Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi ; 36(7): 821-826, 2016 07.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30634209

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study the safety of using Chinese drugs for breaking blood expelling stasis (CDBBES) in hypertension patients with intracerebral hemorrhage within 6 h, and to observe whether they would result in hematoma enlargement. METHODS: A prospective randomized double-blind controlled clinical study was employed. Totally 128 cerebral hemorrhage patients within 6 h were recruited from 8 research centers from October 2013 to March 2015, and finally 76 of them were included. These patients were assigned to 3 groups by simple random sampling, group A, B, and C. Patients in group A (26 cases) took whole CDBBES recipe (containing leeches and equivalent insects). Those in group B (25 cases) took CDBBES recipe (removing leech and gradfly). Those in group C (25 cases) took placebos. Medication lasted for 10 successive days. The hematoma enlargement rate within 24 h, the occurrence of adverse reactions and adverse events were observed. To guarantee the safety of this trial, an interim analysis of first level unblinding was used. RESULTS: The hematoma enlargement rate was 11. 5% (3/26) in group A, 16. 0% (4/25) in group B, and 20. 0% (5/25) in group C. There was no statistical difference in the hematoma enlargement rate among the 3 groups (X² =0. 823, P =0. 682). Adverse reactions and adverse events occurred in 7 cases, 1 patient with acute myocardial infarction, 1 with chest op- pression and palpitation, 2 with diarrhea in group A. No patient had adverse reaction or adverse event in group B. And diarrhea occurred in 3 patients of group C. CONCLUSION: The interim analysis of first level unblinding showed that hematoma enlargement within 6 h was not resulted from using CDBBES.


Assuntos
Hemorragia Cerebral , Hematoma , Hipertensão , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa , Hemorragia Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Hematoma/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Hipertensão/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
BMJ Open ; 9(5): e024932, 2019 05 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31076468

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of removing blood stasis (RBS) herbal medicine for the treatment of acute intracerebral haemorrhage (AICH) within a 6-hour time window. STUDY DESIGN: A randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study performed in 14 hospitals in China. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Patients with AICH were randomly assigned to receive a placebo, the ICH-1 (Intracerebral Haemorrhage) formula (eight herbs, including the RBS herbs hirudo and tabanus) or the ICH-2 formula (six herbs without the RBS herbs hirudo and tabanus) within 6 hours of ICH onset. OUTCOMES: The primary safety outcome was the incidence of haematoma enlargement at 24 hours and at 10 days after treatment. The secondary outcome was the incidence of poor prognosis (mortality or modified Rankin Scale score ≥5) assessed at 90 days after symptom onset. RESULTS: A total of 324 subjects were randomised between October 2013 and May 2016: 105 patients received placebo; 108 patients received the ICH-1 formula; and 111 patients received the ICH-2 formula. The incidence of haematoma enlargement at 24 hours was 7.8% in the placebo group, 12.3% in the ICH-1 group and 7.5% in the ICH-2 group; the incidence of haematoma enlargement on day 10 was 1.1% in the placebo group, 1.1% in the ICH-1 group, and 3.1% in the ICH-2 group, with no significant differences among the groups (P>0.05). The mortality rates were 3.8% in the placebo group, 2.8% in the ICH-1 group, and 0.9% in the ICH-2 group; the incidences of poor prognosis were 7.1% in the placebo group, 6.0% in the ICH-1 group and 4.8% in the ICH-2 group at 3 months, with no significant differences among the groups (p>0.05). However, the overall frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events in the ICH-1 group (12.1%) was higher among the three groups (5.8% and 2.8%, respectively, p<0.05). All three cases of serious adverse events were in the ICH-1 group. CONCLUSIONS: Ultra-early administration of ICH-1 formula for AICH patients did not exert significant beneficial effects on clinical outcomes but increased the risk of bleeding, which probably resulted from the inclusion of RBS herbal medicines in ICH-1. TRIALREGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01918722.


Assuntos
Coagulação Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Hemorragia Cerebral , Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas , Hematoma , Hemorragia , Fitoterapia , Hemorragia Cerebral/complicações , Hemorragia Cerebral/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Hemorragia Cerebral/mortalidade , China , Método Duplo-Cego , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas/administração & dosagem , Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas/efeitos adversos , Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas/classificação , Feminino , Hematoma/diagnóstico , Hematoma/etiologia , Hematoma/prevenção & controle , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , Fitoterapia/efeitos adversos , Fitoterapia/métodos , Tempo para o Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa