Developing Engineered Nano-Immunopotentiators for the Stimulation of Dendritic Cells and Inhibition and Prevention of Melanoma.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to utilize PEGylated poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles as a delivery system for simultaneous administration of the BRAFV600E peptide, a tumor-specific antigen, and imiquimod (IMQ). The objective is to stimulate dendritic cell (DC) maturation, activate macrophages, and facilitate antigen presentation in C57BL6 mice. METHODS: PEG-PLGA-IMQ-BRAFV600E nanoparticles were synthesized using a PLGA-PEG-PLGA tri-block copolymer, BRAFV600E, and IMQ. Characterization included size measurement and drug release profiling. Efficacy was assessed in inhibiting BPD6 melanoma cell growth and activating immature bone marrow DCs, T cells, macrophages, and splenocyte cells through MTT and ELISA assays. In vivo, therapeutic and immunogenic effects potential was evaluated, comparing it to IMQ + BRAFV600E and PLGA-IMQ-BRAFV600E nanoparticles in inhibiting subcutaneous BPD6 tumor growth. RESULTS: The results highlight the successful synthesis of PEG-PLGA-IMQ-BRAFV600E nanoparticles (203 ± 11.1 nm), releasing 73.4% and 63.2% of IMQ and BARFV600E, respectively, within the initial 48 h. In vitro, these nanoparticles demonstrated a 1.3-fold increase in potency against BPD6 cells, achieving ~ 2.8-fold enhanced cytotoxicity compared to PLGA-IMQ-BRAFV600E. Moreover, PEG-PLGA-IMQ-BRAFV600E exhibited a 1.3-fold increase in potency for enhancing IMQ cytotoxic effects and a 1.1- to ~ 2.4-fold increase in activating DCs, T cells, macrophages, and splenocyte cells compared to IMQ-BRAFV600E and PLGA-IMQ-BRAFV600E. In vivo, PEG-PLGA-IMQ-BRAFV600E displayed a 1.3- to 7.5-fold increase in potency for inhibiting subcutaneous BPD6 tumor growth compared to the other formulations. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that PEG-PLGA nanoparticles effectively promote DC maturation, T cell activation, and potentially macrophage activation. The study highlights the promising role of this nanocomposite in vaccine development.

Dose-escalation trial of combination dabrafenib, trametinib, and AT13387 in patients with BRAF-mutant solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Combination BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy is an active regimen in patients who have BRAF V600E-mutated tumors; however, the clinical efficacy of this therapy is limited by resistance. Preclinically, the addition of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibition improves the efficacy of BRAF inhibitor therapy in both BRAF inhibitor-sensitive and BRAF inhibitor-resistant mutant cell lines. METHODS: Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program study 9557 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02097225) is a phase 1 study that was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of the small-molecule HSP90 inhibitor, AT13387, in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib in BRAF V600E/K-mutant solid tumors. Correlative analyses evaluated the expression of HSP90 client proteins and chaperones. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with metastatic, BRAF V600E-mutant solid tumors were enrolled using a 3 + 3 design at four dose levels, and 21 patients were evaluable for efficacy assessment. The most common tumor type was colorectal cancer (N = 12). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in one patient at dose level 3 and in one patient at dose level 4; specifically, myelosuppression and fatigue, respectively. The maximum tolerated dose was oral dabafenib 150 mg twice daily, oral trametinib 2 mg once daily, and intravenous AT13387 260 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15. The best response was a partial response in two patients and stable disease in eight patients, with an overall response rate of 9.5% (90% exact confidence interval [CI], 2%-27%), a disease control rate of 47.6% (90% CI, 29%-67%), and a median overall survival of 5.1 months (90% CI, 3.4-7.6 months). There were no consistent proteomic changes associated with response or resistance, although responders did have reductions in BRAF expression, and epidermal growth factor receptor downregulation using HSP90 inhibition was observed in one patient who had colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: HSP90 inhibition combined with BRAF/MEK inhibition was safe and produced evidence of modest disease control in a heavily pretreated population. Additional translational work may identify tumor types and resistance mechanisms that are most sensitive to this approach.

The role of triple therapy and therapy sequence in treatment of BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. Response to overall survival with first-line atezolizumab in combination with vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAFV600 mutation-positive advanced melanoma (IMspire150): second interim analysis of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 study.

Novel therapies have achieved unprecedented benefit in survival of advanced melanoma patients. While immunotherapy (ICI) can be administered independent of mutational status, BRAF and MEK kinase inhibitors represent another effective treatment option for patients with BRAF mutant melanoma. Given the benefits these therapies demonstrate, the natural instinct was to combine. Three studies have investigated the benefit of combination of ICI using anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibody and targeted therapy (TT) with BRAF and MEK inhibitors over TT and placebo. Among these studies, statistically significantly superior duration of response was observed, however overall and progression-free survival were only numerically superior, if at all. One triple combination was approved for BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma; however, the expected synergistic effect of triple therapy could not be universally confirmed and the observed benefits with triple seem to depend on statistical considerations rather than a biological reason. As patients with BRAF mutant melanoma have both ICI and TT as their first-line treatment options, the question whether the sequence matters was addressed. Two prospective trials compared first-line ICI, followed by TT at progression, or vice-versa, with additional "sandwich" approach (8 weeks of TT followed by ICI until progression, then TT again) in the Secombit study. The benefit of first-line ICI was demonstrated in both studies with Secombit study showing the "sandwich" approach to have similar effect. Current data advices for immunotherapy based regiments in patients with BRAF mutant melanoma or, possibly, sandwich approach. Whether triple therapy is superior to ICI monotherapy still needs to be addressed considering not only efficacy, but also safety.

Antitumor activity of the new tyrphostin briva against BRAFV600E-mutant colorectal carcinoma cells.

Because of a reduced sensitivity of BRAF-mutant colorectal cancers to BRAF inhibitor treatment when compared with BRAF-mutant melanoma, it is essential to develop efficient drugs to cope with this disease. The new 2-(4-bromophenyl)-3-arylacrylonitrile compound Briva was prepared in one step from commercially available starting compounds. Briva and two known thiophene analogs (Thio-Iva and Thio-Dam) were tested for their cytotoxic activity against various tumor cell lines including colorectal and breast cancer cells. The antitumor activities of the test compounds were assessed in vitro via the MTT assay, DAPI staining of nuclei, RT-PCR and immunoblotting, wound healing, clonogenic assay, collagen I adhesion assay, and kinase inhibition assays. A selective activity of Briva was observed against BRAFV600E-mutant HT-29 and COLO-201 colorectal carcinoma (CRC) cells. Briva caused inhibition of HT-29 clonogenic tumor growth and was found to induce cytotoxicity by activating the intrinsic apoptosis pathway. In addition, Briva reduced HT-29 cell adhesion and migration. Kinase inhibition experiments revealed that Briva inhibits VEGFR2. Thus, Briva can be considered as a promising antitumor compound against BRAFV600E-mutant colon carcinoma by targeting VEGFR2 tyrosine kinase and consequently reducing cell adhesion and metastasis formation.

Astrocytoma (CNS WHO grade 4), IDH-mutant with co-occurrence of BRAF p.V600E mutation, and homozygous loss of CDKN2A.

Molecular alterations nowadays play a crucial role in the diagnosis of brain tumors. Some of these alterations are associated with outcome and/or response to treatment, including sequence variants of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) at position p.R132 or p.R172. Such IDH variants have so far been described in histone H3-wildtype primary brain tumors only in adult-type diffuse gliomas and are associated with a better outcome compared to their IDH-wildtype counterpart, the glioblastoma. Moreover, homozygous loss of CDKN2A and/or CDKN2B in IDH-mutant astrocytomas shortens the median overall survival regardless of histological features of malignancy. Such tumors are therefore considered to be aggressive and graded as WHO central nervous system (CNS) grade 4 lesions. The coexistence of an IDH-sequence variation and a BRAF p.V600E alteration has only rarely been described in diffuse astrocytomas. Due to the small number of cases, little is known about such neoplasms in terms of clinical behavior and response to treatment. Herein we describe the first case, to our knowledge, of an astrocytoma (CNS WHO grade 4), IDH-mutant, and BRAF p.V600E-mutant with homozygous deletion of CDKN2A. Pathologists should be aware that such an expression profile does exist even in WHO CNS grade 4 astrocytomas, IDH-mutant, and are encouraged to test for the BRAF p.V600E sequence variant as such an alteration may provide additional treatment options.

Phyto-sesquiterpene lactones DET and DETD-35 induce ferroptosis in vemurafenib sensitive and resistant melanoma via GPX4 inhibition and metabolic reprogramming.

Acquired resistance to vemurafenib (PLX4032) is a thorny issue in BRAFV600E mutant melanoma therapy. Ferroptotic programmed cell death is a potential strategy for combating therapy-resistant cancers. This study uncovers the adaptation and abnormal upregulation of PUFAs and bioactive oxylipin metabolism in PLX4032 resistant melanoma cells. Phyto-sesquiterpene lactone, DET, and its derivative, DETD-35, induced lipid ROS accumulation and triggered ferroptotic cell death in PLX4032 sensitive (A375) and resistant (A375-R) BRAFV600E melanoma cells by reprogramming glutathione and primary metabolisms, lipid/oxylipin metabolism, and causing mitochondrial damage in which DETD-35 showed superior efficiency to DET. We discovered that DET and DETD-35 are a new type of GPX4 enzyme inhibitor through non-covalent binding. This study provides new insight into the therapeutic mechanisms of both DET and DETD-35 to combat PLX4032 sensitive/resistant BRAFV600E mutant melanomas via targeting GPX4 and ferroptosis.

Triplet Therapy in Melanoma - Combined BRAF/MEK Inhibitors and Anti-PD-(L)1 Antibodies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We provide an updated review of clinical trials evaluating the combination of BRAF/MEK inhibitors with anti-PD-(L)1 therapy (triplet therapy) for patients with advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma, accompanied by a summary of the biological evidence supporting this combination. RECENT FINDINGS: Resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibition and comparatively low response rates to immune checkpoint inhibitors remain clinical challenges in the treatment of melanoma. Preclinical data demonstrates that targeted therapy is immune-modulatory and synergises with immune checkpoint inhibition. Several randomised controlled trials have evaluated the combination of targeted therapy with immune checkpoint inhibition. Triplet therapy has shown improvements in progression-free survival and durability of response compared to BRAF/MEK inhibition alone; however, questions remain regarding the best clinical scenario for implementation of this regimen in the era of front-line immunotherapy.

Additional genetic alterations in BRAF-mutant gliomas correlate with histologic diagnoses.

INTRODUCTION: Recently, the term "Diffuse glioma, BRAF V600E-mutant" has been recommended for IDH-wildtype gliomas with BRAF p.V600E mutation and without CDKN2A/B deletion. However, additional alterations in gliomas that coexist with BRAF-mutations are poorly defined. METHODS: We analyzed next-generation sequencing results in 315 cancer-associated genes for 372 gliomas from our institution (2010 to 2017). In addition, we reviewed IDH-WT gliomas with mutation and copy-number alterations available in cBioPortal, to further characterize BRAF-mutant gliomas. RESULTS: Seventeen (4.6%) showed BRAF mutations. Tumor types included 8 glioblastomas, 2 epithelioid glioblastomas (E-GBM), 2 pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas (PXA), 1 anaplastic oligodendroglioma, 1 diffuse astrocytoma, and 3 pilocytic astrocytomas. Fifty-three percent (53%) of cases exhibited BRAF-alterations other than p.V600E. The majority of the tumors were localized in the temporal lobe (52.9%). In addition to BRAF mutations, glioblastomas showed concomitant mutations in TP53 (3/8), CDKN2A/B-loss (6/8), TERT-promoter (6/8), and/or PTEN (5/8). Both E-GBMs and PXAs showed CDKN2A/B-loss and BRAF p.V600E with absence of TERTp, TP53, and PTEN mutations. Similar findings were observed in BRAF-mutant infiltrating gliomas from cBioPortal. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of additional alterations that co-occur with BRAF-mutations in gliomas may improve diagnosis and help identify patients that could benefit from targeted therapies. Furthermore, we provide examples of two patients whose tumors responded to BRAF pathway inhibitors, arguing in favor of these therapies in patients with BRAF-mutant gliomas.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of fused naphthofuro[3,2-c] quinoline-6,7,12-triones and pyrano[3,2-c]quinoline-6,7,8,13-tetraones derivatives as ERK inhibitors with efficacy in BRAF-mutant melanoma.

Approximately 60% of human cancers exhibit enhanced activity of ERK1 and ERK2, reflecting their multiple roles in tumor initiation and progression. Acquired drug resistance, especially mechanisms associated with the reactivation of the MAPK (RAF/MEK/ERK) pathway represent a major challenge to current treatments of melanoma and several other cancers. Recently, targeting ERK has evolved as a potentially attractive strategy to overcome this resistance. Herein, we report the design and synthesis of novel series of fused naphthofuro[3,2-c]quinoline-6,7,12-triones 3a-f and pyrano[3,2-c]quinoline-6,7,8,13-tetraones 5a,b and 6, as potential ERK inhibitors. New inhibitors were synthesized and identified by different spectroscopic techniques and X-ray crystallography. They were evaluated for their ability to inhibit ERK1/2 in an in vitro radioactive kinase assay. 3b and 6 inhibited ERK1 with IC50s of 0.5 and 0.19 µM, and inhibited ERK2 with IC50s of 0.6 and 0.16 µM respectively. Kinetic mechanism studies revealed that the inhibitors are ATP-competitive inhibitors where 6 inhibited ERK2 with a Ki of 0.09 µM. Six of the new inhibitors were tested for their in vitro anticancer activity against the NCI-60 panel of tumor cell lines. Compound 3b and 6 were the most potent against most of the human tumor cell lines tested. Moreover, 3b and 6 inhibited the proliferation of the BRAF mutant A375 melanoma cells with IC50s of 3.7 and 0.13 µM, respectively. In addition, they suppressed anchorage-dependent colony formation. Treatment of the A375 cell line with 3b and 6 inhibited the phosphorylation of ERK substrates p-90RSK and ELK-1 and induced apoptosis in a dose dependent manner. Finally, a molecular docking study showed the potential binding mode of 3b and 6 within the ATP catalytic binding site of ERK2.

Aberrant modulation of ribosomal protein S6 phosphorylation confers acquired resistance to MAPK pathway inhibitors in BRAF-mutant melanoma.

BRAF and MEK inhibitors have shown remarkable clinical efficacy in BRAF-mutant melanoma; however, most patients develop resistance, which limits the clinical benefit of these agents. In this study, we found that the human melanoma cell clones, A375-DR and A375-TR, with acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib and MEK inhibitor trametinib, were cross resistant to other MAPK pathway inhibitors. In these resistant cells, phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 (rpS6) but not phosphorylation of ERK or p90 ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) were unable to be inhibited by MAPK pathway inhibitors. Notably, knockdown of rpS6 in these cells effectively downregulated G1 phase-related proteins, including RB, cyclin D1, and CDK6, induced cell cycle arrest, and inhibited proliferation, suggesting that aberrant modulation of rpS6 phosphorylation contributed to the acquired resistance. Interestingly, RSK inhibitor had little effect on rpS6 phosphorylation and cell proliferation in resistant cells, whereas P70S6K inhibitor showed stronger inhibitory effects on rpS6 phosphorylation and cell proliferation in resistant cells than in parental cells. Thus regulation of rpS6 phosphorylation, which is predominantly mediated by BRAF/MEK/ERK/RSK signaling in parental cells, was switched to mTOR/P70S6K signaling in resistant cells. Furthermore, mTOR inhibitors alone overcame acquired resistance and rescued the sensitivity of the resistant cells when combined with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Taken together, our findings indicate that RSK-independent phosphorylation of rpS6 confers resistance to MAPK pathway inhibitors in BRAF-mutant melanoma, and that mTOR inhibitor-based regimens may provide alternative strategies to overcome this acquired resistance.

BRAF peptide vaccine facilitates therapy of murine BRAF-mutant melanoma.

Approximately, 50% of human melanomas are driven by BRAF mutations, which produce tumors that are highly immunosuppressive and often resistant to vaccine therapy. We introduced lipid-coated calcium phosphate nanoparticles (LCP NPs) as a carrier to efficiently deliver a tumor-specific antigen, the BRAFV600E peptide, to drive dendritic cell (DC) maturation and antigen presentation in C57BL6 mice. The BRAF peptide vaccine elicited a robust, antigen-specific cytotoxic T cell response and potent tumor growth inhibition in a murine BRAF-mutant melanoma model. Advanced BRAF-specific immune response was illustrated by IFN-γ production assay and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) assay. Remodeling of immunosuppressive modules within the tumor microenvironment further facilitated CTL infiltration. Thus, using LCP NPs to deliver the BRAF peptide vaccine is a promising strategy for the BRAF-mutant melanoma therapy.

The plasma membrane Ca2+ pump PMCA4b inhibits the migratory and metastatic activity of BRAF mutant melanoma cells.

Oncogenic mutations of BRAF lead to constitutive ERK activity that supports melanoma cell growth and survival. While Ca2+ signaling is a well-known regulator of tumor progression, the crosstalk between Ca2+ signaling and the Ras-BRAF-MEK-ERK pathway is much less explored. Here we show that in BRAF mutant melanoma cells the abundance of the plasma membrane Ca2+ ATPase isoform 4b (PMCA4b, ATP2B4) is low at baseline but markedly elevated by treatment with the mutant BRAF specific inhibitor vemurafenib. In line with these findings gene expression microarray data also shows decreased PMCA4b expression in cutaneous melanoma when compared to benign nevi. The MEK inhibitor selumetinib-similarly to that of the BRAF-specific inhibitor-also increases PMCA4b levels in both BRAF and NRAS mutant melanoma cells suggesting that the MAPK pathway is involved in the regulation of PMCA4b expression. The increased abundance of PMCA4b in the plasma membrane enhances [Ca2+ ]i clearance from cells after Ca2+ entry. Moreover we show that both vemurafenib treatment and PMCA4b overexpression induce marked inhibition of migration of BRAF mutant melanoma cells. Importantly, reduced migration of PMCA4b expressing BRAF mutant cells is associated with a marked decrease in their metastatic potential in vivo. Taken together, our data reveal an important crosstalk between Ca2+ signaling and the MAPK pathway through the regulation of PMCA4b expression and suggest that PMCA4b is a previously unrecognized metastasis suppressor.

Investigating the poor outcomes of BRAF-mutant advanced colorectal cancer: analysis from 2530 patients in randomised clinical trials.

Background: To improve strategies for the treatment of BRAF-mutant advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC) patients, we examined individual data from patients treated with chemotherapy alone in three randomised trials to identify points on the treatment pathway where outcomes differ from BRAF wild-types. Patients and methods: 2530 aCRC patients were assessed from three randomised trials. End-points were progression-free survival, response rate, disease control rate, post-progression survival (P-PS) and overall survival. Treatments included first-line oxaliplatin/fluorouracil (OxFU) and second-line irinotecan. Clinicians were unaware of BRAF-status. Results: 231 patients (9.1%) had BRAF-mutant tumours. BRAF-mutation conferred significantly worse survival independent of associated clinicopathological factors known to be prognostic. Compared with wild-type, BRAF-mutant patients treated with first-line OxFU had similar DCR (59.2% versus 72%; adjusted OR = 0.76, P = 0.24) and PFS (5.7 versus 6.3 months; adjusted HR = 1.14, P = 0.26). Following progression on first-line chemotherapy, BRAF-mutant patients had a markedly shorter P-PS (4.2 versus 9.2 months, adjusted HR = 1.69, P < 0.001). Fewer BRAF-mutant patients received second-line treatment (33% versus 51%, P < 0.001), but BRAF-mutation was not associated with inferior second-line outcomes (RR adjusted OR = 0.56, P = 0.45; PFS adjusted HR = 1.01, P = 0.93). Significant clinical heterogeneity within the BRAF-mutant population was observed: a proportion (24.3%) had good first-line PFS and P-PS (both >6 months; OS = 24.0 months); however, 36.5% progressed rapidly through first-line chemotherapy and thereafter, with OS = 4.7 months. Conclusions: BRAF-mutant aCRC confers a markedly worse prognosis independent of associated clinicopathological features. Chemotherapy provides meaningful improvements in outcome throughout treatment lines. Post-progression survival is markedly worse and vigilance is required to ensure appropriate delivery of treatment after first-line progression.

New drug targets in metastatic melanoma.

Over the past 30 years, and despite extensive clinical research, the treatment options for metastatic melanoma have been limited. Single-agent and combination chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, biochemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted agent therapy and combination regimes have failed to show significant improvement in overall survival. Recent advances and in-depth understanding of the biology of melanoma have contributed in the development of new agents and to a change in the consideration of melanoma as one of the most therapy-resistant malignancies. Since the discovery of activating mutations in the BRAF oncogene, there has been remarkable progress in the development of targeted therapies for unresectable and metastatic melanoma, with unprecedentedly high response rates. Inactivation of immune regulatory checkpoints that limit T cell responses to melanoma has provided clinically validated targets for cancer immunotherapy, resulting in durable tumour responses. The combination of both approaches may result in additional benefits. Here we discuss current molecular targeted treatment options, immunotherapy and promising ongoing research to develop new strategies to treat melanoma.

COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with encorafenib plus binimetinib and encorafenib monotherapy is associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with vemurafenib in patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant metastatic melanoma. We report results from the 7-year analysis of COLUMBUS part 1 (NCT01909453) at 99.7 months (median duration between randomization and data cutoff). METHODS: 577 patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma who were treatment-naive or progressed after first-line immunotherapy were randomized 1:1:1 to encorafenib 450 mg once daily (QD) plus binimetinib 45 mg twice daily (BID) (n = 192), vemurafenib 960 mg BID (n = 191), or encorafenib monotherapy 300 mg QD (n = 194). No prior BRAF/MEK inhibitor was allowed. RESULTS: Seven-year PFS and OS rates (95 % CI) were 21.2 % (14.7-28.4 %) and 27.4 % (21.2-33.9%) in the encorafenib plus binimetinib arm and 6.4 % (2.1-14.0 %) and 18.2 % (12.8-24.3 %) in the vemurafenib arm, respectively. Median melanoma-specific survival (95 % CI) was 36.8 months (27.7-51.5 months) in the encorafenib plus binimetinib arm and 19.3 months (14.8-25.9 months) in the vemurafenib arm. Thirty-four long-term responders (complete/partial response ongoing at 7 years) were identified across arms. CONCLUSIONS: This is the longest follow-up from a phase III trial of BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination in BRAF V600E/K-mutant metastatic melanoma. Safety results were consistent with the known tolerability profile of encorafenib plus binimetinib. Results support the long-term efficacy and known safety of encorafenib plus binimetinib in this population and provide new insights on long-term responders. Interactive data visualization is available at the COLUMBUS dashboard (https://clinical-trials.dimensions.ai/columbus7/).

First-line encorafenib plus binimetinib and pembrolizumab for advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma: Safety lead-in results from the randomized phase III STARBOARD study.

BACKGROUND: BRAF inhibitors plus MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are approved for BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma. Combinations of BRAFi/MEKi with CPIs may further improve outcomes and could offer additional treatment strategies. METHODS: STARBOARD (NCT04657991) is a phase III study with an initial safety lead-in (SLI) phase conducted to determine the recommended phase III dose (RP3D) for encorafenib in combination with binimetinib and pembrolizumab. Patients with untreated, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant cutaneous melanoma received binimetinib 45 mg twice daily and pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus encorafenib 450 mg once daily (COMBO450 plus pembrolizumab) or 300 mg once daily (COMBO300 plus pembrolizumab). The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary endpoints included safety, objective response, time to response, and duration of response. Progression-free survival was assessed post hoc. RESULTS: In the SLI, the median follow-up duration was 19.4 months. Twenty patients received COMBO450 plus pembrolizumab and 17 received COMBO300 plus pembrolizumab. DLTs occurred in 1 of 17 DLT-evaluable patients in the COMBO450 plus pembrolizumab arm and in 2 of 17 DLT-evaluable patients in the COMBO300 plus pembrolizumab arm. No treatment-related deaths occurred in either treatment arm. The overall response rate was 65.0 % in the COMBO450 plus pembrolizumab arm and 47.1 % in the COMBO300 plus pembrolizumab arm. CONCLUSION: The STARBOARD SLI showed that safety across the cohorts was generally comparable to the known safety profile of each agent. The standard dose regimen of COMBO450 plus pembrolizumab was chosen as the RP3D.

Preoperative prediction of early recurrence in patients with BRAF mutant colorectal cancer using a intergrated nomogram.

Objective To explore the predictive value of radiomics nomogram combining with CT radiomics features and clinical features for postoperative early recurrence in patients with BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer. Methods A total of 220 patients with surgically and pathologically confirmed BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer from 2 institutions were retrospectively included. All patients from institution 1 were randomized at a 7:3 ratio into a training cohort (n = 108) and an internal validation cohort (n = 45), and patients from institution 2 were used as an external validation cohort (n = 67). The association between the radiomics features and early recurrence was assessed in the training cohort and verified in the validation cohort. Furthermore, the performance of the radiomics nomogram was evaluated by combining the rad-score and clinical risk factors. The predictive performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, calibration curve analysis, and decision curve analysis. Results The dierenees in the Lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR) and Peripheral nerve infiltration (PNI) were statistically significant between the early recurrence in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer groups and the early non-recurrence in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer groups (P < 0.05); The two groups showed no significant differenee in clinical parameters including age, sex, and biochemistry serum markers (P > 0.05). Comparing with the pure radiomics or clinical data, combined models can be seen that the addition of LMR and PNI further improveed the predictive efficiency of the model. The rad-score based on LR, generated by 4 selected radiomics features, demonstrated a favorable ability to predict early recurrence in both the training (AUC 0.81), internal validation (AUC 0.73), external validation (AUC 0.63) cohorts. Subsequently, integrating two independent predictors into a nomogram exhibited more favorable discriminatory performance, with the AUC improved to 0.88 and 0.81 in both cohorts. Conclusions The proposed CT-based radiomics signature is associated with early recurrence among the patients with BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer. The present study also proposes a combined model can potentially be applied in the individual preoperative prediction of early recurrence in patients with BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer. Advances in knowledge CT-based radiomics showed satisfactory diagnostic significance for early recurrence in patients with BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer. Key baseline clinical characteristics were associated with early recurrence in patients with BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer. The combined model may be applied in the individual preoperative prediction of early recurrence in patients with BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer.

Combination Atezolizumab, Cobimetinib, and Vemurafenib as a Treatment Option in BRAF V600 Mutation-Positive Melanoma: Patient Selection and Perspectives.

The treatment landscape for advanced and metastatic melanoma has drastically changed in recent years, with the advent of novel therapeutic options such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies offering remarkable efficacy and significantly improved patient outcomes compared to traditional approaches. Approximately 50% of melanomas harbor activating BRAF mutations, with over 90% resulting in BRAF V600E. Tumors treated with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy have a high rate of developing resistance within six months. Combination therapy with MEK inhibitors helped to mitigate this treatment resistance and led to improved outcomes. Due to the up-regulation of PD-1/PD-L1 receptors in tumors treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy, further studies included a third combination agent, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. This triple combination therapy may have superior efficacy and a manageable safety profile when compared with single or double agent therapy regimens.

Effective treatment of advanced and metastatic melanoma can be challenging. Newer treatment methods for patients with BRAF-mutated tumors include a combination of drugs with different complementary mechanisms. These drugs include BRAF-inhibitors, MEK-inhibitors, and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. When these three medications are used in combination, patients may have better response rates and survival outcomes, when compared to using just one or two of these medications together. Toxicity rates are higher with a triple-medication regimen, so careful patient selection is important to consider.

POU5F1B is responsible for the acquired resistance to dabrafenib in papillary thyroid cancer cells with the BRAF V600E mutation.

BACKGROUND: Dabrafenib, an inhibitor of the B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) V600E mutant, has become the major drug for targeted therapy of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) with the BRAF V600E mutant; however, acquired resistance is inevitable. OBJECTIVE: To identify key transcription factors (TFs) involved in dabrafenib resistance and identify targets to reverse dabrafenib resistance. METHODS: Dabrafenib-resistant PTC cell lines BCPAP/DabR and K1/DabR were established, and phenotypic assays were performed to validate the malignant phenotype. RNA sequencing and bioinformatics analyses were used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and screen TFs involved in resistant phenotype-related pathways. The role of the key TF POU5F1B in dabrafenib resistance was further validated using gene gain-and-loss assays. RESULTS: BCPAP/DabR and K1/DabR were resistant to dabrafenib, with a resistance index of 5-8. Resistant cells exhibited slower proliferation, strong migration, and spheroid-forming abilities. RNA sequencing screened 6233 DEGs in the resistant group, including 2687 protein-coding RNA (mRNA). Venn analysis indicated that three genes, E2F2, WNT4, and POU5F1B, were involved in resistant phenotype-related pathways and were included in the TF regulatory network. Four TFs of the three genes, POU5F1B, TBX4, FOXO4, and FOXP3, were validated, and POU5F1B showed the highest validated fold-change. Overexpression of POU5F1B in sensitive cells resulted in resistance to dabrafenib and induced a malignant phenotype, whereas silencing it sensitized the resistant cells and reversed the resistant phenotype. CONCLUSION: This study successfully established two dabrafenib-resistant PTC cell lines, and POU5F1B could be a potential target for reversing dabrafenib resistance.

Preclinical efficacy of carfilzomib in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer models.

Serine/threonine-protein kinase B-raf (BRAF) mutations are found in 8-15% of colorectal cancer patients and identify a subset of tumors with poor outcome in the metastatic setting. We have previously reported that BRAF-mutant human cells display a high rate of protein production, causing proteotoxic stress, and are selectively sensitive to the proteasome inhibitors bortezomib and carfilzomib. In this work, we tested whether carfilzomib could restrain the growth of BRAF-mutant colorectal tumors not only by targeting cancer cells directly, but also by promoting an immune-mediated antitumor response. In human and mouse colorectal cancer cells, carfilzomib triggered robust endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy, followed by the emission of immunogenic-damage-associated molecules. Intravenous administration of carfilzomib delayed the growth of BRAF-mutant murine tumors and mobilized the danger-signal proteins calreticulin and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1). Analyses of drug-treated samples revealed increased intratumor recruitment of activated cytotoxic T cells and natural killers, concomitant with the downregulation of forkhead box protein P3 (Foxp3)+ T-cell surface glycoprotein CD4 (CD4)+ T cells, indicating that carfilzomib promotes reshaping of the immune microenvironment of BRAF-mutant murine colorectal tumors. These results will inform the design of clinical trials in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer patients.