[Comparison of efficiency and safety of laparoscopic manual esophagoenterostomy and esophagoenterostomy with mechanical anastomotic devices after laparoscopic gastrectomy for stomach cancer]. / Sravnenie bezopasnosti i effektivnosti primeneniya metodiki ruchnogo intrakorporal'nogo ezofagoenteroanastomoza i apparatnogo ezofagoenteroanastomoza s ispol'zovaniem lineinykh sshivayushchikh apparatov posle laparoskopicheskoi gastrektomii po povodu raka zheludka.

OBJECTIVE: To compare laparoscopic manual esophagoenterostomy and esophagoenterostomy with mechanical stapling anastomotic devices after laparoscopic gastrectomy for stomach cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 34 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy for stomach in 2015-2018. Roux-en-Y esophagoenterostomy was used to reconstruct the gastrointestinal tract. Manual anastomoses were performed in 18 patients (group 1), stapled anastomoses (endogia 45 mm, covidien, mansfield, ma, usa) - in 16 patients (group 2). There was no randomization. Surgery duration, length of icu-stay, terms of enteral nutrition initiation, postoperative complications, hospital-stay were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean duration of surgery in the first group was 217 (184-302) min, in the second group - 201 (162-311) min. Duration of surgery in the first group was 1.08-fold higher than in the second group (95% CI 1.03-1.13, p=0.05). Mean blood loss was 145 ml in both groups. Mean icu-stay was 20.2 (17-42) hours in the first group and 21.1 (16.2-46) hours in the second group (ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-1.01, p=0.06). Total enteral feeding (sipping) was initiated on the third day in both groups. Mean postoperative hospital-stay was 9.21 (6-13) days in the first group and 9.23 (6-12 days) days in the second group (ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0,95-1.02, p=0.06). Postoperative morbidity was 5.5% in the first group and 6.25% in the second group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic manual esophagoenterostomy proposed by our surgical team does not have disadvantages in comparison with stapling anastomotic devices and these methods may be alternative to each other.

Α systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of aortic anastomotic devices.

OBJECTIVE: One of the factors contributing to complications related to open repair of the aorta is the construction of a hand-sewn anastomosis. Aortic anastomotic devices (AADs), such as the intraluminal ringed graft (IRG), and the anastomotic stenting technique have been developed to perform a sutureless and less complicated anastomosis. This study performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature reporting clinical use of AADs and aimed to assess, primarily, the effect of each device on 30-day overall and operation-related mortality and aortic cross-clamping time and, secondarily, the rate of successful two-sided application of the IRG device and the operation-related morbidity for each device. METHODS: An electronic search was performed using MEDLINE, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library by two independent authors. Our exclusion criteria included studies incorporating fewer than three patients and studies reporting results solely from animals or in vitro testing, results solely from end-to-side anastomosis, and results solely from endarterectomy procedures. The last search date was February 1, 2018. RESULTS: A total of 41 studies were identified that reported outcomes for the use of three different device types: IRG, anastomotic stenting technique, and surgical staplers. The last two types were classified together as the non-IRG group. The meta-analysis included 27 studies with 50 cohorts incorporating 1260 patients. The median age of the incorporated patients was 61.4 years (range, 51-73 years), and 68.9% were male. The operations were performed for the treatment of acute aortic dissection in 82.3%. The pooled overall 30-day mortality rate varied by device type; IRG devices had a mean rate of all-cause mortality of 9.71%, whereas non-IRG devices were associated with a significantly (I2 = 15.78%; P for Cochrane Q test < .19) lower rate of death (1.47%). The pooled mean aortic cross-clamping time was 35.83 minutes. Metaregression showed that the performance of two-sided anastomosis with the IRG device significantly decreased the aortic cross-clamping time. However, a successful two-sided ringed anastomosis was performed in approximately half of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Taking into account that the majority of operations were performed for the treatment of acute aortic dissection, AADs had a relatively low rate of 30-day mortality. Despite the observed heterogeneity in study protocols and the small sample size in the non-IRG group, the non-IRG group presented with the lowest 30-day mortality rate. Specific device-related complications between the different device types need further investigation.

Clinical value of microvascular anastomotic devices in repairing oral carcinoma defects by anterolateral thigh flap / 局解手术学杂志

Objective To evaluate the clinical value of microvascular anastomotic devices in free anterolateral thigh flap in the recon-struction of oral carcinoma defects.Methods From September 2013 to September 2014,52 patients with oral cancer were treated by func-tional neck cleaning,primary tumors resection,and free anterolateral thigh flap in the reconstruction.Of which 27 patients received free of femoral anterolateral flap to repair veins by using microsurgical line end to end anastomosis.And 25 pieces of microvascular anastomotic ad-vices were applied in 25 patients with oral carcinoma defects.The length of anastomosis time,flap survival rate,and complications were recor-ded.Results In 52 patients,microvascular anastomotic devices were applied in 25 veins with shorter anastomosis time,(6.3 ±1.9)min vs. (12.3 ±1.4)min,and the difference was significant(P =0.001).The flap survival rate and vascular anastomosis patency rate was 100%.No intra-and post-operative complications such as blood leak,stapling,excessive tension and tear,thrombosis in flap vein crisis associated with microvascular anastomotic devices were observed.Twenty-seven patients with 40 root vein received manual microsurgical anastomosis,2 of them showed vein crisis.Conclusion The microvascular anastomotic devices used in repairing the soft tissue defects by anterolateral thigh flap with venous anastomosis for patients of oral cancer after surgery has the advantage of higher quality,shorter time and less complications.

Vascular connector devices increase the availability of minimally invasive cardiac surgery to ischemic heart patients.

The revival of off-pump cardiac surgery and the exploration of less invasive techniques for coronary artery bypass grafting, have lead to an increasing technical difficulty, as compared to conventional surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass. The moving target vessel in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery, as well as the increasingly limited space in minimally invasive cardiac surgery were not convenient to many surgeons, a fact that lead many surgeons to deprive their patients the potential benefits of these techniques. Since the 1950's, surgeons have attempted to make the anastomotic procedure less cumbersome and less time consuming. Many creative ideas and devices were made, but for many different reasons, they eventually faded away. Since then, hand-sewn anastomoses have been the standard of care in coronary artery bypass grafting. Today, with the obvious need for a facilitated and fast coronary anastomosis, interest in these anastomotic devices has been re-awakened. The exact geometry, physiology and dynamics of the perfect anastomosis have thus been studied, in an attempt to provide an understanding of reasons behind anastomosis and graft failure after coronary artery bypass surgery, and eventually design the best performing device. These devices would allow for a faster, more accurate and a more reproducible coronary anastomosis using minimally invasive techniques. Also, due to a short learning curve, the standardization of percutaneous devices would allow much more surgeons to more widely adopt less invasive techniques. In summary, we see anastomotic devices as a solution to the technical challenges surgeons encounter with minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.