The tolerability and efficacy of antifibrotic therapy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Results from a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a progressive and fatal lung disease lacking effective therapeutics. Treatment with pirfenidone or nintedanib is recommended for patients to delay the progression of their disease. Adverse reactions caused by anti-fibrosis drugs can sometimes interrupt treatment and even change the progression of the disease. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the clinical use, adverse reactions, tolerability of pirfenidone and nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and the efficacy of antifibrotic therapy in a real world. METHODS: We recruited patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treated with pirfenidone or nintedanib at China-Japan Friendship Hospital from February 2017 to February 2022. We investigated the medication situation, adverse reactions, tolerability and survival of patients taking medications. RESULTS: A total of 303 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis were enrolled in the study. Treatment was divided between 205 patients receiving pirfenidone and 98 patients receiving nintedanib. Baseline data between the two groups were not significantly different. Patients treated with nintedanib had a higher overall discontinuation rate than those treated with pirfenidone (61.22 vs. 32.68 %, p < 0.001). Across all patient groups, the most common reason for discontinuing treatment was medication-related adverse effects. Compared to pirfenidone, nintedanib had a significantly higher discontinuation rate due to adverse events (48.98 % vs 27.80 %, p < 0.001). The most common side effect of both drugs was diarrhea. Pirfenidone was associated with a higher rate of extra-digestive adverse effects than nintedanib. Survival was not significantly different between the two drugs and using pirfenidone above 1200 mg/day did not confer significant survival benefits. The survival rate of patients who adhere to anti-fibrosis therapy for more than 6 months can be significantly improved (HR = 0.323, p = 0.0015). CONCLUSION: Gastrointestinal adverse effects were the most common adverse effects and the main reason of discontinuation of antifibrotic therapy, especially nintedanib. Consistent adherence to antifibrotic therapy may make the patients benefit from adjusting their antifibrotic medications, dosage, and active management of side effects.

The usual Interstitial pneumonia pattern in autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) is characterized by progression of lung parenchyma that may be observed in various autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs), including rheumatoid arthritis and connective tissue diseases. From a diagnostic point of view, a UIP pattern related to ARDs may display imaging and pathological features able to distinguish it from that related to IPF, such as the "straight-edge" sign at HRCT and lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates at histologic specimens. Multidisciplinary approach (MDD), involving at least pulmonologist, rheumatologist and radiologist, is fundamental in the differential diagnosis process, but MDD is also required in the evaluation of severity, progression and response to treatment, that is based on the combination of changes in symptoms, pulmonary function trends, and, in selected patients, serial CT evaluation. Differently from IPF, in patients with ARDs both functional evaluation and patient-reported outcomes may be affected by systemic involvement and comorbidities, including musculoskeletal manifestations of disease. Finally, in regards to pharmacological treatment, immunosuppressants have been considered the cornerstone of therapy, despite the lack of solid evidence in most cases; recently, antifibrotic drugs were also proposed for the treatment of progressive fibrosing ILDs other than IPF. In ARD-ILD, the therapeutic choice should balance the need for the control of systemic and lung involvements with the risk of adverse events from multi-morbidities and -therapies. Purpose of this review is to summarize the definition, the radiological and morphological features of the UIP pattern in ARDs, together with risk factors, diagnostic criteria, prognostic evaluation, monitoring and management approaches of the UIP-ARDs.

Serine/threonine kinase inhibition as antifibrotic therapy: transforming growth factor-ß and Rho kinase inhibitors.

Serine/threonine kinases mediate the phosphorylation of intracellular protein targets, transferring a phosphorus group from an adenosine triphosphate molecule to the specific amino acid residues within the target proteins. Serine/threonine kinases regulate multiple key cellular functions. From this large group of kinases, TGF-ß through serine/threonine activity of its receptors and Rho kinase (ROCK) play an important role in the development and maintenance of fibrosis in various human diseases, including SSc. In recent years, multiple drugs targeting and inhibiting these kinases have been developed, opening the possibility of becoming potential antifibrotic agents of clinical value for treating fibrotic diseases. This review analyses the contribution of TGF-ß and ROCK-mediated serine/threonine kinase molecular pathways to the development and maintenance of pathological fibrosis and the potential clinical use of their inhibition.

Blood Krebs von den Lungen-6 levels predict treatment response to antifibrotic therapy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Antifibrotic therapy can slow disease progression (DP) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, the prognostic biomarkers for DP in patients with IPF receiving antifibrotic therapy have not been identified. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic efficacy of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) for DP in patients with IPF receiving antifibrotic therapy. METHODS: The clinical data of 188 patients with IPF who initiated antifibrotic therapy at three tertiary hospitals was retrospectively analyzed. DP was defined as a relative decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥ 10%, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide ≥ 15%, acute exacerbation, or deaths during 6 months after antifibrotic therapy. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 68.9 years, 77.7% were male, and DP occurred in 43 patients (22.9%) during follow-up (median, 7.6 months; interquartile range, 6.2-9.8 months). There was no difference in baseline KL-6 levels between the DP and no-DP groups; however, among patients with high baseline KL-6 levels (≥ 500 U/mL), changes in KL-6 levels over 1 month were higher in the DP group than those in the non-DP group, and higher relative changes in KL-6 over 1 month were independently associated with DP (odds ratio, 1.043; 95% confidence interval 1.005-1.084) in the multivariable logistic analysis adjusted for age and FVC. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the 1-month change in KL-6 was also useful for predicting DP (area under the curve = 0.707; P < 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the relative change in KL-6 over 1 month might be useful for predicting DP in patients with IPF receiving antifibrotic therapy when baseline KL6 is high.

Antifibrotics and lung transplantation: A Spanish multicentre case-controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Antifibrotic drugs are the standard treatments for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This study aims to assess the safety of antifibrotic treatment in IPF patients undergoing lung transplantation. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of IPF who received a lung transplant between January 2015 and June 2019 at four Spanish hospitals specialized in lung transplantation were retrospectively recruited. Cases were defined as patients receiving antifibrotic treatments at time of transplant. Each case was matched with a control who did not receive antifibrotic treatment. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were included in the study cohort (103 cases and 61 controls). There were no statistically significant differences between the cases and controls in any of the items studied related to transplantation except the time until the appearance of chest wall dehiscence: although there were no differences in the incidence of wall dehiscence in either group (12.3% vs. 13.7%; p = 0.318), the patients on antifibrotic drugs experienced it earlier (21 days [IQR = 12.5-41.5] vs. 63 days [IQR = 46.75-152.25]; p = 0.012). There were no differences in overall post-transplant survival between the two groups (p = 0.698) or in conditional survival at 30 days, 90 days, 3 years or 5 years. However, 1 year survival was significantly greater among controls (80.6% vs. 93.3%; p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: There was evidence that chest wall dehiscences appeared earlier post-transplant in patients using antifibrotics, even though this factor did not significantly impact survival.

Nintedanib in IPF: Post hoc Analysis of the Italian FIBRONET Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: The FIBRONET study was an observational study of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in Italy. OBJECTIVES: In this post hoc descriptive analysis, we describe changes in lung function, anxiety/depression, coughing, exacerbations, and adverse events (AEs) in patients receiving nintedanib treatment. METHODS: Patients with IPF from 20 centers in Italy, aged ≥40 years who received nintedanib for ≥7 months, were followed up for 12 months from study enrollment, attending clinic visits every 3 months. Outcomes included change in forced vital capacity (FVC)% predicted from baseline to 12 months, anxiety/depression measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the proportion of patients with cough, AEs, and exacerbations. RESULTS: In total, 52 patients received nintedanib (mean duration of 11.6 months). Ten patients had dose reductions from 150 mg to 100 mg twice daily, due to AEs. FVC% predicted was unchanged in the overall nintedanib population (78.7% at baseline; 79.8% at 12 months) and those with a reduced dose (77.7% at baseline; 81.0% at 12 months). HADS score was low at baseline and throughout the study. The proportion of patients with cough decreased from 50.0% to 21.2% over 12 months. Two patients experienced exacerbations, 2 patients discontinued treatment, and 27 (51.9%) reported AEs. The most common AE was diarrhea (34.6%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IPF who received nintedanib in the FIBRONET study, FVC% predicted was stable over 12 months, and the proportion of patients with cough decreased. The safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile for nintedanib in IPF.

[Treatment of lung fibrosis in systemic rheumatic diseases (new treatment)]. / Therapie von Lungenfibrosen bei rheumatischen Systemerkrankungen (neue Therapien).

An interstitial lung disease represents a relevant organ manifestation in many systemic rheumatic diseases (connective tissue disease-interstitial lung disease, CTD-ILD). In 10% of the cases pulmonary fibrosis even results in an underlying systemic disease. The CTD-ILDs are frequently associated with a poor prognosis. Therefore, it is important to test patients with systemic rheumatic diseases timely and regularly for the presence of an ILD. Treatment decisions should be made together with pneumologists and rheumatologists, particularly with respect to the initiation of a specific treatment. Treatment is based on randomized studies only in a few cases and can mostly be derived from case control studies. For systemic sclerosis-associated ILD (SSc-ILD) antifibrotic treatment with nintedanib has also now been approved in addition to an immunosuppressive treatment. For other CTD-ILDs an antifibrotic treatment should be discussed in an interdisciplinary approach depending on the underlying disease corresponding to a progressively fibrosing ILD.

Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Diagnosis and Management.

Fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis is a complex interstitial lung disease that is not entirely understood. In its chronic and fibrotic form, hypersensitivity pneumonitis is one of the main mimickers of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Distinguishing between these two conditions is challenging but is of particular clinical relevance. Two approved therapies are available for IPF, and a considerable number of clinical trials are now exploring newer pharmacological options. This impressive research effort is a consequence of new pathogenetic understanding, updated diagnostic criteria and a long history of pharmacological trials. Conversely, current knowledge gaps on pathogenesis of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, coupled with lack of validated diagnostic criteria, make the management of this disease an unsolved clinical challenge. This also reflects the paucity of therapeutic clinical trials in this field. In this review, we describe the current evidence and the possible future options to approach this complex disease.

An Atypical Case of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in a Patient from Africa.

A 39 years old African man presented with fatigue, loss of weight and night sweats; radiology showed a possible usual interstitial pneumonia pattern. The patient missed follow-up visits, and presented again after 3 years with productive cough and general illness. Pulmonary function tests showed a decline of FVC compared to a previous investigation. The CT scans showed progression of the interstitial lung disease, and a multidisciplinary conference recommended to proceed with a surgical lung biopsy. Histopathology showed an atypical pattern, with bronchiolar metaplasia. A new multidisciplinary conference made a diagnosis of IPF, and the patient was treated with antifibrotic drugs with a good effect, reaching stability of lung function. This case report highlights the need to improve knowledge and to better characterize rare pulmonary diseases, and especially IPF, among African patients.

Identifying Barriers to Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Treatment: A Survey of Patient and Physician Views.

BACKGROUND: Antifibrotics are recommended for the treatment of individuals with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but treatment use remains at ∼60%. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the views of individuals with IPF and pulmonologists on the diagnosis and management of IPF to understand treatment patterns. METHODS: Interviews and/or online surveys were completed by patients and pulmonologists from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK. Responses from physicians were analyzed by time between diagnosis and treatment initiation in the majority of patients with IPF (group A, > 4 months; group B, ≤4 months). Statistical comparisons between physicians were undertaken using z tests, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The physicians in group A saw fewer patients, were less comfortable discussing the IPF prognosis with patients, and had less belief in the benefits of antifibrotic treatments than the physicians in group B. These physicians' attitudes contrasted with those of the patients, who wanted more information about the IPF prognosis and pharmacological treatment options at diagnosis and were more concerned about preventing disease progression than avoiding medication side effects. Differences between countries were found regarding physicians' comfort in discussing the prognosis at diagnosis and access to care. CONCLUSIONS: Several barriers to antifibrotic treatment, principally reflecting the differing views and values of patients and physicians, were identified in this study, suggesting a need for better patient-physician communication about pharmacological therapy for IPF.

Understanding Patterns of Adherence to Antifibrotic Treatment in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Insights from an Italian Prospective Cohort Study.

Background: Pirfenidone and Nintedanib have significantly improved the prognosis of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), reducing mortality risk and exacerbations. This study aimed to analyze antifibrotic treatment utilization and its association with clinical outcomes (i.e., acute exacerbation or death) during 2014-2021 in newly diagnosed IPF patients, using Healthcare Utilization Databases of the Marche Region, Italy. Methods: The first 12-month adherence to antifibrotic was estimated using the Proportion of Days Covered (PDC), defining adherence as PDC ≥ 75%. State Sequence Analysis over the initial 52 weeks of treatment was used to identify adherence patterns. The role of adherence patterns on acute exacerbations/death, adjusted by demographic, clinical features, and monthly adherence after the 52-week period (time-dependent variable), was assessed with Cox regression. Results: Among 667 new IPF cases, 296 received antifibrotic prescriptions, with 62.8% being adherent in the first year. Three antifibrotic utilization patterns emerged-high adherence (37.2%), medium adherence (42.5%), and low adherence (20.3%)-with median PDCs of 95.3%, 79.5%, and 18.6%, respectively. These patterns did not directly influence three-year mortality/exacerbation probability, but sustained adherence reduced risk over time. Conclusions: Good adherence was observed in in this population-based study, emphasizing the importance of continuous antifibrotics therapy over time to mitigate adverse outcomes.

Silicosis: New Challenges from an Old Inflammatory and Fibrotic Disease.

Silicosis, an occupational lung disease that can be prevented, is still a significant public health concern in many countries, despite its considerably decreased incidence over the years. The latency period for silicosis ranges from a few years to several decades, depending on the duration and intensity of exposure to silica dust. The complex pathogenic mechanisms of the disease are not fully understood, but it is known to be characterized by inflammation, the formation of silicotic nodules, and progressive and irreversible fibrosis. The aim of this paper was to present the current sources of exposure to silica dust and summarize the updates on risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic status, genetic susceptibility) and sex differences, silico-tuberculosis, prognostic markers including 16-kDa Clara cell secretory protein, antifibrotic treatment, and other therapeutic possibilities with promising results. There are no effective treatment options for silicosis, and prevention remains the primary tool to significantly reduce the risk of disease. There are promising new treatments under investigation including antifibrotic, cellular, and immunomodulatory therapies, but further research is needed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of these therapies in adequately powered clinical trials.

Idiopathic Fibrotic Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia with Cicatricial Organizing Pneumonia and Intraluminal Pulmonary Ossification Containing Bone Marrow.

A 72-year-old man presented with bilateral ground-glass opacities in the lower lung fields on chest radiography. Computed chest tomography showed ground-glass opacities and micronodules in both lower lungs. A video-assisted thoracoscopic biopsy of the right lower lung showed homogeneous thickening of the alveolar septa with fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration consistent with fibrotic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (fNSIP). Cicatricial organizing pneumonia and intraluminal pulmonary ossification containing bone marrow that was considered to represent dendriform pulmonary ossification. Idiopathic fNSIP was diagnosed. The patient remains stable under antifibrotic treatment.

Impact of ILD-Specific Therapies on Perioperative Course in Patients with Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease Undergoing Lung Transplantation.

Immunosuppressants and antifibrotics are currently used to treat patients with various interstitial lung diseases, which may undergo lung transplantation (LTx). The retrospective study aimed to evaluate the potential effects of therapeutic regimen on the perioperative course in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) undergoing LTx. All patients with IPF and PPF undergoing LTx between January 2014 and December 2021 were included. We retrospectively screened for previous use of immunosuppressants and antifibrotic therapy. We analyzed perioperative courses, short-term outcomes, and safety retrospectively. In total, 286 patients with diagnosis of IPF or PPF were analyzed. According to the treatment regimen before LTx, the study cohort was divided into four groups and compared. No differences between antifibrotic monotherapy, combined antifibrotic and immunosuppressive therapy with regard to postoperative complications were observed. Length of mechanical ventilation was shorter in patients with antifibrotics prior to LTx. Pretreatment with antifibrotic monotherapy and a combination of antifibrotic drugs with immunosuppressive therapy, lower body mass index (BMI) and lower blood loss, were independently associated with primary graft dysfunction grades 0-3 72 hours after LTx (p < 0.001). Finally, patients with antifibrotic monotherapy developed significantly less de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) (p = 0.009). Higher intraoperative blood loss, etiology of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and older age were independently associated with shorter survival after LTx. Use of antifibrotic monotherapy and a combination of antifibrotic drugs with immunosuppressive therapy in IPF/PPF patients undergoing LTx, proved to be safe and might lead to beneficial effects after LTx.

Post-COVID-19 Pulmonary Fibrosis: Facts-Challenges and Futures: A Narrative Review.

Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) usually suffer from post-acute sequelae of coronavirus disease 2019 (PASC). Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) has the most significant long-term impact on patients' respiratory health, called post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis (PC19-PF). PC19- PF can be caused by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or pneumonia due to COVID-19. The risk factors of PC19-PF, such as older age, chronic comorbidities, the use of mechanical ventilation during the acute phase, and female sex, should be considered. Individuals with COVID-19 pneumonia symptoms lasting at least 12 weeks following diagnosis, including cough, dyspnea, exertional dyspnea, and poor saturation, accounted for nearly all disease occurrences. PC19-PF is characterized by persistent fibrotic tomographic sequelae associated with functional impairment throughout follow-up. Thus, clinical examination, radiology, pulmonary function tests, and pathological findings should be done to diagnose PC19-PF patients. PFT indicated persistent limitations in diffusion capacity and restrictive physiology, despite the absence of previous testing and inconsistency in the timeliness of assessments following acute illness. It has been hypothesized that PC19-PF patients may benefit from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treatment to prevent continued infection-related disorders, enhance the healing phase, and manage fibroproliferative processes. Immunomodulatory agents might reduce inflammation and the length of mechanical ventilation during the acute phase of COVID-19 infection, and the risk of the PC19-PF stage. Pulmonary rehabilitation, incorporating exercise training, physical education, and behavioral modifications, can improve the physical and psychological conditions of patients with PC19-PF.

Therapeutic targets of fibrosis: Translational advances and current challenges.

In a physiological context, the extracellular matrix (ECM) provides an important scaffold for organs. Dysregulation of ECM in disease conditions, characterised by excess deposition of connective tissue and extracellular matrix in response to a pathological insult, is a key driver of disease progression in multiple organs. The resultant fibrosis is predominantly an irreversible process and directly contributes to, and exacerbates, dysfunction of an affected organ. This is particularly paramount in the kidney, liver, heart and lung. A hybrid Joint Meeting of NC-IUPHAR and British Pharmacological Society was held in Paris and via a webinar in November 2020, when two successive sessions were devoted to translational advances in fibrosis as a therapeutic target. On the upsurge of response to these sessions, the concept of a special themed issue on this topic emerged, and is entitled Translational Advances in Fibrosis as a Therapeutic Target. In this special issue, we seek to provide an up-to-date account of the diverse molecular mechanisms and causal role that fibrosis plays in disease progression (contributing to, and exacerbating, dysfunction of affected organs). Recent developments in the understanding of molecular targets involved in fibrosis, and how their actions can be manipulated therapeutically, are included. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue on Translational Advances in Fibrosis as a Therapeutic Target. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v180.22/issuetoc.

Therapeutic decisions in a cohort of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a multicenter, prospective survey from Poland.

Background: Pirfenidone and nintedanib are considered as the standard of care in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but there is no consensus as to which of these two agents should be regarded as first-line treatment. Objective: To provide real-world data on therapeutic decisions of pulmonary specialists, particularly the choice of the antifibrotic drug in patients with IPF. Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective survey collecting clinical data of patients with IPF considered as candidates for antifibrotic treatment between September 2019 and December 2020. Clinical characteristics and information on the therapeutic approach were retrieved. Statistical evaluation included multiple logistic regression analysis with stepwise model selection. Results: Data on 188 patients [74.5% male, median age 73 (interquartile range, 68-78) years] considered for antifibrotic therapy were collected. Treatment was initiated in 138 patients, while 50 patients did not receive an antifibrotic, mainly due to the lack of consent for treatment and IPF severity. Seventy-two patients received pirfenidone and 66 received nintedanib. Dosing protocol (p < 0.01) and patient preference (p = 0.049) were more frequently associated with the choice of nintedanib, while comorbidity profile (p = 0.0003) and concomitant medication use (p = 0.03) were more frequently associated with the choice of pirfenidone. Age (p = 0.002), lung transfer factor for carbon monoxide (TLCO) (p = 0.001), and gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with the qualification for the antifibrotic treatment. Conclusion: This real-world prospective study showed that dose protocol and patient preference were more frequently associated with the choice of nintedanib, while the comorbidity profile and concomitant medication use were more frequently associated with the choice of pirfenidone. Age, TLCO, and history of gastrointestinal bleeding were significant factors influencing the decision to initiate antifibrotic therapy.

Differential Discontinuation Profiles between Pirfenidone and Nintedanib in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Antifibrotic agents have been widely used in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Long-term continuation of antifibrotic therapy is required for IPF treatment to prevent disease progression. However, antifibrotic treatment has considerable adverse events, and the continuation of treatment is uncertain in many cases. Therefore, we examined and compared the continuity of treatment between pirfenidone and nintedanib in patients with IPF. We retrospectively enrolled 261 consecutive IPF patients who received antifibrotic treatment from six core facilities in Gunma Prefecture from 2009 to 2018. Among them, 77 patients were excluded if the antifibrotic agent was switched or if the observation period was less than a year. In this study, 134 patients treated with pirfenidone and 50 treated with nintedanib were analyzed. There was no significant difference in patient background, discontinuation rate of antifibrotic treatment over time, and survival rate between the two groups. However, the discontinuation rate due to adverse events within one year of antifibrotic treatment was significantly higher in the nintedanib group than in the pirfenidone group (76% vs. 37%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the discontinuation rate due to adverse events in nintedanib was higher than that of pirfenidone treatment throughout the observation period (70.6% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.016). The pirfenidone group tended to be discontinued due to acute exacerbation or transfer to another facility. The results of this study suggest that better management of adverse events with nintedanib leads to more continuous treatment that prevents disease progression and acute exacerbations, thus improving prognosis in patients with IPF.

Progressive fibrosis in interstitial lung diseases - proposed definition and management.

Interstitial lung diseases may have an unpredictably progressive course, which is manifested as progression of pulmonary fibrosis, causing an increasing impairment of lung function affecting a poor prognosis. The possibility of an effective antifibrotic treatment is a chance for patients to slow down the progression of the disease, perhaps even extend their life. For this reason, standardization of the definition as well as identification criteria for progressive fibrosis interstitial lung disease is a method for optimizing the management in this group of patients.

DSP rs2076295 variants influence nintedanib and pirfenidone outcomes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The antifibrotic drugs nintedanib and pirfenidone are used for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We analysed the association of common profibrotic polymorphisms in MUC5B (mucin 5B, rs35705950) and DSP (desmoplakin, rs2076295) on antifibrotic treatment outcomes in IPF. METHODS: MUC5B rs35705950 and DSP rs2076295 were assessed in IPF patients (n = 210, 139 men/71 women) from the Czech EMPIRE registry and age- or sex-matched healthy individuals (n = 205, 125 men/80 women). Genetic data were collated with overall survival (OS), acute exacerbation episodes, worsening lung function and antifibrotic treatment. RESULTS: We confirmed overexpression of the MUC5B rs35705950*T allele (55.2% versus 20.9%, p < 0.001) and the DSP rs2076295*G allele (80.4% versus 68.3%, p < 0.001) in IPF compared with controls. On antifibrotic drugs, lower mortability was observed in IPF patients with DSP G* allele (p = 0.016) and MUC5B T* allele (p = 0.079). Carriers of the DSP rs2076295*G allele benefitted from nintedanib treatment compared with TT genotype by a longer OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 7.99; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.56-40.90; p = 0.013] and a slower decline in lung function (HR = 8.51; 95% CI = 1.68-43.14; p = 0.010). Patients with a TT genotype (rs2076295) benefitted from treatment with pirfenidone by prolonged OS (p = 0.040; HR = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.13-0.95) compared with nintedanib treatment. Both associations were confirmed by cross-validation analysis. After stratifying by MUC5B rs35705950*T allele carriage, no difference in treatment outcome was observed for nintedanib or pirfenidone (p = 0.784). In the multivariate model, smoking, age, forced vital capacity (FVC) and DLCO (diffuse lung capacity) at the IPF diagnosis were associated with survival. CONCLUSION: Our real-world study showed that IPF patients with MUC5B T* allele or DSP G* allele profit from antifibrotic treatment by lower mortability. Moreover, carriers of the DSP rs2076295*G allele benefit from treatment with nintedanib, and TT genotype from treatment with pirfenidone. MUC5B rs35705950 did not impact the outcome of treatment with either nintedanib or pirfenidone. Our single-registry pilot study should be confirmed with an independent patient cohort.