Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy in 2018-2019: ARVC/ALVC or Both?

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is now commonly used to describe any form of non-hypertrophic, progressive cardiomyopathy characterised by fibrofatty infiltration of the ventricular myocardium. Right ventricular (RV) involvement refers to the classical arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, but left ventricular, or bi-ventricular involvement are now recognised. ACM is mostly hereditary and associated with mutations in genes encoding proteins of the intercalated disc. ACM classically manifests as ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden death may be the first presentation of the disease. Heart failure is seen with advanced stages of the disease. Diagnosis can be challenging due to variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance, and is guided by established Taskforce criteria that incorporate electrical features (12-lead electrocardiography (ECG), features of ventricular arrhythmias), structural features (on imaging via echo and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), tissue characteristics (via biopsy), and familial/genetic evaluation. Electrical abnormalities may precede structural alterations, which also make diagnosis challenging, especially in differentiating ACM from other conditions such as benign right ventricular arrhythmias, channelopathies such as Brugada, or the Athlete's Heart. Genetic testing is critical in identifying familial mutations and initiating cascade testing, but finds a pathogenic mutation in only ∼50% of patients. Some critical genotype-phenotype correlations do exist and may help guide risk stratification and give clues to disease progression. Therapeutic strategies include restriction from high endurance and competitive sports, ß-blockers, antiarrhythmic drugs, heart failure medications, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and combined endocardial/epicardial catheter ablation. Ablation has emerged as the treatment of choice for recurrent ventricular arrhythmias in ACM. This state-of-the-art review outlines the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of ACM in the contemporary era.

Filamin C (FLNC) truncating mutation in a fatal arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy (ALVC).

Forensic pathologists are frequently asked to investigate cases of sudden death (SD), and identifying the cause of death can be of particular importance, especially where it may be necessary to perform family screening among the relatives of the victim. A multidisciplinary approach inclusive of genetic analysis is therefore strongly recommended. According to forensic practice, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a well-known cause of SD. However, cases of SD caused by a left ventricular pattern of ACM diagnosed at autopsy are rarely reported in the literature. We present the case of an apparently healthy, 37-year-old male found dead at his home. At autopsy, multiple foci of epicardial and mid-wall fibrous and fibro-adipose tissue were observed within the left ventricle and, to a lesser extent, within the interventricular septum. Toxicology was negative, whereas a filamin C truncating mutation was detected through genetic analysis. To our knowledge, this is the first instance of arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy being diagnosed at autopsy.

Genetic testing in the management of inherited cardiac disorders: two cases of Filamin-C arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy.

Background: Arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy (ALVC) is a left ventricle-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) subtype often associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular (LV) scar and sudden cardiac death. Awareness about LV involvement is now on the rise. The diagnosis relies on structural abnormalities on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and known ACM-causing genetic mutations. Case summary: A 28-year-old lady (Case 1) was referred for cardiac screening after her father passed away suddenly. Her paternal uncle (Case 2) had been diagnosed with supposed dilated cardiomyopathy prior to referral. Both cases were worked up extensively with an electrocardiogram (ECG), 24-h ambulatory ECG monitor, exercise testing, and CMR imaging. Investigations of Case 1 showed T-wave inversion in the infero-lateral leads and a ventricular ectopic burden of 3% on ambulatory monitoring. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed moderately reduced LV systolic function (ejection fraction of 40%) with circumferential macroscopic fibrosis. Her uncle (Case 2) also had an impaired and dilated ventricle with extensive scar on CMR. Following the recent introduction of a cardiogenetic service in our unit, both were heterozygous for a pathogenic Filamin-C variant (c.7384+1G>A). Based on CMR findings and genetic results, the diagnosis of both patients was deemed to be ALVC. After years of surveillance, Patient 1 now has an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) indication. Discussion: The importance of diagnosing patients with ACM lies in the predisposition to sudden cardiac death. Gene-specific treatment algorithms in ACM may alter management strategies, including ICD implantation as primary prevention. An in-depth multidisciplinary discussion and respecting patient autonomy are key factors in any decision pertaining to ICD implantation.

Prognostic Prediction of Genotype vs Phenotype in Genetic Cardiomyopathies.

BACKGROUND: Diverse genetic backgrounds often lead to phenotypic heterogeneity in cardiomyopathies (CMPs). Previous genotype-phenotype studies have primarily focused on the analysis of a single phenotype, and the diagnostic and prognostic features of the CMP genotype across different phenotypic expressions remain poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: We sought to define differences in outcome prediction when stratifying patients based on phenotype at presentation compared with genotype in a large cohort of patients with CMPs and positive genetic testing. METHODS: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, and biventricular arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy were examined in this study. A total of 281 patients (80% DCM) with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were included. The primary and secondary outcomes were: 1) all-cause mortality (D)/heart transplant (HT); 2) sudden cardiac death/major ventricular arrhythmias (SCD/MVA); and 3) heart failure-related death (DHF)/HT/left ventricular assist device implantation (LVAD). RESULTS: Survival analysis revealed that SCD/MVA events occurred more frequently in patients without a DCM phenotype and in carriers of DSP, PKP2, LMNA, and FLNC variants. However, after adjustment for age and sex, genotype-based classification, but not phenotype-based classification, was predictive of SCD/MVA. LMNA showed the worst trends in terms of D/HT and DHF/HT/LVAD. CONCLUSIONS: Genotypes were associated with significant phenotypic heterogeneity in genetic cardiomyopathies. Nevertheless, in our study, genotypic-based classification showed higher precision in predicting the outcome of patients with CMP than phenotype-based classification. These findings add to our current understanding of inherited CMPs and contribute to the risk stratification of patients with positive genetic testing.