MASCC/ISOO Clinical Practice Statement: Clinical assessment of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: A MASCC/ISOO Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) is aimed at generating a concise tool for clinicians that concentrates practical information needed for the management of oral complications of cancer patients. This CPS is focused on the clinical assessment of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia in cancer patients. METHODS: This CPS was developed based on a critical evaluation of the literature followed by a structured discussion of a group of leading experts, members of the Oral Care Study Group of MASCC/ISOO. The information is presented in the form of succinct bullets and tables to generate a short manual about the best standard of care. RESULTS: The objective assessment of saliva secretion involves an extra- and intra-oral clinical examination while the subjective assessment involves eliciting information on the patient's complaint of xerostomia and its impact on daily functioning. This CPS summarizes the common investigator- and patient-reported instruments used in clinical practice for assessing salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia in cancer patients. CONCLUSION: There is a range of tools to assess salivary gland function in patients undergoing cancer therapy, patients recovering from cancer therapy, or cancer survivors. Clinicians should ideally conduct both objective and subjective measurements to ensure a clear understanding about the status of the patients in order to provide the most appropriate treatment.

Subjective Oral Dryness following Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Report from the Orastem Study.

Xerostomia, or subjective oral dryness, is a serious complaint after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Xerostomia is rated as one of the most bothersome symptoms by HCT recipients, negatively affecting quality of life. This substudy of the Orastem study, a prospective longitudinal, international, observational, multicenter study, aimed to describe the prevalence and severity of xerostomia following HCT. Furthermore, the effect of the conditioning regimen, type of transplantation, and oral mucosal changes related to chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) in the development of xerostomia were studied. All HCT recipients rated xerostomia on a scale of 0 to 10 before the conditioning regimen, several times early post-HCT, and at 3 months post-HCT, and only allogeneic HCT recipients also rated xerostomia at 6 and 12 months post-HCT. In addition, stimulated whole mouth saliva was collected several times. Linear regression models and longitudinal mixed-effects models were created to investigate the influence of risk indicators on xerostomia. A total of 99 autologous and 163 allogeneic HCT recipients were included from 6 study sites in Sweden, Canada, the Netherlands, and the United States. The prevalence of xerostomia was 40% before the conditioning regimen, 87% early post-HCT, and 64% at 3 months post-HCT. Complaints after autologous HCT were transient in nature, while the severity of xerostomia in allogeneic HCT recipients remained elevated at 12 months post-HCT. Compared to autologous HCT recipients, allogeneic HCT recipients experienced 1.0 point more xerostomia (95% confidence interval [CI], .1 to 2.0) early post-HCT and 1.7 points more (95% CI, .4 to 3.0) at 3 months post-HCT. Allogeneic HCT recipients receiving a high-intensity conditioning regimen experienced more xerostomia compared to those receiving a nonmyeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. The difference was 2.0 points (95% CI, 1.1 to 2.9) early post-HCT, 1.8 points (95% CI, .3 to 3.3) after 3 months, and 1.7 points (95% CI, .0 to 3.3) after 12 months. Total body irradiation as part of the conditioning regimen and oral mucosal changes related to cGVHD did not significantly influence the severity of xerostomia. Conditioning regimen intensity was a significant risk indicator in the development of xerostomia, whereas total body irradiation was not. Allogeneic HCT recipients experienced more xerostomia than autologous HCT recipients, a difference that cannot be explained by a reduction in stimulated salivary flow rate or the development of oral mucosal changes related to cGVHD.