Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Trop Pediatr ; 70(1)2023 12 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38085999

RESUMO

Nosocomial infections in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) tend to cluster and multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens are rising in developing countries. We did a retrospective cohort study of neonates admitted to a NICU in Brazil with late-onset neonatal sepsis (LOS) confirmed by blood culture from October 2012 to December 2016 and from July 2018 to December 2021. We defined a cluster of infection when at least two cases of LOS occurred within two different time intervals: 15 and 30 days with the same pathogen in different patients. A random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) was performed from samples from one of these clusters. A logistic regression model was applied having death as the outcome and the infection with an MDR pathogen as the exposure of interest. There were 987 blood cultures from 754 neonates, 621 (63%) were gram-positive cocci, 264 (30%) were gram-negative rods and 72 (7%) fungi. A third of Enterobacterales were resistant to cefepime and a third of non-fermenting glucose rods were resistant to carbapenems. There were 100 or 104 clusters of infection in the 15- or 30-day interval, respectively. A RAPD analysis from an outbreak of MDR Acinetobacter baumannii showed that all five samples belonged to a single clone. An infection with an MDR pathogen was associated with death (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.03-3.21). In conclusion, clusters of infections in a Brazilian NICU are a frequent phenomenon as seen elsewhere. They suggest cross-transmission of pathogens with increasing antimicrobial resistance and should prompt intensified surveillance and infection control measures.


Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis , Infecção Hospitalar , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Brasil/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Técnica de Amplificação ao Acaso de DNA Polimórfico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Análise por Conglomerados , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana
2.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1289454, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38516229

RESUMO

Background: Persistent symptoms and exercise intolerance have been reported after COVID-19, even months after the acute disease. Although, the long-term impact on exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is still unclear. Research question: To assess the long-term functional capacity and HRQoL in patients hospitalized due to COVID-19. Study design and methods: This is a prospective cohort study, conducted at two centers in Brazil, that included post-discharge COVID-19 patients and paired controls. The cohort was paired by age, sex, body mass index and comorbidities, using propensity score matching in a 1:3 ratio. Patients were eligible if signs or symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 and pulmonary involvement on chest computed tomography. All patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and a HRQoL questionnaire (SF-36) 6 months after the COVID-19. The main outcome was the percentage of predicted peak oxygen consumption (ppVO2). Secondary outcomes included other CPET measures and HRQoL. Results: The study sample comprised 47 post-discharge COVID-19 patients and 141 healthy controls. The mean age of COVID-19 patients was 54 ± 14 years, with 19 (40%) females, and a mean body mass index of 31 kg/m2 (SD, 6). The median follow-up was 7 months (IQR, 6.5-8.0) after hospital discharge. PpVO2 in COVID-19 patients was lower than in controls (83% vs. 95%, p = 0.002) with an effect size of 0.38 ([95%CI], 0.04-0.70). Mean peak VO2 (22 vs. 25 mL/kg/min, p = 0.04) and OUES (2,122 vs. 2,380, p = 0.027) were also reduced in the COVID-19 patients in comparison to controls. Dysfunctional breathing (DB) was present in 51%. HRQoL was significantly reduced in post COVID patients and positively correlated to peak exercise capacity. Interpretation: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients presented, 7 months after discharge, with a reduction in functional capacity and HRQoL when compared to historical controls. HRQoL were reduced and correlated with the reduced peak VO2 in our population.

3.
J Clin Virol ; 156: 105197, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35691819

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although the clinical course of the COVID-19 in adults has been extensively described, the impact of the co-detection of SARS-CoV-2 and rhinovirus on severity outcomes is not understood. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the risk of hospitalization of outpatients with COVID-19 with and without the co-detection of rhinovirus in southern Brazil. Secondarily, such risk was also compared between all individuals with COVID-19 and those with single rhinovirus infection. STUDY DESIGN: Outpatients (>18 years) with acute signs of cough, fever, or sore throat were prospectively enrolled at two emergency departments from May to September 2020. Sample collection was performed to detect SARS-CoV-2 and other 20 respiratory pathogens. Participants were followed for 28 days through telephone interviews. RESULTS: 1,047 participants were screened and 1,044 were included. Of these, 4.9% were lost during follow-up, and 993/1,044 (95.1%) were included in severity-related analysis. Rhinovirus was the most prevalent pathogen (25.0%, 248/993), followed by SARS-CoV-2 (22.6%, 224/993), with coinfection of these two viruses occurring in 91/993 (9.2%) participants. The risk of COVID-19-related hospitalizations were not different between individuals with and without co-detection of rhinovirus (9.9% vs. 7.6%, respectively, P = 0.655). Conversely, subjects with COVID-19 had a higher hospitalization risk than single rhinovirus infection (8.3 vs 0.4%, respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The co-detection of SARS-CoV-2 and rhinovirus did not change the risk of hospitalizations in adults. Furthermore, COVID-19 was more severe than single rhinovirus infection.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Adulto , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudos Prospectivos , Rhinovirus , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Nat Commun ; 12(1): 6844, 2021 11 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34824230

RESUMO

COVID-19 manifests as a milder disease in children than adults, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully characterized. Here we assess the difference in cellular or humoral immune responses of pediatric and adult COVID-19 patients to see if these factors contribute to the severity dichotomy. Children's non-specific immune profile is dominated by naive lymphocytes and HLA-DRhighCX3CR1low dendritic cells; meanwhile, children show strong specific antibody and T cell responses for viral structural proteins, with their T cell responses differing from adults by having weaker CD8+TNF+ T cells responses to S peptide pool but stronger responses to N and M peptide pools. Finally, viral mRNA is more abundant in pediatric patients. Our data thus support a scenario in which SARS-CoV-2 infected children contribute to transmission yet are less susceptible to COVID-19 symptoms due to strong and differential responses to the virus.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , COVID-19/imunologia , Imunidade Humoral , RNA Viral , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Brasil , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/imunologia , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Citocinas/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Imunidade Inata , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , RNA Mensageiro , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia , Linfócitos T , Proteínas Estruturais Virais/imunologia , Adulto Jovem , Vacinas de mRNA
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa