Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of adult aplastic anaemia: A British Society for Haematology Guideline.

Pancytopenia with hypocellular bone marrow is the hallmark of aplastic anaemia (AA) and the diagnosis is confirmed after careful evaluation, following exclusion of alternate diagnosis including hypoplastic myelodysplastic syndromes. Emerging use of molecular cyto-genomics is helpful in delineating immune mediated AA from inherited bone marrow failures (IBMF). Camitta criteria is used to assess disease severity, which along with age and availability of human leucocyte antigen compatible donor are determinants for therapeutic decisions. Supportive care with blood and platelet transfusion support, along with anti-microbial prophylaxis and prompt management of opportunistic infections remain key throughout the disease course. The standard first-line treatment for newly diagnosed acquired severe/very severe AA patients is horse anti-thymocyte globulin and ciclosporin-based immunosuppressive therapy (IST) with eltrombopag or allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from a matched sibling donor. Unrelated donor HSCT in adults should be considered after lack of response to IST, and up front for young adults with severe infections and a readily available matched unrelated donor. Management of IBMF, AA in pregnancy and in elderly require special attention. In view of the rarity of AA and complexity of management, appropriate discussion in multidisciplinary meetings and involvement of expert centres is strongly recommended to improve patient outcomes.

Long-term outcomes of previously untreated myeloma patients: responses to induction chemotherapy and high-dose melphalan incorporated within a risk stratification model can help to direct the use of novel treatments.

Induction chemotherapy followed by high-dose melphalan (HDM) is the standard treatment for fitter patients with myeloma. The place of bortezomib and the thalidomide analogues within this treatment paradigm is yet to be established. We sought to identify patients who may benefit from the introduction of novel agents during their initial management. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed on 383 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma eligible for HDM to determine whether the extent of response to induction therapy and HDM correlated with long-term survival. Early response [complete response (CR) and partial response (PR)] to induction therapy was predictive of overall survival (OS) [median OS, 7.47 years for responders (CR and PR) versus 4.89 years for non-responders; P = 0.035]. The attainment of CR at 3 months post-HDM correlated with a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS, 7.4 years in CR group versus 5.3 years in non-CR group; P = 0.023). This data suggests that, at every stage of treatment, the aim should be to achieve CR. Patients with suboptimal responses could be offered alternative therapy. We propose a multiparametric risk-adapted model that includes response to induction chemotherapy and HDM, for identifying patients who may benefit from novel approaches to treatment.