Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 79(5): 671-677, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37004542

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Knowledge of clinical pharmacotherapy is essential for all who prescribe medication. The aims of this study were to investigate differences in the pharmacotherapy and polypharmacy knowledge of medical and surgical residents and consultants and whether this knowledge can be improved by following an online course. METHODS: Design: A before-and-after-measurement. SETTING: An online course available for Dutch residents and consultants working in hospitals. STUDY POPULATION: Dutch residents and consultants from different disciplines who voluntarily followed an online course on geriatric care. INTERVENTION: An online 6-week course on geriatric care, with 1 week dedicated to clinical pharmacotherapy and polypharmacy. Variables, such as medical vs surgical specialty, consultant vs resident, age, and sex, that could predict the level of knowledge. The effects of the online course were studied using repeated measures ANOVA. The study was approved by the National Ethics Review Board of Medical Education (NERB dossier number 996). RESULTS: A total of 394 residents and 270 consultants, 220 from surgical and 444 from medical specialties, completed the online course in 2016 and 2017. Residents had higher test scores than consultants for pharmacotherapy (73% vs 70%, p < 0.02) and polypharmacy (75% vs 72%, p < 0.02). The learning effect did not differ. Medical residents/consultants had a better knowledge of pharmacotherapy (74% vs 68%, p < 0.001) and polypharmacy (77% vs 66%, p < 0.001) than surgical residents/consultants, but the learning effect was the same. CONCLUSIONS: Residents and consultants had a similar learning curve for acquiring knowledge, but residents outperformed consultants on all measures. In addition, surgical and medical residents/consultants had similar learning curves, but medical residents/consultants had higher test scores on all measures.


Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Humanos , Idoso , Consultores , Polimedicação , Competência Clínica
2.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 87(8): 3268-3278, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33527489

RESUMO

AIMS: Junior doctors frequently prescribe incorrectly and this can cause serious harm to patients. Pharmacotherapy education in most medical schools falls short in preparing their students to prescribe safely in clinical practice. According to the theory of assessment-driven learning, a pharmacotherapy self-assessment for junior doctors may reduce potential harmful prescriptions in clinical practice, by revealing deficits in prescribing knowledge and skills. METHODS: In this single centre, prospective cohort study, the potential harmful prescriptions of junior doctors in clinical practice were compared before and after a pharmacotherapy self-assessment with and without additional pharmacotherapy education. RESULTS: Potential harmful prescriptions best known to cause harm to patients were studied in all the prescriptions written out by 199 junior doctors in the first 2 months of their employment in our hospital. The pharmacotherapy self-assessment reduced the total number of potential harmful prescriptions made by junior doctors relative to those made by junior doctors in the control group (1.3 vs. 3.2%, respectively; P < .001). Additional education did not reduce potential harmful prescriptions beyond the effect of the self-assessment alone (1.3 vs. 1.0%, P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacotherapy self-assessment leads to fewer potential harmful prescriptions made by junior doctors in clinical practice, thereby improving patient safety. More research is needed to investigate whether additional pharmacotherapy education strategies reduce potential harmful prescriptions further.


Assuntos
Erros de Medicação , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , Competência Clínica , Humanos , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Padrões de Prática Médica , Estudos Prospectivos
3.
Innov Pharm ; 13(1)2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36304678

RESUMO

Purpose: Polypharmacy is a known risk factor for potentially inappropriate prescribing. Recently there is an increasing interest in clinical decision support systems (CDSS) to improve prescribing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a CDSS, with the START-STOPP criteria as main content in the setting of a geriatric ward. Endpoints were 1) appropriateness of prescribing and 2) acceptance rate of recommendations. Methods: This prospective study comparing the use of a CDSS with usual care involved patients admitted to geriatric wards in two teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients were included from January to May 2017. The medications of 64 patients in the first six weeks was assessed according to the current standard, whereas the medications of 61 patients in the second six weeks were also assessed by using a CDSS. Medication appropriateness was assessed with the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI). Results: The medications of 125 patients (median age 83 years) were reviewed. In both the usual care group and the intervention group MAI scores decreased significantly from admission to discharge (within group analyses, p<0.001). This effect was significantly larger in the intervention group (p<0.05). MAI scores at discharge in the usual care group and the intervention group were respectively 9.95±6.70 and 7.26±5.07. The CDSS generated 193 recommendations, of which 71 concerned START criteria, 45 STOPP criteria, and 77 potential interactions. Overall, 31.6% of the recommendations were accepted. Conclusion: This study shows that a CDSS to improve prescribing has additional value in the setting of a geriatric ward. Almost one third of the software-generated recommendations were interpreted as clinically relevant and accepted, on average one per patient.

4.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 158: A7381, 2014.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25027217

RESUMO

The prevalence of aortic stenosis is increasing due to aging of the general population. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) for high-risk patients. Cardiac scoring systems have been developed to predict the risk of adverse outcomes following surgery, but currently they do not include frailty parameters, and frail patients have an increased risk of adverse health outcomes. Preoperative frailty correlates with adverse outcomes, mortality and functional decline in patients undergoing TAVI; by identifying these patients it is possible to counteract symptoms of frailty by implementing tailored intervention by the geriatrician. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a tool used to detect frailty. Based on the current literature, we highly recommend performing a CGA and a minimum of a Timed Up and Go test, a mini nutritional assessment and serum albumin measurements in patients aged > 70 years undergoing a TAVI or surgical AVR, in order to aim reducing the accompanying risks of the intervention.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Idoso Fragilizado , Avaliação Geriátrica , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Medição de Risco , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Feminino , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa