Usefulness of several biomarkers in the management of septic patients: C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, presepsin and mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin.

BACKGROUND: Our objective is to analyze whether the combination of C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), presepsin or SCD14-ST and mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) measured in the first 24 h from ICU admission allowing a better management of septic patients (diagnostic and prognostic) both in severe sepsis (SS) and septic shock (SSh). METHODS: Cohort study of 388 patients admitted in the ICU during 12 months of whom 142 were controls. Biomarkers were measured through immunoluminometric assays in samples of serum or plasma within the first 24 h after admission. Data were evaluated with non-parametric statistics bivariant, ROC curve analysis for diagnostic evaluation and multivariate analyses for survival analysis. RESULTS: In the analyzed cohort, 61.8% of patients were males, mean age: 63 years range (18-90) and 67.8% in controls mean age: 63 years, range (39-91). PCT showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.989) as compared with the rest of biomarkers (p<0.01). PCT also enabled the difference between Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria to be determined. The AUCs for CRP (0.922) and presepsin (0.948) showed a similar diagnostic value. In cases of SSh, the AUC of presepsin experienced a noticeable increase (p<0.0001). MR-proADM showed a better prognostic value (p=0.00022) particularly in cases of SSh (p=0.00001) increasing along with the APACHE-II score. CONCLUSIONS: PCT, MR-proADM and presepsin are complementary markers that could be of great help in the management of septic patients when they are measured in the first 24 h after ICU admission.

Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain.

CONTEXT: Concern exists that current guidelines for care of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock are followed variably, possibly due to a lack of adequate education. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a national educational program based on the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines affected processes of care and hospital mortality for severe sepsis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Before and after design in 59 medical-surgical intensive care units (ICUs) located throughout Spain. All ICU patients were screened daily and enrolled if they fulfilled severe sepsis or septic shock criteria. A total of 854 patients were enrolled in the preintervention period (November-December 2005), 1465 patients during the postintervention period (March-June 2006), and 247 patients during the long-term follow-up period 1 year later (November-December 2006) in a subset of 23 ICUs. INTERVENTION: The educational program consisted of training physicians and nursing staff from the emergency department, wards, and ICU in the definition, recognition, and treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock as outlined in the guidelines. Treatment was organized in 2 bundles: a resuscitation bundle (6 tasks to begin immediately and be accomplished within 6 hours) and a management bundle (4 tasks to be completed within 24 hours). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital mortality, differences in adherence to the bundles' process-of-care variables, ICU mortality, 28-day mortality, hospital length of stay, and ICU length of stay. RESULTS: Patients included before and after the intervention were similar in terms of age, sex, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score. At baseline, only 3 process-of-care measurements (blood cultures before antibiotics, early administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and mechanical ventilation with adequate inspiratory plateau pressure) we had compliance rates higher than 50%. Patients in the postintervention cohort had a lower risk of hospital mortality (44.0% vs 39.7%; P = .04). The compliance with process-of-care variables also improved after the intervention in the sepsis resuscitation bundle (5.3% [95% confidence interval [CI], 4%-7%] vs 10.0% [95% CI, 8%-12%]; P < .001) and in the sepsis management bundle (10.9% [95% CI, 9%-13%] vs 15.7% [95% CI, 14%-18%]; P = .001). Hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay did not change after the intervention. During long-term follow-up, compliance with the sepsis resuscitation bundle returned to baseline but compliance with the sepsis management bundle and mortality remained stable with respect to the postintervention period. CONCLUSIONS: A national educational effort to promote bundles of care for severe sepsis and septic shock was associated with improved guideline compliance and lower hospital mortality. However, compliance rates were still low, and the improvement in the resuscitation bundle lapsed by 1 year.

Influence of age on clinical course, management and mortality of acute myocardial infarction in the Spanish population.

BACKGROUND: To assess age-related differences in cardiovascular risk factors, clinical course and management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in intensive care (ICU) or coronary care units (CCU). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all AMI patients listed in the ARIAM register (Analysis of Delay in AMI), a multi-centre register in which 119 Spanish hospitals participated. The study period was from January 1995 to January 2001. A univariate analysis was carried out to evaluate differences between different age groups. Multivariate analysis was used to assess whether age difference was an independent predisposing factor for mortality and for differences in patient management. RESULTS: 17,761 patients were admitted to the ICUs/CCUs with a diagnosis of AMI. The distribution by ages was: <55 years, 3,954 patients (22.3%); 55-64 years, 3,593 (22.2%); 65-74 years, 5,924 (33.4%); 75-84 years, 3,686 (20.8%); and >84 years, 604 (3.4%) (P<0.0001); 24.6% of the patients were female, and the relative proportion of females increased with age. There were clear differences in risk factors between the different age groups, with a predominance of tobacco, cholesterol and family history of heart disease in the younger patients. The incidence of complications, including haemorrhagic complications, increased significantly with age. The older age groups had a lower rate of thrombolysis and less use of revascularisation techniques. The mortality of the above groups was 2.6, 5.4, 10.7, 17.7 and 25.8%, respectively. Age difference was an independent predictive variable for mortality and the administration of thrombolysis. CONCLUSIONS: The distinct age groups differed in cardiovascular risk factors, management and mortality. Age is a significant independent predictive variable for mortality and for the administration of thrombolysis.

Combination antibiotic therapy improves survival in patients with community-acquired pneumonia and shock.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether combination antibiotic therapy improves outcome of severe community-acquired pneumonia in the subset of patients with shock. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective observational, cohort study. SETTING: Thirty-three intensive care units (ICUs) in Spain. PATIENTS: Patients were 529 adults with community-acquired pneumonia requiring ICU admission. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy (51%) patients required vasoactive drugs and were categorized as having shock. The effects of combination antibiotic therapy and monotherapy on survival were compared using univariate analysis and a Cox regression model. The adjusted 28-day in-ICU mortality was similar (p = .99) for combination antibiotic therapy and monotherapy in the absence of shock. However, in patients with shock, combination antibiotic therapy was associated with significantly higher adjusted 28-day in-ICU survival (hazard ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.60; p = .01) in a Cox hazard regression model. Even when monotherapy was appropriate, it achieved a lower 28-day in-ICU survival than an adequate antibiotic combination (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.64). CONCLUSIONS: Combination antibiotic therapy does not seem to increase ICU survival in all patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia. However, in the subset of patients with shock, combination antibiotic therapy improves survival rates.