Multiscale Structure and Function of the Aortic Valve Apparatus.

While studying the aortic valve in isolation has facilitated the development of life-saving procedures and technologies, the dynamic interplay of the aortic valve and its surrounding structures is vital to preserving their function across the wide range of conditions encountered in an active lifestyle. Our view is that these structures should be viewed as an integrated functional unit, herein referred to as the aortic valve apparatus (AVA). The coupling of the aortic valve and root, left ventricular outflow tract, and blood circulation is crucial for AVA's functions: unidirectional flow out of the left ventricle, coronary perfusion, reservoir function, and supporting left ventricular function. In this review, we explore the multiscale biological and physical phenomena that underly the simultaneous fulfilment of these functions. A brief overview of the tools used to investigate the AVA is included, such as: medical imaging modalities, experimental methods, and computational modelling, specifically fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations, is included. Some pathologies affecting the AVA are explored, and insights are provided on treatments and interventions that aim to maintain quality of life. The concepts explained in this paper support the idea of AVA being an integrated functional unit and help identify unanswered research questions. Incorporating phenomena through the molecular, micro, meso and whole tissue scales is crucial for understanding the sophisticated normal functions and diseases of the AVA.

Revisiting the anatomy of the left ventricle in the light of knowledge of its development.

Despite centuries of investigation, certain aspects of left ventricular anatomy remain either controversial or uncertain. We make no claims to have resolved these issues, but our review, based on our current knowledge of development, hopefully identifies the issues requiring further investigation. When first formed, the left ventricle had only inlet and apical components. With the expansion of the atrioventricular canal, the developing ventricle cedes part of its inlet to the right ventricle whilst retaining the larger parts of the cushions dividing the atrioventricular canal. Further remodelling of the interventricular communication provides the ventricle with its outlet, with the aortic root being transferred to the left ventricle along with the newly formed myocardium supporting its leaflets. The definitive ventricle possesses inlet, apical and outlet parts. The inlet component is guarded by the mitral valve, with its leaflets, in the normal heart, supported by papillary muscles located infero-septally and supero-laterally. There is but a solitary zone of apposition between the leaflets, which we suggest are best described as being aortic and mural. The trabeculated component extends beyond the inlet to the apex and is confluent with the outlet part, which supports the aortic root. The leaflets of the aortic valve are supported in semilunar fashion within the root, with the ventricular cavity extending to the sinutubular junction. The myocardial-arterial junction, however, stops well short of the sinutubular junction, with myocardium found only at the bases of the sinuses, giving rise to the coronary arteries. We argue that the relationships between the various components should now be described using attitudinally appropriate terms rather than describing them as if the heart is removed from the body and positioned on its apex.

Is Osteogenesis Imperfecta Associated with Cardiovascular Abnormalities? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare genetic disorder caused by abnormal collagen type I production. While OI is primarily characterized by bone fragility and deformities, patients also have extraskeletal manifestations, including an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the literature on cardiovascular diseases in OI patients in order to raise awareness of this understudied clinical aspect of OI and support clinical guidelines. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus was conducted that included articles from the inception of these databases to April 2023. Valvular disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension appear to be more prevalent in OI than in control individuals. Moreover, a larger aortic root was observed in OI compared to controls. Various cardiovascular diseases appear to be more prevalent in OI than in controls. These cardiovascular abnormalities are observed in all types of OI and at all ages, including young children. As there are insufficient longitudinal studies, it is unknown whether these abnormalities are progressive in nature in OI patients. Based on these findings, we would recommend referring individuals with OI to a cardiologist with a low-threshold.

Transcatheter valve-in-valve interventions after aortic root replacement: A systematic review.

Structural valve deterioration after aortic root replacement (ARR) surgery may be treated by transcatheter valve-in-valve (ViV-TAVI) intervention. However, several technical challenges and outcomes are not well described. The aim of the present review was to analyze the outcomes of ViV-TAVI in deteriorated ARR. This review included studies reporting any form of transcatheter valvular intervention in patients with a previous ARR. All forms of ARR were considered, as long as the entire root was replaced. Pubmed, ScienceDirect, SciELO, DOAJ, and Cochrane library databases were searched until September 2023. Overall, 86 patients were included from 31 articles that met our inclusion criteria out of 741 potentially eligible studies. In the entire population, the mean time from ARR to reintervention was 11.0 years (range: 0.33-22). The most frequently performed techniques/grafts for ARR was homograft (67.4%) and the main indication for intervention was aortic regurgitation (69.7%). Twenty-three articles reported no postoperative complications. Six (7.0%) patients required permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after the ViV-TAVI procedure, and 4 (4.7%) patients had a second ViV-TAVI implant. There were three device migrations (3.5%) and 1 stroke (1.2%). Patients with previous ARR present a high surgical risk. ViV-TAVI can be considered in selected patients, despite unique technical challenges that need to be carefully addressed according to the characteristics of the previous surgery and on computed tomography analysis.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for pure aortic insufficiency in a patient following David-type aortic valve-sparing root replacement after aortic dissection-A successful off-label procedure.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has traditionally been indicated for the treatment of aortic stenosis. However, in this case report, we describe a successful TAVI procedure in a 46-year-old male patient who had previously undergone David aortic valve-sparing aortic root replacement for type 1 aortic dissection. The patient presented with aortic valve insufficiency 4 years after the initial surgery and was subsequently treated with a 34 mm Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R prosthesis via TAVI. This case highlights the feasibility of TAVI as a viable treatment option for postoperative aortic valve insufficiency in patients with prior ascending aortic or aortic arch surgery.

The clinical anatomy of the atrioventricular conduction axis.

It is axiomatic that the chances of achieving accurate capture of the conduction axis and its fascicles will be optimized by equally accurate knowledge of the relationship of the components to the recognizable cardiac landmarks, and we find it surprising that acknowledged experts should continue to use drawings that fall short in terms of anatomical accuracy. The accuracy achieved by Sunao Tawara (1906) in showing the location of the atrioventricular conduction axis is little short of astounding. Our purpose in bringing this to current attention is to question the need of the experts to have produced such inaccurate representations, since the findings of Tawara have been extensively endorsed in very recent years. The recent studies do no more than point to the amazing accuracy of the initial account of Tawara. At the same time, we draw attention to the findings described in the middle of the 20th century by Ivan Mahaim (1947). These observations have tended to be ignored in recent accounts. They are, perhaps, of equal significance to those seeking specifically to pace the left fascicles of the branching atrioventricular bundle.

Comprehensive imaging evaluation of the aortic valve and root before aortic root surgery: a study comparing MDCT and TEE.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy and consistency of MDCT and TEE in the preoperative assessment of aortic root surgery. METHODS: From January 2021 to September 2022, 118 patients who underwent aortic root surgery were included in this study. All patients underwent high-quality preoperative MDCT and TEE examinations, and the examination results were independently measured and assessed by two senior radiologists or ultrasound specialists. Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson correlation testing were employed to assess the correlation and consistency between MDCT and TEE. These analyses were then compared with actual intraoperative measurement data. RESULTS: Among all the patients, 73 (61.86%) had tricuspid aortic valve (TAV), and 45 (38.14%) had bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). A comparison between the TEE and MDCT measurements showed that for the annulus diameter, the area-derived diameter had the best correlation and agreement. For the sinus of Valsalva diameter, the circumference-derived diameter was optimal. However, for the STJ diameter, the minimum cross-sectional diameter showed the best agreement with TEE. In contrast, measurements of geometric height showed a weaker correlation and agreement. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MDCT can be a valuable tool for perioperative evaluation in aortic root surgery, with good correlation, consistency, and feasibility when compared to TEE. The choice of MDCT measurement methodology, specifically area-derived and circumference-derived diameter, proved to be more accurate than other methods. Further research is required to enhance the understanding of aortic valve repair and associated imaging techniques.

Clinical impact of cardiovascular calcifications on stroke incidence in primary prevention: analysis in NADESICO study.

The utility of assessment of cardiovascular calcifications for predicting stroke incidence remains unclear. This study assessed the relationship between cardiovascular calcifications including coronary artery calcification (CAC), aortic valve (AVC), and aortic root (ARC) assessed by coronary computed tomography (CT) and stroke incidence in patients with suspected CAD. In this multicenter prospective cohort study, 1187 patients suspected of CAD who underwent coronary CT were enrolled. Cardiovascular events including stroke were documented. Hazard ratio (HR) and confidence interval (CI) were assessed by Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for the Framingham risk score. C statistics for stroke incidence were also examined by models including cardiovascular calcifications. A total of 980 patients (mean age, 65 ± 7 years; females, 45.8%) were assessed by the CAC, AVC, and ARC Agatston scores. During a median follow-up of 4.0 years, 19 patients developed stroke. Cox proportional hazard model showed severe CAC (Agatston score ≥ 90th percentile [580.0 value]) and presence of AVC and ARC were associated with stroke incidence (HR; 10.33 [95% CI; 2.08-51.26], 3.08 [1.19-7.98], and 2.75 [1.03-7.30], respectively). C statistic in the model with CAC and AVC severity for predicting stroke incidence was 0.841 (95% CI; 0.761-0.920), which was superior to the model with CAC alone (0.762 [95% CI; 0.665-0.859], P < 0.01). CAC, AVC, and ARC were associated with stroke incidence in patients suspected of CAD. Assessment of both CAC and AVC may be useful for prediction of stroke incidence.

How-I-Do-It: Aortic Annular Enlargement - Are the Nicks and Manouguian Obsolete?

The Y-incision aortic annular enlargement (AAE), first performed in August 2020, offers a safe and more effective alternative for management of a small aortic annulus/root without need for violation of the left ventricular outflow tract, mitral valve geometry, or left/right atria in both first-time aortic valve replacement (AVR) and reoperative AVR. In the first consecutive 119 patients with Y-incision AAE, the median age was 65 (59, 71), 67% female, 28% had previous cardiac surgery, and 2 cases had endocarditis. The preoperative mean gradient was 36 (30, 47), and the native aortic valve area was 0.9 (0.7, 1.0). After aortic annular enlargement, the median prosthesis size was 29 (27, 29) with 63% of patients having a size 29 or the largest sized valve. The median increment of annulus enlargement was 3 (3, 4) valve sizes. Postoperative complications included 1 operative mortality, 1 stroke exacerbation, and 2 pacemaker implantations (including one case of endocarditis with Gerbode fistula). There was no renal failure requiring permanent dialysis, mediastinitis, or reoperation for bleeding. Postoperative computed tomography aortogram showed the aortic root was enlarged from 27 (24, 30) to 40 (37, 42) mm without aortic pseudoaneurysm. The postoperative mean gradient was 6 (5, 9) mm Hg and valve area was 2.2 (1.8, 2.6) cm2 at 24 months. Mitral and tricuspid valve functions were significantly improved. This report describes the Y-incision technique with the most up-to-date modifications and short-term outcomes.

Partial Heart Transplantation - How to Change the System.

Partial heart transplantation is the first clinically successful approach to deliver growing heart valve implants. To date, 13 clinical partial heart transplants have been performed. However, turning partial heart transplantation into a routine procedure that is available to all children who would benefit from growing heart valve implants poses formidable logistical challenges. Firstly, a supply for partial heart transplant donor grafts needs to be developed. This challenge is complicated by the scarcity of donor organs. Importantly, the donor pools for orthotopic heart transplants, partial heart transplants and cadaver homografts overlap. Secondly, partial heart transplants need to be allocated. Factors relevant for equitable allocation include the indication, anatomical fit, recipient clinical status and time on the wait list. Finally, partial heart transplantation will require regulation and oversight, which only recently has been undertaken by the Food and Drug Administration, which regulates human cellular and tissue-based products. Overcoming these challenges will require a change in the system. Once this is achieved, partial heart transplantation could open new horizons for children who require growing tissue implants.

The Clinical Significance of Unplanned Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Aortic Root Replacement.

OBJECTIVES: Unexpected coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is occasionally required during aortic root replacement (ARR). However, the impact of unplanned CABG remains unknown. DESIGN: A single-center, retrospective observational study. SETTING: At university-affiliated tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All patients who underwent ARR from 2011 through 2022. INTERVENTIONS: Aortic root replacement with or without unplanned CABG. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 795 patients underwent ARR. Among them, 131 (16.5%) underwent planned concomitant CABG, and 34 (4.3%) required unplanned CABG. The most common indication of unplanned CABG was ventricular dysfunction (33.3%), followed by disease pathology (25.6%), anatomy (15.4%), and surgical complications (10.3%). A vein graft to the right coronary artery was the most commonly performed bypass. Infective endocarditis and aortic dissection were observed in 27.8% and 12.8%, respectively. Prior cardiac surgery was seen in 40.3%. The median follow-up period was 4.3 years. Unplanned CABG was not associated with operative mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, 95% CI 0.33-7.16, p = 0.58) or long-term mortality (hazard ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.44-1.89, p = 0.81). Body surface area smaller than 1.7 was independently associated with an increased risk of unplanned CABG (OR 4.51, 95% CI 1.85-11.0, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Unplanned CABG occurred in 4.3% of patients during ARR, but was not associated with operative mortality or long-term mortality. A small body surface area was a factor associated with unplanned CABG.

The mid-term outcomes of aortic root replacement after surgical repair for CHD.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to assess the mid-term outcomes of aortic root replacement after repair of CHDs. METHOD: This is a single-institutional retrospective, cohort study with consecutive patients undergoing aortic root replacement after surgical repair of CHDs between 1999 and 2022. Operative indications included aortic root dilatation with/without aortic insufficiency, sinus of Valsalva rupture, or aortic dissection involving the root. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (36 male and 8 female) were enrolled. Mean age at the root replacement was 36.6 ± 11.9 years. The most frequent primary diagnosis was congenital aortic stenosis (n = 10) and ventricular septal defect (n = 10). Mean time from the surgical repair to aortic root replacement was 26.6 ± 13.0 years. Operative indications were aortic root enlargement with or without aortic valve aetiology (n = 40), sinus of Valsalva rupture (n = 2), and aortic dissection (n = 2). Forty-two patients underwent valve-replacing aortic root replacement, and two patients underwent valve-sparing, with 40 concomitant procedures. The median follow-up was 3.5 (1.3-7.6) years. There were one early and five late mortalities and five cardiovascular-related reoperations. Actuarial survival at 5-10 years after root replacement was 81.0 ± 6.6%. The cumulative incidence of cardiovascular-related reoperation and aortic root or valve-related reoperation at 5 years after root replacement was 11.9% and 5.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The early and mid-term outcomes of aortic root replacement for patients with a history of repair of CHDs were favourable in terms of survival and aortic root or valve-related reoperation.

Long-term outcomes after the arterial switch operation.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to evaluate the 16-year experience with  arterial switch operation at Beijing Children's Hospital and to determine early and late mortality and late morbidity, to explore risk factors for late complications and reintervention, and finally to evaluate whether the neoaortic sinotubular junction reconstruction technique reduces late complications of arterial switch operation. METHODS: The clinical data of 185 patients with transposition of the great arteries who underwent arterial switch operation in Beijing Children's Hospital from January 2006 to January 2022 and 30 patients who underwent modified arterial switch operation with neoaortic sinotubular junction reconstruction technique in Fuwai Hospital during the same period were retrospectively analysed. Propensity score matching was also used to match the neoaortic sinotubular junction reconstruction patients in Fuwai Hospital with 30 non-neoaortic sinotubular junction reconstruction patients in Beijing Children's Hospital. RESULTS: There were 13 early deaths (7.03%) and five late deaths (3.01%). Nineteen patients (11.45%) developed new aortic valve regurgitation and 28 patients (16.87%) developed aortic root dilation. Late right ventricular outflow tract obstruction occurred in 33 patients (19.88%). Late reintervention occurred in 18 cases (10.84%). Multivariate analysis showed that aorto-pulmonary diameter mismatch, previous pulmonary artery banding, and mild moderate or above new aortic valve regurgitation at discharge were independent risk factors for late new aortic valve regurgitation and aortic root dilation. Low surgical weight was an independent risk factor specific to new aortic valve regurgitation, and bicuspid native pulmonary valve was an independent risk factor specific to aortic root dilation. Older surgical age and aortic root dilation were independent risk factors for late right ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Older surgical age, operation before 2014, late right ventricular outflow tract obstruction, and late aortic root dilation were independent risk factors for late intervention. Propensity score matching showed that new aortic valve regurgitation and aortic root dilation were not followed up in the neoaortic sinotubular junction reconstruction group, while seven cases of aortic root dilation and five cases of new aortic valve regurgitation occurred in the non-neoaortic sinotubular junction reconstruction group, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (P = 0.003; P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: The increased incidence of new aortic valve regurgitation, aortic root dilation, and right ventricular outflow tract obstruction as children age is a major concern outcome in the future and may mean more late reintervention. neoaortic sinotubular junction reconstruction technique may reduce the incidence of new aortic valve regurgitation and aortic root dilation, and improve the late prognosis of arterial switch operation. Careful follow-up of neo-aortic valve and root function is imperative, especially in patients with aorto-pulmonary diameter mismatch, previous pulmonary artery banding, mild new aortic valve regurgitation at discharge, low surgical weight, and bicuspid native pulmonary valve structures.

Increased indexed proximal aortic diameter is a predictor of poor prognosis in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

Background: Recent studies have shown that the baseline values of absolute aortic root diameter (ARD) and indexed diameter are associated with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in the general population, even in the absence of aneurysmal aortic disease. However, there is limited available data on the association between ARD and prognosis in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to investigate the predictive value of ARD for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in this specific population.Methods: ARD was measured by echocardiography at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva at end diastole and indexed to body surface area (BSA). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke. Cox proportional hazards models were conducted to evaluate the association between baseline ARD/BSA and clinical outcomes.Results: A total of 391 patients were included in this study. The primary endpoint occurred in 95 (24.3%) patients while the secondary endpoint occurred in 71 (18.2%) patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that ARD/BSA was an independent prognostic factor for all-cause mortality (HR, per 1-SD increase, 1.403; 95% CI, 1.118-1.761; p = 0.003) as well as MACE (HR, per 1-SD increase, 1.356; 95% CI, 1.037-1.772; p = 0.026).Conclusions: Our results show that ARD/BSA is predictive of all-cause mortality and MACE in MHD patients with ESRD and support the view that assessment of ARD/BSA may refine risk stratification and preventive strategies in this population.

Hybrid extracorporeal cannulation for aortic root pseudoaneurysm re-operation: The role of a multidisciplinary team.

Introduction: Adequate cerebral protection for aortic reoperation is challenging and optimal technique is still controversial.Case Report: We report a hybrid cannulation approach to achieve safe cerebral protection during circulatory arrest to repair an aortic root pseudoaneurysm.Conclusion: A multidisciplinary approach combining conventional techniques and interventional expertise could be considered in complex aortic scenario.

Aortic root enlargement and replacement of the ascending aorta in type 0 aortic valve stenosis.

INTRODUCTION: This case report aims to describe an aortic root enlargement in combination with the replacement of the ascending aorta in a patient presenting with severe aortic valve stenosis. CASE REPORT: A 68-year-old woman with severe aortic stenosis due to a type 0 bicuspid aortic valve and an aortic aneurysm underwent surgery for treatment. The annulus was preoperatively measured with 19 mm. Enlargement was performed by using a tissue patch to create a neo-noncoronary sinus and enlarge the root. DISCUSSION: Patients with a small aortic root face an increased risk of patient prosthesis mismatch. Enlarging the aortic root can mitigate this, but it extends cross-clamp and overall operative times. This case shows the need for carefully planned surgical interventions to optimize outcomes in complex anatomies. CONCLUSIONS: Each step of the performed surgery is well-established, however the combination and the creation of a neo-noncoronary sinus is not described so far.

Aortic root morphometry revisited-Clinical implications for aortic valve interventions.

The complex anatomy of the aortic root is of great importance for many surgical and transcatheter cardiac procedures. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive morphological description of the nondiseased aortic root. We morphometrically examined 200 autopsied human adult hearts (22.0% females, 47.9 ± 17.7 years). A meticulous macroscopic analysis of aortic root anatomy was performed. The largest cross-section area of the aortic root was observed in coaptation center plane (653.9 ± 196.5 mm2), followed by tubular plane (427.7 ± 168.0 mm2) and basal ring (362.7 ± 159.1 mm2) (p < 0.001). The right coronary sinus was the largest (area: 234.3 ± 85.0 mm2), followed by noncoronary sinus (218.7 ± 74.8 mm2) and left coronary sinus (201.2 ± 78.08 mm2). The noncoronary sinus was the deepest, followed by right and left coronary sinus (16.4 ± 3.2 vs. 15.9 ± 3.1 vs. 14.9 ± 2.9 mm, p < 0.001). In 68.5% of hearts, the coaptation center was located near the aortic geometric center. The left coronary ostium was located 15.6 ± 3.8 mm above sinus bottom (within the sinus in 91.5% and above sinutubular junction in 8.5%), while for right coronary ostium, it was 16.2 ± 3.5 mm above (83.5% within sinus and 16.5% above). In general, males exhibited larger aortic valve dimensions than females. A multiple forward stepwise regression model showed that anthropometric variables might predict the size of coaptation center plane (age, sex, and heart weight; R2 = 31.8%), tubular plane (age and sex; R2 = 25.6%), and basal ring (age and sex; R2 = 16.9%). In conclusion, this study presents a comprehensive analysis of aortic-root morphometry and provides a platform for further research into the intricate interplay between structure and function of the aortic root.

Use of Sutureless Valve in Aortic Root Enlargement.

AIM: The small aortic annulus is a surgical challenge in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement which may lead to patient prosthesis mismatch. Management options include aortic root enlargement, aortic root replacement, and the use of sutureless valves. In this case series, we report our results with aortic root enlargement, sutureless valve implantation, and benchtop modelling of the radial forces exerted. METHODS: Five patients underwent aortic root enlargement and insertion of the Perceval valve as part of the management strategy to enlarge their effective orifice area. We further investigate this strategy with a benchtop model to quantify the radial forces exerted by the Perceval valve on the aortic annulus. Radial and hoop forces on the aortic annulus and inner ring of the Perceval valve were recorded using a Mylar force tester. RESULTS: Five female patients with native annulus between 18mm-20mm underwent root enlargement and insertion of a Perceval S valve. The postoperative course was uncomplicated for all patients except for one who required a permanent pacemaker insertion. Transvalvular pressure gradients remained low at up to 4 years of follow-up (12 mmHg-21 mmHg), with no evidence of paravalvular leak. Benchtop testing demonstrated radial forces exerted at the annulus in all-size Perceval S valves to be within physiological variables, whereas compressive forces required to deform the valves were supraphysiological. CONCLUSIONS: The deployment of a sutureless valve within a surgical enlarged aortic root is a feasible solution in patients with a small aortic root.

[Long-term result of aortic root remodeling using the Florida sleeve technique in a patient with connective tissue dysplasia and aortic root aneurysm without aortic insufficiency]. / Otdalennyi rezul'tat ekzoprotezirovaniya kornya aorty po metodike Florida Sleeve u bol'nogo s soedinitel'notkannoi displaziei i anevrizmoi kornya aorty bez aortal'noi nedostatochnosti.

Aortic root remodeling using the Florida sleeve technique was proposed as a simpler alternative to classical reconstructive interventions in patients with aortic root aneurysm without aortic insufficiency. We present a 10-year result of valve-sparing surgical treatment using the Florida sleeve technique in a patient with connective tissue dysplasia and aortic root aneurysm.

Prevalence of cardiovascular manifestations in patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome at the University of Miami.

Cardiovascular system involvements have been frequently reported in hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS). Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and aortic root dilatation are included in the 2017 international classification criteria for hEDS. Different studies have found conflicting results regarding the significance of cardiac involvement in hEDS patients. We conducted a retrospective review of cardiac involvement in patients diagnosed with hEDS based on the 2017 International diagnostic criteria to provide further evidence toward more defined and reliable diagnostic criteria and recommended cardiac surveillance. A total of 75 hEDS patients with at least one diagnostic cardiac evaluation were included in the study. The most common reported cardiovascular complaints were lightheadedness (80.6%), followed by palpitations (77.6%), fainting (44.8%), and chest pain (32.8%). Of the 62 echocardiogram reports, 57 (91.9%) showed trace/trivial to mild valvular insufficiency, and 13 (21%) had additional abnormalities such as grade I diastolic dysfunction, mild aortic sclerosis, and trivial or small pericardial effusion. Of the 60 electrocardiograms (ECG) reports, 39 (65%) were normal, and 21 (35%) reported minor abnormalities or normal variants. Even though many hEDS patients in our cohort experienced cardiac symptoms, the presence of a significant cardiac abnormality was very low.