Mucocutaneous toxicities from MEK inhibitors: a scoping review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: MEK inhibitors cause a wide spectrum of mucocutaneous toxicities which can delay or interrupt life-saving therapy. PURPOSE: To summarize the morphology, incidence, and clinical presentation of mucocutaneous toxicities from MEK inhibitors via a scoping review of the literature. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of the published literature, including clinical trials, retrospective and prospective studies, reviews, and case reports and series. All included literature was analyzed by a panel of pediatric and adult oncodermatologists. RESULTS: Of 1626 initial citations, 227 articles met final inclusion criteria. Our review identified follicular reactions, ocular toxicities, xerosis, eczematous dermatitis, edema, and paronychia as the most common mucocutaneous side effects from MEK inhibitor therapy. Grade 1 and 2 reactions were the most prevalent and were typically managed while continuing treatment; however, grade 3 toxicities requiring dose reductions or treatment interruptions were also reported. CONCLUSION: Mucocutaneous toxicities to MEK inhibitor therapy are common and most often mild in severity. Early recognition and treatment can mitigate disruptions in oncologic therapy.

An Analysis of Risk Factors for the Development of Acneiform Eruptions in Patients on Monoclonal Antibody Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors.

Acneiform eruptions occur frequently and early in patients on epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi). Identification of baseline patient risk factors would prompt earlier referral to dermatology to optimize prevention and management. The primary objective of this retrospective study is to determine the association between clinical and demographic characteristics and the development of acneiform eruptions. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients diagnosed with colon and head and neck cancers who started EGFRi between January 2017 and December 2021. Patients were followed until death or September 2022. Baseline demographic and clinical parameters were documented and patients were followed from the time of diagnosis to most recent visit for the development and management of an acneiform eruption. Regression analyses were performed to determine the association between baseline characteristics and the development of acneiform eruptions. A total of 66 patients were treated with cetuximab or panitumumab between 2017-2021 were included in the analysis. Forty-seven of the sixty-six patients developed an acneiform eruption while on EGFRi therapy (71.2%). Combination cancer therapy with another chemotherapeutic agent was associated with a lower risk of acneiform eruption (OR 0.03, P = .027). No other baseline features were statistically associated with a lower risk of acneiform eruption. Acneiform eruptions are a common cutaneous adverse event of EGFRi therapy. Ongoing research is required to elucidate risk factors for the development of acneiform eruptions, to improve the quality of life of oncology patients.

A systematic review of oral retinoids for treatment of acneiform eruptions induced by epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors.

Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi) are now standard of care in patients with EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are increasingly being used in other EGFR mutated cancers, including gastrointestinal, and head and neck. However, EGFRi are well known to cause acneiform eruptions, which are shown to positively correlate with tumor response to treatment, but may be severe enough to cause interruption of their treatment. Although most guidelines call for the use of tetracyclines to treat these acneiform eruptions, there is mounting evidence for the use of systemic retinoids instead. The objective of this review is to summarize available data on the use of systemic retinoids for management of acneiform eruptions on EGFRi. This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from database inception until December 10th, 2021. All articles were screened and relevant data extracted independently in duplicate by two reviewers. In total, 16 case reports, case series and retrospective reviews were included. Forty-three patients were treated with retinoids for their acneiform eruption due to EGFRi. The majority (77%) noted moderate to significant improvement after treatment initiation with minimal adverse events (16%). The findings of this systematic review suggest that systemic retinoids are a safe and effective therapy for the management of acneiform eruptions induced by EGFRi.

A multicenter study of skin toxicity management in patients with left-sided, RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line anti-EGFR-based doublet regimen: is there room for improvement?

BACKGROUND: Skin toxicity in patients affected by metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors is well known. However, ad hoc ESMO guidelines have only recently been published. AIM AND METHODS: To describe the management (pre-emptive or reactive) of anti-EGFR-related cutaneous adverse events (AEs), in a real-life clinical context, in a selected population of patients with left-sided, metastatic RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC treated with doublet chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (i.e., panitumumab or cetuximab) as first-line regimen at 22 Institutions. The measured clinical outcomes were treatment-related adverse events, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 515 patients included in the analysis, 173 (33.6%) received a pre-emptive and 342 (66.4%) a reactive treatment. The median follow-up period for the overall population was 30.0 months. A significantly lower incidence of any grade acneiform rash was found in the pre-emptive compared to the reactive cohort both in the overall population (78.6% vs 94.4%, p < 0.001) and in patients treated with panitumumab (76.1% vs 93.7%, p < 0.001) or cetuximab (83.3% vs 95.4%, p = 0.004), respectively. A lower incidence of any grade (41.6% vs 50.9%, p = 0.047) but a higher incidence of G3-G4 (9.2% vs 4.7%, p = 0.042) paronychia/nail disorders were found in the pre-emptive compared to the reactive cohort. Nevertheless, a lower rate of patients within the reactive compared to the pre-emptive cohort was referred to dermatological counseling (21.4% vs 15.3%, respectively, p = 0.001). A higher rate of anti-EGFR therapy modification was needed in the pre-emptive compared to the reactive cohort (35.9% vs 41.6%, respectively, p < 0.001). The pre-emptive approach did not reduce the efficacy of antineoplastic therapy compared to the reactive in terms of ORR (69.2% vs 72.8%), median PFS (12.3 vs 13.0 months), and median OS (28.8 vs 33.5 months). CONCLUSION: Although recommended by international guidelines, the pre-emptive approach of anti-EGFR-related skin toxicity in mCRC patients still appears less adopted in daily clinical practice, compared to the reactive one. A wider reception and application of this indication is desirable to improve patients' quality of life without compromising the continuity and efficacy of antineoplastic therapy.

Acneiform eruptions with combination targeted cancer therapy in colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRI) can be used with pathway inhibitors, including mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors (MEKIs), BRAF inhibitors (BRAFIs), and checkpoint inhibitors such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) to treat colorectal cancer. These can precipitate treatment-resistant acneiform eruptions, prompting dose modification or discontinuation. Predicting the likelihood of severe rash development and crafting effective treatments may promote adherence to life-saving chemotherapy. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective chart review of patients with colorectal cancer treated with EGFRI or MEKI in combination with HER2, BRAF, PI3K, or checkpoint inhibitors between January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2020, was performed. Surrogates for rash severity were investigated, including lower extremity involvement, utilization of oral steroids or retinoids, dose modification, and incidence of superinfection. RESULTS: Of 122 patients treated with combination therapy, 105 developed a rash, and 87 developed an acneiform eruption. Common combinations included MEKI/PD-LI, EGFRI/MEKI, and MEKI/PD-1I. Patients treated with EGFRI/MEKI developed the most severe rashes (p = 0.02). Lower extremity involvement was more frequent with EGFRI/MEKI compared to alternative combinations (p = 0.05). Drug holiday correlated with all rash severity surrogates, including rash grade, lower extremity involvement, oral steroid or retinoid use, and incidence of superinfection. Use of oral steroids or retinoids was associated with development of superinfection (p = 0.002). Prophylactic tetracycline use did not impact rash severity or rash incidence. CONCLUSION: This is the first descriptive analysis to characterize acneiform eruptions for patients with colorectal cancer on combination cancer therapy. Approximately 85% of patients developed a cutaneous toxicity with what appears to be synergistic effects of EGFRI and MEKI combination therapy causing the most severe eruptions. Superinfection rate correlated to systemic therapy use beyond oral tetracyclines. Further investigation into the utility of prophylactic oral tetracyclines in this population is needed.

Topical corticosteroid therapy for facial acneiform eruption due to EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial comparing starting with a very strong or a weak topical corticosteroid (FAEISS study, NCCH1512, colorectal part).

BACKGROUND: Although pre-emptive therapy with oral tetracycline, moisturizer, sunscreen, and topical corticosteroid is useful for preventing acneiform eruption (AfE) due to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, no studies have examined the efficacy of topical corticosteroids themselves, or investigated the optimal potency of corticosteroid for treating facial AfE (FAfE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Screened patients with RAS wild-type colorectal cancer started pre-emptive therapy with oral minocycline and moisturizer on initiation of cetuximab or panitumumab therapy. Patients who developed grade 1 or 2 FAfE were randomly allocated to two groups: a ranking-down (RD) group that started with a very strong corticosteroid and serially ranked down every 2 weeks unless FAfE exacerbated; and a ranking-up (RU) group that started with a weak corticosteroid and serially ranked up at exacerbation. FAfE grade, patient quality of life, and adverse events (AEs) with topical corticosteroid were evaluated every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the total number of times grade 2 or higher FAfE was identified in the central review of the 8-week treatment period. RESULTS: No significant differences in total numbers of grade 2 or higher FAfE or in AEs caused by topical corticosteroids were observed between groups during the 8 weeks. Incidence of grade 2 or higher FAfE tended to be lower in the RD group during the first 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: Considering the long-term care of FAfE, the RU regimen appears suitable and should be considered the standard treatment for FAfE due to EGFR inhibitor therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000024113).

A Commentary on the "Duration of Oral Antibiotics Administration for Cetuximab-Induced Acneiform Eruption".

Acneiform eruption is a devastating cutaneous side effect of cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody used to treat a variety of cancers. Despite its effectiveness, many patients avoid or discontinue it after experiencing its dermatological side effects as it negatively impacts their quality of life (QoL). This displays the immense need for multidisciplinary collaboration to prevent and treat cetuximab-induced acneiform eruption (CIAE). Prevention methods include, but are not limited to, education, skin care routines, and prophylactic drugs. The following measures reduce the likelihood of developing CIAE and decrease its severity, making it easier to treat if it were to occur. Ongoing research on the treatment of CIAE continues. Of these treatments, oral tetracyclines and systemic corticosteroids have been shown to be the most effective by far. This commentary aims to evaluate the study by Park et al. [Dermatology. 2021;237(3):457-63], further elaborate on prevention and treatment measures of CIAE, and highlight the implications of CIAE on a patient's QoL.

Successful treatment of a child with MEK inhibitor-induced acneiform eruption with low-dose isotretinoin.

Selumetinib is a mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase inhibitor (MEKi) approved to treat inoperable plexiform neurofibromas and used off-label for low-grade gliomas. Acneiform eruptions are a known complication of MEKi use, and in some cases, may lead to paused, dose-reduced, or discontinued therapy. Isotretinoin has been reported as an effective treatment for acneiform eruptions secondary to targeted therapies, primarily in the adult population. Here we describe a pediatric patient with a severe acneiform eruption secondary to selumetinib who was successfully treated with low-dose isotretinoin when unresponsive to conventional therapies.

Navigating metastatic colorectal treatment options in the USA: a survey of patient acceptance of skin toxicities associated with Vectibix.

PURPOSE: To understand the extent to which metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients receive education on the prevention and management associated with skin rash following Vectibix treatment. Furthermore, to investigate how this adverse event affects a patient's quality of life (QoL) and influences their treatment decisions. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered to 200 mCRC patients (100 Vectibix users and 100 Vectibix non-users). After excluding respondents who had used cetuximab, 61 Vectibix users and 56 Vectibix non-users remained. RESULTS: Most Vectibix users (79%) experienced a skin rash in response to treatment of which 65% considered the rash moderate, 27% mild, and 8% severe. Vectibix users generally felt they were adequately informed about the rash (83%), with the most common messages received related to sun protection. However, sunscreen was used by only 42% of patients prior to rash and 60% of patients following the appearance of rash. The use of oral antibiotics was low prior to rash (21%) and following rash (46%). Among patients experiencing a rash within the past week (n=16), 75% reported the rash had a large negative impact on their QoL based on the Dermatology Life Quality Index. CONCLUSION: There was a disconnect between patients feeling they were adequately informed and use of prevention and management strategies such as sun protection. This suggests a gap in patient education and adoption currently exists on management strategies both prior to and following the appearance of rash. Given the negative impact that skin toxicity has on the patient's quality of life, it is essential that patients receive and subsequently utilize all information that can minimize rash severity.

Results of the non-small cell lung cancer part of a phase III, open-label, randomized trial evaluating topical corticosteroid therapy for facial acneiform dermatitis induced by EGFR inhibitors: stepwise rank down from potent corticosteroid (FAEISS study, NCCH-1512).

PURPOSE: This FAEISS study was designed to confirm the superior efficacy of reactive topical corticosteroid strategies employing serially ranking-DOWN from very strong steroid levels for the treatment of facial acneiform rash induced by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors (EGFRIs), in comparison with strategies employing serially ranking-UP from weak steroid levels. This article reports the primary results of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) part of the trial. METHODS: Patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC treated with erlotinib or afatinib were enrolled in the first registration. All patients received preemptive therapy with oral minocycline and heparinoid moisturizer from the initiation of an EGFR inhibitor. Enrolled patients who developed facial acneiform rash within 2 weeks were randomized at second registration to either a ranking-UP (WEAK) group or a ranking-DOWN group. The primary endpoint was incidence of grade ≥ 2 facial acneiform rash over 8 weeks. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were enrolled at the first registration and received EGFRIs (n = 30 for afatinib, n = 21 for erlotinib). However, 35 patients did not develop facial acneiform rash within 2 weeks; one patient discontinued preemptive treatment. Fifteen patients (29.4%) were enrolled in the second registration; nine were assigned to the WEAK group and six to the DOWN group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade ≥ 2 facial acneiform rash between the WEAK group (one patient, twice) and the DOWN group (one patient, twice; p = 0.8417). No patients developed severe facial acneiform rash within 10 weeks. CONCLUSION: In NSCLC patients who received EGFRIs, preemptive therapy of oral minocycline and heparinoid moisturizer reduced facial acneiform rash incidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000024113.

Duration of Oral Antibiotics Administration for Cetuximab-Induced Acneiform Eruption.

BACKGROUND: Acneiform eruption is the most common cutaneous adverse event associated with cetuximab. As it can affect quality of life and adversely affect chemotherapy schedule, additional medical care is required. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the adherence to and the duration of antibiotic administration to treat cetuximab-induced acneiform eruption. METHODS: Medical data of patients who were referred to the Department of Dermatology were reviewed from January 2013 to June 2018. Dermatologists assessed the severity of acneiform eruption and prescribed tetracycline-class antibiotics according to the severity every 2 or 4 weeks. We investigated the duration and amount of oral antibiotic administration and analyzed the factors that may affect the control of acneiform eruption statistically. RESULTS: A total of 207 of 267 patients referred to the Department of Dermatology showed acneiform eruption; 124 patients were treated with minocycline, 34 patients with doxycycline, 27 patients with both, and 22 patients with topical agents. The mean duration of oral antibiotic medication was 82.7 days. A statistical analysis of the factors that prolonged the use of antibiotics for more than 90 days showed that male and younger age were risk factors. Shorter time interval from starting cetuximab to starting antibiotics was associated with longer duration of antibiotic use, statistically. CONCLUSIONS: Cetuximab-induced acneiform eruption can be well controlled with tetracycline-class antibiotics in about 3 months. It can last longer in male and younger patients. The sooner and the more severe it appears, the longer it can last.

Analysis of risk factors for skin disorders caused by anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody drugs and examination of methods for their avoidance.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Cancer drug treatment is often discontinued because of skin disorder aggravation. However, information on risk factors for skin disorders caused by anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody drugs is limited. The aim of this study was to analyse the factors associated with skin disorders caused by anti-EGFR antibody drugs and establish a method to minimize such aggravations. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 67 colorectal cancer patients treated with anti-EGFR antibody drugs for the first time. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A higher proportion of males than females experienced drug withdrawal, dose reduction or treatment discontinuation. The multiple logistic regression analysis revealed body weight as a risk factor affecting drug withdrawal, dose reduction or treatment discontinuation because of an acneiform rash. An examination of methods to avoid the aggravation of skin disorders revealed the acneiform rash grade in patients who received prophylactic minocycline was significantly lower than that in patients who did not receive prophylactic minocycline. Furthermore, among patients with grade 1 acneiform rash at the initiation of minocycline, the proportion of those who withdrew, required dose reduction or discontinued treatment was lower than that among patients with grade 2 acneiform rash. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: High body weight was identified as a novel factor for skin disorder aggravation caused by anti-EGFR antibody drugs. The aggravation of skin disorders during cancer treatment with anti-EGFR antibody drugs can potentially be avoided by carefully observing the onset of acneiform rash in affected patients with high body weight and using minocycline prophylactically or as an early-stage intervention.

[Acne]. / Akne.

Acne vulgaris is one of the most frequent dermatological diseases with a lifetime prevalence of about 85%. The clinical spectrum shows a great variety. Key factors of pathogenesis are increased sebum production, hyperkeratinization of the follicular infundibulum, inflammatory processes, and a dysbiosis of the skin microbiome. In addition to endogenous factors (e.g., disturbances of the androgen metabolism) or other hormonal changes, exogenous factors (e.g., diet, mechanical irritation or the use of inappropriate cosmetics) can also play an important role. The clinical spectrum is broad, extending from neonatal Acne (A.) to adult A., from comedonal A. to fulminant A., from cosmetic A. to A. excoriée (skin picking disorder). The psychological effects of acne can be profound and can cause a severe reduction in quality of life. Therefore, in addition to an effective therapy with regular medical check-ups and good adherence, it is always necessary to consider psychological aspects.

Twelve cases of acneiform eruptions while on anti-CTLA4 therapy.

We present the first detailed report of acneiform eruptions in patients on CTLA-4 inhibitor therapy. Acneiform eruptions commonly occur (up to 75-100%) as a cutaneous adverse event associated with EGFR inhibition; however, acneiform eruptions have not been highly reported as a cutaneous adverse event associated with CTLA-4 inhibitor therapy. We conducted a retrospective chart review of our institution's database to assess cutaneous adverse events associated with ipilimumab and tremelimumab, identifying 12 patients with acneiform eruptions (2 on tremelimumab and 10 on ipilimumab). The median time to onset of rash was 3 weeks after starting CTLA-4 inhibitor therapy, ranging from 0.7-45 weeks. Median time to cutaneous resolution was 6 weeks, ranging from 2 to 282 weeks. Treatment included oral and topical antibiotics, antihistamines, and oral or topical corticosteroids with four patients receiving no treatment. Acneiform eruptions are seen less commonly with CTLA-4 inhibitors than other cancer therapies, but awareness that it does occur is important for clinical practice. Better description is a necessary help to aid in early diagnosis and intervention. While EGFR inhibitor-associated acneiform eruptions are associated with clinical benefit, our sample size is too small to determine whether CTLA-4 inhibitor associated acneiform eruptions display the same correlation.

Analysis of Characteristics and Trends in Treatment Response of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients: A Southern US Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that has a substantial impact on patients' quality of life. As the exact pathogenesis remains unclear, treatment is complex and not yet standardized. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe patient characteristics and to broadly examine trends in treatment response of various therapeutic strategies in patients with HS in a single academic referral center in the southern USA. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of a cohort of HS patients seen in a faculty general dermatology practice with academic affiliation to Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, TX, between February 2015 and February 2018. Patient demographics, clinical features, prescribed treatments, and response to treatment were analyzed using the Pearson χ2 test or Fisher exact test, and by the Mann-Whitney U test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients (113 females, 36 males) were included. Hurley stages I, II, and III were diagnosed in 29.6, 36.5, and 33.9% of patients, respectively. 44.2% of patients had a positive family history of HS, 39.5% of patients were current or former smokers, and 52.8% reported alcohol use. 80.9% of patients were overweight or obese (BMI ≥25), compared to 68.5% in Texas in 2016 (p = 0.0012). The most frequently prescribed treatments were oral antibiotic therapy (83.9%), topical antibiotic therapy (74.5%), metabolic medications such as metformin/zinc (67.1%), intralesional Kenalog (63.1%), and biologic therapies (tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors; TNF-α inhibitors; 49%). In examining the response rate, patients with disease localized to the buttocks had significantly higher response rates (60.4 vs. 25%, p = 0.043) and approached statistical significance in responders versus nonresponders in treatment with biologics (p = 0.0632) when compared against all other treatments. CONCLUSIONS: HS is a complex inflammatory skin condition associated with obesity and smoking. In this cohort, the most frequently prescribed therapies were oral and topical antibiotics. However, the use of biologic agents (TNF-α inhibitors) appears to be associated with the most significant treatment response. KEY POINTS: This is the first study to evaluate trends in treatment response of various therapeutic strategies in HS patients at an academic referral center in Dallas, TX, a unique geographic region of the southern USA. Biologic therapy (TNF-α inhibitor) appears to be associated with the most significant treatment response.

Dermatological side effects of targeted antineoplastic therapies: a prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRs) are chemotherapeutic agents used in multiple solid organ malignity. These medications have common dermatological side effects, particularly papulopustular (PPL) lesions. The management of the diagnosis and treatment processes for such side effects may facilitate the continuation of chemotherapy and enhance the patient's quality of life. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to report the cutaneous side effects of EGFR inhibitors and to share treatment methods for such side effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 59 patients using EGFR due to breast and colorectal carcinoma at the oncology unit of Haseki Training and Research Hospital were assessed. The patients for whom EGFR was initiated were examined at the beginning of the treatment at weeks 1 and 2, their demographic characteristics were recorded, and the patients who developed a skin rash were followed up from the onset of the lesion. The PPL side effects that developed in the patients and other dermatological findings were recorded. The PPL side effects were graded, and the treatment plans were reported. The study was conducted between February 2016 and February 2018 under the approval of the local ethical committee. RESULTS: The mean age of the 59 patients (47 females, 12 males) taking EGFR inhibitors was 52.4 ± 12.0 (range: 29-84). Forty-five patients had early stage and 14 patients had advanced stage carcinoma. Fourteen patients had colorectal carcinoma, three patients had renal cancer, and 42 patients had breast cancer. Forty-two patients were using trastuzumab (single therapy in 29 patients and combined therapy in 13 patients), five patients were using cetuximab, three patients were using sunitinib, eight patients were using panitumumab, and six patients were using pertuzumab. In 22 patients, PPL side effects were observed in the skin; it was G1 in 19 patients and G2 in three patients. In seven patients who developed acneiform side effects, systemic doxycycline was used, and in others, topical tetracycline and clindamycin were used. Except for one patient using trastuzumab, all patients has lesions on the face, upper trunk, and back. One patient exhibited an atypical rash, which was diagnosed as a granulomatous follicular reaction. Xerosis was present in two cases, and paronychia, pyogenic granuloma, trichomegaly, and madarosis were observed in one patient each. The patients who developed an acneiform rash were treated with topical and systemic antibiotics, light keratolytics, and emollients. The skin side effects of all patients were mild to moderate, and all patients completed the chemotherapy process. An acneiform skin rash and other dermatological side effects are common with EGFR inhibitors. To treat these side effects, emollients, topical steroids, and local, systemic antibiotics are recommended. Clindamycin may be preferred as a topical treatment, and doxycycline may be preferred as a systematic treatment.

Cutaneous toxicities of antineoplastic agents: data from a large cohort of Greek patients.

PURPOSE: Cutaneous toxicities from novel anticancer treatments are an emerging problem in dermato-oncology. However, the prevalence of those toxicities and necessity of skin consultations are currently unknown. The purpose of our study was to perform an epidemiologic analysis of cutaneous toxicities that were referred to our cutaneous toxicity clinic in Athens, Greece. METHODS: All patients examined at the oncodermatology department over a 42-month period were included. Gender, age, type of cancer, type of antineoplastic treatment, and type of toxicity were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-nine patients (182 males, 277 females) with mean age (SD) 60.6 years (13.05) were included in the analysis. Six hundred seventy-two cutaneous toxicities were recorded. Chemotherapy-induced toxicities were the most commonly recorded incidents, with taxanes being the most commonly involved agent. Immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) have steadily increased over the past 3 years. Treatment modifications due to skin toxicities were more common in patients treated with targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors than in those treated with chemotherapy. The toxicities that led to the most treatment modifications were acneiform eruptions and perionychias. The most common IRAEs recorded were psoriasis in 11 patients, followed by pruritus, macular rash, and lichenoid-type eruptions. In addition, 4 interesting cases of IRAEs are discussed. CONCLUSION: Antineoplastic treatments can lead to a wide range of cutaneous toxicities. Our study underlines the need for a multidisciplinary approach in oncologic patients. The dermatologists' role is crucial in effectively managing those reactions and preventing antineoplastic drug dose adjustments or discontinuation of treatment.

Topical doxycycline foam 4% for prophylactic management of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor skin toxicity: an exploratory phase 2, randomized, double-blind clinical study.

PURPOSE: Acneiform rash, a common toxicity of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs), can cause patient discomfort, warranting changes in treatment. This study investigated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a novel doxycycline foam, FDX104 4%, for managing EGFRI-related skin toxicity. METHODS: This was an exploratory phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Subjects had metastatic colorectal cancer and were being treated with either cetuximab or panitumumab plus chemotherapy. Treatment (twice-daily topical FDX104 4% on one side of the face and vehicle foam on the other for 5 weeks) was initiated 7 ± 3 days prior to EGFRI therapy. Rash severity, safety, and tolerability were evaluated at 2 and 4 weeks after EGFRI start. RESULTS: The mean maximal rash grade was lower with FDX104 4% vs vehicle, and fewer subjects developed moderate-to-severe (grades 2-3) rash. On the Global Severity Score scale, a statistically significant difference favored FDX104 4% over vehicle (P = .047). Adverse events (AEs) (n = 68) occurred in 20 subjects; most were mild or moderate. The most common AEs were oral mucositis, nausea, and vomiting, common to chemotherapy and EGFRI treatment. Study-drug-related AEs were experienced by five subjects and consisted of mild, local skin reactions. No study-drug-related systemic side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: Twice-daily, topical administration of FDX104 4% as an adjunct to either cetuximab or panitumumab was safe and well tolerated, and appeared to prevent the onset of rash, especially severe rash. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: Trial Registration NCT02239731.