Validity and reliability of ultrasonographic assessment of femoral and tibial torsion in children and adolescents: a systematic review.

Torsional disorders of the lower limb are common in childhood, and they are one of the primary reasons parents seek consultation with healthcare providers. While clinical manoeuvres can assess femoral and tibial torsion, their reliability is medium to low. Various imaging-based techniques, including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, fluoroscopy, biplanar radiology and ultrasonography, have been used to evaluate torsional alterations of the lower extremity. Among these, ultrasound assessment offers certain advantages: it is a low-cost, non-irradiating technique, which allows the follow-up of children's torsional development. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, its validity and reliability have not been summarised in a systematic review. This study aims to analyse the validity and reliability of ultrasonography in determining femoral and tibial torsion in children and adolescents. A search from Medline (via PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus and CINAHL databases were performed from inception to 16 March 2023. No restrictions were placed on the publication year or language. The methodological quality of all eligible studies was independently reviewed by two authors using QUADAS and STARD checklists. Overall, 1546 articles were identified through the searches; 30 were considered eligible for full-text screening; and 8 studies were finally included in this review. The included studies were conducted in Germany, Norway and the UK. Among them, 7 studies analysed the validity of ultrasonography compared with other imaging techniques such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and biplanar X-ray, and 4 studies assessed intra- and inter-observer reliability. All the studies assessed femoral torsion, but only one of them also included tibial torsion.     Conclusion: Ultrasound is a good alternative for routine evaluation and follow-up of femoral torsional alterations in children and adolescents due to its safety, accessibility and immediate results in the clinical examination room. Although ultrasound has good accuracy and reliability for routine evaluations, there is controversy about whether it is sufficient for surgical planning. In cases where greater accuracy is required, magnetic resonance imaging and biplanar radiography are the preferred imaging techniques. What is Known: • Several imaging-based techniques have been described for the assessment of torsional alterations of the lower extremity. • Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, biplanar radiology and ultrasonography are the most used and studied methods. What is New: • Ultrasonography represents a good alternative for the assessment of femoral and tibial torsional alterations in children and adolescents, given its safety, accessibility and immediacy of results in the consultation room. • Its accuracy and reliability are good but not sufficient for surgical planning, in which case MRI and biplanar X-ray will be the preferred choices.

Changes in femoral anteversion after intramedullary nailing for pediatric femoral shaft fracture: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The rotational change after using a flexible intramedullary (IM) nail for femoral shaft fractures has been a concern for many surgeons. Recently, a statistical shape model (SSM) was developed for the three-dimensional reconstruction of the femur from two-dimensional plain radiographs. In this study, we measured postoperative femoral anteversion (FAV) in patients diagnosed with femoral shaft fractures who were treated with flexible IM nails and investigated age-related changes in FAV using the SSM. METHODS: This study used radiographic data collected from six regional tertiary centers specializing in pediatric trauma in South Korea. Patients diagnosed with femoral shaft fractures between September 2002 and June 2020 and patients aged < 18 years with at least two anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LAT) femur plain radiographs obtained at least three months apart were included. A linear mixed model (LMM) was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 72 patients were included in the study. The average patient age was 7.6 years and the average follow-up duration was 6.8 years. The average FAV of immediate postoperative images was 27.5 ± 11.5°. Out of 72 patients, 52 patients (72.2%) showed immediate postoperative FAV greater than 20°. The average FAV in patients with initial FAV > 20° was 32.74°, and the LMM showed that FAV decreased by 2.5° (p = 0.0001) with each 1-year increase from the time of initial trauma. CONCLUSIONS: This study explored changes in FAV after femoral shaft fracture using a newly developed technology that allows 3D reconstruction from uncalibrated 2D images. There was a pattern of change on the rotation of the femur after initial fixation, with a 2.5° decrease of FAV per year.

The vastus medialis oblique compensates in current patellar dislocation patients with the increased femoral anteversion.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the vastus medialis oblique (VMO) muscle compensates in patellar dislocation (PD) patients with the increased femoral anteversion angle (FAA). METHODS: Between 2021 and 2024, we included 60 patients with recurrent PD (RPD group). Inclusion criteria were at least two episodes of PD, as well as complete CT scans of the knee and hip. Exclusion criteria included traumatic or habitual dislocation, previous knee surgery, etc. Of these patients, 30 with excessive FAA (≥ 30°) were assigned to the A group, and 30 without excessive FAA (< 30°) to the B group. A control group of 120 patients without patellofemoral disorders was also included (C group). The cross-sectional areas of the VMO and vastus lateralis muscle (VLM) were measured 20 mm above the patella on CT scans, and the VMO/VLM area ratio was calculated. The correlation between FAA and the VMO/VLM ratio was analyzed. RESULTS: The RPD group had a significantly larger FAA (15.0 ± 1.9° vs. 30.1 ± 9.6°, P = 0.040) and a smaller VMO/VLM ratio (4.2 ± 1.5 vs. 3.5 ± 1.0, P = 0.014) compared to the C group. Within the RPD group, the A group had a higher VMO/VLM ratio than the B group (4.0 ± 1.1 vs. 3.0 ± 0.7, P = 0.029). The B group's VMO/VLM ratio was lower than that of the C group (3.0 ± 0.7 vs. 4.2 ± 1.5, P = 0.004). However, there was no significant difference in the VMO/VLM ratio between the A group and the C group. The VMO/VLM ratio showed a moderate positive correlation with FAA in the RPD group, with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.4 (P = 0.012), indicating a statistically significant relationship between the two. CONCLUSION: Patients with recurrent PD showed a smaller VMO/VLM ratio compared to controls. Increased FAA was correlated with compensatory thickening of the VMO and a higher VMO/VLM ratio in PD patients. This suggests that increased FAA may drive biomechanical adaptations in the quadriceps, stabilizing the patella. Clinicians should consider changes in FAA when assessing and treating PD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Increased combined anteversion is associated with larger posterior acetabular rim ossification in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

PURPOSE: (1) To determine the prevalence, magnitude and distribution pattern of acetabular rim ossification in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and (2) to determine the association between acetabular rim ossification and rotational abnormalities of the hip. METHODS: Patients underwent hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS at our institute between January 2021 and May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if preoperative computed tomography (CT) images of the operated hip and ipsilateral distal femur were available for the measurement of femoral and acetabular anteversion. The presence and size of acetabular rim ossification were evaluated on coronal CT sections for the superior half of the acetabulum on each clockface location. The associations between acetabular rim ossification and radiographic parameters of hip rotational morphology were examined. RESULTS: A total of 214 hips were included. Acetabular rim ossification was found in 167 hips (78%) and the most common locations were 10 and 11 o'clock. Patients presenting with acetabular rim ossification had a mean size of 4.6 ± 1.6 mm. It was the largest at 9 o'clock position (4.9 ± 2.2 mm), with a decreasing trend in size from posterior to anterior. Logistics regression analysis found age was associated with the occurrence of posterior ossification (p = 0.002). Linear regression analysis found age (p = 0.049) and male sex (p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with the size of ossification. Patients with increased cranial combined anteversion had larger posterior ossification than patients with normal and decreased cranial combined anteversion (4.2 ± 2.9 vs. 3.1 ± 2.5 mm, p = 0.016; 4.2 ± 2.9 vs. 2.5 ± 2.4 mm, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Increased combined anteversion is associated with greater posterior acetabular rim ossification. The presence and size of acetabular rim ossification are positively associated with older age and male sex. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Femoral anteversion angle is more advantageous than TT-TG distance in evaluating patellar dislocation: A retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to report the parameter characteristics of the femoral anteversion angle (FAA) and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance in patients with patellar instability compared to healthy individuals and to evaluate their reliability in predicting patellar dislocation, providing potential indications for osteotomy. METHODS: A retrospective collection of consecutive patients with patellar instability constituted the study group, while individuals without patellofemoral disorder served as the control group. Measurement of the FAA and TT-TG distance were conducted by lower extremity computed tomography scans and knees with true patellar dislocation were recorded. The diagnostic capability of the FAA and TT-TG distance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC), determining the pathological values by sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: The FAA (21.6 ± 9.0°) and TT-TG distance (20.1 ± 4.8 mm) in the study group were significantly greater than the control group (10.6 ± 7.9° and 15.6 ± 4.6 mm, respectively) (p < 0.001). The AUCs for patellar dislocation were 0.869 for FAA and 0.712 for TT-TG distance, with pathological cut-off values of 18.2° and 18.2 mm, respectively. The odds ratios for FAA and TT-TG distance were 1.185 and 1.125, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with patellar instability exhibited significantly greater FAA and TT-TG distance compared to healthy individuals. The FAA demonstrated superior predictive capability for patellar dislocation compared to the TT-TG distance. The FAA (>18.2°) measured by surgical transepicondylar axis and TT-TG distance (>18.2 mm) were the potential pathological thresholds. Additionally, an increase of 1° in FAA and 1 mm in TT-TG distance was associated with a 18.5% and 12.5% increased risk of patellar dislocation, respectively. Surgeons should be aware of the risk of patellar dislocation associated with rotational malalignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Significant difference in femoral torsion between coronal plane alignment of the knee type 1 and 4.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to find out whether the torsions of the femur and tibia are dependent on the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) type. METHODS: Five hundred patients (1000 legs) were included, who received a whole leg standing three-dimensional (3D) radiograph using EOS imaging (EOS Imaging, Paris, France). SterEOS software was used for digital reconstruction. Femoral and tibial torsions were determined by analysing 3D reconstructions of each leg. Femoral torsion was defined as the angle between the femoral neck axis (FNA) and the posterior condylar axis (PCA). Tibial torsion was defined as the angle between the axis tangent to the posterior part of the tibia plateau and the transmalleolar axis. Arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and joint-line obliquity (JLO) were also determined, allowing each leg to be assigned one of nine possible phenotypes according to CPAK. RESULTS: The mean femoral torsion in CPAK type 1 was significantly higher (+ 2.6° ± 0.8°) than in CPAK type 4 (p = 0.02). All other CPAK types did not differ in the degree of femoral torsions. No differences could be demonstrated for the tibial torsion. CONCLUSION: There is a correlation between the coronal alignment of the lower limb and femoral torsion. This may provide the basis for extending the CPAK classification beyond the coronal plane. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Digital protractor as an intraoperative guide to cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: To explore if digital protractor could guide the anteversion of acetabular cup during primary THA and make it consistent with preoperative. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 172 cases of primary THA with direct anterior approach (DAA) over 2 years. The anteversion of acetabular cup were measured from computed tomography (CT) scan preoperative and de-identified plain radiographs postoperative by two blinded investigators who were not involved in the surgery. The effect of the digital protractor on the anteversion was determined using regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean anteversion for the THAs in digital protractor group was 15.5°and 21.4°in control group (P < 0.01). The mean anteversion bias for the THAs in digital protractor group was 1.59° and 6.63° in control group (P < 0.01).Regression analysis identified a 10.7% difference in anteversion due to the use of digital protractor (P < 0.01), and THAs performed without digital protractor were six times more likely to result in anteversion of > 25°. The correlation coefficient for the interobserver reliability of the measurement of the two investigators was 0.94. CONCLUSION: The digital protractor is a practical tool in the DAA for THA to determine the anteversion of the acetabular prosthesis.

Combined Anteversion Threshold to Avoid Anterior Dislocation in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through the Direct Anterior Approach.

BACKGROUND: Component malposition in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can lead to dislocation, early implant failure, and revision surgery. As the surgical approach might affect the targeted combined anteversion (CA) of THA components, the present study aimed to evaluate the optimal CA threshold to avoid anterior dislocation in primary THA performed through a direct anterior approach (DAA). METHODS: A total of 1,176 THAs in 1,147 consecutive patients (men: 593, women: 554) who had an average age of 63 years (range, 24 to 91) and a mean body mass index of 29 (range, 15 to 48) were identified. Medical records were reviewed for dislocation, whereas postoperative radiographs were assessed to measure the acetabular inclination and CA using a previously validated radiographic method. RESULTS: An anterior dislocation occurred in 19 patients at an average of 40 days postoperatively. The average CA in patients who did and did not have a dislocation was 66 ± 8° and 45 ± 11°, respectively (P < .001). In 5 of 19 of the patients, a THA was performed for secondary osteoarthritis and 17 of 19 had a 28-mm femoral head. A CA ≥ 60° yielded a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 90% for predicting an anterior dislocation in the present cohort. A CA ≥ 60° was associated with a significantly higher risk of anterior dislocation (odds ratio = 75.6; P < .001) compared to patients who had a CA<60 points. CONCLUSION: The optimal CA to avoid anterior dislocations in THA performed through the DAA should be less than 60°. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cross-sectional study, Level III.

How Do Changes in Femoral Anteversion Impact Femoral Rotation and Anterior Offset After Total Hip Arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION: The impact of femoral anteversion changes on femoral rotation and anterior offset following total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been well studied. This study therefore investigated the relationship between femoral anteversion, anterior offset, and femoral rotation before and after THA. METHODS: There were 995 patients who had staged primary bilateral THAs who received a preoperative supine computerized axial tomography (CT) scan, following a standardized protocol, for surgical planning prior to each THA. The following measurements were performed for the first operative hip preoperatively and postoperatively on the first and second CT scans, respectively: femoral anatomic anteversion, defined as the angle between the native femoral neck or stem neck axis and the posterior condylar axis; femoral rotation, defined as the angle of the posterior condylar axis relative to the coronal plane of the CT; and femoral anterior offset, defined as the shortest distance between the femoral head center and a femoral plane containing the epicondyles and the piriformis fossa. The mean time between imagings was 11 months (range, 2 to 44). Associations are described using linear regression (ß = slope) and Pearson correlation (r) coefficients. A t distribution was used for testing correlational significance. RESULTS: Femoral anteversion correlated with femoral anterior offset preoperatively (ß = 0.565, r = 0.914, P < 0.0001) and postoperatively (ß = 0.671, r = 0.958, P < 0.0001), and with femoral rotation preoperatively (ß = 0.623, r = 0.575, P < 0.0001) and postoperatively (ß = 0.459, r = 0.517, P < 0.0001). Increasing anteversion from preoperatively to postoperatively increased anterior offset (ß = 0.621, r = 0.908, P < 0.0001) and femoral internal rotation (ß = 0.241, r = 0.273, P < 0.0001). Patients who had > 20° increase in anteversion (mean increase 26°, range 20 to 40.5°, n = 71) had a mean increase in femoral internal rotation of 9.6 ± 9.8°. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing femoral anteversion increases anterior offset and internal rotation of the femur, with approximately a 1° increase in internal rotation for every 4° increase in anteversion on average. Surgeons should appreciate the implications of changing anteversion during THA planning.

Predicting Instability Risk Following Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Hip Fractures in Geriatric Patients.

BACKGROUND: Although a rare complication, dislocation following hemiarthroplasty (HA) for a femoral neck hip fracture is associated with increased mortality, readmission, and possible revision surgery. To date many of the specific risk factors have been difficult to demonstrate. Patient factors, surgical factors, as well as morphological factors need to be assessed. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to elucidate the risk factors for dislocation of HA following femoral neck hip fractures in the geriatric population. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 270 patients who had hip fractures. Medical records between the years 2016 and 2022 informed binomial regression predictive models. The discriminative ability of variables in the final model and acetabular anteversion to predict dislocation was assessed with area under the curve (AUC) estimates. RESULTS: Center edge angle (odds ratio 1.23), abduction angle (odds ratio 1.17), and depth width ratio (2.96e-11) were significant predictors of dislocation (P = .003, .028, and <.001, respectively). Center edge angle and depth width ratio (<44.1 ° and .298), respectively, were cut scores for risk. Dementia had a high discriminative of ability, as did men (AUC = 0.617, 0.558, respectively). Acetabular anteversion was not predictive of dislocation (P = .259) and theorized anteversion safe zones had poor discriminative ability with AUCs of 0.510 and 0.503, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Morphological factors related to hip dysplasia and a shallow acetabulum, which can be assessed with a radiograph alone, were found to be predictors of instability following HA in the elderly. Hemiarthroplasty implant design and manufacturer, and also acetabular version did not contribute to instability risk.

Decreased "Polar Axis Angle" is Associated With Instability After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A New Method to Assess Functional Component Position on Lateral-Seated Radiographs.

BACKGROUND: Research on hip instability has focused on establishing "safe" ranges of combined component position in supine posture or functional placement of the acetabular component based on the hip-spine relationship. A new angle, the polar axis angle (PAA), of the total hip arthroplasty (THA) components describes the concentricity of both components and can be evaluated in functional positions that confer a greater risk of instability (ie, sitting). The goal of this study was to compare the PAA in functional positions between patients who experienced a postoperative dislocation and a matched control group who did not have a dislocation. METHODS: An institutional database was searched for patients experiencing a dislocation after primary THA. Patients who had postoperative full-length standing and lateral-seatedradiographs were included in the dislocator group. A control group of nondislocator patients was matched 2:1 by age, body mass index, sex, and hip-spine classification. Radiographic measurements of the neck angle, acetabular ante-inclination, and PAA were performed by 2 separate blinded, trained reviewers. RESULTS: The lateral-seated neck angle and lateral-seated PAA measurements were significantly lower in the dislocator groups (n = 37) than the control group (n = 74) (23 versus 33 degrees, P < .001; 74 versus 83 degrees, P = .012, respectively). Significant differences were also observed in changes in the polar axes and neck angles between standing and seated positions (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). When comparing patients who have mobile spines versus stiff spines within the dislocator group, there were no differences in the acetabular, neck, or PAAs. The effect of neck angle on the PAA showed a linear trend across cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who experience postoperative instability have a significantly lower PAA on lateral-seated radiographs when matched for age, sex, body mass index, and hip-spine classification. In addition, the lower seated PAA is driven more strongly by decreased functional femoral anteversion, which emphasizes the role of functional femoral version on stability in THA.

Retroverting Periacetabular Osteotomy for Symptomatic Acetabular Anteversion.

BACKGROUND: Acetabular dysplasia has traditionally been defined using the lateral center edge angle and treated with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). However, the recently described Ottawa classification further quantifies dysplasia in 3-dimensional terms, categorizing Ottawa A as dysplasia due to isolated, excessive acetabular anteversion or anterior acetabular under-coverage. We sought to determine if patients who have Ottawa A dysplasia can expect similar outcomes when undergoing a PAO compared to a traditional dysplasia cohort. METHODS: Patients who had undergone PAO with Ottawa A hip dysplasia were selected and compared to a control group of patients who had lateral acetabular undercoverage. The modified Harris Hip Score and International Hip Outcome Tool-33 were collected preoperatively and at various follow-up points for a final follow-up average of 2.3 years (range, 0.9 to 6.2). RESULTS: The 17 patients (21 hips) who had Ottawa A dysplasia were compared to a control cohort of 69 patients (88 hips). Both groups saw significant improvements in modified Harris Hip Score and International Hip Outcome Tool-33 at final follow-up, P < .001. There were no differences between groups in any of the outcome measures or rates of achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) or substantial clinical benefit. Rates of MCID ranged from 82.4 to 100%, and rates of achieving substantial clinical benefit ranged from 47.1 to 52.9%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing a PAO for Ottawa A hip dysplasia, a significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes can be expected with high rates of MCID achievement. This is not significantly different for patients undergoing PAO for more traditional dysplasia parameters.

Side-to-side variability in the femoral neck anteversion angle: A study of the Japanese population with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

BACKGROUND: Side-to-side variability in the femoral neck anteversion angle (FA) reportedly varies from 0.0° to 17.3°. To investigate the side-to-side variability in the FA and the relationship between the FA and the morphology of the acetabulum in the Japanese population, we performed a three-dimensional computed tomography (CT)-based study involving patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). METHODS: CT data were obtained from 170 nondysplastic hips of 85 patients with ONFH. The FA and acetabular coverage parameters, including the acetabular anteversion angle, acetabular inclination angle, and acetabular sector angle in the anterior, superior, and posterior directions, were measured using three-dimensional CT. The distribution of the side-to-side variability in the FA was evaluated separately for each of the five degrees. RESULTS: The mean side-to-side variability in the FA was 6.7° ± 5.3° (range, 0.2°-26.2°). The distribution of the side-to-side variability in the FA was 0.0°-5.0° in 41 patients (48.2%), 5.1°-10.0° in 25 patients (29.4%), 10.1°-15.0° in 13 patients (15.3%), 15.1°-20.0° in 4 patients (4.7%), and >20.1° in 2 patients (2.4%). There was a weak negative correlation between the FA and anterior acetabular sector angle (r = -0.282, P < 0.001) and a very weak positive correlation between the FA and acetabular anteversion angle (r = 0.181, P < 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The mean side-to-side variability in the FA was 6.7° ± 5.3° (range, 0.2°-26.2°) in Japanese nondysplastic hips, and about 20% of the patients had a side-to-side variability of >10°.

Increased femoral anteversion in females with anterior knee pain relates to both the neck and the shaft of the femur.

INTRODUCTION: Increased femoral anteversion (FAV) can have many clinical manifestations, including anterior knee pain (AKP). To our knowledge, no studies have measured the location of FAV in a cohort of female AKP patients. The objective of this research is to determine whether the increased FAV in AKP females originates above the lesser trochanter, below the lesser trochanter or at both levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thrity-seven consecutive AKP female patients (n = 66 femurs) were recruited prospectively. There were 17 patients (n = 26 femurs; mean age of 28 years) in whom the suspicion for the increased FAV of the femur was based on the clinical examination (pathological group-PG). The control group (CG) consisted of 20 patients (n = 40 femurs; mean age of 29 years) in whom there was no increased FAV from the clinical standpoint. All of them underwent a torsional computed tomography of the lower limbs. FAV was measured according to Murphy´s method. A segmental analysis of FAV was performed using the lesser trochanter as a landmark. RESULTS: Significant differences in the total FAV (18.7 ± 5.52 vs. 42.46 ± 6.33; p < 0.001), the neck version (54.88 ± 9.64 vs. 64.27 ± 11.25; p = 0.0006) and the diaphysis version (- 36.17 ± 8.93 vs. - 21.81 ± 11.73; p < 0.001) were observed between the CG and the PG. The difference in the diaphyseal angle between CG and PG accounts for 60% of the total difference between healthy and pathological groups, while the difference between both groups in the angle of the neck accounts for 40%. CONCLUSION: In chronic AKP female patients with increased FAV, the two segments of the femur contribute to the total FAV, with a different pattern among patients and controls, being the compensation mechanism of the diaphysis much lower in the pathological femurs than in the controls.

Intraoperative fluoroscopic confirmation of the knee improves the accuracy of stem anteversion in total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach using traction table.

BACKGROUND: Stem anteversion (SA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is crucial for postoperative outcomes, affecting dislocation risk and hip function. Accurate SA placement is challenged by intraoperative estimation methods, with discrepancies reported between predicted and true SA. This study investigates the effect of conventional methods and intraoperative fluoroscopic confirmation on SA accuracy in THA performed with a direct anterior approach using a traction table. METHODS: This involves 200 patients undergoing primary THA from August 2019 to January 2023, divided into a conventional group (n = 100) and a fluoroscopic group (n = 100). Postoperative SA measurements were conducted using computed tomography scans. Statistical analysis focused on comparing the SA angles and the prevalence of excessive SA (≥>35° and ≥>40°) between the groups. RESULTS: The fluoroscopic group showed a lower average SA angle (24.3° ± 8.3°) compared to the conventional group (30.0° ± 11.3°), with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01). Excessive SA (≥>40°) was found in 17% of the conventional group, significantly reduced to 5% in the fluoroscopic group (p < 0.01). Similarly, SA exceeding 35° was present in 39% of the conventional group, compared to only 11% in the fluoroscopic group (p < 0.01), indicating a substantial reduction in excessive SA placements with fluoroscopic guidance. DISCUSSION: The study demonstrates that intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance significantly enhances the accuracy of SA placement in THA, reducing the variability and proportion of excessive SA. This suggests a critical reevaluation of conventional estimation methods in favor of fluoroscopic confirmation to improve surgical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative fluoroscopic confirmation of knee external rotation angle markedly decreases the proportion of excessive SA and enhances the precision of stem placement in THA with a direct anterior approach. This technique represents a significant advancement in surgical practice, offering a simple and effective method to achieve optimal postoperative results.

Is There Safety Outside the "Safe Zone" in Total Hip Replacement? A Retrospective Observational Study.

Background and Objectives: The safe zone in total hip replacement was introduced many years ago. Its aim was to provide guidelines for orthopedic surgeons in order to avoid complications such as instability. With the growing interest in spinopelvic alignment, some new insights suggest that the safe zone is an obsolete concept. This study aims to show that, even outside the safe zone, the effect of total hip replacement can be satisfactory. This could be used as preliminary study for an analysis of a larger group. Materials and Methods: Fifty-nine consecutive patients with end-stage osteoarthritis treated by total hip replacement were enrolled into the study and divided into two groups: inside the safe zone and outside the safe zone. A physical examination during postoperative visits was performed; the range of movement was measured using a goniometer; and the HHS and VAS were taken to measure functional outcomes and pain, respectively. An analysis of the radiological outcomes was performed. Results: There was no significant difference in regard to changes in total offset, pain, HHS and other complications. There were no signs of instability among patients during the follow-up. Conclusions: The results of this study show that the "safe zone" is a more complicated term that was previously thought. A proper soft tissue balance and spinopelvic alignment could be factors that change the "safe zone" for each patient and make it more individual.

Incidence of Rotational Malalignment after Intertrochanteric Fracture Intramedullary Nailing: A CT-Based Prospective Study.

Background and Objectives: Rotational malformation after intramedullary nailing of intertrochanteric fractures is a relatively common, possibly severe, and difficult-to-detect complication, since intraoperative radiographic imaging allows for the assessment of the quality of reduction in the frontal and sagittal planes, but not in the transverse plane. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rotational malalignment after intramedullary nailing of intertrochanteric fractures and to investigate a possible connection with specific patients' or fractures' characteristics. Materials and Methods: 74 patients treated with intramedullary nailing due to an intertrochanteric fracture underwent a postoperative CT of the pelvis-hips and knees. The value of the anteversion was measured both in the operated-on (angle 1) and in the healthy hip (angle 2) based on the technique described by Jeanmart et al. and the difference in anteversion (D angle = angle 1 minus angle 2) was calculated. A positive D angle indicated the presence of excessive internal overcorrection of the distal fragment during fracture reduction, while a negative D angle indicated the presence of excessive external overcorrection. The absolute value of the D angle represents the postoperative difference in anteversion between the two hips. The patients were divided into three groups according to this value: group A, with D < 5° (physiological difference); group B, with 5° < D < 15° (acceptable rotational alignment); and group C, with D ≥ 15° (rotational deformity). Results: Group A constitutes 56.8%, group B 12.2%, and group C 31.1% of the study population. Overall, 79.7% of the patients presented a positive angle D, while, for group C, the percentage was even higher at 91.3%. According to the AO/OTA classification system, 37.8% of the cases were stable fractures, 47.3% were unstable fractures, and 14.9% were reverse oblique fractures. Based on our analysis, the type of fracture has a serious impact on the rotational alignment, since the statistical significance of the mean angle D for the three types of fracture is reliable (p = 0.029). Stable fractures present the lowest anteversion difference values, while reverse oblique fractures present the highest difference. Conclusions: Our study reveals that the percentage of rotational malalignment after the intramedullary nailing of intertrochanteric fractures remains high (31.1%), despite the proper use of radiographic imaging during the intraoperative fracture reduction. In most cases (91.3%), this malalignment appears to be a matter of internal overcorrection. A clear correlation between hip's rotational deformity and patients' functional outcome has yet to be proven, and constitutes our objective in the near future.

Feasibility and anteversion accuracy of a patient-specific instrument for femoral prosthesis implantation in total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the precision and feasibility of patient-specific instruments (PSI) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) as compared to the traditional free-hand (FRH) approach. METHODS: During the period of January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022, a randomized allocation was used for patients receiving unilateral primary THA to either the PSI or conventional operation group. The placement and size of the PSI were specifically chosen to guide femoral neck resection and prosthesis implantation. The study analyzed component positions and evaluated radiographic and clinical outcomes in 30 patients who received PSI-assisted THAs and 30 patients who received FRH THAs. This study was registered at China Clinical Trial Registry (number: ChiCTR2300072325) on June 9th, 2023. RESULTS: The use of PSI in THA resulted in significantly higher precision in achieving the desired component position as compared to the FRH approach. The PSI group showed significantly smaller absolute errors of femoral anteversion (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in operation time, intra-operative blood loss, hospitalization duration, or time to walk after surgery. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the application of patient-specific instruments in THA provides a simple and reliable solution to enhance the precision of femoral prosthesis placement with high accuracy and feasibility. This study highlights the potential benefits of using the PSI in THA.

Evaluation of the reproducibility of preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography planning for posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasty.

The anteversion of the stem is occasionally intentionally changed by the surgeon for patients with smaller femoral neck anteversion during total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the reproducibility of preoperative planning with increasing anteversion has been rarely assessed. The present study investigated it using two types of stems. This retrospective study included patients who underwent primary posterolateral THA using taper-wedge (TS group; 73 hips) and anatomical (AS group; 70 hips) stems. Characteristics of sex and age were matched in the two groups by propensity score matching. In both groups, the relationship between the preoperative three-dimensional planning and postoperative stem position, and the relationship between postoperative stem position and femoral neck anteversion (FNA) were evaluated. In the TS group, there were no significant differences in average stem anteversion (SA) between preoperative planning and postoperative placement (36.1° ± 7.0° and 36.6° ± 11.1°, respectively: p = 0.651). The absolute error of SA was 8.1° ± 6.4°. In the AS group, the postoperative SA was significantly smaller than the preoperative planning SA (22.7° ± 11.6° and 30.0° ± 9.3°, respectively: p < 0.001). The absolute error of SA was 9.0° ± 5.8°. The postoperative SA was significantly larger than the FNA in the TS group (36.6° ± 11.1° and 26.3° ± 10.9°, respectively: p < 0.001). However, no significant differences between the two were observed in the AS group (23.7° ± 10.1° and 22.7° ± 11.6°, respectively: p = 0.253). The preoperative planning of intentional increasing anteversion did not show high reproducibility with taper-wedge and anatomical stems. The anatomical stem was placed according to the femoral medullary canal regardless of preoperative planning with increased SA.

Virtual 3D femur model to assess femoral version: comparison to the 2D axial slice approach.

BACKGROUND: Quantifying femoral version is crucial in diagnosing femoral version abnormalities and for accurate pre-surgical planning. There are numerous methods for measuring femoral version, however, reliability studies for most of these methods excluded children with hip deformities. OBJECTIVE: To propose a method of measuring femoral version based on a virtual 3D femur model, and systematically compare its reliability to the widely used Murphy's 2D axial slice technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched our imaging database to identify hip/femur CTs performed on children (<18 years old) with a clinical indication of femoral version measurement (September 2021-August 2022). Exclusion criteria were prior hip surgery, and inadequate image quality or field-of-view. Two blinded radiologists independently measured femoral version using the virtual 3D femur model and Murphy's 2D axial slice method. To assess intrareader variability, we randomly selected 20% of the study sample for re-measurements by the two radiologists >2 weeks later. We analyzed the reliability and correlation of these techniques via intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, and deformity subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Our study sample consisted of 142 femurs from 71 patients (10.6±4.4 years, male=31). Intra- and inter-reader correlations for both techniques were excellent (ICC≥0.91). However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the standard deviation (SD) of the absolute difference between the two radiologists for the Murphy method (mean 13.7°) was larger than that of the 3D femur model technique (mean 4.8°), indicating higher reader variability. In femurs with hip flexion deformity, the SD of the absolute difference for the Murphy technique was 17°, compared to 6.5° for the 3D femur model technique. In femurs with apparent coxa valga deformity, the SD of the absolute difference for the Murphy technique was 10.4°, compared to 5.2° for the 3D femur model technique. CONCLUSION: The 3D femur model technique is more reliable than the Murphy's 2D axial slice technique in measuring femoral version, especially in children with hip flexion and apparent coxa valga deformities.