Open-state structure and pore gating mechanism of the cardiac sodium channel.

The heartbeat is initiated by voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.5, which opens rapidly and triggers the cardiac action potential; however, the structural basis for pore opening remains unknown. Here, we blocked fast inactivation with a mutation and captured the elusive open-state structure. The fast inactivation gate moves away from its receptor, allowing asymmetric opening of pore-lining S6 segments, which bend and rotate at their intracellular ends to dilate the activation gate to ∼10 Å diameter. Molecular dynamics analyses predict physiological rates of Na+ conductance. The open-state pore blocker propafenone binds in a high-affinity pose, and drug-access pathways are revealed through the open activation gate and fenestrations. Comparison with mutagenesis results provides a structural map of arrhythmia mutations that target the activation and fast inactivation gates. These results give atomic-level insights into molecular events that underlie generation of the action potential, open-state drug block, and fast inactivation of cardiac sodium channels, which initiate the heartbeat.

Dofetilide for the treatment of premature ventricular complexes and ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Dofetilide is a class III antiarrhythmic agent approved for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Given the efficacy of other class III agents, it has been used off-label for the treatment of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) and ventricular tachycardias (VTs). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of dofetilide for ventricular arrythmias (VAs). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 81 patients (59 men; age = 60 ± 14 years; LVEF = 0.34 ± 0.16) were admitted for dofetilide initiation to treat PVCs (29), VTs (42) or both (10). A ≥ 80% decrease in PVC burden was defined as a satisfactory response. An ICD was present in 72 patients (89%). Another antiarrhythmic was previously used in 50 patients (62%). Prior catheter ablation had been performed in 33 patients (41%). RESULTS: During intitiation, dofetilide was discontinued in 12 patients (15%) due to QT prolongation (8) and inefficacy to suppress VAs (4). Among the 32 patients with PVCs who successfully started dofetilide, the mean PVC burden decreased from 20 ± 10% to 8 ± 8% at a median follow-up of 2.6 months (p < .001). PVC burden was reduced by ≥80% in only 11/32 patients (34%). During 7 ± 1 years of follow-up, 41/69 patients (59%) continued to have VAs and received appropriate ICD therapies for monomorphic VTs (35) and polymorphic VT/VF (6) at a median of 8.0 (IQR 2.6-33.2) months. Dofetilide had to be discontinued in 50/69 patients (72%) due to inefficacy or intolerance. The composite outcome of VT/VF recurrence, heart transplantation, or death occurred in 6/12 patients (50%) without dofetilide and 49/69 patients (71%) with dofetilide. The event free survival was similar between patients treated with and without dofetilide (log-rank p = .55). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with dofetilide was associated with a decrease in PVCs, however clinically significant suppression occurred in a minority of patients. Dofetilide failed to suppress the occurrence of VTs in a majority of patients.

Characterization of remodeling processes in the atria of atrioventricular block dogs: Utility as an early-stage atrial fibrillation model.

To characterize utility of atrioventricular block (AVB) dogs as atrial fibrillation (AF) model, we studied remodeling processes occurring in their atria in acute (<2 weeks) and chronic (>4 weeks) phases. Fifty beagle dogs were used. Holter electrocardiogram demonstrated that paroxysmal AF occurred immediately after the production of AVB, of which duration tended to be prolonged in chronic phase. Electrophysiological analysis showed that inter-atrial conduction time and duration of burst pacing-induced AF increased in the chronic phase compared with those in the acute phase, but that atrial effective refractory period was hardly altered. Echocardiographic study revealed that diameters of left atrium, right pulmonary vein and inferior vena cava increased similarly in the acute and chronic phases. Histological evaluation indicated that hypertrophy and fibrosis in atrial tissue increased in the chronic phase. Electropharmacological characterization showed that i.v. pilsicainide effectively suppressed burst pacing-induced AF with increasing atrial conduction time and refractoriness of AVB dogs in chronic phase, but that i.v. amiodarone did not exert such electrophysiological effects. Taken together, AVB dogs in chronic phase appear to possess such pathophysiology as developed in the atria of early-stage AF patients, and therefore they can be used to evaluate drug candidates against early-stage AF.

In vivo cardiovascular profile of ryanodine receptor 2 inhibitor M201-A: Utility as an anti-atrial fibrillatory drug for patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) often coexist; however, clinically available anti-AF drugs can exacerbate symptoms of HFpEF. M201-A suppressed ryanodine receptor-mediated diastolic Ca2+ leakage, possibly inhibiting common pathological processes toward AF and HFpEF. To bridge the basic information to clinical practice, we assessed its cardiohemodynamic, anti-AF and ventricular proarrhythmic profile using halothane-anesthetized dogs (n = 4). M201-A hydrochloride in doses of 0.03, 0.3 and 3 mg/kg/10 min was intravenously administered, providing peak plasma concentrations of 0.09, 0.81 and 5.70 µg/mL, respectively. The high dose of M201-A showed various cardiovascular actions. Namely, M201-A increased mean blood pressure and tended to enhance isovolumetric ventricular relaxation without suppressing ventricular contraction or decreasing cardiac output. M201-A enhanced atrioventricular conduction, but hardy affected intra-atrial/ventricular conduction. Importantly, M201-A prolonged effective refractory period more potently in the atrium than in the ventricle, indicating that it may become an atrial-selective antiarrhythmic drug. Meanwhile, M201-A prolonged QT interval/QTcV, and showed reverse frequency-dependent delay of ventricular repolarization. M201-A prolonged J-Tpeakc without prolonging Tpeak-Tend or terminal repolarization period, indicating the risk of causing torsade de pointes is negligible. Thus, M201-A is expected to become a hopeful therapeutic strategy for patients having pathology of both AF and HFpEF.

Risk Factors for Treatment Transition in Patients with Low-Risk Atrial Fibrillation Patients Undergoing Anticoagulation Monotherapy: A Large Claims Database Study in Japan.

The global prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is rising, paralleling increased life expectancy. Early rhythm control benefits AF management. However, in low-risk, often asymptomatic, AF patients, anticoagulant monotherapy is the selected treatment, aligning with current guidelines. However, early AF progression in these low-risk individuals is not well-understood. Thus, this study aims to: 1) determine the proportion of low-risk AF patients who worsen within a year of initial AF diagnosis and 2) identify risk factors such treatment transitions. We analyzed data from 18623 AF patients, spanning January 2005 to June 2017. Low-risk patients were those on anticoagulant monotherapy ± rate control, following the JCS/JHRS 2020 Guideline on Pharmacotherapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias. We defined 2 patterns of treatment transition for 1) initiating ablation or antiarrhythmic drug therapy and 2) solely using antiarrhythmic drugs. This retrospective cohort study was employed a 12-month study, following a 6-month screening period. We included 1874 patients for all rhythm control (analysis 1) and 1503 for only medication-based control (analysis 2). The primary endpoint, treatment transition of AF under monotherapy, occurred in 28.4% of patients in analysis 1 and 10.8% in analysis 2. Risk factors common to both scenarios were male gender, baseline rate control drug use, and rivaroxaban selection, as identified by multiple logistic regression. These findings suggest a higher AF treatment transition trend in patients starting rivaroxaban, calling for further research. The study highlights the importance of informed early rhythm control initiation decisions in clinical settings.

Impact of early vs. delayed atrial fibrillation catheter ablation on atrial arrhythmia recurrences.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is an effective strategy in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its timing in the course of management remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine if an early vs. delayed AF ablation strategy is associated with differences in arrhythmia outcomes during 12-month follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred patients with symptomatic AF referred to a tertiary centre for management were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either an early ablation strategy (within 1 month of recruitment) or a delayed ablation strategy (optimized medical therapy followed by catheter ablation at 12 months post recruitment). The primary endpoint was atrial arrhythmia free survival at 12 months post-ablation. Secondary outcomes included: (i) AF burden, (ii) AF burden by AF phenotype, and (iii) antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) use at 12 months. Overall, 89 patients completed the study protocol (Early vs. Delayed: 48 vs. 41). Mean age was 59 ± 12.9 years (29% women). Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 100% of patients. At 12 months, 56.3% of patients in the early ablation group were free from recurrent arrhythmia, compared with 58.6% in the delayed ablation group (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.59-2.13, P = 0.7). All secondary outcomes showed no significant difference including median AF burden (Early vs. Delayed: 0% [IQR 3.2] vs. 0% [5], P = 0.66), median AF burden amongst paroxysmal AF patients (0% [IQR 1.1] vs. 0% [4.5], P = 0.78), or persistent AF patients (0% [IQR 22.8] vs. 0% [5.6], P = 0.45) or AAD use (33% vs. 37%, P = 0.8). CONCLUSION: Compared with an early ablation strategy, delaying AF ablation by 12 months for AAD management did not result in reduced ablation efficacy.

Antiarrhythmic therapy for narrow QRS supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in newborns and infants in the first year of life: Potent tools to be handled with care.

Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias pose a significant challenge in neonates and infants, particularly within the first year of life, where prompt and effective management is crucial. By synthesizing available evidence and clinical experience, this review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of antiarrhythmic therapy in this vulnerable population, with a focus on narrow QRS supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. This review examines the current understanding of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia management and discusses the challenges associated with antiarrhythmic therapy in newborns and infants during the critical first year of life, evaluating the efficacy and safety of various antiarrhythmic agents commonly utilized in this population, including dosing considerations, adverse effects, and strategies for acute management and prophylactic long-term antiarrhythmic treatment.

Effect of dronedarone vs. placebo on atrial fibrillation progression: a post hoc analysis from ATHENA trial.

AIMS: This post hoc analysis of the ATHENA trial (NCT00174785) assessed the effect of dronedarone on the estimated burden of atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter (AFL) progression to presumed permanent AF/AFL, and regression to sinus rhythm (SR), compared with placebo. METHODS AND RESULTS: The burden of AF/AFL was estimated by a modified Rosendaal method using available electrocardiograms (ECG). Cumulative incidence of permanent AF/AFL (defined as ≥6 months of AF/AFL until end of study) or permanent SR (defined as ≥6 months of SR until end of study) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. A log-rank test was used to assess statistical significance. Hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a Cox model, adjusted for treatment group. Of the 4439 patients included in this analysis, 2208 received dronedarone, and 2231 placebo. Baseline and clinical characteristics were well balanced between groups. Overall, 304 (13.8%) dronedarone-treated patients progressed to permanent AF/AFL compared with 455 (20.4%) treated with placebo (P < 0.0001). Compared with those receiving placebo, patients receiving dronedarone had a lower cumulative incidence of permanent AF/AFL (log-rank P < 0.001; HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.56-0.75), a higher cumulative incidence of permanent SR (log-rank P < 0.001; HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.09-1.29), and a lower estimated AF/AFL burden over time (P < 0.01 from Day 14 to Month 21). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that dronedarone could be a useful antiarrhythmic drug for early rhythm control due to less AF/AFL progression and more regression to SR vs. placebo, potentially reflecting reverse remodeling. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00174785.

Negative Inotropic Effects of Class I Antiarrhythmics on Guinea Pig Ventricular Myocardium: Correlation with L-Type Ca2+ Channel Blockade.

The negative inotropic effects of nine Vaughan Williams class I antiarrhythmic drugs were examined in guinea pig ventricular tissue preparations. The drugs decreased the contractile force of papillary muscles with different potencies: the potency order was propafenone > aprindine > cibenzoline > flecainide > ranolazine > disopyramide > pilsicainide > mexiletine > GS-458967. The potency of drugs correlated with the reported IC50 values to block the L-type Ca2+ channel rather than the Na+ channel. The effects of drugs were roughly the same when examined under a high extracellular K+ solution, which inactivates the Na+ channel. Furthermore, the attenuation of the extracellular Ca2+-induced positive inotropy was strong with propafenone, moderate with cibenzoline, and weak with pilsicainide. These results indicate that the negative inotropic effects of class I antiarrhythmic drugs can be largely explained by their blockade of the L-type Ca2+ channel.

What Is the Optimal Digoxin Level? Challenging Case of Fetal Atrial Flutter Treatment in a Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin.

Background: Atrial flutter is an infrequent yet potentially fatal arrhythmia. Digoxin is the preferred first-line treatment for fetal atrial flutter due to its efficacy and favorable safety profile. The optimal digoxin serum target level for neonatal atrial flutter management remains uncertain, with the standard target level ranging from 1.0 to 2.0 ng/mL due to potential toxicity concerns above this threshold. Case Presentation: We present a case of atrial flutter in a fetus within a monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancy that was successfully managed using a higher-than-standard target level of digoxin. A 34-year-old nulliparous woman was referred to our institution at 31 + 3 weeks of gestation due to fetal distress in an MCDA twin pregnancy. Fetal echocardiography revealed a ventricular rate of 214 bpm in twin A, while twin B exhibited no abnormal findings. Conclusions: Our case highlights a distinct correlation between the serum digoxin level and its impact on atrial flutter. A higher target serum level of digoxin may be necessary to achieve sinus conversion due to the unique maternal and fetal circulatory characteristics in MCDA pregnancies.