Risk of acute arterial events associated with treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases: nationwide French cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with IBD are at increased risk of acute arterial events. Antitumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents and thiopurines may, via their anti-inflammatory properties, lower the risk of acute arterial events. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of thiopurines and anti-TNFs on the risk of acute arterial events in patients with IBD. DESIGN: Patients aged 18 years or older and affiliated to the French national health insurance with a diagnosis of IBD were followed up from 1 April 2010 until 31 December 2014. The risks of acute arterial events (including ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and peripheral artery disease) were compared between thiopurines and anti-TNFs exposed and unexposed patients with marginal structural Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for baseline and time-varying demographics, medications, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities and IBD disease activity. RESULTS: Among 177 827 patients with IBD (96 111 (54%) women, mean age at cohort entry 46.2 years (SD 16.3), 90 205 (50.7%) with Crohn's disease (CD)), 4145 incident acute arterial events occurred (incidence rates: 5.4 per 1000 person-years). Compared with unexposed patients, exposure to anti-TNFs (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.95), but not to thiopurines (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.05), was associated with a decreased risk of acute arterial events. The magnitude in risk reduction was highest in men with CD exposed to anti-TNFs (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.72). CONCLUSION: Exposure to anti-TNFs is associated with a decreased risk of acute arterial events in patients with IBD, particularly in men with CD.

Risk of Serious and Opportunistic Infections Associated With Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The risk of infection associated with tumor necrosis factor antagonists (anti-TNF) and thiopurines (combination therapy) is uncertain. We assessed the risk of serious and opportunistic infections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with thiopurine monotherapy, anti-TNF monotherapy, or combination therapy in a large cohort of patients in France. METHODS: We performed a nationwide population-based study of patients (18 years or older) with a diagnosis of IBD in the French national health insurance database; we collected data from January 1, 2009 until December 31, 2014. The risks of serious and opportunistic infections associated with exposure to combination therapy, anti-TNF, and thiopurine monotherapies were compared using marginal structural Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for baseline and time-varying sociodemographic characteristics, medications, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Among the 190,694 patients with IBD included in our analysis, 8561 serious infections and 674 opportunistic infections occurred. Compared with anti-TNF monotherapy, combination therapy was associated with increased risks of serious infection (hazard ratio [HR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.45) and opportunistic infection (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.32-2.91). Compared with thiopurine monotherapy, anti-TNF monotherapy was associated with increased risks of serious infection (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.56-1.88), mycobacterial infection (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.15-3.40), and bacterial infection (HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.23-4.58, respectively). Conversely, anti-TNF monotherapy was associated with decreased risk of opportunistic viral infection compared with thiopurine monotherapy (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.87). CONCLUSIONS: In a nationwide cohort study of patients with IBD in France, we found heterogeneity in risks of serious and opportunistic infections in patients treated with immune-suppressive regimens. These should be carefully considered and weighed against potential benefits for IBD treatment in patient management.

Monoclonal Antibodies: Past, Present and Future.

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are immunoglobulins designed to target a specific epitope on an antigen. Immunoglobulins of identical amino-acid sequence were originally produced by hybridomas grown in culture and, subsequently, by recombinant DNA technology using mammalian cell expression systems. The antigen-binding region of the mAb is formed by the variable domains of the heavy and light chains and contains the complementarity-determining region that imparts the high specificity for the target antigen. The pharmacokinetics of mAbs involves target-mediated and non-target-related factors that influence their disposition.Preclinical safety evaluation of mAbs differs substantially from that of small molecular (chemical) entities. Immunogenicity of mAbs has implications for their pharmacokinetics and safety. Early studies of mAbs in humans require careful consideration of the most suitable study population, route/s of administration, starting dose, study design and the potential difference in pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects compared to patients expressing the target antigen.Of the ever-increasing diversity of therapeutic indications for mAbs, we have concentrated on two that have proved dramatically successful. The contribution that mAbs have made to the treatment of inflammatory conditions, in particular arthritides and inflammatory bowel disease, has been nothing short of revolutionary. Their benefit has also been striking in the treatment of solid tumours and, most recently, as immunotherapy for a wide variety of cancers. Finally, we speculate on the future with various new approaches to the development of therapeutic antibodies.

Regional differences in anti-TNF-α therapy and surgery in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease patients: a Norwegian nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: During the last decades, substantial progress has been made in both medical and surgical treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this study was to determine the use of anti-TNFs and surgery during the first 3 years after diagnosis in IBD patients across the four health regions in Norway using nationwide patient registry data. METHODS: This study used nationwide data from the Norwegian Patient Registry. Cumulative incidence of anti-TNF exposure and major surgery was calculated for patients diagnosed in 2010-2012. The analyses were stratified by diagnosis and health region. All patients were followed for an equal period of 3 years from diagnosis. RESULTS: The study population included 8,257 IBD patients first registered between 2010 and 2012, of whom 2,829 were diagnosed with Crohn's disease (CD) and 5,428 with ulcerative colitis (UC). Across Norway's health regions, the cumulative incidence of major surgery after 3 years varied from 11.4% to 17.1% for CD and from 4.6% to 6.9% for UC. The cumulative incidence of anti-TNF exposure varied from 20.9% to 31.4% for CD and from 8.0% to 13.5% for UC. The region with the lowest anti-TNF use had the highest surgery rates for both UC and CD. CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative incidence of anti-TNF exposure and surgery varied significantly across Norway's health regions during the three first years after IBD diagnosis.

The role of DMARDs in reducing the immunogenicity of TNF inhibitors in chronic inflammatory diseases.

The management of RA, SpA, psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease has significantly improved over the last decade with the addition of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNFs) to the therapeutic armamentarium. Immunogenicity in response to monoclonal antibody therapies (anti-drug antibodies) may give rise to low serum drug levels, loss of therapeutic response, poor drug survival and/or adverse events such as infusion reactions. To combat these, the use of concomitant MTX may attenuate the frequency of anti-drug antibodies in RA, SpA and Crohn's disease. Although a similar effect to methotrexate has been observed with AZA usage in the management of Crohn's disease, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that other DMARDs impact immunogenicity. In this article we review the evidence to date on the effect of immunomodulatory therapy when co-administered with anti-TNFs. We also discuss whether such a strategy should be employed in SpA and psoriasis, and if optimization of the MTX dose could improve biologic drug survival and thereby benefit disease management.

Comparative Efficacy of Biologic Therapies for Inducing Response and Remission in Fistulizing Crohn's Disease: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: The medical treatment of fistulizing Crohn's disease (CD) remains a challenge to clinicians. Over the last 20 years, biologic therapies have been the mainstay of medical treatment of fistulizing CD. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of biologic therapies in inducing response and remission in fistulizing CD. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central databases from inception to December 2021. Inclusion criteria were any randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of biologic therapies against an active comparator or placebo for induction of response or remission in adults with fistulizing CD. The proportion of patients with fistula response or remission, as defined by each clinical trial, was our primary study outcome. A Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis was used to measure treatment effects and results were reported as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: In our analysis, 10 studies were included, and all were RCTs. Infliximab was superior to adalimumab in inducing response (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.06-0.99) but not in inducing remission (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.04-2.27). Tumor necrosis factor antagonists were superior to placebo in the induction of response (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35-0.750) and remission (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.22-0.58). Infliximab was superior to placebo in inducing response (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17-0.75) and remission (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.87). Ustekinumab was superior to placebo in inducing response (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.860) but not in inducing remission (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.13-1.93). When comparing biologic therapies against each other, there was no statistical difference in inducing remission. Vedolizumab was not superior to placebo in inducing remission (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.04-2.29). Certolizumab was not superior to placebo in inducing response (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.40-1.55) or remission (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.40-1.55). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor necrosis factor antagonists are effective in inducing response and remission in fistulizing CD. Infliximab was superior to adalimumab for inducing response but not for inducing remission. Ustekinumab is effective in the induction of response but not in the induction of remission. When compared against each other, biologic therapies showed no significant difference in the induction of remission. Based on the available data, infliximab is the preferred first-line treatment. As for other biologics, the limited published data do not allow us to make firm recommendations. This study supports current practice and emphasizes the need for dedicated RCTs to evaluate the efficacy of biologic therapies in fistulizing CD.

Despite the era of biologic therapies, the management of fistulizing Crohn's disease remains challenging. This is the first systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of biologic therapies in inducing response and remission in patients with fistulizing Crohn's disease. We found that anti-tumor necrosis factor agents are effective in inducing response and remission. Infliximab was superior to adalimumab for inducing response but not for inducing remission.

Managing inadequate response to initial anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: optimising treatment outcomes.

Anti-tumour necrosis factors (anti-TNFs) are established as first-line biological therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with over two decades of accumulated clinical experience. Anti-TNFs have well established efficacy/safety profiles along with additional benefits on various comorbidities. However, up to 40% of patients may respond inadequately to an initial anti-TNF treatment because of primary non-response, loss of response, or intolerance. Following inadequate response (IR) to anti-TNF treatment, clinicians can consider switching to an alternative anti-TNF (cycling) or to another class of targeted drug with a different mechanism of action, such as Janus kinase inhibitors, interleukin-6 receptor blockers, B-cell depletion agents, and co-stimulation inhibitors (swapping). While European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for pharmacotherapeutic management of RA, published in 2020, are widely regarded as helpful guides to clinical practice, they do not provide any clear recommendations on therapeutic choices following an IR to first-line anti-TNF. This suggests that both cycling and swapping treatment strategies are of equal value, but that the treating physician must take the patient's individual characteristics into account. This article considers which patient characteristics influence clinical decision-making processes, including the reason for treatment failure, previous therapies, comorbidities, extra-articular manifestations, pregnancy, patient preference and cost-effectiveness, and what evidence is available to support decisions made by the physician.

A review of the therapeutic management of ulcerative colitis.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic relapsing and remitting gastrointestinal disorder of uncertain aetiology. The last two decades have seen an expansion in the therapeutic arsenal used to treat UC. This has resulted in improved clinical remission and response rates. Nonetheless, staples in our current medical management originate from trials conducted in the early 20th century. In this review article, we aim to outline the key milestones in the history of the medical management of UC in addition to highlighting promising therapeutic developments for the future.

Evaluation of AIF-1 (Allograft Inflammatory Factor-1) as a Biomarker of Crohn's Disease Severity.

Background: Recently, increased tissue levels of AIF-1 have been shown in experimental colitis, supporting its role in intestinal inflammation. Therefore, we studied the levels of AIF-1 in Crohn's disease (CD). Methods: This study included 33 patients with CD (14 men and 19 women) who participated in the PREDICROHN project, a prospective multicenter study of the Spanish Group of Inflammatory bowel disease (GETECCU). Results: This article demonstrates declines with respect to baseline levels of serum AIF-1 in Crohn's disease (CD) patients after 14 weeks of treatment with anti-TNFs. Furthermore, in patients with active CD (HB ≥ 5), serum AIF-1 levels were significantly higher than those in patients without activity (HB ≤ 4). The study of serum AIF-1 in the same cohort, revealed an area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of AUC = 0.66 (p = 0.014), while for the CRP (C-reactive protein), (AUC) value of 0.69 (p = 0.0066), indicating a similar ability to classify CD patients by their severity. However, the combination of data on serum levels of AIF-1 and CRP improves the predictive ability of these analyses for classifying CD patients as active (HB ≥ 5) or inactive (HB ≤ 4). When we used the odds ratio (OR) formula, we observed that patients with CRP > 5 mg/L or AIF-1 > 200 pg/mL or both conditions were 13 times more likely to show HB ≥ 5 (active CD) than were those with both markers below these thresholds. Conclusion: The development of an algorithm that includes serum levels of AIF-1 and CRP could be useful for assessing Crohn's disease severity.

Monotherapy with thiopurines in stricturing Crohn's disease: A real-life experience from low- and middle-income countries.

BACKGROUND: Stricturing Crohn's disease (CD) is difficult to manage medically with limited treatment options, anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy being the first-line therapy. Although thiopurines are also recommended first-line treatment option for maintenance of remission in steroid-dependent CD, evidence on their use in stricturing CD is lacking. We evaluated the efficacy of azathioprine (AZA) in patients with stricturing CD. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study (January 2005 to July 2020), patients with stricturing CD who were managed with AZA as a primary therapy for at least 6 months, and had a follow-up of at least 6 months after AZA initiation were included. Disease characteristics, complications, long-term response, and adverse events were noted. RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen patients were included (mean age 33.8±14 years, 67.8% males, median disease duration 98 months [IQR: 60-158], median follow-up duration 60 months [IQR: 50-96]). 46.1% (n=53) patients had significant anemia at presentation, and 73% (n=84) had isolated small bowel involvement. Median dose of AZA was 100 mg (equivalent to 1.5 mg/kg). Median therapy and follow-up duration (after AZA initiation) was 17 (IQR: 9-42) and 33 months (IQR 18-60), respectively. The cumulative probability of maintaining response without treatment failure at 1, 2, and 5 years was 73.1%, 40.7%, and 18.5%, respectively. Among patients with AZA failure, 15.6% received methotrexate, 13% received anti-TNFs, and 9.5% underwent surgery. Significant anemia (<10 g/dL) at presentation and steroid dependence predicted AZA failure. 31.3% patients experienced adverse events, commonest being leukopenia (n=29, 25.2%). CONCLUSION: Azathioprine demonstrated good short-term and modest long-term response rates in patients with stricturing CD.

Biologics: how far can they go in Crohn's disease?

Crohn's disease is a chronic gastrointestinal inflammatory disorder, characterized by episodes of relapsing and remitting flares. As the disease mechanism becomes better elucidated, there is a significant increase in the number of available biologic therapies. This article summarizes and synthesizes current Food and Drug Administration-approved biological therapy for Crohn's disease and examines the positioning of medical therapy as emerging biologics break onto the market.

Certolizumab Can Also Be Effective in Monotherapy for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Although it is known that methotrexate (MTX) increases the effectiveness of biological drugs (mainly anti-TNFs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in real life, it is known that many patients using anti-TNFs are on monotherapy due to many causes. This article compares the effectiveness of certolizumab as monotherapy as combined with MTX or leflunomide (LFN) in RA patients with failure to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) in a real-world setting. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at a specialized centre for RA management in Colombia. Patients treated with certolizumab as monotherapy or in combination with MTX, LFN, or MTX+LFN, between 2011 and 2020 with a minimum 3-month follow-up were included. Demographics and RA clinical characteristics were recorded; effectiveness was assessed as the improvement in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) getting remission or low disease activity at 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 181 patients were included, 24 received certolizumab as monotherapy, 62 certolizumab plus MTX, 47 certolizumab plus LFN and 48 certolizumab plus MTX+LFN. At 3 months of follow-up, 80% of the patients showed decreased disease activity, with no significant differences between groups; at 12 months of treatment, response in certolizumab monotherapy group was 94.4% compared to 81.8% in combination with MTX, 80.5% in combination with LFN and 51.4% in combination with MTX+LFN. Response at 3 months (OR 4.04; 95% CI 1.28-12.69) and positive anti-CCP (OR 3.83; 95% CI 1.11-13.21) were associated with 12-month response. CONCLUSION: Certolizumab seems to be effective as monotherapy in the treatment of RA patients with failure to csDMARDs.

Adalimumab or Infliximab for the Prevention of Early Postoperative Recurrence of Crohn Disease: Results From the ENEIDA Registry.

BACKGROUND: Anti-tumor necrosis factor agents (anti-TNFs) are efficacious at preventing the postoperative recurrence (POR) of Crohn disease, as demonstrated in 2 randomized controlled trials. However, real-life data for infliximab or adalimumab in this setting are scarce. Our aim was to assess both the efficiency of anti-TNFs at preventing early POR of Crohn disease in clinical practice and the associated risk factors for POR. METHODS: Patients in whom anti-TNFs were prescribed for the prevention of POR within 3 months after ileocolonic resection and who had an endoscopic assessment within 18 months were identified from the ENEIDA registry. Clinical and endoscopic features were collected within 18 months after surgery. RESULTS: In total, 152 patients were included (55 treated with infliximab, 97 with adalimumab, and 39% with concomitant immunosuppressants). Anti-TNF treatment was started after a median time of 29 days (IQR 13-44) after surgery. Eighty-two percent of patients had at least one risk factor for POR, and 82% had been exposed to anti-TNFs before the index surgery. Overall, 34% had endoscopic POR (as defined using a Rutgeerts endoscopic score > i1); 14% had advanced endoscopic POR (>i2); and 20% had clinical POR, with no differences between infliximab and adalimumab. In the multivariate analysis, only perianal disease (odds ratio 2.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-5.91) and rectal involvement (odds ratio 2.79, 95% CI 1.09-7.14) were independent predictors of endoscopic POR. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, anti-TNFs for the prevention of POR of Crohn disease are frequently used in patients experienced with anti-TNFs and with concomitant immunosuppressants. The efficacy of infliximab and adalimumab for POR prevention is similar and in accordance with the results obtained in randomized controlled trials.

Improved Quality of Life With Anti-TNF Therapy Compared With Continued Corticosteroid Utilization in Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids (CS) and anti-TNF drugs are used to treat Crohn's disease (CD). In this study, we assessed the net health benefit of initiating anti-TNF therapy relative to additional CS use in CD using a novel combination of a retrospective cohort study and a simulation model. METHODS: Using Medicaid data from 2001 to 2005 and Medicare data from 2006 to 2013, beneficiaries were identified with CD and CS use who subsequently received either an anti-TNF or reached a cumulative dose of >3000 mg CS during the year. By using overall and latent class-specific remission-time equivalent (RTE) estimates derived from discrete-choice experiments, mean 12-month cumulative RTEs were calculated after propensity score adjustment for baseline characteristics. A Markov model was constructed using transition probabilities derived from the retrospective cohort to perform additional sensitivity analyses of RTE estimates, analytic assumptions, and transition probabilities. Cumulative RTEs were calculated via Monte Carlo simulation in this model. RESULTS: In the retrospective cohort, 1563 new anti-TNF initiators and 1563 propensity score-matched prolonged CS users were identified. Anti-TNF use was associated with greater mean RTEs at the end of 1 year (5.34 vs 4.54, incremental benefit: 0.79; 95% CI, 0.53-1.07). This benefit persisted in all latent classes. In the Markov model, anti-TNF therapy was the preferred strategy, and the results were robust in multiple sensitivity analysis and latent class analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In both a retrospective cohort study and a simulation model, anti-TNF use was associated with improved quality of life, measured as RTEs, when compared with continued CS utilization for CD.

Biosimilars for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis.

Introduction: In recent years, biosimilars of reference adalimumab (re-ADA), etanercept (re-ETN) and infliximab (re-IFX) have been licensed. In the absence of specific controlled studies, by the extrapolation principle, biosimilars have been approved for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).Areas covered: To assess the efficacy and safety of biosimilars in PsA, the literature, present until 30 June 2019, was reviewed. The literature search was undertaken using the PubMed database to identify English-language papers focusing on biosimilar efficacy in PsA. No specific PsA study was found, and the results were retrieved from trials on different inflammatory rheumatic diseases that were also enrolling patients with PsA. Data on re-IFX biosimilar CT-P13 and re-ETN SB4 were found, but not on re-ADA biosimilars. The results showed a trend toward a reduced efficacy of biosimilars. However, considering the small number of PsA patients, the non-statistically-powered studies, and the inappropriate outcome measures, these results could have occurred by chance.Expert opinion: The few data do not allow to draw definitive conclusions, and emerging results suggest the need of specific trials, and of rigorous registries to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biosimilars in PsA.

Assessing the Optimal Position for Vedolizumab in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Simulation Model.

Background: Vedolizumab, an α4ß7 integrin monoclonal antibody inhibiting gut lymphocyte trafficking, is an effective treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). We evaluated the optimal position of vedolizumab in the UC treatment paradigm. Methods: Using Markov modeling, we assessed multiple algorithms for the treatment of UC. The base case was a 35-year-old male with steroid-dependent moderately to severely active UC without previous immunomodulator or biologic use. The model included 4 different algorithms over 1 year, with vedolizumab use prior to: initiating azathioprine (Algorithm 1), combination therapy with infliximab and azathioprine (Algorithm 2), combination therapy with an alternative anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and azathioprine (Algorithm 3), and colectomy (Algorithm 4). Transition probabilities and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) estimates were derived from the published literature. Primary analyses included simulating 100 trials of 100,000 individuals, assessing clinical outcomes, and QALYs. Sensitivity analyses employed longer time horizons and ranges for all variables. Results: Algorithm 1 (vedolizumab use prior to all other therapies) was the preferred strategy, resulting in 8981 additional individuals in remission, 18 fewer cases of lymphoma, and 1087 fewer serious infections per 100,000 patients compared with last-line use (A4). Algorithm 1 also resulted in 0.0197 to 0.0205 more QALYs compared with other algorithms. This benefit increased with longer time horizons. Algorithm 1 was preferred in all sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: The model suggests that treatment algorithms positioning vedolizumab prior to other therapies should be considered for individuals with moderately to severely active steroid-dependent UC. Further prospective research is needed to confirm these simulated results.

Antibody Response to Hepatitis B Virus Vaccine is Impaired in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Infliximab Therapy.

Background: Studies have demonstrated an association between anti-TNF/immunomodulator agents used in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and impaired hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine immunogenicity, but little data exist on whether specific medication types affect protective HBsAb titers. Our aim was to analyze this association. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria: age ≥18, diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC), previous HBV vaccination series and/or ≥1 positive HBsAb, and record of IBD therapy in 6 months before titer level. Patients were stratified based upon medication exposures: anti-TNF, immunomodulator, combination anti-TNF and immunomodulatory, and a reference arm. Titer levels following vaccination and specific medication types given in the 6 months before titer were recorded. Seroprotection was defined as HBsAb ≥10 IU/l and ≥100 IU/l. Results: The study cohort (N = 391) was 70.8% white, 51.4% female and 64.2% had CD and 35.8% had UC. The mean age was 45.8 years. A significantly lower percentage of patients exposed to anti-TNF, immunomodulator or dual therapy had titers ≥10 (P < 0.01). Regarding specific medications, only patients exposed to infliximab (P < 0.01) were less likely to have titer levels ≥10, after controlling for other medication exposures, age at titer level, and interval time between vaccination/titer level. This was not found for patients exposed to adalimumab, methotrexate, 6-mercaptopurine, or azathioprine. Conclusions: Patients exposed to infliximab were significantly less likely to have protective HBsAb titer levels following vaccination, a trend not seen in patients on adalimumab. Efforts to vaccinate IBD patients against HBV before use of immunomodulators and anti-TNFs, infliximab specifically, and screen periodically thereafter must be reinforced.

Use of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factors and Anti-Integrins in the Treatment of Crohn's Disease.

In patients with Crohn's disease (CD), anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy is efficacious for the induction and maintenance of clinical remission, mucosal healing, reducing rates of surgery and hospitalizations, and improving health-related quality of life. The decision between anti-TNFs and anti-integrins as first-line treatment in CD depends on disease severity, safety concerns, and prescription coverage. Given the existing data on long-term outcomes and safety, anti-TNFs are often preferred to anti-integrins. Additional clinical experience and preferably prospective, head-to-head studies will be important to determine whether vedolizumab should be considered more often for first-line therapy in CD.

First line anlotinib plus liposomal doxorubicin for locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: A prospective, single-arm trial

Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of anlotinib as firstline therapy to treat locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. Methods: This is a single-arm trial. Treatment-naive patients (≥14 years) with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma were eligible. Each treatment cycle lasted for 3 weeks, and included liposomal doxorubicin (40-50 mg/m2) on day 1 and anlotinib (12 mg) on days 8-21. Starting from the 9th cycle, treatment consisted of only anlotinib. Treatment continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. The primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Eight patients were enrolled between July 25, 2019 and January 8, 2020. The median number of treatment cycles was 5.5. Within 5.9 months median follow-up, PFS events occurred in 4 (4/8, 50%) patients. The median PFS was 11.3 months and the 6-month PFS rate was 56%. No patients attained complete response and 2 patients (fibrosarcoma, 1 patient and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, 1 patient) achieved partial response. Three patients (fibrosarcoma, 2 patients and synovial sarcoma, 1 patient) had stable disease. The objective response rate was 25% (2/8) for the study population, and the disease control rate was 75% (6/8). No new safety concerns emerged. Conclusions: Anlotinib plus liposomal doxorubicin demonstrated antitumor activities in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. Due to the small sample size, further investigations with a larger population should be undertaken to confirm the study findings.