"To teach or not to teach- that is the question" The educational and clinical impact of introducing an outcome based, modular curriculum in Social Emergency Medicine (SEM) at a private tertiary care center in Karachi, Pakistan.

INTRODUCTION: An enhanced knowledge of Emergency Medicine (EM) personnel regarding negative Social Determinants of Health (SDH) can impact EM service provision in a resource limited country like Pakistan. Interventions to build capacity in identifying and addressing these SDH through education in Social Emergency Medicine (SEM) can be one of the ways in which EM key performance indicators (KPIs) can be improved. METHOD: A SEM based curriculum was administered to the EM residents at a tertiary care center in Karachi, Pakistan. Pre, post and delayed post-test was conducted for knowledge of EM residents and analyzed using Repeated Measures ANOVA (RMANOVA). Clinical impact of this intervention was assessed through the ability of the residents to identify the patients' SDH and determining appropriate disposition. Comparison of the bounce-back of patients in the pre-intervention (2020) and post-intervention year (2021) year was appreciated to see the clinical impact of this intervention. RESULT: A significant improvement was seen in post intervention (p < 0.001) and follow up knowledge (p < 0.001) of residents regarding negative SDH. Bounce-back rate was higher in the pre-SEM curriculum (43%) as compared to the post-SEM curriculum year (27.7%). Post-intervention, the residents were able to identify the unique Pakistani SDH, however appropriate patient disposition needs further reinforcement. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the beneficial impact of an educational intervention in SEM upon the knowledge of EM residents and the bounce-back of patients in the emergency department (ED) of a low resource setup. This educational intervention can be scaled up to other EDs across Pakistan for potential improvement in knowledge, EM process flow and KPIs.

Overcoming Health Literacy Barriers by Developing Standardized Surgical Discharge Instructions.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately one-third of surgical patients exhibit low health literacy, and 39% of our patients are primary Spanish speakers. We first evaluated the current content of our arteriovenous fistula/graft discharge instruction (DCI) templates. Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle quality improvement methodology, we then aimed to optimize the readability and formally translate new DCI and evaluate usage and inappropriate bouncebacks following implementation. METHODS: Current arteriovenous fistula/graft template content was reviewed by the literacy department for readability and vascular faculty for completeness and accuracy. The literacy department edits were categorized by word choice, added/removed content, format change, and grammatical errors. Two vascular surgeons rated completeness and accuracy on a Likert scale (1-5). Retrospective chart review was performed for telephone calls and emergency department bouncebacks for 3 mo flanking new DCI implementation. RESULTS: Of the 10 templates, all were in English and word count ranged from 192 to 990 words. Despite each template including all necessary subcategories, the median number of edits per 100 words was 9.2 [7.0-9.5]. Approximately half of the edits (5.4 [5.1-5.5]) were word choice edits. Overall, experts rated completeness at 3.9 [3.2-4.2] and accuracy at 4.0 [3.7-4.1]. Highest template utilization occurred during post-implementation months 1 (90%) and 3 (100%) with orientation sessions. There was a significant increase in concordant Spanish DCI use (P < 0.01) and no inappropriate bouncebacks after implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated notable variability in the content and readability of our vascular access instruction templates. New DCI had strong usage and language concordance; continued use may decrease bouncebacks.

Emergency department bounceback characteristics for patients diagnosed with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The global healthcare burden of COVID-19 continues to rise. There is currently limited information regarding the disease progression and the need for hospitalizations in patients who present to the Emergency Department (ED) with minimal or no symptoms. OBJECTIVES: This study identifies bounceback rates and timeframes for patients who return to the ED due to COVID-19 after initial discharge on the date of testing. METHODS: Using the NorthShore University Health System's (NSUHS) Enterprise Data Warehouse (EDW), we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients who were tested positive for COVID-19 and were discharged home on the date of testing. A one-month follow-up period was included to ensure the capture of disease progression. RESULTS: Of 1883 positive cases with initially mild symptoms, 14.6% returned to the ED for complaints related to COVID-19. 56.9% of the mildly symptomatic bounceback patients were discharged on the return visit while 39.5% were admitted to the floor and 3.6% to the ICU. Of the 1120 positive cases with no initial symptoms, only four returned to the ED (0.26%) and only one patient was admitted. Median initial testing occurred on day 3 (2-5.6) of illness, and median ED bounceback occurred on day 9 (6.3-12.7). Our statistical model was unable to identify risk factors for ED bouncebacks. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 patients diagnosed with mild symptoms on initial presentation have a 14.6% rate of bounceback due to progression of illness.

A Comprehensive Review of the Outcome for Patients Readmitted to the ICU Following Trauma and Strategies to Decrease Readmission Rates.

In recent years, there has been an emphasis on evaluating the outcomes of patients who have experienced an intensive care unit (ICU) readmission. This may in part be due to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's Hospital Readmission Reduction Program which imposes financial sanctions on hospitals who have excessive readmission rates, informally known as bounceback rates. The financial cost associated with avoidable bounceback combined with the potentially preventable expenses can result in unnecessary financial strain. Within the hospital readmissions, there is a subset pertaining to unplanned readmission to the ICU. Although there have been studies regarding ICU bounceback, there are limited studies regarding ICU bounceback of trauma patients and even fewer proven strategies. Although many studies have concluded that respiratory complications were the most common factor influencing ICU readmissions, there is inconclusive evidence in terms of a broadly applicable strategy that would facilitate management of these patients. The purpose of this review is to highlight the outcomes of patients readmitted to the ICU and to provide an overview of possible strategies to aid in decreasing ICU readmission rates.

Preventing Early Bouncebacks to the Neurointensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Analysis and Quality Improvement Pilot.

BACKGROUND: Early unplanned readmissions of "bouncebacks" to intensive care units are a healthcare quality metric and result in higher mortality and greater cost. Few studies have examined bouncebacks to the neurointensive care unit (neuro-ICU), and we sought to design and implement a quality improvement pilot to reduce that rate. METHODS: First, we performed a retrospective chart review of 504 transfers to identify potential bounceback risk factors. Risk factors were assessed on the day of transfer by the transferring physician identifying patients as "high risk" or "low risk" for bounceback. "High-risk" patients underwent an enhanced transfer process emphasizing interdisciplinary communication and rapid assessment upon transfer during a 9-month pilot. RESULTS: Within the retrospective cohort, 34 of 504 (4.7%) transfers required higher levels of care within 48 h. Respiratory failure and sepsis/hypotension were the most common reasons for bounceback among this group. During the intervention, 8 of 225 (3.6%) transfers bounced back, all of who were labeled "high risk." Being "high risk" was associated with a risk of bounceback (OR not calculable, p = 0.02). Aspiration risk (OR 6.9; 95% CI 1.6-30, p = 0.010) and cardiac arrhythmia (OR 7.1; 95% CI 1.6-32, p = 0.01) were independent predictors of bounceback in multivariate analysis. Bounceback rates trended downward to 2.8% in the final phase (p for trend 0.09). Eighty-five percent of providers responded that the pilot should become standard of care. CONCLUSION: Patients at high risk for bounceback after transfer from the neuro-ICU can be identified using a simple tool. Early augmented multidisciplinary communication and care for high-risk patients may improve their management in the hospital.

Characteristics of patients and families who make early return visits to the pediatric emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to identify reasons why parents make early return visits, within 72 hours of discharge from a tertiary care pediatric emergency department (PED). A secondary objective was to investigate associated demographic and diagnostic variables. METHODS: A survey was conducted with a convenience sample of parents of children returning to the PED within 72 hours of discharge. A chart review was also completed for consented survey participants. Recruitment occurred from September 2005 to August 2006 at the Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. RESULTS: A total of 264 parents were approached to participate. Overall, 231 surveys were returned and 212 (92%) charts were reviewed. The overall rate of early return during the study period was 5.4%. More than half of parents stated that they returned because their child's condition worsened and many parents (66.7%) reported feeling stressed. Patients were typically under 6 years of age (67.4%), and most frequently diagnosed with infectious diseases (38.0%). Patients triaged with the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) as CTAS 2 (emergent) for initial visits were more likely to be admitted on return, regardless of age (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Variables associated with early returns included young age, diagnosis, triage acuity, and parental stress. Future variable definition should include a deeper exploration of modifiable factors such as parental stress and patient education. These next steps may help direct interventions and resources to address needs in this group and possibly pre-empt the need to return.