejection to steroids. Reduced graft survival was associated with the presence of CD20 cells in the graft. In conclusion, a specific subset of early lineage B cells appears to be an antigen-presenting cell and which when present in the rejected graft may support a steroid-resistant T-cell-mediated cellular rejection. Late lineage interstitial plasmablasts and plasma cells may also support humoral rejection. These studies suggest that detailed analysis of interstitial cellular infiltrates may allow better use of B-cell lineage specific treatments to improve graft outcomes.

"To B or not to B?" B-cells and graft rejection.

There is increasing evidence that various maturational stages of B-cells infiltrate various solid organ transplants undergoing acute rejection. The presence of immature CD20 and mature CD138 plasma cells associate with more aggressive and steroid-recalcitrant graft rejection and portend poor graft outcomes. Though associative, the causal role of B-cells in graft rejection remains to be better understood. This review discusses the possible roles of B-cells in graft rejection, whether involved as antigen presenting, as indirect effector, or antibody producing cells.

Phenotypic evaluation of B-cell subsets after rituximab for treatment of acute renal allograft rejection in pediatric recipients.

BACKGROUND: Recently published pediatric trial of Rituximab for the treatment of CD20+ acute renal allograft rejection (AR) demonstrated transient depletion of circulating/intragraft B cells (Zarkhin et al., Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 2607). In this study, we have evaluated phenotypic definition of circulating B-cell subsets before and after standard of care and B-cell depletional AR therapies. METHODS: We assessed peripheral B cells by flow cytometry at the time of AR and after AR treatment in 35 pediatric renal transplant recipients: 17 patients with AR who received Rituximab (R-AR; n=11) or steroid pulsing (S-AR; n=6), 18 stable patients with stable graft function with (iSTA; n=10) or without interval infection (hSTA; n=8), and 3 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: Infections increased memory (P=0.02) and CD19+/CD27⁻/IgD⁻ double negative (DN) B cells (P=0.02) and decreased naive B cells (P=0.01) in iSTA group compared to hSTA patients. Decrease in naive/memory B cells ratio at AR was observed compared with hSTA patients (P=0.01). One year after AR treatment, S-AR patients had persistently lower naive/memory B-cell ratio (P=0.01) and higher DN B cells (P=0.0001) than hSTA patients, whereas after R-AR treatment naive/memory B-cell ratio (P=0.6) and DN B cells (P=0.13) recovered to levels of hSTA patients. R-AR patients with sustained AR resolution (n=8) had trend toward better graft survival (P=0.06) and higher naive B cells (P=0.004) than R-AR relapsers (n=3). CONCLUSIONS: Increase in circulating memory B cells was seen in pediatric patients at AR. B cells persist as memory after S-AR treatment, whereas Rituximab resulted in repopulation of mostly naive B cells. The heterogeneity in B-cells reconstitution after rejection therapies deserves further investigation as a possible means to follow the clinical and immunologic outcomes of graft rejection.

The yin and yang of B cells in graft rejection and tolerance.

Various lineages of B cells are being increasingly recognized as important players in the etiology and prognosis of both acute and chronic graft rejection. The role of immature, chronically activated B cells, as efficient antigen-presenting cells, supporting recalcitrant cell-mediated graft rejection and late lineage B cells driving humoral rejections, is being increasingly recognized. This review captures the recent literature on this subject and discusses the various roles of the B cell in renal graft rejection and conversely, also in graft tolerance, both in animal and human studies. In addition, novel therapies targeting specific B-cell lineages in graft rejection are also discussed, with a view to developing more targeted therapies for graft rejection.

Expression of soluble HLA-G identifies favorable outcomes in liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-G displays immunotolerogenic properties toward the main effector cells involved in graft rejection through inhibition of natural killer cell- and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-mediated cytolysis, and CD4 T-cell alloproliferation. An increase in serum and graft levels of HLA-G has been noted in transplant patients with improved allograft survival. However, the clinical relevance of soluble serum HLA-G molecules in tolerant pediatric and young adult liver transplant patients remains to be studied. METHODS: We examined the serum HLA-G levels in 42 pediatric and young adult liver transplant patients with a mean age of 15 years; 13 patients had operational tolerance (TOL), with complete immunosuppression withdrawal for 2.3 to 13.2 years. RESULTS: Median HLA-G level in patients with acute rejection (AR) was similar to the level in pediatric healthy volunteers (9.9 vs. 4.2 U/mL, P=0.13). HLA-G was higher in patients with stable liver function on immunosuppression (54.6 U/mL) than in patients with AR (P=0.01) and healthy volunteers (P=0.003), but almost 6-fold lower than in TOL patients (325.4 U/mL). HLA-G did not correlate with clinical confounders or a history of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease or Epstein-Barr virus; although levels in the TOL group were negatively correlated with time after immunosuppression withdrawal (r=-0.75, P=0.003). In rejectors, HLA-G levels trended to negatively correlate with a higher number (r=-0.58) and greater severity of AR episodes (r=-0.56) after 1 year posttransplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Increased serum HLA-G levels track with operational tolerance of liver grafts and support favorable outcomes in pediatric and young adult recipients.

Microarrays: monitoring for transplant tolerance and mechanistic insights.

With recent advances in immunology and a growing understanding of transplantation biology, the development of reliable assays that may be used for identification and prediction of the current state of an immune response (rejection and tolerance) are urgently needed to allow us to predict the development of immunologic graft injury, individualize immunosuppression, rationally minimize immunosuppressive drug toxicity, promote a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying stable graft acceptance, and aid in the design of tolerance-inducing clinical transplantation trials. Microarrays can provide nonbiased, simultaneous global expression patterns for more than 40,000 human genes across different experiments. High throughput microarray technology offers a means to study disease-specific transcriptional changes in tissue biopsy, peripheral blood, and biofluids.