A2/A2B to B deceased donor kidney transplantation in the Kidney Allocation System era.

Kidney transplantation from blood type A2/A2B donors to type B recipients (A2→B) has increased dramatically under the current Kidney Allocation System (KAS). Among living donor transplant recipients, A2-incompatible transplants are associated with an increased risk of all-cause and death-censored graft failure. In light of this, we used data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from December 2014 until June 2022 to evaluate the association between A2→B listing and time to deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) and post-DDKT outcomes for A2→B recipients. Among 53 409 type B waitlist registrants, only 12.6% were listed as eligible to accept A2→B offers ("A2-eligible"). The rates of DDKT at 1-, 3-, and 5-years were 32.1%, 61.4%, and 72.1% among A2-eligible candidates and 14.1%, 29.9%, and 44.1% among A2-ineligible candidates, with the former experiencing a 133% higher rate of DDKT (Cox weighted hazard ratio (wHR) = 2.192.332.47; P < .001). The 7-year adjusted mortality was comparable between A2→B and B-ABOc (type B/O donors to B recipients) recipients (wHR 0.780.941.13, P = .5). Moreover, there was no difference between A2→B vs B-ABOc DDKT recipients with regards to death-censored graft failure (wHR 0.771.001.29, P > .9) or all-cause graft loss (wHR 0.820.961.12, P = .6). Following its broader adoption since the implementation of the kidney allocation system, A2→B DDKT appears to be a safe and effective transplant modality for eligible candidates. As such, A2→B listing for eligible type B candidates should be expanded.

Impact of the Pediatric ABO Policy Change on Listings, Transplants, and Outcomes for Children Younger Than 2 Years Listed for Heart Transplantation in the United States.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the impact of the liberalized ABO pediatric policy change on candidate characteristics and outcomes for children undergoing heart transplant (HT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Children <2 years undergoing HT with ABO strategy reported at listing and HT from December 2011 to November 2020 to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database were included. Characteristics at listing, HT, and outcomes during the waitlist and post-transplant were compared before the policy change (December 16, 2011 to July 6, 2016), and after the policy change (July 7, 2016 to November 30, 2020). The percentage of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) listings did not increase immediately after the policy change (P = .93); however, ABOi transplants increased by 18% (P < .0001). At listing, both before and after the policy change, ABOi candidates had higher urgency status, renal dysfunction, lower albumin, and required more cardiac support (intravenous inotropes, mechanical ventilation) than those listed ABO compatible (ABOc). On multivariable analysis, there were no differences in waitlist mortality between children listed as ABOi and ABOc before the policy change (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-1.05, P = .10) or after the policy change (aHR 1.2, 95% CI 0.85-1.6, P = .33). Post-transplant graft survival was worse for ABOi transplanted children before the policy change (aHR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.8, P = .014), but not significantly different after the policy change (aHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61-1.4, P = .76). After the policy change, ABOi listed children had significantly shorter waitlist times (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The recent pediatric ABO policy change has significantly increased the percentage of ABOi transplantations and decreased waitlist times for children listed ABOi. This change in policy has resulted in broader applicability and actual performance of ABOi transplantation with equal access to ABOi or ABOc organs, and thus eliminated the potential disadvantage of only secondary allocation to ABOi recipients.

Outcomes of ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Compared to Waiting or Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is considered only for patients who do not have an ABO-compatible (ABOc) LD. Therefore, a clinically practical question is whether to proceed with ABOi LDKT or remain on dialysis while waiting for ABOc deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). However, this issue has not been addressed in Asian countries, where ABOi LDKT programs are more active than DDKT programs. METHODS: A total of 426 patients underwent ABOi-LDKT between 2010 and 2020 at Seoul National University Hospital and Severance Hospital, Korea. We compared outcomes between the ABOi-LDKT and the propensity-matched control groups (waiting-list-only group, n = 1,278; waiting-list-or-ABOc-DDKT group, n = 1,278). RESULTS: The ABOi-LDKT group showed a significantly better patient survival rate than the waiting-list-only group (p = 0.001) and the waiting-list-or-ABOc-DDKT group (p = 0.048). When the ABOi-LDKT group was categorized into a high-titer group (peak anti-ABO titer ≥1:128) and a low-titer group (peak anti-ABO titer ≤1:64), the low-titer group showed better patient survival rates than those of the waiting-list-or-ABOc-DDKT group (p = 0.046) or the waiting-list-only group (p = 0.004). In contrast, the high-titer ABOi-LDKT group showed no significant benefit in patient survival compared to the waiting-list-or-ABOc-DDKT group. Death-censored graft survival in the ABOi-LDKT group was not significantly different from that in the ABOc-DDKT group (p = 0.563). CONCLUSION: The ABOi-LDKT group has better outcomes than the waiting-list-or-ABOc-DDKT group in a country with a long waiting time.

Successful treatment pure red cell aplasia after ABO major mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with avatrombopag and low dose rituximab.

BACKGROUND: Pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with ABO major incompatibility is characterized by transfusion dependent anemia. No standard treatment existed for PRCA following allo-HSCT yet. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study, and reported our experience with the use of avatrombopag and lower dose rituximab to treat five patients with PRCA subsequent to major ABO-incompatible allo-HSCT. RESULTS: Five cases of PRCA were identified from 72 patients who underwent allo-HSCT with major or bidirectional ABO mismatch. Cumulative incidence at Day +60 was 6.9% (5/72) at our center. All donor and recipient blood groups were A+  and O+ , respectively. In the first three cases we reported, patients received erythropoietin, plasma exchange, and donor lymphocyte infusion, but none of them had any effect. After 4 weeks of treatment with low dose rituximab (100 mg/week) combined with avatrombopag (40 mg/day), favorable outcomes were obtained. According to the aforementioned experience, Cases 4 and 5 were administered low-dose rituximab and avatrombopag in 3 months after transplantation, and erythroid response was observed on 3 weeks after treatment. Our patients tolerated low-dose rituximab and avatrombopag well and experienced rapid efficacy, with a median duration of 3 weeks. Furthermore, no severe infection or thrombocytosis necessitated a dose adjustment. CONCLUSION: Low-dose rituximab and avatrombopag may be an effective treatment for patients with PRCA after major ABO-incompatible allo-HSCT. The patients should be treated at least 90 days post transplantation if conventional erythropoietin therapy fails.

A2/A2B to B kidney transplantation outcomes: A single center 7-year experience.

INTRODUCTION: Data on long-term outcomes following A2/A2B to B kidney transplants since the 2014 kidney allocation system (KAS) changes are few. The primary aim of this study is to report our 7-year experience with A2/A2B to B kidney transplants and to compare post-transplant outcomes of A2/A2B to a concurrent group of B to B kidney transplants. Additionally, the study evaluates the impact of pre-transplant anti-A1 titers on survival outcomes in A2/A2B transplants. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center analysis included all adults who received A2/A2B to B deceased donor kidney transplants from December 2014 to June 2021 compared to B to B recipients. The effects of pre-transplant IgM/IgG titers, stratified as ≤1:8 and ≥1:16, on death-censored, rejection-free, and overall graft survival were tested. RESULTS: Fifty-three A2/A2B and 114 B to B adults were included with a median follow-up time of 32 months. Overall graft survival, patient survival, and rejection-free graft survival did not differ between the two groups. There were no differences between the groups' overall kidney function values (p > .80) or their temporal trajectories (time by group interaction p > .11). Unadjusted death-censored graft survival was lower in A2/A2B to B compared to B recipients (p = .03), but the effect was not significant (p = .195) after adjusting for any readmissions (p = .96), rejection episodes (p < .001) or BK infection (p = .76). We did not detect an effect of pre-transplant titer group on death-censored (p = .59), rejection-free (p = .61), or overall graft survival (p = .26) CONCLUSIONS: A2/A2B to B kidney transplants have comparable overall patient and graft survival, rejection-free graft survival, and longitudinal renal function compared to B to B transplants at our center. Allograft survival outcomes were not significantly different between patients with low and high pre-transplant anti-A1 IgM/IgG titers.

Non-antigen-specific Immunoadsorption Is a Risk Factor for Severe Postoperative Infections in ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplant Recipients.

ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living kidney transplantation (KTx) is an established procedure to address the demand for kidney transplants with outcomes comparable to ABO-compatible KTx. Desensitization involves the use of immunoadsorption (IA) to eliminate preformed antibodies against the allograft. This monocentric retrospective study compares single-use antigen-selective Glycosorb® ABO columns to reusable non-antigen-specific Immunosorba® immunoglobulin adsorption columns regarding postoperative infectious complications and outcome. It includes all 138 ABOi KTx performed at Freiburg Transplant Center from 2004-2020. We compare 81 patients desensitized using antigen-specific columns (sIA) to 57 patients who received IA using non-antigen-specific columns (nsIA). We describe distribution of infections, mortality and allograft survival in both groups and use Cox proportional hazards regression to test for the association of IA type with severe infections. Desensitization with nsIA tripled the risk of severe postoperative infections (adjusted HR 3.08, 95% CI: 1.3-8.1) compared to sIA. nsIA was associated with significantly more recurring (21.4% vs. 6.2%) and severe infections (28.6% vs. 8.6%), mostly in the form of urosepsis. A significantly higher proportion of patients with sIA suffered from allograft rejection (29.6% vs. 14.0%). However, allograft survival was comparable. nsIA is associated with a two-fold risk of developing a severe postoperative infection after ABOi KTx.

Therapeutic apheresis in renal transplantation: An update.

Therapeutic apheresis (TA) plays a significant role in various aspects of renal transplantation. It has been a necessary preconditioning component in ABO incompatible kidney transplants and an important modality in the removal of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies both in the context of desensitization protocols that have been developed to allow highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates to be successfully transplanted and as treatment of antibody mediated rejection episodes post transplantation. In addition, TA has been used with various results for the management of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The purpose of this review is to examine the evidence supporting the application of TA as an adjunctive therapeutic option to immunosuppressive agents in protocols both before and after kidney transplantation.

I-JAMM-(I): A survey providing an insight into the practices of isoagglutinin titration in ABO incompatible kidney and liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: ABO-incompatible transplantations allow patients to receive timely transplants. Isoagglutinin titration to ascertain levels of incompatible antibodies in the recipient is important in determining patient selection and transplant survivability. To find out the prevalent trends in India, the largest, first of its kind survey was carried out among the transplant centers regarding their practices in isoagglutinin titration. METHODS: The survey was drafted by a working group of Transfusion and Transplant Immunology specialists from six different centers. Data was obtained via the use of an online questionnaire. RESULTS: Results were categorized into four categories, Hospital information, Titration methodology, Role of transfusion specialists and cut-off titers. Most centers had a well-established solid-organ transplant program with considerable number of ABO-incompatible transplantations. Most centers performed isoagglutinin titration in Transfusion Medicine department. Column Agglutination Technique (CAT) was the most common method, using EDTA blood samples and freshly-prepared in-house pooled cells. Most centers had a turn-around time of less than 12 h. While the policy for ascertaining baseline and threshold titers is well-defined in ABO-incompatible renal transplants, variations from center to center still exist for ABO-incompatible liver transplants. Most centers required a Transfusion Medicine consultation for the patients before such transplants. CONCLUSION: With increasing ABO-incompatible kidney and liver transplants across the country, the role of Transfusion medicine specialists has become vital in pre-conditioning regimes enabling the viability and success of such transplants. This was a unique survey that provided a snapshot of current trends and practices of isoagglutinin titration for ABO-incompatible transplants in India.

The first successful case of ABO-incompatible living-donor lobar lung transplantation following desensitization therapy.

ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) was successfully performed in a 14-year-old girl who suffered from bronchiolitis obliterans due to graft-versus-host disease following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In the ABO-I LDLLT procedure, the blood type O patient received a right lower lobe donated from her blood type B father and a left lower lobe donated from her blood type O mother. Desensitization therapy, using rituximab, immunosuppressants, and plasmapheresis, was implemented for 3 weeks prior to transplantation to reduce the production of anti-B antibodies in the recipient and prevent acute antibody-mediated rejection after ABO-I LDLLT.

Comparison of Haemonetics Cell Saver 5+ and manual density separation for optimum depletion of red blood cells and preservation of CD34+ cells in major ABO-incompatible bone marrow grafts.

BACKGROUND AIMS: The current approach for preventing hemolysis of red blood cells (RBCs) in major ABO-incompatible bone marrow (BM) grafts after infusion is to deplete RBCs from BM products before transplantation. Traditionally, manual density separation (MDS) using Ficoll-Hypaque (Cytiva Sweden AB, Uppsala, Sweden has been used to accomplish RBC depletion. This process yields good CD34+ cell recovery, but it requires open manipulation and is labor-intensive and time-consuming. We hypothesized that an alternative automated method using Haemonetics Cell Saver 5+ (Haemonetics Corporation, Boston, MA, USA) would offer equivalent RBC depletion and CD34+ cell recovery. Small marrow volumes from pediatric donors can be processed using Cell Saver (CS) without adding the third-party RBCs necessary for other automated methods. METHODS: This retrospective analysis comprised data from 58 allogeneic BM grafts. RBC depletion and CD34+ cell recovery from BM using MDS (35 grafts) were compared with CS (14 grafts). Nine products underwent RBC depletion using CS with Ficoll (CS-F) when RBC volume was less than 125 mL. RESULTS: Linear regression analysis of log transformation of CD34+ cell recovery adjusted for log transformation of both baseline CD34+ cell content and baseline total volume showed no significant difference between MDS and CS (estimated coefficient, -0.121, P = 0.096). All products contained an RBC volume of less than 0.25 mL/kg post-processing. CD34+ cell recovery with CS-F was comparable to MDS and CS and suitable for pediatric recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence that an automated method using Haemonetics Cell Saver 5+ achieves RBC depletion and CD34+ cell recovery comparable to MDS when adjusting for baseline factors.

Advances and innovations in living donor liver transplant techniques, matching and surgical training: Meeting report from the living donor liver transplant consensus conference.

The practice of LDLT currently delivers limited impact in western transplant centers. The American Society of Transplantation organized a virtual consensus conference in October 2021 to identify barriers and gaps to LDLT growth, and to provide evidence-based recommendations to foster safe expansion of LDLT in the United States. This article reports the findings and recommendations regarding innovations and advances in approaches to donor-recipient matching challenges, the technical aspects of the donor and recipient operations, and surgical training. Among these themes, the barriers deemed most influential/detrimental to LDLT expansion in the United States included: (1) prohibitive issues related to donor age, graft size, insufficient donor remnant, and ABO incompatibility; (2) lack of acknowledgment and awareness of the excellent outcomes and benefits of LDLT; (3) ambiguous messaging regarding LDLT to patients and hospital leadership; and (4) a limited number of proficient LDLT surgeons across the United States. Donor-recipient mismatching may be circumvented by way of liver paired exchange. The creation of a national registry to generate granular data on donor-recipient matching will guide the practice of liver paired exchange. The surgical challenges to LDLT are addressed herein and focuses on the development of robust training pathways resulting in proficiency in donor and recipient surgery. Utilizing strong mentorship/collaboration programs with novel training practices under the auspices of established training and certification bodies will add to the breadth and depth of training.

ABO Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Without B-cell Depletion is Associated With Increased Early Acute Rejection: A Single-Center Australian Experience.

We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of 66 consecutive ABO incompatible kidney transplants (ABOiKT) performed without B-cell depleting therapy. Outcomes were compared to an earlier era performed with rituximab (n = 18) and a contemporaneous cohort of ABO compatible live donor transplants (ABOcKT). Acute rejection within 3 months of transplant was significantly more common after rituximab-free ABOiKT compared to ABOiKT with rituximab (OR 8.8, p = 0.04) and ABOcKT (OR 2.9, p = 0.005) in adjusted analyses. Six recipients of rituximab-free ABOiKT experienced refractory antibody mediated rejection requiring splenectomy, and a further two incurred early graft loss with no such episodes amongst ABOiKT with rituximab or ABOcKT cohorts. Patient and graft survival were similar between groups over a median follow-up of 3.1 years. This observational evidence lends strong support to the continued inclusion of rituximab in desensitization protocols for ABOiKT.

Successful ABO and HLA incompatible kidney transplantation in children in the UK.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence of good short-term and medium-term outcomes of ABO incompatible (ABOi) and HLA incompatible (HLAi) kidney transplantation with pre-transplant positive crossmatches in paediatric practice. However, there remain concerns regarding the higher risks of infective complications and antibody-mediated rejections. The aim of our study is to show longer-term follow-up on all ABOi and HLAi paediatric kidney transplant recipients (pKTR) in the UK. METHODS: Questionnaires specifying kidney transplant type, desensitisation requirement and kidney allograft function were sent to 13 paediatric nephrology centres that performed kidney transplantation in children and young people under 18 years of age who received an ABOi and/or HLAi transplant between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2016. Patient and kidney allograft survival were compared between ABOi, HLAi and ABO/HLA compatible (ABOc/HLAc) groups. RESULTS: Among 711 living donor kidney transplants performed in the UK, 23 were ABOi and 6 were HLAi. Patient survival was 87%, 100% and 96% in ABOi, HLAi and ABOc/HLAc groups, respectively, at median follow-up of 6.8 (3.6-14.0) years post-transplant. Death-censored kidney allograft survival was 100% in all 3 groups at last follow-up. There were no cases of primary non-function in ABOi or HLAi groups, but 2% in the ABOc/HLAc group. There was one reported case of Epstein-Barr viral-induced post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. CONCLUSION: Longer term follow-up has shown that ABOi and HLAi kidney transplantation are feasible for pKTR where no compatible donors are available, and that minimising desensitisation should be achieved where possible. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Therapeutic apheresis in renal transplantation: An update.

Therapeutic apheresis (TA) plays a significant role in various aspects of renal transplantation. It has been a necessary preconditioning component in ABO incompatible kidney transplants and an important modality in the removal of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies both in the context of desensitization protocols that have been developed to allow highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates to be successfully transplanted and as treatment of antibody mediated rejection episodes post transplantation. In addition, TA has been used with various results for the management of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The purpose of this review is to examine the evidence supporting the application of TA as an adjunctive therapeutic option to immunosuppressive agents in protocols both before and after kidney transplantation.

Acute hemolytic transfusion reaction following ABO-mismatched platelet transfusion: Two case reports.

Acute hemolytic transfusion reaction following ABO-incompatible platelet transfusion: two case reports An ideal platelet transfusion should provide ABO identical platelet concentrate, and cross match compatibility is not routinely performed in the standard practices. However, ABO non identical platelet transfusions are not uncommon with the limited resources and short shelf life of platelet concentrate. Though rare, acute hemolytic transfusion reaction (AHTR) may occur following minor ABO-incompatible platelet transfusion. Here, we report two cases of thrombocytopenic patients (one child and one adult) type as Group B RhD positive and received Group O RhD positive platelet transfusions. Both patients experienced an AHTR evidenced by a drop in hemoglobin level, spherocytosis and small agglutinations on the blood film, and positive direct Coombs test. They were treated symptomatically, recovered and discharged well post-event without any morbidity. No anti-B isohemagglutinins titer were done to confirm the high titer of the antibody in the platelet donors. Our cases highlighted the importance of ABO-compatible platelet transfusion, especially to children and those vigilant groups of patients.

Hyporesponsiveness against donor's ABO antigens of renal grafts after ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: ABO antigens expressed on the red blood cells (RBCs) are not identical to those expressed on the renal endothelial cells. The isohemagglutinin assay employing the RBCs is the gold standard for evaluating anti-ABO antibody (Ab) levels. However, it remains unclear whether the anti-ABO Abs detected by the isohemagglutinin assay after ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantations (KTx) that are not associated with antibody-mediated rejection can bind to renal graft endothelial cells. METHODS: Ninety plasma samples were collected from patients with stable graft function after ABO-compatible (ABOc) or ABOi KTx. Anti-ABO Ab titers were examined by both the isohemagglutinin assay and the CD31-ABO microarray, which was developed as a mimic of the ABO antigens expressed on the renal endothelial cells. RESULTS: The antibody titers detected by the isohemagglutinin assay and the CD31-ABO microarray after the ABOc KTx relatively correlated with each other. However, the CD31-ABO microarray results showed low antibody levels against donor blood group antigens after ABOi KTx and did not correlate with the isohemagglutinin assay. In contrast, the antibody levels against non-donor blood group antigens after ABOi KTx were comparable to those after the ABOc KTx. Fourteen patients received graft biopsies, and no antibody-mediated rejection was observed in ABOi KTx recipients, except for two patients who had anti-donor-HLA Abs. CONCLUSION: The present study suggested that the anti-ABO Abs detected by the isohemagglutinin assay after ABOi KTx with stable graft function were hyporeactive to the ABO antigen of graft renal endothelial cells.

Protracted COVID-19 pneumonitis early post-ABO incompatible kidney transplantation: Management considerations and the role of whole genome sequencing.

We present the case of a recent ABO incompatible kidney transplant recipient with persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection and pneumonitis. Serial whole genome sequencing confirmed intra-host viral evolution, which was used as a surrogate to confirm active viral replication and support re-treatment with antivirals, late in the course of infection. A prolonged course of remdesivir combined with immunosuppression modulation resulted in successful clearance of virus and clinical improvement. The diagnostic process undertaken in this case provides a useful guide for other clinicians when approaching similar patients.

Successful treatment of pure red cell aplasia using therapeutic plasma exchange after ABO-incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) are widely used in the treatment of hematologic malignancies and bone marrow failure syndromes. ABO compatibility is typically of secondary importance, and up to 50% of HSCT are performed in ABO-incompatible pairings. In the literature, pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) occurs in 1% to 50% of all major/bidirectional ABO-incompatible stem cell transplants, but treatment of PRCA remains heterogeneous. Here, we report two cases in which patients with transfusion-dependent PRCA following HSCT were successfully treated with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). Case 1: A 52-year-old type O-positive male with acute myeloid leukemia underwent HSCT using apheresis-derived HSCs from a fully human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched, related type A-positive male donor. He developed PRCA that was refractory to multiple therapies, so a series of 10 TPE was performed over 3 weeks. Case 2: A 21-year-old type A-positive male with aplastic anemia underwent HSCT using bone marrow-derived HSCs from a fully HLA-matched related type B-positive female donor. He developed PRCA that was refractory to multiple therapies, so a series of 5 TPE was performed over 2 weeks. Case 1: The patient has been transfusion independent since TPE #7, and type A red blood cells (RBCs) were seen on the ABO type after TPE #9. Case 2: The patient has been transfusion independent since after TPE #1, and type B RBCs were seen on the ABO type after TPE #5. TPE was successful in treating two patients with PRCA after ABO-incompatible HSCT transplants. Isoagglutinin titers decreased below the level of detection for both our patients. Ultimately both patients became transfusion independent and showed evidence of erythroid cell recovery.

Large volume plasmapheresis using a single-use immunoadsorption column: A cost-effective approach for desensitization in ABO-incompatible liver transplant.

INTRODUCTION: Liver transplant is a life-saving treatment, but due to the limited availability of suitable liver donors, ABO-incompatible liver transplants (ABOi-LT) are conducted to increase the availability of liver donors. Perioperative desensitization for ABOi-LT is an established strategy to circumvent the risk of graft rejection. A single prolonged session can be performed to achieve the desired titers to avoid using multiple immunoadsorption (IA) columns or off-label reuse of single-use columns. This study retrospectively assessed the effectiveness of a single prolonged plasmapheresis session using IA as a desensitization strategy in live donor liver transplant (LDLT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study conducted at a center for liver diseases in North India on six ABOi-LDLT patients who underwent single prolonged IA sessions in the perioperative period from January 2018 to June 2021. RESULTS: Median baseline titer in patients was 320 (64, 1024). The median plasma volume adsorbed was 7.5 volumes (4, 8) per procedure, with a mean procedure time of 600 min (310-753). The reduction in titer ranged from 4 log to 7 log reduction per procedure. Two patients developed transient hypotension during the procedure, which was managed successfully. The median duration of pre-transplant hospital stay was 1.5 days (1, 3). CONCLUSION: Desensitization therapy helps overcome the ABO barrier and decreases the waiting period before a transplant when ABO identical donors are unavailable. A single prolonged IA session reduces the cost of additional IA columns and hospital stay, thus making it a cost-effective approach to desensitization.

Long-term outcomes following ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure: a single-center experience of over 20 years.

PURPOSE: Acute liver failure is a life-threatening condition for which ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation (ABOi-LDLT) is sometimes the only life-saving treatment option. We reviewed a single-center experience of adult ABOi-LDLT treatment for acute liver failure (ALF). METHODS: Preoperative treatment, immune indices (B cell marker, anti-donor blood-type antibody), and postoperative outcomes were compared between ALF and non-ALF groups. RESULTS: There were 5 and 33 patients in the ALF and non-ALF groups, respectively. The ALF group received higher doses of steroids, underwent more rounds of plasma exchange (PE), and underwent transplantation for ALF with a shorter interval following preoperative rituximab (RTx) administration (median: 2 vs 13 days; P < 0.05) than the non-ALF group. Preoperatively, CD19-positive lymphocytes in the peripheral blood were sufficiently depleted in all of the non-ALF group patients, whereas they were poorly depleted in the ALF group. Postoperatively, neither group suffered anti-donor blood-type antibody titer rebound or antibody-mediated rejection. The ALF group had a comparable 5-year survival rate to the non-ALF group (80.0% vs 77.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the delayed preoperative administration of RTx, the ALF group showed an uneventful immunological response and acceptable long-term survival rate. Thus, ABOi-LDLT seems a viable treatment option for ALF.