Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Neurooncol ; 126(3): 509-17, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26643804

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to determine the predictability of vertebral compression fracture (VCF) development applying the spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) prior to delivery of stereotactic spinal radiosurgery (SSRS) for spinal metastases. From two prospective cohorts of SSRS for spinal metastases, we selected patients with a low degree of cord compression or cauda equine from C3 to S1 and analyzed 79 patients enrolled according to binary SINS criteria. The primary endpoint was the development of a de novo VCF or progression of an existing fracture after SSRS. We identified 32 fractures (40.5%): 19 de novo and 13 progressive. The mean time to fracture after SSRT was 3.3 months (range, 0.4-34.1 months). In 41 patients with low SINS (0-6), 7 patients (17.1%) developed a fracture after SSRS. In 38 patients with high SINS (7-12), 25 (65.8%) developed a fracture. Among the 32 fractures, 15 were symptomatic. Patients with high SINS were more likely to experience symptomatic fractures (31.6%) than were patients with lower SINS (7.4%). On univariate and multivariate analysis, 24-month fracture-free rates were 78.7 and 33.7% in low and high SINS group, respectively and high SINS was found to be a significant risk factor for VCFs and symptomatic fractures (respectively, HR 5.6, p = 0.04; HR 5.3, p = 0.01). SINS is a useful tool for predicting the development of VCF after SSRS for spinal metastases. Prophylactic cement augmentation should not be considered for patients with lower SINS, since the risk of fracture is low.


Assuntos
Fraturas por Compressão/diagnóstico , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Compressão da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fraturas por Compressão/etiologia , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Compressão da Medula Espinal/etiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/secundário , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto Jovem
2.
Cureus ; 15(7): e42380, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37621799

RESUMO

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has long been the standard surgical treatment for cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD); however, cervical artificial total disc replacement (cTDR) has gained increasing recognition in recent years due to its ability to maintain a natural range of motion and lower the rate of adjacent segment disease. Although cTDR is only approved for one or two levels in the United States, it has been used for three or more levels in other countries. We present a case of a 59-year-old male patient who underwent three-level cTDR (C4-C7) in Germany and presented 10 years later with progressive paracervical pain and worsening dysphagia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scan showed hardware loosening, progressive loss of bone around the device, and a cyst ventral to C4-C5 with mass effect on the hypopharynx. The patient was successfully treated with posterior cervical fusion and showed improvement in neck pain. This case underscores the significance of long-term follow-up and thoughtful consideration when selecting an appropriate treatment modality for patients afflicted with cervical DDD.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa