Differentiation of five forensically relevant body fluids using a small set of microRNA markers.

In forensic investigations, identifying the type of body fluid allows for the interpretation of biological evidence at the activity level. Over the past two decades, significant research efforts have focused on developing molecular methods for this purpose. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) hold great promise due to their tissue-specific expression, abundance, lack of splice variants, and relative stability. Although initial findings are promising, achieving consistent results across studies is still challenging, underscoring the necessity for both original and replication studies. To address this, we selected 18 miRNA candidates and tested them on 6 body fluids commonly encountered in forensic cases: peripheral blood, menstrual blood, saliva, semen, vaginal secretion, and skin. Using reverse transcription quantitative PCR analysis, we confirmed eight miRNA candidates (miR-144-3p, miR-451a, miR-205-5p, miR-214-3p, miR-888-5p, miR-891a-5p, miR-193b-3p, miR-1260b) with high tissue specificity and four (miR-203a-3p, miR-141-3p, miR-200b-3p, miR-4286) with lesser discrimination ability but still contributing to body fluid differentiation. Through principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering, the set of 12 miRNAs successfully distinguished all body fluids, including the challenging discrimination of blood from menstrual blood and saliva from vaginal secretion. In conclusion, our results provide additional data supporting the use of a small set of miRNAs for predicting common body fluids in forensic contexts. Large population data need to be gathered to develop a body fluid prediction model and assess its accuracy.

Comparative analysis of SNaPshot and massively parallel sequencing for body fluid-specific DNA methylation markers.

The identification of tissue-specific differentially methylated regions has significantly contributed to the field of forensic genetics, particularly in body fluid identification crucial for linking evidence to crimes. Among the various approaches to analyzing DNA methylation, the SNaPshot assay has been popularly studied in numerous researches. However, there is a growing interest in exploring alternative methods such as the use of massively parallel sequencing (MPS), which can process a large number of samples simultaneously. This study compares SNaPshot and MPS multiplex assays using nine cytosine-phosphate-guanine markers for body fluid identification. As a result of analyzing 112 samples, including blood, saliva, vaginal fluid, menstrual blood, and semen, both methods demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, indicating their reliability in forensic investigations. A total of 92.0% samples were correctly identified by both methods. Although both methods accurately identified all blood, saliva, and semen samples, some vaginal fluid samples showed unexpected methylation signals at nontarget loci in addition to the target loci. In the case of menstrual blood samples, due to their complexity, independent typing criteria were applied, and successful menstrual blood typing was possible, whereas a few samples showed profiles similar to vaginal fluid. The MPS method worked better in vaginal fluid samples, and the SNaPshot method performed better in menstrual blood samples. This study offers valuable insights into body fluid identification based on the characteristics of the SNaPshot and MPS methods, which may help in more efficient forensic applications.

Expanding the scope of methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme (MSRE) PCR for forensic identification of body fluids through the novel use of methylation-dependent restriction enzymes (MDRE) and the combination of autosomal and Y-chromosomal markers.

Methylation-sensitive/-dependent restriction enzyme (MSRE/MDRE) PCR can be performed to detect hypomethylated or hypermethylated CpG sites. With the combined use of different tissue-specific CpG markers, MSRE/MDRE-PCR leads to tissue-specific methylation patterns (TSMPs), enabling the correlation of DNA samples to their source tissue. MSRE/MDRE assays can use the same platform as forensic STR typing and offer many advantages in the field of forensic body fluid detection. In the present study, we aimed to establish MSRE assays for the detection of blood, saliva, vaginal secretion, and semen, using markers from literature and from our own database search. We designed two different MSRE test-sets, which include two novel Y-chromosomal non-semen markers, and enable differentiation between female and male non-semen samples. Furthermore, we established an MSRE/MDRE semen approach, which includes only Y-chromosomal non-semen and semen markers. This Y-semen multiplex PCR utilizes the novel combination of the methylation-sensitive enzyme SmaI and the methylation-dependent enzyme GlaI, which enables more sensitive detection of male body fluids within male/female DNA mixtures. Our validation tests confirmed that MSRE/MDRE assays exhibit high sensitivity, similar to that of STR typing.

Advances in body fluid identification: MiRNA markers as powerful tool.

Body fluids are one of the most encountered types of evidence in any crime and are commonly used for identifying a person's identity. In addition to these, they are also useful in ascertaining the nature of crime by determining the ty pe of fluid such as blood, semen, saliva, urine etc. Body fluids collected from crime scenes are mostly found in degraded, trace amounts and/or mixed with other fluids. However, the existing immunological and enzyme-based methods used for differentiating these fluids show limited specificity and sensitivity in such cases. To overcome these challenges, a new method utilizing microRNA expression of the body fluids has been proposed. This method is believed to be non-destructive as well as sensitive in nature and researches have shown promising results for highly degraded samples as well. This systematic review focuses on and explores the use and reliability of miRNAs in body fluid identification. It also summarizes the researches conducted on various aspects of miRNA in terms of body fluid examination in forensic investigations.

Analysis of MiR-20b, MIR-197 markers for differentiation between forensic body fluids encountered in sexual assault cases.

Identifying body fluids can be a critical clue that aids in reconstructing the crime scene. Semen and vaginal fluid identification is crucial, especially in cases of sexual assault. The majority of forensic studies focused on identifying normal body fluids and neglected the expression variation of semen in pathology. To differentiate between vaginal fluids, fertile and infertile semen samples (oligospermia and azoospermia) using miR 20b and miR197. A total of 48 body fluid samples, divided as 16 vaginal fluids, 16 fertile semen, and 16 infertile semen samples (8 with oligospermia and 8 with azoospermia), were collected, and the expression levels of miR-20b and miR-197 were detected by the SYBR Green real-time quantitative PCR technique. Our results showed significant different expression of these miRNAs in normal semen compared to vaginal and infertile semen. Moreover, we designed a model based on Fisher's discriminant function to forecast the group affiliations of unidentified samples. With three novel equations, we were able to accurately distinguish between semen and vaginal fluid, fertile and infertile semen, and oligospermia and azoospermia semen samples with validation accuracy of 81.3%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. MiR-20b and miR-197 expression levels are efficient and appropriate markers to distinguish semen from vaginal fluid and to differentiate between fertile and infertile semen samples. However, the present study is a preliminary study based on clinical samples, and the potential role of these markers in differentiating real crime scene samples is still unknown, so we recommend further research to investigate these markers expression while using forensic samples.

An mRNA Profiling Study of Vaginal Swabs from Pre- and Postmenopausal Women.

Body fluid identification by means of mRNA profiling provides valuable supplementary information in forensic investigations. In particular, the detection of vaginal mucosa mRNA markers is highly relevant in sexual assault cases. Although the vagina undergoes characteristic age-related physiological changes over a lifetime, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of vaginal mRNA markers in women of different ages. In this multicentric study, a 19-plex mRNA profiling assay including vaginal-specific markers (CYP2B7P1, MUC4, MYOZ1) was tested in a collection of 6-20-month-old vaginal swabs obtained from pre- (n = 84) and postmenopausal (n = 55) female volunteer donors. Overall, participating laboratories were able to correctly identify ~85% of samples as vaginal mucosa by mRNA profiling. The assay's success rate did not differ between the two age groups and was not affected by the time interval between swab collection and RNA analysis. MYOZ1 resulted a less sensitive vaginal marker compared to MUC4 and CYP2B7P1. A significant relative increase in the contribution to the total amplification signal was observed for MUC4, compared to CYP2B7P1 and MYOZ1, in postmenopausal women. Observation of other body fluids and tissues different from vaginal mucosa was also evaluated in connection to information on previous sexual activity and menstrual cycle phase at the time of sampling.

A systematic analysis of miRNA markers and classification algorithms for forensic body fluid identification.

Identifying the types of body fluids left at the crime scene can be essential to reconstructing the crime scene and inferring criminal behavior. MicroRNA (miRNA) molecule extracted from the trace of body fluids is one of the most promising biomarkers for the identification due to its high expression, extreme stability and tissue specificity. However, the detection of miRNA markers is not the answer to a yes-no question but the probability of an assumption. Therefore, it is a crucial task to develop complicated methods combining multi-miRNAs as well as computational algorithms to achieve the goal. In this study, we systematically analyzed the expression of 10 most probable body fluid-specific miRNA markers (miR-451a, miR-205-5p, miR-203a-3p, miR-214-3p, miR-144-3p, miR-144-5p, miR-654-5p, miR-888-5p, miR-891a-5p and miR-124-3p) in 605 body fluids-related samples, including peripheral blood, menstrual blood, saliva, semen and vaginal secretion. We introduced the kernel density estimation (KDE) method and six well-established methods to classify the body fluids in order to find the most optimal combinations of miRNA markers as well as the corresponding classifying method. The results show that the combination of miR-451a, miR-891a-5p, miR-144-5p and miR-203a-3p together with KDE can achieve the most accurate and robust performance according to the cross-validation, independent tests and random perturbation tests. This systematic analysis suggests a reference scheme for the identification of body fluids in an accurate and stable manner.

High-resolution melt analysis for the detection of skin/sweat via DNA methylation.

The determination of tissue type is important when reconstructing a crime scene as skin cells may indicate innocent contact, whereas other types of cells, such as blood and semen, may indicate foul play. Up to now, there has been no specific DNA methylation-based marker to distinguish skin cell DNA from other body fluids. The goal of this study is to develop a DNA methylation-based assay to detect and identify skin cells collected at forensic crime scenes for use in DNA typing. For this reason, we have utilized a DNA methylation chip array-based genome-wide association study to identify skin-specific DNA methylation markers. DNA obtained from skin along with other body fluids, such as semen, saliva, blood, and vaginal epithelia, were tested using five genes that were identified as sites for potential new epigenetic skin markers. Samples were collected, bisulfite converted, and subjected to real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with high-resolution melt analysis. In our studies, when using WDR11, PON2, and NHSL1 assays with bisulfite-modified PCR, skin/sweat amplicons melted at lower temperatures compared to blood, saliva, semen, and vaginal epithelia. One-way analysis of variance demonstrates that these three skin/sweat markers are significantly different when compared with other body fluids (p < 0.05). These results demonstrate that high-resolution melt analysis is a promising technology to detect and identify skin/sweat DNA from other body fluids.

Analysis of DNA methylation markers for tissue identification in individuals with different clinical phenotypes.

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation patterns can be used to identify the type of tissue or body fluid found at a crime scene. However, tissue-related methylation levels have not been analyzed in individuals with different illnesses and medical conditions in forensic-specific studies. The primary goal of this study was to investigate if certain clinical phenotypes can alter the methylation levels of CpG sites in genes involved in tissue typing. Four studies with focus on DNA methylation analysis on individuals with different clinical conditions were selected from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Then, a list of 137 CpG sites was compiled for further investigation. Statistical tests were performed to compare the beta-values results obtained for the control groups and the individuals affected by medical conditions. For each study, CpG sites that presented significant statistical differences between patients and control group were identified and it was possible to notice that DNA methylation levels can be affected in sites with potential forensic use. Although the observed DNA methylation variation (less than 10% difference) in this study would likely not cause any issues in body fluid identification, the results are important to show that this type of analysis should be taken into consideration when investigating and further validating body fluid markers. The CpG sites identified in this study should be further investigated by future studies on body fluids identification, and due to the significant difference in methylation levels in samples from affected individuals, caution must be taken before including these sites in tissue identification investigations.

Forensic validation of a combined analysis of mRNA and miRNA markers for precise tissue origin inferences of five kinds of body fluids by RT-qPCR.

Correctly inferring the tissue origin types of forensic-relevant body fluids left at a crime scene is beneficial for reconstructing a crime scene. However, it is still a challenge to accurately identify different kinds of body fluids at a crime scene. Shorter sequence length and anti-degradation microRNA (miRNA) can be used to infer the tissue sources of biological fluid traces, but a limited number of miRNAs are tissue specific. The application of messenger RNA (mRNA) has been confirmed by different studies based on its high tissue specificity. According to the differential expression features of mRNA or miRNA in forensically relevant body fluids, this study developed a simultaneously reversed mRNA and miRNA system and then used these two types of RNAs for the determinations of five common kinds of body fluids. Compared with previously reported single kind of mRNA or miRNA assay, the combined mRNA and miRNA system showed good advantages for human body fluid identifications, especially it could be applied in mixed samples. In conclusion, the obtained results indicated that this combined mRNA and miRNA system might provide a scientific and accurate reference for body fluid identifications.

Knife wound or nosebleed-where does the blood at the crime scene come from?

Secretion analysis is a useful tool in forensic genetics, since it establishes the (cellular) origin of the DNA prior in addition to the identification of the DNA donor. This information can be crucial for the construction of the crime sequence or verification of statements of people involved in the crime. For some secretions, rapid/pretests already exist (blood, semen, urine, and saliva) or can be determined via published methylation analyses or expression analyses (blood, saliva vaginal secretions, menstrual blood, and semen). To discriminate nasal secretion/blood from other secretions (like oral mucosa/saliva, blood, vaginal secretion, menstrual blood, and seminal fluid), assays based on specific methylation patterns at several CpGs were set up in this study. Out of an initial 54 different CpG markers tested, two markers showed a specific methylation value for nasal samples: N21 and N27 with a methylation mean value of 64.4% ± 17.6% and 33.2% ± 8.7%, respectively. Although identification or discrimination was not possible for all nasal samples (due to partial overlap in methylation values to other secretions), 63% and 26% of the nasal samples could be unambiguously identified and distinguished from the other secretions using the CpG marker N21 and N27, respectively. In combination with a blood pretest/rapid test, a third marker (N10) was able to detect nasal cells in 53% of samples. Moreover, the employment of this pretest increases the proportion of identifiable or discriminable nasal secretion samples using marker N27 to 68%. In summary, our CpG assays proved to be promising tools in forensic analysis for the detection of nasal cells in samples from a crime scene.

More than just blood, saliva, or sperm-setup of a workflow for body fluid identification by DNA methylation analysis.

The determination of cellular origin of DNA is a useful method in forensic genetics and complements identification of the DNA donor by STR analysis, since it could provide helpful information for the reconstruction of crime scenes and verify or disprove the descriptions of involved people. There already exist several rapid/pre-tests for several secretions (blood, sperm secretion, saliva, and urine), RNA-based expression analyses (blood, menstrual blood, saliva, vaginal secretion, nasal secretion, and sperm secretion), or specific CpG methylation analyses (nasal blood, blood, saliva, vaginal secretion, nasal secretion, and sperm secretion) for determining the cell type.To identify and to discriminate seven different body fluids and mixtures thereof in a simple workflow from each other, assays based on specific methylation patterns at several CpGs combined with pre-/rapid tests were set up in this study. For each of the seven secretions listed above, we selected the CpG marker achieving the highest possible discrimination (out of 30 markers tested). Validation studies confirmed a definite identification for saliva, vaginal secretion, and semen secretion in 100% of samples as well as discrimination from all other secretions. Moreover, the unambiguously correctly determined proportion of nasal samples, blood and menstrual blood varied between 61% (nasal blood) and 85% (nasal secretion).In summary, our workflow proved to be an easy and useful tool in forensic analysis for the identification and discrimination of seven different body fluids often found at a crime scene.

Development and application of a multiplex PCR system for forensic salivary identification.

In forensics, accurate identification of the origin of body fluids is essential for reconstructing a crime scene or presenting strong evidence in court. Microorganisms have demonstrated great potential in body fluid identification. We developed a multiplex PCR system for forensic salivary identification, which contains five types of bacteria:Streptococcus salivarius, Neisseria subflava, Streptococcus. mutans, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, and Bacteroides. uniformis. And the validated studies were carried out following the validation guidelines for DNA analysis methods developed by the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM), which included tests for sensitivity, species specificity, repeatability, stability, and mixed samples, trace samples, case samples, and a population study. Our result depicted that the lowest detection limit of the system was 0.01 ng template DNA. Moreover, the corresponding bacteria can still be detected when the amount of saliva input is low to 0.1 µL for DNA extraction. In addition, the target bacteria were not detected in the DNA of human, seven common animals, and seven bacteria DNA and in nine other body fluid samples (skin, semen, blood, menstrual blood, nasal mucus, sweat, tears, urine, and vaginal secretions). Six common inhibitors such as indigo, EDTA, hemoglobin, calcium ions, alcohol and humic acid were well tolerated by the system. What is more, the salivary identification system recognized the saliva component in all mixed samples and simulated case samples. Among 400 unrelated individuals from the Chinese Han population analyzed by this novel system, the detection rates of N. subflava, S. salivarius, and S. mutans were 97.75%, 70.75%, and 19.75%, respectively, with 100% identification of saliva. In conclusion, the salivary identification system has good sensitivity, specificity, stability, and accuracy, which can be a new effective tool for saliva identification.

Targeted S5 RNA sequencing assay for the identification and direct association of common body fluids with DNA donors in mixtures.

The evidentiary value of DNA profiles varies depending upon the context in which the DNA was found. Linking a DNA profile to a particular cellular phenotype in mixtures may aid in assessing its evidentiary relevance and value. We report the development of two dual-function high-resolution messenger RNA (mRNA) sequencing assays that can each identify the presence of 6 body fluids/tissues (blood, semen, saliva, vaginal secretions, menstrual blood, skin) and, via coding region SNPs (cSNPs) present in the body fluid-specific mRNA transcripts, directly associate particular body fluids with their specific DNA donors in mixtures. The original blood, semen, and saliva (BSS) assay contains 23 cSNPs for blood, semen, and saliva, while the expanded 6F (all 6 fluids/tissues) assay encompasses the BSS assay and also contains 23 additional cSNPs for vaginal secretions, menstrual blood, and skin. Software tools were developed to infer the identity of the body fluids present as well as providing the corresponding cSNP genotypes. Concomitant genomic DNA assays (BSS-d and 6F-d), required to genotype the same cSNPs from persons of interest/inferred contributors to the body fluid mixture, were also developed. Body fluid specificity was demonstrated by the ability to identify the body fluid origin of single-source and two-fluid admixtures. The discriminatory power (European Caucasians) for all body fluids is 0.957-0.997, with linkage disequilibrium considered. Reciprocal body fluid admixtures (mixture pairs with the same two donors but reversed body fluid types) were used to demonstrate the ability to identify the body fluid source of origin as well as associate the donor of each of the two fluids.

Use of Lateral Flow Assays in Forensics.

Already for some decades lateral flow assays (LFAs) are 'common use' devices in our daily life. Also, for forensic use LFAs are developed, such as for the analysis of illicit drugs and DNA, but also for the detection of explosives and body fluid identification. Despite their advantages, including ease-of-use, LFAs are not yet frequently applied at a crime scene. This review describes (academic) developments of LFAs for forensic applications, focusing on biological and chemical applications, whereby the main advantages and disadvantages of LFAs for the different forensic applications are summarized. Additionally, a critical review is provided, discussing why LFAs are not frequently applied within the forensic field and highlighting the steps that are needed to bring LFAs to the forensic market.

Potential applications of microRNA profiling to forensic investigations.

Within the forensic science community, there is a continued push to develop novel tools to aid in criminal investigations. microRNA (miRNA) analysis has been the focus of many researcher's attention in the biomedical field since its discovery in 1993; however, the forensic application of miRNA analysis has only been suggested within the last 10 years and has been gaining considerable traction recently. The primary focus of the forensic application of miRNA analysis has been on body fluid identification to provide confirmatory universal analysis of unknown biological stains obtained from crime scenes or evidence items. There are, however, other forensic applications of miRNA profiling that have shown potential, yet are largely understudied, and warrant further investigation such as organ tissue identification, donor age estimation, and more. This review paper aims to evaluate the current literature and future potential of miRNA analysis within the forensic science field.

Typing of semen-containing mixtures using ARMS-based semen-specific CpG-InDel/STR markers.

Mixed traces are common biological materials found at crime scenes, and their identification remains a significant challenge in the field of forensic genetics. In recent years, DNA methylation has been considered as a promising approach for body fluid identification, and length polymorphic loci are still the preferred markers for personal identification. In this study, we used tissue-specific CpG sites with linked insertion or deletion (InDel) or short tandem repeat (STR) markers (CpG-InDel/STR) for both body fluid and individual identification. The tissue-specific CpG loci, which were all selected from the previous reports, were analyzed using a combination of bisulfite conversion and amplification refractory mutation system-multiprimer-PCR technology. InDels or STRs, which were selected within 400 bp upstream or downstream of the semen-specific CpG loci, were analyzed using a capillary electrophoresis platform. Eventually, we successfully constructed a panel containing 17 semen-specific CpG-InDel/STR compound markers compassing 21 InDels/STRs, 3 body-fluid positive controls (vaginal secretion-, saliva-, and blood-specific CpG), and 1 gender identification locus. Using this panel, full genotyping of individuals could be obtained successfully with 50 ng DNA input. Semen stains stored at room temperature for 7 months and degraded samples that were heat treated for up to 6 h were still identified efficiently. For semen containing mixed stains, it is also useful when the semen content is as low as 3.03%. Moreover, the cumulative discrimination power of this panel is 0.9999998. In conclusion, it is a robust panel enabling the validation of both the tissue source and individual identification of semen containing mixed stains and can be employed as an alternative solution for forensic case investigation.

Establishment of a co-analysis system for personal identification and body fluid identification: a preliminary report.

Analysis of genetic markers can provide clues for case investigation. Short tandem repeat (STR) detection and analysis are widely used for both personal identification and parentage testing. However, DNA analysis currently cannot provide sufficient information for body fluid identification. Tissue or cell sources of samples can be identified by detecting body fluid-specific mRNA markers, which have been studied thoroughly. Integrating STR profiling and mRNA expression patterns can provide more information than conventional methods for investigations and the reconstruction of crime scenes; this can be achieved by DNA/RNA co-extraction technology, which is economical, efficient, and suitable for low-template samples. Here, we propose a co-analysis system based on the PowerPlex 16 kit. This system can simultaneously amplify 25 markers, including 15 STRs, one non-STR amelogenin, and nine mRNA markers (three blood-specific, two saliva-specific, two semen-specific, and two housekeeping gene markers). The specificity and sensitivity of the co-analysis system were determined and aged and degraded samples were used to validate the stability of the co-analysis system. Finally, different DNA/RNA ratios and various carriers were evaluated. The results showed that the DNA/RNA co-analysis system correctly identified different types of body fluid stains. The STR profiles obtained using the co-analysis system were identical to those obtained using the PP16 kit, which demonstrates that the mRNA primers used did not affect STR profiling. Complete STR and mRNA profiles could be obtained from 1/8 portions of buccal swabs, 1/16 portions of swabs of blood and semen samples, 0.1 cm2 of blood samples, 0.25 cm2 of semen samples, and 1.0 cm2 saliva samples. Additionally, our findings indicate that complete STR and mRNA profiles can be obtained with this system from blood and semen samples when the DNA/RNA ratio is 1:1/32. This study suggests that the co-analysis system could be used for simultaneous personal identification and body fluid identification.

Integrating the salivary microbiome in the forensic toolkit by 16S rRNA gene: potential application in body fluid identification and biogeographic inference.

Saliva is a common body fluid with significant forensic value used to investigate criminal cases such as murder and assault. In the past, saliva identification often relied on the α-amylase test; however, this method has low specificity and is prone to false positives. Accordingly, forensic researchers have been working to find new specific molecular markers to refine the current saliva identification approach. At present, research on immunological methods, mRNA, microRNA, circRNA, and DNA methylation is still in the exploratory stage, and the application of these markers still has various limitations. It has been established that salivary microorganisms exhibit good specificity and stability. In this study, 16S rDNA sequencing technology was used to sequence the V3-V4 hypervariable regions in saliva samples from five regions to reveal the role of regional location on the heterogeneity in microbial profile information in saliva. Although the relative abundance of salivary flora was affected to a certain extent by geographical factors, the salivary flora of each sample was still dominated by Streptococcus, Neisseria, and Rothia. In addition, the microbial community in the saliva samples in this study was significantly different from that in the vaginal secretions, semen, and skin samples reported in our previous studies. Accordingly, saliva can be distinguished from the other three body fluids and tissues. Moreover, we established a prediction model based on the random forest algorithm that could distinguish saliva between different regions at the genus level even though the model has a certain probability of misjudgment which needs more in-depth research. Overall, the microbial community information in saliva stains might have prospects for potential application in body fluid identification and biogeographic inference.

A data-driven, high-throughput methodology to determine tissue-specific differentially methylated regions able to discriminate body fluids.

Tissue-specific differentially methylated regions (tDMRs) are regions of the genome with methylation patterns that modulate gene expression in those tissue types. The detection of tDMRs in forensic evidence can permit the identification of body fluids at trace levels. In this report, we have performed a bioinformatic analysis of an existing array dataset to determine if new tDMRs could be identified for use in body fluid identification from forensic evidence. Once these sites were identified, primers were designed and bisulfite modification was performed. The relative methylation level for each body fluid at a given locus was then determined using qPCR with high-resolution melt analysis (HRM). After screening 127 tDMR's in multiple body fluids, we were able to identify four new markers able to discriminate blood (2 markers), vaginal epithelia (1 marker) and buccal cells (1 marker). One marker for each target body fluid was also tested with pyrosequencing showing results consistent with those obtained by HRM. This work successfully demonstrates the ability of in silico analysis to develop a novel set of tDMRs capable of being differentiated by real time PCR/HRM. The method can rapidly determine the body fluids left at crime scenes, assisting the triers of fact in forensic casework.