ICP wave morphology as a screening test to exclude intracranial hypertension in brain-injured patients: a non-invasive perspective.

Intracranial hypertension (IH) is a life-threating condition especially for the brain injured patient. In such cases, an external ventricular drain (EVD) or an intraparenchymal bolt are the conventional gold standard for intracranial pressure (ICPi) monitoring. However, these techniques have several limitations. Therefore, identifying an ideal screening method for IH is important to avoid the unnecessary placement of ICPi and expedite its introduction in patients who require it. A potential screening tool is the ICP wave morphology (ICPW) which changes according to the intracranial volume-pressure curve. Specifically, the P2/P1 ratio of the ICPW has shown promise as a triage test to indicate normal ICP. In this study, we propose evaluating the noninvasive ICPW (nICPW-B4C sensor) as a screening method for ICPi monitoring in patients with moderate to high probability of IH. This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter study that recruited adult patients requiring ICPi monitoring from both Federal University of São Paulo and University of São Paulo Medical School Hospitals. ICPi values and the nICPW parameters were obtained from both the invasive and the noninvasive methods simultaneously 5 min after the closure of the EVD drainage. ICP assessment was performed using a catheter inserted into the ventricle and connected to a pressure transducer and a drainage system. The B4C sensor was positioned on the patient's scalp without the need for trichotomy, surgical incision or trepanation, and the morphology of the ICP waves acquired through a strain sensor that can detect and monitor skull bone deformations caused by changes in ICP. All patients were monitored using this noninvasive system for at least 10 min per session. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to describe discriminatory power of the P2/P1 ratio for IH, with emphasis in the Negative Predictive value (NPV), based on the Youden index, and the negative likelihood ratio [LR-]. Recruitment occurred from August 2017 to March 2020. A total of 69 patients fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria in the two centers and a total of 111 monitorizations were performed. The mean P2/P1 ratio value in the sample was 1.12. The mean P2/P1 value in the no IH population was 1.01 meanwhile in the IH population was 1.32 (p < 0.01). The best Youden index for the mean P2/P1 ratio was with a cut-off value of 1.13 showing a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 60%, and a NPV of 97%, as well as an AUC of 0.83 to predict IH. With the 1.13 cut-off value for P2/P1 ratio, the LR- for IH was 0.11, corresponding to a strong performance in ruling out the condition (IH), with an approximate 45% reduction in condition probability after a negative test (ICPW). To conclude, the P2/P1 ratio of the noninvasive ICP waveform showed in this study a high Negative Predictive Value and Likelihood Ratio in different acute neurological conditions to rule out IH. As a result, this parameter may be beneficial in situations where invasive methods are not feasible or unavailable and to screen high-risk patients for potential invasive ICP monitoring.Trial registration: At clinicaltrials.gov under numbers NCT05121155 (Registered 16 November 2021-retrospectively registered) and NCT03144219 (Registered 30 September 2022-retrospectively registered).

Waveform Morphology as a Surrogate for ICP Monitoring: A Comparison Between an Invasive and a Noninvasive Method.

BACKGROUND: Although the placement of an intraventricular catheter remains the gold standard technique for measuring intracranial pressure (ICP), the method has several limitations. Therefore, noninvasive alternatives to ICP (ICPni) measurement are of great interest. The main objective of this study was to compare the correlation and agreement of wave morphology between ICP (standard intraventricular ICP monitoring) and a new ICPni monitor in patients admitted with stroke. The second objective was to estimate the discrimination of the noninvasive method to detect intracranial hypertension. METHODS: We prospectively collected data of adults admitted to an intensive care unit with subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, or ischemic stroke in whom an invasive ICP monitor was placed. Measurements were simultaneously collected from two parameters [time-to-peak (TTP) and the ratio regarding the second and first peak of the ICP wave (P2/P1 ratio)] of ICP and ICPni wave morphology monitors (Brain4care). Intracranial hypertension was defined as an invasively measured sustained ICP > 20 mm Hg for at least 5 min. RESULTS: We studied 18 patients (subarachnoid hemorrhage = 14; intracerebral hemorrhage = 3; ischemic stroke = 1) on 60 occasions with a median age of 52 ± 14.3 years. A total of 197,400 waves (2495 min) from both ICP (standard ICP monitoring) and the ICPni monitor were sliced into 1-min-long segments, and we determined TTP and the P2/P1 ratio from the mean pulse. The median invasively measured ICP was 13 (9.8-16.2) mm Hg, and intracranial hypertension was present on 18 occasions (30%). The correlation and agreement between invasive and noninvasive methods for wave morphology were strong for the P2/P1 ratio and moderate for TTP using categoric (κ agreement 88.1% and 71.3%, respectively) and continuous (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.831 and 0.584, respectively) measures. There was a moderate but significant correlation with the mean ICP value (P2/P1 ratio r = 0.427; TTP r = 0.353; p < 0.001 for all) between noninvasive and invasive techniques. The areas under the curve to estimate intracranial hypertension were 0.786 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.93] for the P2/P1 ratio and 0.694 (95% CI 0.60-0.74) for TTP. CONCLUSIONS: The new ICPni wave morphology monitor showed a good agreement with the standard invasive method and an acceptable discriminatory power to detect intracranial hypertension. Clinical trial registration Trial registration: NCT05121155.

Clinical variables related to the diagnostic stability of demential syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Assigning a diagnosis to a patient with dementia is important for the present treatment of the patient and caregivers, and scientific research. Nowadays, the dementia diagnostic criteria are based on clinical information regarding medical, history, physical examination, neuropsychological tests, and supplementary exams and, therefore, subject to variability through time. METHODS: A retrospective observational study to evaluate variables related to clinical diagnostic stability in dementia syndromes in at least one year follow up. From a sample of 432 patients, from a single university center, data were collected regarding sociodemographic aspects, Clinical Dementia Rating, physical examination, neuropsychological tests, and supplementary exams including a depression triage scale. RESULTS: From this sample, 113 (26.6%) patients have their diagnosis changed, most of them adding a vascular component to initial diagnosis or depression as comorbidity or main disease. Our findings show that many factors influence the diagnostic stability including the presence of symmetric Parkinsonism, initial diagnosis of vascular dementia, presence of diabetes and hypertension, the presence of long term memory deficit in the neuropsychological evaluation, and normal neuroimaging. We discuss our findings with previous findings in the literature. CONCLUSION: Every step of the clinical diagnosis including history, vascular comorbidities and depression, physical examination, neuropsychological battery, and neuroimaging were relevant to diagnosis accuracy.

Multimodal monitoring intracranial pressure by invasive and noninvasive means.

Although the placement of an intraventricular catheter remains the gold standard method for the diagnosis of intracranial hypertension (ICH), the technique has several limitations including but not limited to its invasiveness. Current noninvasive methods, however, still lack robust evidence to support their clinical use. We aimed to estimate, as an exploratory hypothesis generating analysis, the discriminative power of four noninvasive methods to diagnose ICH. We prospectively collected data from adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH), and ischemic stroke (IS) in whom invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring had been placed. Measures were simultaneously collected from the following noninvasive methods: optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), pulsatility index (PI) using transcranial Doppler (TCD), a 5-point visual scale designed for brain Computed Tomography (CT), and two parameters (time-to-peak [TTP] and P2/P1 ratio) of a noninvasive ICP wave morphology monitor (Brain4Care[B4c]). ICH was defined as a sustained ICP > 20 mmHg for at least 5 min. We studied 18 patients (SAH = 14; ICH = 3; IS = 1) on 60 occasions with a mean age of 52 ± 14.3 years. All methods were recorded simultaneously, except for the CT, which was performed within 24 h of the other methods. The median ICP was 13 [9.8-16.2] mmHg, and intracranial hypertension was present on 18 occasions (30%). Median values from the noninvasive techniques were ONSD 4.9 [4.40-5.41] mm, PI 1.22 [1.04-1.43], CT scale 3 points [IQR: 3.0], P2/P1 ratio 1.16 [1.09-1.23], and TTP 0.215 [0.193-0.237]. There was a significant statistical correlation between all the noninvasive techniques and invasive ICP (ONSD, r = 0.29; PI, r = 0.62; CT, r = 0.21; P2/P1 ratio, r = 0.35; TTP, r = 0.35, p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The area under the curve (AUC) to estimate intracranial hypertension was 0.69 [CIs = 0.62-0.78] for the ONSD, 0.75 [95% CIs 0.69-0.83] for the PI, 0.64 [95%Cis 0.59-069] for CT, 0.79 [95% CIs 0.72-0.93] for P2/P1 ratio, and 0.69 [95% CIs 0.60-0.74] for TTP. When the various techniques were combined, an AUC of 0.86 [0.76-0.93]) was obtained. The best pair of methods was the TCD and B4cth an AUC of 0.80 (0.72-0.88). Noninvasive technique measurements correlate with ICP and have an acceptable discrimination ability in diagnosing ICH. The multimodal combination of PI (TCD) and wave morphology monitor may improve the ability of the noninvasive methods to diagnose ICH. The observed variability in non-invasive ICP estimations underscores the need for comprehensive investigations to elucidate the optimal method-application alignment across distinct clinical scenarios.

Lifestyle Medicine During (and After) the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has made it challenging for individuals and families to maintain a healthy lifestyle, quality of life, and well-being. Preliminary evidence have suggested that higher odds of both mortality and severity of the COVID-19 are closely associated to unhealthy lifestyle behaviors. Thus, in an effort to contribute to this challenging global situation, we joined a group of lifestyle medicine researchers and/or practitioners to provide scientifically sound information, recommendations, resources, and suggestions related to the main pillars of lifestyle medicine (healthy eating, physical activity, sleep, tobacco/alcohol, stress management, relationships, and planetary health) that may help health practitioners to support clients and patients maintain a healthy lifestyle during (and after) the COVID-19 crisis.

The Contribution of Supplementary Tests in the Differential Diagnosis of Dementia.

INTRODUCTION: Supplementary tests are part of the clinical approach to diagnose cognitive impairment. We aimed to determine the role of supplementary examinations, except for biomarkers, on diagnostic stability of dementia over time and to identify reversible dementias. METHODS: We identified 432 patients with dementia who performed 2 clinical evaluations and the supplementary examinations recommended by the American Academy of Neurology in a follow-up period of 1 year. RESULTS: In this sample, 110 (24.5%) patients changed their diagnosis at 1-year follow-up for the appearance of vascular cognitive impairment than the initial diagnosis, due to the neuroimaging. Concerning the reversible dementias, depression was the major differential diagnosis, detected in 13 (81%) of the 16 patients with cognitive improvement. CONCLUSION: Therefore, regarding the supplementary examinations only neuroimaging and the depression triage were relevant for clinical practice regarding the differential diagnosis of dementia.