RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lifestyle has become a crucial modulator in the management of diabetes and is intimately linked with the development and exacerbation of comorbid depression. The study aimed to analyze lifestyle patterns and their impact on depression in individuals with diabetes and to explore the role of the Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) in the relationship between lifestyle patterns and depression. METHODS: Data was attained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2009 and 2020. A latent class analysis (LCA) was performed on 3,009 diabetic adults based on lifestyle behaviors. A generalised linear model (GLM) was employed to analyse the effects of different lifestyle patterns on depression. The mediation effect model was utilised to examine the relationship between lifestyle patterns, DII and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores. RESULTS: The cohort was divided through LCA into unhealthy lifestyle (44.53%), unhealthy but non-alcohol use (48.06%) and healthy but smoking (7.41%) groups of lifestyle behaviors, the unhealthy but non-alcohol use group was identified as a risk factor for depression (OR = 1.379, 95%CI = 1.095 ~ 1.735, P = 0.006). The DII partially mediated the relationship between the unhealthy but non-alcohol use group and PHQ-9, and fully mediated the relationship between the healthy but smoking group and PHQ-9, with effect coefficients of - 0.018 (95%CI: -0.044 ~ - 0.001) and - 0.035 (95%CI: -0.083 ~ - 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle patterns significantly influence the occurrence of depression among diabetes patients. The dietary inflammation plays a varying mediating role between different lifestyle patterns and depression. Restricting pro-inflammatory diets or encouraging anti-inflammatory diets, combined with the promotion of healthy lifestyle practices, may be an effective method for preventing and alleviating symptoms of depression among patients with diabetes.
Assuntos
Depressão , Diabetes Mellitus , Dieta , Inflamação , Estilo de Vida , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Depressão/epidemiologia , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/psicologia , Dieta/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Idoso , Análise de Classes Latentes , Análise de MediaçãoRESUMO
Background and objective: In recent years, many studies have investigated metformin and its effects on lung cancer. However, since previous studies have shown that the relationship between metformin and lung cancer is complicated, we performed a meta-analysis to analyze this relationship. Material and methods: An electronic database search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library. Outcomes were quantified with hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals to compare lung cancer survival in patients treated with or without metformin. Results: Ten studies, involving 4397 participants, were included. In the pooled analysis, we found that metformin treatment significantly improved the survival of lung cancer patients (hazard ratio = 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.80; P<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that when stratified by geographic region, the hazard ratios for overall survival were 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.71-0.81, P<0.001) and 0.51 (95% confidence interval: 0.25-0.78, P<0.001) for Western and Asian countries, respectively. When stratified by lung cancer subtype, the hazard ratios for overall survival were 0.78 (95% confidence interval: 0.71-0.84, P<0.001), 0.73 (95% confidence interval: 0.66-0.81, P<0.001), and 0.51 (95% confidence interval: 0.25-0.78, P<0.001) for non-divided, non-small cell, and small-cell lung cancer subtypes, respectively. When stratified by study design, the hazard ratios for overall survival were 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.71-0.83, P<0.001) and 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.63-0.80, P<0.001) for cohort-based and case-controlled studies, respectively
Antecedentes y objetivo: En los últimos años, muchos estudios han investigado los efectos de la metformina sobre el cáncer de pulmón. Sin embargo, dado que estudios previos habían demostrado que la relación entre la metformina y el cáncer de pulmón era complicada, realizamos un metaanálisis para estudiar esta relación. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda en las bases de datos electrónicas PubMed, Embase y Cochrane Library. Los resultados se cuantificaron con cociente de riesgos instantáneos e intervalos de confianza del 95% para comparar la supervivencia del cáncer de pulmón en pacientes tratados con o sin metformina. Resultados: Se incluyeron 10 estudios con un total de 4.397 participantes. En el análisis combinado, el tratamiento con metformina mejoró significativamente la supervivencia de los pacientes con cáncer de pulmón (cociente de riesgos instantáneos=0,75; intervalo de confianza del 95%: 0,70-0,80; p<0,001). El análisis de subgrupos mostró que cuando se estratificó por región geográfica, los cocientes de riesgos para la supervivencia global fueron de 0,76 (intervalo de confianza del 95%: 0,71-0,81; p<0,001) y 0,51 (intervalo de confianza del 95%: 0,25-0,78; p<0,001) para los países occidentales y asiáticos, respectivamente. Cuando se estratificó por subtipo de cáncer de pulmón, los cocientes de riesgo para la supervivencia global fueron de 0,78 (intervalo de confianza del 95%: 0,71-0,84; p<0,001), de 0,73 (intervalo de confianza del 95%: 0,66-0,81; p<0,001) y de 0,51 (intervalo de confianza del 95%: 0,25-0,78; p<0,001) para subtipos de cáncer de pulmón no microcítico, de células no pequeñas y de células pequeñas, respectivamente. Cuando se estratificó según el diseño del estudio, los cocientes de riesgo para la supervivencia global fueron de 0,77 (intervalo de confianza del 95%: 0,71-0,83; p<0,001) y de 0,71 (intervalo de confianza del 95%: 0,63-0,80; p<0,001) para estudios de cohortes y de casos-controles, respectivamente