Assessment of Computed Tomography Imaging for Isolated Type 1 Bicuspid Aortic Valve Repair: A Comparison between Internal and External Suture Annuloplasty Techniques.

Background: The ideal position of suture annuloplasty relative to the aortic annulus (internal or external) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of internal and external suture annuloplasty for isolated type 1 bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair. Electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated computed tomography (CT) was used to compare the two techniques and analyze their impact on the aortic annulus. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 20 patients who underwent isolated type 1 BAV repair with either internal or external suture annuloplasty. Each group included 10 patients with comparable clinical features. Preoperative and postoperative ECG-gated CT scans were performed to assess the anatomical relationship between the ventricular-aortic junction (VAJ) and virtual basal ring (VBR), and to measure the height of annuloplasty from the VBR at predefined landmarks in both groups. Perioperative annular geometries, including annular area and perimeter, were measured to quantify the impact of annuloplasty on annular expansibility. The discrepancy between the postoperative annular dimension and size of the Hegar dilator were compared between groups to evaluate the effectiveness of annuloplasty. Results: In both groups, VAJ was higher than VBR at the right coronary (RC) ostium (7.7 ± 3.3 mm) and the raphe (7.9 ± 1.5 mm). The height from the VBR to the external suture annuloplasty shared a similar pattern at the RC ostium and raphe (5.3 ± 1.1 mm and 4.8 ± 1.0 mm, respectively). In contrast, the height differences were minimal for these landmarks in the internal group. Postoperative annular area expansibility decreased in the internal group compared to preoperative levels (4.9 ± 2.3% vs. 8.9 ± 5.5%, p = 0.038), while no significant change was found in the external group (7.6 ± 4.1% vs. 6.5 ± 2.8%, p = 0.473). The internal group showed less area discrepancy between the VBR and the Hegar dilator both at systole (10.1 ± 3.7% vs. 30.1 ± 16.6%, p = 0.004) and diastole (5.7 ± 4.9% vs. 20.9 ± 14.5%, p = 0.009) compared to the external group. Conclusions: Internal suture annuloplasty results in better positioning relative to the VBR than external suture annuloplasty due to the absence of VAJ interference. While this results in more precise annular reduction and less expansibility in the short term, a long-term follow-up evaluation is necessary to assess its effectiveness.

Outcomes of concomitant aortic valve procedures and left ventricular assist device implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is frequently employed in patients with end-stage heart failure. The outcomes of addressing the repair of all substantial aortic valvular disease at the time of LVAD implantation remain unclear. We sought to assess the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing LVAD implantation concomitant with aortic valve procedures (AVPs) compared with isolated LVAD implantation. METHODS: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library from inception till June 2022. Primary outcomes included short-term mortality and long-term survival. Random effects models were used to compute mean differences and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 14 observational studies (N = 52 693) met our inclusion criteria. Concomitant LVAD implantation and AVPs were associated with higher short-term mortality (OR = 1.61 [95% CI, 1.06-2.42]; p = 0.02) and mean CPBt (MD = 43.25 [95% CI, 22.95-63.56]; p < 0.0001), and reduced long-term survival (OR = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.55-0.88]; p = 0.003) compared with isolated LVAD implantation. No difference in the odds of cerebrovascular accident (OR = 1.05 [95% CI, 0.79-1.39]; p = 0.74) and mean length of hospital stay (MD = 2.89 [95% CI, -4.04 to 9.82]; p = 0.41) was observed between the two groups. On adjusted analysis, short-term mortality was significantly higher in the LVAD group with concurrent AVPs when compared with the isolated LVAD group (aHR = 1.50 [95% CI, 1.20-1.87]; p = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent AVPs were associated with higher short-term mortality and reduced long-term survival in patients undergoing LVAD implantation compared with isolated LVAD implantation.

Congenital Aortic Valve Repair When the Options aren't Good: Truncus Arteriosus and Transposition of the Great Arteries.

Patients with truncus arteriosus and transposition of great arteries are prone to neo-aortic valve insufficiency. Although presenting at opposite ends of the age spectrum, both conditions tend to be commonly associated with neo aortic root dilatation. In patients with truncus arteriosus there is an additional complexity of quadricuspid valve morphology, which make up the majority of valves requiring repair. A unified approach to all these patients would include reduction and stabilization of the annulus and sinotubular junction, as well as achieving equal and symmetrical coaptation of the valve leaflets. By systematically employing these techniques, valve replacement should be avoidable in most children.

Comparison of hemodynamics and root configurations between remodeling and reimplantation methods for valve-sparing aortic root replacement: a pulsatile flow study.

PURPOSE: To compare the characteristics of reimplantation (RI) using grafts with sinuses and remodeling (RM) with/without external suture annuloplasty using a pulsatile flow simulator. METHODS: Porcine aortic roots were obtained from an abattoir, and six models of RM and RI with sinuses were prepared. External suture annuloplasty (ESA) was performed in the RM models to decrease the root diameter to 22 mm (RM-AP22) and 18 mm (RM-AP18). Valve models were tested at mean pulsatile flow and aortic pressure of 5.0 L/min and 120/80 (100) mmHg, respectively, at 70 beats/min. The forward flow, regurgitation, leakage, backflow rates, valve-closing time, and mean and peak pressure gradient (p-PG) were evaluated. Root configurations were examined using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). RESULTS: The backflow rate was larger in the RM models than in the RI models (RI: 8.56% ± 0.38% vs. RM: 12.64% ± 0.79%; p < 0.01). The RM-AP and RI models were comparable in terms of the forward flow, regurgitation, backflow rates, p-PG, and valve-closing time. The analysis using a micro-CT showed a larger dilatation of the sinus of the Valsalva in the RM groups than in the RI group (Valsalva: RI, 26.55 ± 0.40 mm vs. RM-AP22, 31.22 ± 0.55 mm [p < 0.05]; RM-AP18, 31.05 ± 0.85 mm [p < 0.05]). CONCLUSIONS: RM with ESA and RI with neo-sinuses showed comparable hemodynamics. ESA to RM reduced regurgitation.

[Aortic valve repair surgery : state of the art and clinical experience of the university hospital center of Liege]. / Chirurgie de réparation de la valve aortique : statut actuel de la technique et expérience clinique du CHU de Liège.

In the past 20 years, there has been a real development of aortic valve repair techniques with an increasing number of publications describing the long-term benefits of aortic valve repair in terms of survival, freedom from major adverse valve related-events and reoperations. Aortic valve repair can now be considered as a valuable alternative to prosthetic valve replacement in patients with dystrophic ascending aorta pathology associated or not to aortic insufficiency with pliable leaflets. In this paper, the authors describe the state of the art of aortic valve repair and present their clinical experience with aortic valve repair surgery in the university hospital center of Liege from April 2021 to September 2022.

Les techniques de réparation de la valve aortique se sont considérablement développées ces 20 dernières années. Plusieurs publications confirment les bénéfices à long terme de ces techniques en termes de survie, d'absence de complications majeures et de réinterventions pour récidive d'insuffisance aortique. La réparation de la valve aortique apparaît ainsi comme une véritable alternative au remplacement valvulaire aortique prothétique chez certains patients qui présentent une pathologie dystrophique de l'aorte ascendante associée ou non à une insuffisance aortique sur valve souple. Dans cet article, les auteurs parcourent la littérature actuelle sur le sujet et décrivent leur expérience clinique avec la chirurgie de réparation de la valve aortique au sein du centre hospitalier universitaire de Liège d'avril 2021 à septembre 2022.

Surgical Management of Complex Aortic Valve Disease in Young Adults: Repair, Replacement, and Future Alternatives.

The ideal aortic valve substitute in young adults remains unknown. Prosthetic valves are associated with a suboptimal survival and carry a significant risk of valve-related complications in young patients, mainly reinterventions with tissue valves and, thromboembolic events and major bleeding with mechanical prostheses. The Ross procedure is the only substitute that restores a survival curve similar to that of a matched general population, and permits a normal life without functional limitations. Though the risk of reintervention is the Achilles' heel of this procedure, it is very low in patients with aortic stenosis and can be mitigated in patients with aortic regurgitation by tailored surgical techniques. Finally, the Ozaki procedure and the transcatheter aortic valve implantation are seen by many as future alternatives but lack evidence and long-term follow-up in this specific patient population.

Quadricuspid aortic valve repair with a modified-tricuspidization technique.

INTRODUCTION: Quadricuspid aortic valve (QAV) is an extremely rare developmental abnormality with an incidence of 0.006%. QAV is an incidental finding that in some patients (23%) may determine aortic regurgitation (AR). Altogether 16% of patients indeed require surgery with AR being the most frequent indication. METHODS AND RESULTS: We describe a case report of a 46 year-old female affected by severe aortic regurgitation due to QAV successfully treated with a  modified-tricuspidization technique associated with cusp extension, prolapsing commissure suturing, and sub-commissural annuloplasty. DISCUSSION: QAV repair represents an attractive perspective to overcome the drawbacks of either mechanical or biological prosthesis.

Aortic Valve Repair Using HAART 300 Geometric Annuloplasty Ring: A Review and Echocardiographic Case Series.

Aortic valve repair (AVr) aims to preserve the native aortic leaflets and restore normal valve function. In doing so, AVr is a more technically challenging approach than traditional aortic valve replacement. Some of the complexity of repair techniques can be attributed to the unique structure of the functional aortic annulus (FAA), which, unlike the well-defined mitral annulus, is comprised of virtual and functional components. Though stabilizing the ventriculo-aortic junction (VAJ), a component of the FAA, is considered beneficial for patients with chronic aortic insufficiency (AI), the ideal AVr technique remains a subject of much debate. The existing AVr techniques do not completely stabilize the VAJ which may increase susceptibility to recurrent AI due to VAJ dilation. An emerging new technique showing promise for the treatment of both isolated and complex AI is AVr using HAART 300TM geometric annuloplasty ring (GAR). The GAR is implanted below the valve leaflets in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), providing stability and creating a neo-annulus. As with other AVr subtypes, this procedure has a learning curve. There are unique surgical and echocardiographic aspects of AVr with GAR, including the appearance of the LVOT, the aortic valve leaflets, and their motion which cardiac anesthesiologists and echocardiographers must be familiar with. In this work, using an eight-patient echocardiographic case series, we provide an overview of this novel AVr technique, including some unique aspects of device sizing, patient selection, expected post-repair echocardiographic features, and a review of outcomes data.

Bicuspid aortic valve repair with external or subcommissural annuloplasty-echocardiographic prospective trial.

BACKGROUND: The incompetent bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) can be repaired using various techniques. This study presents a prospective comparison of external and subcommissural aortic annuloplasty. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients (38 males, age: 43.9 ± 15.8 years) with BAV insufficiency with or without aortic dilatation underwent valve repair in a single institution. They were prospectively allocated to one of two groups based on the aortic annulus stabilization technique: 25 patients were operated on using the subcommissural annuloplasty (SCA) and 25 using the external complete annuloplasty (EA). Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in all patients before the operation and 1 and 3 years after the operation. Moreover, mortality and morbidity at 7 years were evaluated. RESULTS: In prospective echocardiographic comparison, EA was associated with smaller diameter of the aortic annulus (24.1 ± 2.6 mm vs. 25.8±2.1 mm, p < .05) and lower mean and peak transvalvular gradients (7 ± 4 mmHg vs. 13 ± 4 mmHg, p = .02 and 15.3 ± 9.7 mmHg vs. 20.7 ± 5.6 mmHg, p = .03, respectively). No patients died or required reoperation due to recurrent insufficiency at 6,81 (interquartile range-0,17) years after the operation. The Kaplan-Meier actuarial freedom from aortic regurgitation (AR) grade =2 or gradient > 20 mmHg at 35.1 ± 3.6 months years was 96% (24 out of 25) for patients who had external annuloplasty and amounted to 76% (19 out of 25) for those who had SCA, p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: External annuloplasty performed during repair of the BAV is associated with better hemodynamics at medium-term follow-up compared to SCA.

Preliminary results of a simplified aortic valve-sparing technique: A feasibility study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate whether the simplified valve-sparing technique (SVST) implies clinical outcomes comparable or not with those of established David technique in the surgery of aortic root. METHODS: We collected the records of patients who had undergone aortic root surgery with the SVST or standard David technique (SDT) at our institution between January 2009 and December 2018. The primary endpoints were the incidence of all-cause death, reoperation for any reason, and postoperative complications. The secondary endpoint was the midterm incidence of reoperation for aortic valve regurgitation. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients who underwent aortic root surgery were analyzed. SDT and SVST were performed in 48 (28.4%) and in 121 (71.6%) patients, respectively. Thirty-day mortality occurred in 0% and 0.8% of patients in the SDT and SVST groups, respectively. The rate of postoperative new permanent pacemaker implantation was 6.3% (three patients) and 0.8% (one patient) in SDT and SVST cohort, respectively (p = .07). The incidence of postoperative thromboembolic stroke was 6.3% and 2.5% in SDT and SVST groups, respectively (p = .23). The median follow-up time was 29 (23-47) months. During the FU period, no differences were found between two cohorts in terms of all-cause mortality (p = .99), the incidence of reoperation (p = .19), and incidence of aortic valve regurgitation requiring reoperation (p = .58). CONCLUSIONS: The SVST appears to be safe and feasible showing early clinical results comparable to the SDT. Nevertheless, further studies with larger series and long-term follow-ups are required to demonstrate its safety and efficacy.

Alport syndrome: A case study of chronic type A aortic dissection.

A 39-year-old woman with a history of Alport syndrome was admitted to our hospital for heart failure due to severe aortic regurgitation. Computed tomography revealed a chronic type A aortic dissection that required valve-sparing aortic root replacement. The pathological examination demonstrated that elastic fibers in the tunica media of the aortic wall are torn and severely disorganized. Immunostaining showed fragmented alpha 5 chains, indicating Alport syndrome. These findings imply Alport syndrome may have connective tissue vulnerability, rendering patients susceptible to the development of aortic disease at a young age.

Minimally invasive aortic valve repair using geometric ring annuloplasty.

OBJECTIVES: As aortic valve repair (AVr) for aortic insufficiency (AI) expands, minimally invasive (Mi) approaches are increasingly being applied. Cardiac surgical techniques can be more difficult through small incisions, and this report analyzes medium-term outcomes for MiAVr facilitated by geometric ring annuloplasty. METHODS: Since 2013, 58 patients were selected for AVr through upper sternotomy third-interspace incisions. The average age was 58.9 ± 15.4 (mean ± SD) years, 71% were male, and preoperative AI grade was 3.6 ± 0.8. Sixty-two percent (36/58) had a proximal aortic replacement for ascending aortic aneurysms (n = 26) and/or remodeling grafts for aortic root aneurysms (n = 10). Annuloplasty rings were placed subannularly (69% trileaflet; 31% bicuspid), and leaflet procedures were performed in 70%. The average ring diameter was 21.6 ± 1.4 mm, and the average aortic clamp time was 113 ± 35 min. RESULTS: After repair, AI grade fell to an average of 0.5 ± 0.6 (p < .0001), with a mean valve gradient of 12.5 ± 7.1 mmHg. No operative mortalities or major complications occurred. Three patients required reoperations for bleeding, and two had pacemakers. At an average follow-up of 38 months (maximal 88 months), three late deaths and no valve-related complications were observed. Four patients required reoperative aortic valve replacement over follow-up, and Kaplan-Meier survival and freedom from reoperation both exceeded 80% at 88 months. At the last follow-up, the average AI grade was 0.7 ± 0.7, and the mean valve gradient was 12.7 ± 6.3 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Geometric ring annuloplasty was safe and seemed to facilitate performing AVr ± proximal aortic replacement through Mi incisions. Hemodynamic improvements were significant, medium-term clinical outcomes were acceptable, and results could improve further with experience.

A novel technique to quantify aortic valve annulus deformation: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the potential of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived strain to assess aortic valve (AV) annulus deformation during the cardiac cycle in regurgitant and well-functioning AVs. METHODS: Four patients with severe aortic regurgitation and seven healthy controls underwent CMR. Assessment of longitudinal strain was performed by hypothesizing the AV annulus would be the left ventricle in long-axis orientation. Longitudinal strain of the segments belonging to the muscular and fibrous AV annulus was weighted and averaged to obtain regional values (RLS). RESULTS: Comparison of RLS between regurgitant and well-functioning AVs showed a considerably different deformation of the muscular AV annulus (i.e., median RLS: 4.18 % [patients] vs. -10.41 % [controls], p = .024). The fibrous AV annulus demonstrated comparable deformational changes in both groups. CONCLUSION: CMR-derived strain allows for quantification of AV annulus deformation during the cardiac cycle and shows an altered RLS in the muscular AV annulus in patients with severe aortic regurgitation.

Reply to Jasinski M et al.: "Indeed, there is still room for improvement in long-term durability of BAV repair".

We read the letter to the editor by Dr Jasinski et al. entitled "Long-term durability of valve-sparing or repair procedures in BAV-Is there room for improvement?" with great interest.

Aortic valve leaflet and root dimensions in normal tricuspid aortic valves: A computed tomography study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to use coronary computed tomography in patients with normal tricuspid aortic valves to perform detailed aortic root and aortic valve geometric analysis with a focus on the asymmetry of the three leaflets. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of anonymized coronary computed tomography angiograms was performed using dedicated software, where manual aortic root segmentation and marking of several points of interest were followed by automated measurements of aortic root and leaflets. Asymmetry of the three leaflets in individual patients was assessed by calculating absolute and relative differences between the largest and the smallest of the three leaflets. RESULTS: We analyzed 70 aortic valves, the mean patient age was 53 ± 11 years, and 50% (n = 35) of patients were female. All aortic valves were tricuspid, without calcifications and aortic roots were of normal dimensions. Some degree of asymmetry was present in all analyzed valves. Absolute and relative differences for free margin length were 3.2 ± 1.4 mm and 9.3 ± 3.8%, respectively. The largest relative difference was noted in the coaptation area (36.5 ± 16.5%) and the smallest in leaflet effective height (6.1 ± 4.8%). Using predefined cutoff criteria for absolute differences in leaflet dimensions, 86% of the valves were classified as asymmetric. CONCLUSIONS: Most normal tricuspid aortic valves show some degree of asymmetry. Equal free margin length of the three leaflets is not needed for normal tricuspid aortic valve function. Leaflet effective height showed the least amount of asymmetry confirming its importance in keeping the aortic valve competent.

Valve-sparing versus valve-replacing aortic root replacement in patients with aortic root aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) is an alternative to valve-replacing aortic root replacement (VRARR) with valved-conduits based on recent guidelines for clinical practice. This study investigated outcomes of these two procedures in patients with nonstenotic valves. METHODS: Between January 7, 2007 and June 30, 2019, 475 patients with aortic root aneurysm without aortic stenosis underwent VSARR (151) or VRARR (324) techniques. Propensity score-matching (PSM) was used to alleviate confounding. Endpoints were 30-day mortality, 8-year survival and reoperation, aortic regurgitation, and valve gradients. RESULTS: PSM created 69 pairs of patients with a mean age 52 ± 13 years (10.1% Marfan syndrome, 34.8% bicuspid aortic valve). There was no statistically significant difference in major perioperative morbidity or 30-day mortality (0% VSARR vs. 1.4% VRARR; p = 0.316). Overall survival was significantly higher (p = 0.025) in the VSARR group versus the VRARR group (8-year estimates 100% vs. 88.9%, respectively), while freedom from valve reoperation was similar (p = 0.97, 8-year estimates 90.9% vs. 96.7%, respectively). Freedom from > moderate-severe AR was not significantly different (p = 0.08, 8-year estimates 90.0% VSARR group vs. 100% VRARR), but mean valve gradients at last follow-up were better in the VSARR group (5.9 vs. 13.2 mmHg, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: VSARR is a safe operation in patients with aortic root aneurysm and nonstenotic aortic valves in the hands of experienced surgeons. Freedom from reoperation is similar and the mode of aortic valve failure differs between the two groups.

Aortic Valve Repair in Young Patients: A Single Patch Design for Leaflet Extension.

The surgical treatment for young patients with aortic valve diseases has not been standardized because of differences in the patients' growth. We aimed to investigate short-term results of aortic valve repair with leaflet extension techniques. From October 2017 to June 2020, we performed aortic valve repair with leaflet extension technique in 15 consecutive patients with a median age of 13 years (range, 33 months-27 years). Among them, all had moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (AR), eight had concomitant aortic stenosis, and 12 underwent prior cardiac operations. The leaflet patch design has been modified from separate patch design to single patch design. No early and late deaths were reported, no re-operations were performed, and temporary ectopic atrial arrhythmia was the only early complication noted. The patients were discharged with less than moderate AR after a median postoperative period of 5 (range, 3-7) days. All the patients were New York Heart Association class I after a median follow-up period of 17.3 (range, 4.4-34.6) months. However, two patients progressed to moderate AR postoperatively at 6 and 30 months, respectively, after which one was treated with single patch technique. Among the remaining patients, six had trace, six had mild, and one had mild-to-moderate AR. Aortic valve repair with leaflet extension is acceptable in young patients. Our single patch design was easy to manipulate and showed good short-term results. Long-term follow-up is required to further confirm the efficacy of this technique.

Concomitant aortic valve repair for aortic insufficiency and implantation of left ventricle mechanical support.

BACKGROUND: Moderate to severe aortic valve insufficiency (AI) in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is a significant complication which occurs in up to 10.7% of patients in the INTERMACS database and has profound consequences for survival. Preoperative Impella use is associaed with greater post-LVAD AI. CASE PRESENTATION: 56 y/o Caucasian female with acute exacerbation of chronic congestive heart failure who needed urgent Impella placement followed by elective Heartmate III LVAD. CONCLUSION: Patients who have aortic valve regurgitation at the time of implantation have been handled by several methods, including aortic valve leaflets approximation, to aortic valve replacement or even valve closure. We report a case of geometric ring annuloplasty for repair of a regurgitant aortic valve during destination LVAD implantation.

Comparison of early-stage stenosis and regurgitation results among patients who underwent aortic valve repair.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to analyse the results of paediatric aortic valve repairs in our institution. METHOD: The data of 57 patients under 18 years of age who underwent aortic valve repair between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Early postoperative reoperation and hospital mortality rates were evaluated based on the ages of the patients, their preoperative diagnoses, and the surgical techniques used. Survival curves for groups of patients were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The rate of reoperation was 14% (n = 8), and there were no significant differences regarding valve pathologies and preoperative diagnoses (p > 0.05). Among the repair techniques, tricuspidisation was considered to be a risk factor for reoperation (p < 0.05). Augmentation, the material used (0.1 PTFE or pericardium), and the number of cusps were not found to have significant effects on reoperation or mortality. The mean follow-up period was 29.86 ± 21.30 months. The survival rates of the patients were 88%, 100%, and 88.2% for those with aortic stenosis, aortic insufficiency, and mixed disease, respectively, and no significant difference was found when these rates were evaluated with the log-rank test (p > 0.05). The mortality rate was 8.8% (n = 5), and undergoing surgery before the age of 1 year was found to be significant in terms of mortality (p = 0.032, p < 0.05). The bicuspid aortic valve group had the lowest mortality risk, while the Shone complex group had the highest. CONCLUSION: With its acceptable reoperation and mortality rates, aortic valve repair should be the first choice of treatment in the paediatric age group. Early results were satisfactory in all groups.

Normative Aortic Valvar Measurements in Adults Using Cardiac Computed Tomography　- A Potential Guide to Further Sophisticate Aortic Valve-Sparing Surgery.

BACKGROUND: A thorough understanding of the anatomy of the aortic valve is necessary for aortic valve-sparing surgery. Normal valvar dimensions and their relationships in the living heart, however, have yet to be fully investigated in a 3-dimensional fashion.Methods and Results:In total, 123 consecutive patients (66±12 years, Men 63%) who underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography were enrolled. Mid-diastolic morphology of the aortic roots, including height of the interleaflet triangles, geometric height, free margin length of each leaflet, effective height, and coaptation length were measured using multiplanar reconstruction images. Average height of the interleaflet triangle, geometric height, free margin length, effective height, and the coaptation length were 17.3±1.8, 14.7±1.3, 32.6±3.6, 8.6±1.4, and 3.2±0.8 mm, respectively. The right coronary aortic leaflet displayed the longest free margin length and shortest geometric height. Geometric height, free margin length, and effective height showed positive correlations with aortic root dimensions. Coaptation length, however, remained constant regardless of aortic root dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: Diversities, as well as characteristic relationships among each value involving the aortic root, were identified using living-heart datasets. The aortic leaflets demonstrated compensatory elongation along with aortic root dilatation to maintain constant coaptation length. These measurements will serve as the standard value for revealing the underlying mechanism of aortic regurgitation to plan optimal aortic valve-sparing surgery.