Nutritional status as the risk factor of serious infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with severe infection in RA patients, with a particular focus on the association of the nutritional status.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 74 patients with RA (male, n = 21; female, n = 53; age 74.2 ± 12.4) admitted to our hospital between 2016 and 2017 for infection (infection group). We also recruited control RA patients (n = 222) who were matched for age, gender and disease duration, with a match ratio of 1:3 (non-infection group). The nutritional condition was assessed based on controlling nutrition status (CONUT) score, and prognostic nutritional index (PNI). The data of the infection group were obtained from the most recent visit prior to the present admission, and non-infection group from the last regular visit in 2017.Results: The respiratory tract was the most frequent site of infection. The BMI and PNI were significantly lower and the CONUT score significantly higher in the infection group than in the non-infection group. A logistic regression analysis revealed that the CONUT score, underlying lung disease and use of prednisolone and biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were independent and significant risk factors for serious infection.Conclusion: Poor nutritional status increases the risk of serious infection.

PsABIOnd Study and eDaily Substudy Design: Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Guselkumab and IL-17 Inhibitors in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Randomised clinical studies in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) do not always reflect patients in routine clinical practice. Large-scale data from routine practice are needed to better understand drug persistence, effectiveness and long-term safety of therapeutic agents. METHODS: PsABIOnd is an international, prospective, observational study designed to collect long-term routine care data in patients with PsA who receive guselkumab (an interleukin-23 [IL-23] inhibitor) or an interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitor. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of PsA who are starting guselkumab or any approved IL-17 inhibitor as a first, second, third or fourth line of PsA treatment and who provide written informed consent will be eligible to participate. Participants will be followed for a maximum of 36 months (+3 months) from the start of treatment. Study visits will occur in line with the standard of care, approximately every 6 months, plus an additional visit at 3 months after the start of treatment. eDaily by PsABIOnd - aneHealth substudy, will document the impact of these treatments on wellbeing and symptoms in a subgroup of participants over a 24-week (+4 weeks) observation period on treatment. PLANNED OUTCOMES: The primary objective of PsABIOnd is to evaluate treatment persistence with guselkumab and IL-17 inhibitors. Data sources will include validated electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) and physician-completed assessments. Safety data will be collected through reporting adverse events. The eDaily by PsABIOnd substudy will use wearable and digital technologies for continuous activity and sleep monitoring, and frequent patient eDiary and ePRO collection to provide a more detailed and comprehensive picture of PsA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05049798.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a type of arthritis associated with inflammation that occurs in almost one-third of patients with the inflammatory skin condition psoriasis. PsA can vary between individuals, and typically causes joint pain, swelling and stiffness, affecting both physical and social well-being. Over the past decade, several new PsA treatments have become available. However, there is currently a lack of agreement about the best treatment options. As PsA is a chronic (long-term) disease, the duration of time a patient continues taking a prescribed treatment (termed "treatment persistence") is important. The randomised clinical trials used to determine if a treatment works use strict rules to select patients. Therefore, large studies from everyday practice are needed to better understand the effectiveness and safety of these PsA treatments for a wider range of patients. PsABIOnd is a real-life study that will compare guselkumab (an interleukin-23 inhibitor) and interleukin-17 inhibitors, which are two relatively new types of PsA treatments. The study will provide information about how long patients remain on these treatments and how effectively and safely they work over a 3-year period. PsABIOnd will also explore the impact of PsA on participants' lives by collecting information about their quality of life, disease activity and treatment satisfaction. In addition, participants also taking part in the eDaily by PsABIOnd substudy will wear a watch-like device and use a smartphone-based app to record measurements including activity, sleep, pain and well-being to give a detailed picture of PsA and its impact on patients' daily lives.

Risk factors for bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

OBJECTIVE: Osteoporosis is a complication of rheumatoid arthritis. We examined the risk factors for bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density was measured at two time points in 153 patients with rheumatoid arthritis managed with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. We examined patients' variables to identify risk factors for least significant reduction of bone mineral density. RESULTS: Least significant reduction of lumbar spine bone mineral density (≤ - 2.4%) was seen in 13.1% of patients. Least significant reduction of femoral neck bone mineral density (≤ - 1.9%) was seen in 34.0% of patients. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that a risk factor for least significant reduction of the lumbar spine was high-dose methylprednisolone use. Multiple regression analysis showed that a risk factor for least significant reduction of the femoral neck was short disease duration. Our findings showed that a risk factor for femoral neck bone mineral density reduction was a short disease duration. These findings suggest that rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving treatment with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs may benefit from earlier osteoporosis treatments to prevent femoral neck bone loss.

Use and effectiveness of tocilizumab among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for rheumatoid arthritis.

The aims of the present study are to describe the characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients selected for tocilizumab (TCZ), compare the "real-world" effectiveness of TCZ and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) when used as a first biologic and assess the influence of past biologic exposure/concurrent methotrexate (MTX) therapy on post-TCZ treatment outcomes. The British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-RA) is a prospective cohort study following RA patients starting biologics in the UK. This includes patients starting TCZ as first or subsequent biologic, alongside biologic-naïve patients starting TNFi. Six-month disease activity and 1-year drug survival were compared between biologic-naïve patients starting TCZ versus TNFi and first-line versus subsequent TCZ users and TCZ users with MTX versus without using regression models adjusted by propensity score. Two hundred seventeen patients started TCZ, and 2419 started TNFi as first biologic. Seven hundred seventy-seven started TCZ after other biologics. First-line TCZ users had a higher prevalence of pulmonary fibrosis and cancer history than TNFi users. The first-line TCZ users were more likely to achieve DAS28 remission at 6 months than first-line TNFi, but other improvement markers were similar. The treatment response at 6 months was similar between subsequent-line TCZ users and first-line users after adjusting for baseline patient differences. Concurrent MTX use was not associated with treatment response in either first- or subsequent-line TCZ users. TCZ has been primarily used as subsequent-line biologic in the UK. When used as first line, the response appears similar to that observed in patients starting TNFi, suggesting that clinical response alone should not decide between initial biologic therapies.