Characterizing Patients Presenting on Hospital Admission With Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: There are no systematic measures of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) in patients maintaining central venous catheters (CVCs) outside acute care hospitals. To clarify the burden of CLABSIs in these patients, we characterized patients with CLABSI present on hospital admission (POA). METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patients with CLABSI-POA in 3 health systems covering 11 hospitals across Maryland, Washington DC, and Missouri from November 2020 to October 2021. CLABSI-POA was defined using an adaptation of the acute care CLABSI definition. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were collected via record review. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to assess factors associated with the all-cause mortality rate within 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 461 patients were identified as having CLABSI-POA. CVCs were most commonly maintained in home infusion therapy (32.8%) or oncology clinics (31.2%). Enterobacterales were the most common etiologic agent (29.2%). Recurrent CLABSIs occurred in a quarter of patients (25%). Eleven percent of patients died during the hospital admission. Among patients with CLABSI-POA, mortality risk increased with age (hazard ratio vs age <20 years by age group: 20-44 years, 11.2 [95% confidence interval, 1.46-86.22]; 45-64 years, 20.88 [2.84-153.58]; ≥65 years, 22.50 [2.98-169.93]) and lack of insurance (2.46 [1.08-5.59]), and it decreased with CVC removal (0.57 [.39-.84]). CONCLUSIONS: CLABSI-POA is associated with significant in-hospital mortality risk. Surveillance is required to understand the burden of CLABSI in the community to identify targets for CLABSI prevention initiatives outside acute care settings.

In vitro activity of taurolidine against clinical Candida auris isolates: relevance to catheter-related bloodstream infections.

Candida auris is an evolving and concerning global threat. Of particular concern are bloodstream infections related to central venous catheters. We evaluated the activity of taurolidine, a broad-spectrum antimicrobial in catheter lock solutions, against 106 C. auris isolates. Taurolidine was highly active with a MIC50/MIC90 of 512/512 mg/L, over 20-fold lower than lock solution concentrations of ≥13,500 mg/L. Our data demonstrate a theoretical basis for taurolidine-based lock solutions for prevention of C. auris catheter-associated infections.

The applicability of the central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) criteria for the evaluation of bacteremia episodes in pediatric oncology patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the applicability of the central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in pediatric oncology patients. METHODS: Bacteremia episodes from 2020 to 2022 from a prospective cohort of pediatric oncology patients with a central venous catheter were included. Episodes were classified by three medical experts following the CLABSI criteria as either a CLABSI or non-CLABSI (i.e., contamination, other infection source, or mucosal barrier injury-laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection (MBI-LCBI)). Subsequently, they were asked if and why they (dis)agreed with this diagnosis following the criteria. The primary outcome was the percentage of episodes where the experts clinically disagreed with the diagnosis given following the CLABSI criteria. RESULTS: Overall, 84 bacteremia episodes in 71 patients were evaluated. Following the CLABSI criteria, 34 (40%) episodes were classified as CLABSIs and 50 (60%) as non-CLABSIs. In 11 (13%) cases the experts clinically disagreed with the diagnosis following the CLABSI criteria. The discrepancy between the CLABSI criteria and clinical diagnosis was significant; McNemar's test p < .01. Disagreement by the experts with the CLABSI criteria mostly occurred when the experts found an MBI-LCBI a more plausible cause of the bacteremia than a CLABSI due to the presence of a gram negative bacteremia (Pseudomonas aeruginosa n = 3) and/or mucositis. CONCLUSIONS: A discrepancy between the CLABSI criteria and the evaluation of the experts was observed. Adding Pseudomonas aeruginosa as an MBI pathogen and incorporating the presence of mucositis in the MBI-LCBI criteria, might increase the applicability.

Risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections during COVID-19 pandemic in intensive care patients in a tertiary care centre in Saudi Arabia.

This retrospective study compared central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates per 1 000 central line days, and overall mortality before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in adult, paediatric, and neonatal ICU patients at King Abdul-Aziz Medical City-Riyadh who had a central line and were diagnosed with CLABSI according to the National Healthcare Safety Network standard definition. The study spanned between January 2018 and December 2019 (pre-pandemic), and January 2020 and December 2021 (pandemic). SARS-CoV-2 was confirmed by positive RT-PCR testing. The study included 156 CLABSI events and 46 406 central line days; 52 and 22 447 (respectively) in pre-pandemic, and 104 and 23 959 (respectively) during the pandemic. CLABSI rates increased by 2.02 per 1 000 central line days during the pandemic period (from 2.32 to 4.34, p < 0.001). Likewise, overall mortality rates increased by 0.86 per 1 000 patient days (from 0.93 to 1.79, p = 0.003). Both CLABSI rates (6.18 vs. 3.7, p = 0.006) and overall mortality (2.72 vs. 1.47, p = 0.014) were higher among COVID-19 patients compared to non-COVID-19 patients. The pandemic was associated with a substantial increase in CLABSI-associated morbidity and mortality.

Mitigating risks in central line-associated bloodstream infection: a comprehensive insight into critical care nurses' knowledge, attitudes, barriers, and compliance.

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are a significant concern in intensive care units (ICUs) as they lead to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Fortunately, these infections are largely preventable through strict adherence to CLABSI prevention guidelines. Nurses play a critical role in preventing CLABSIs. AIM: This study aimed to investigate factors affecting critical care nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers related to implementing CLABSI prevention guidelines, and to predict factors influencing compliance with these guidelines. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted from April to May 30, 2023, with a convenience sample of 470 critical care nurses from ICUs across eight hospitals in Sana'a, Yemen. Data were collected using an observational checklist and self-administered questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, Independent Student's t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficient, multiple linear regression, and multilayer perceptron neural networks were performed. RESULTS: Critical care nurses exhibited low knowledge of CLABSI prevention guidelines, with compliance reaching an acceptable level. Despite the higher perceived barriers, the nurses demonstrated a positive attitude. Nurses with greater knowledge and positive attitudes displayed higher compliance levels. However, perceived barriers were negatively associated with knowledge and compliance. Notably, multilayer neural network analysis identified knowledge and perceived barriers as the strongest predictors of nurses' compliance. CONCLUSION: The current findings emphasize the need for multifaceted strategies to implement the CLABSI prevention guidelines. These strategies should address knowledge gaps, support positive attitudes, and address practical barriers faced by nurses to ensure successful implementation of CLABSI prevention.

Utility of Differential Time to Positivity in Diagnosing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Differential time to positivity (DTP), defined as pathogen growth at least 2 hours earlier from catheter versus paired peripheral blood cultures, is sometimes used to diagnose central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Previous studies assessing DTP, however, have been small, provided conflicting results, and did not assess heterogeneity across important subgroups. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the diagnostic characteristics of DTP for CLABSI using MEDLINE, Embase, WoS, CINAHL, LILACS, AMED, and the Cochrane database. Studies were included if they reported sensitivities, specificities, predictive values, likelihood ratios, or 2 × 2 tables of DTP for diagnosing CLABSI. Extracted data were analyzed by using forest plots, bivariate model meta-analysis, and QUADAS-2 quality assessment. RESULTS: We identified 274 records, of which 23 met the criteria for meta-analysis. Among 2526 suspected CLABSIs, DTP demonstrated a summary sensitivity of 81.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72.8%-87.7%), specificity of 91.8% (95% CI: 84.5%-95.8%), positive likelihood ratio of 9.89 (95% CI: 5.14-19.00), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.20 (95% CI: .14-.30). Covariate analysis based on catheter duration, study design, and patient immune status demonstrated no significant differences. However, DTP performed worse for Staphylococcus aureus (low sensitivity but high specificity) and Candida (high sensitivity but low specificity) compared to other organisms. CONCLUSIONS: DTP performs well in ruling CLABSIs in or out. Obtaining paired catheter and peripheral blood cultures for DTP when the infectious source is unclear may prevent unnecessary line removal and diagnostic tests. However, this must be balanced against higher contamination rates from catheter cultures.

Reducing the rate of central line-associated bloodstream infections; a quality improvement project.

BACKGROUND: The burden of central line-associated bloodstream infections is significant and has negative implications for healthcare, increasing morbidity and mortality risks, increasing inpatient hospital stays, and increasing the cost of hospitalization. Efforts to reduce the incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infections have utilized quality improvement projects that implement, measure, and monitor outcomes. However, variations in location, healthcare organization, patient risks, and practice gaps are key to the success of interventions and approaches. This study aims to evaluate interventions of a quality improvement project on the reduction of central line-associated bloodstream infection rates at a university teaching hospital. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of a quality improvement project that was implemented using the Plan-Do-Study-Act quality improvement cycle. Active surveillance of processes and outcomes was performed in the critical care areas; compliance to central line care bundles, and central line-associated bloodstream infections. Interrupted time series was used to analyze trends pre and post-intervention and regression modeling to estimate data segments preceding and succeeding the interventions. RESULTS: There were 350 central line insertions, 3912 catheter days, and 20 central line-associated bloodstream infection events during the intervention period. Compliance with central line care bundles was at 94%. There was a trend in the reduction of central line-associated bloodstream infections by 18% that did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.252). CONCLUSIONS: Improvement projects to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections face challenges and complexities associated with implementing interventions in real-world healthcare settings. There is a great need to continuously monitor, evaluate, readjust, and adapt interventions to achieve desired results, sustain improvements in patient outcomes, and investigate reasons for non-adherence as keys to achieving desired outcomes.

Unintended impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the rate of catheter related nosocomial infections and incidence of multiple drug resistance pathogens in three intensive care units not allocated to COVID-19 patients in a large teaching hospital.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of resistant hospital infections in the intensive care unit (ICU) increases mortality and antibiotic resistance. COVID-19 pandemic may have unintended impact on nosocomial infections (NI) and the prevalence of resistant microorganism. METHODOLOGY: The present non-interventional study was performed by a pre and a post survey each lasting 8 months before (March-October 2019) and after (March-October 2020) the onset of COVID-19 pandemic in three ICU's, not allocated to COVID-19 patients, in Nemazee Hospital, Shiraz, Iran. The rates of the following nosocomial infections were compared at pre- and post-pandemic period: ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) and incidence of multiple drug resistance (MDR) pathogens. RESULTS: Pre-pandemic and pandemic incidence of VAP was 23.5 and 17.2 cases per 1000 device-days, respectively; an absolute decrease of 27%. The main reason for the decrease in the rate of VAP during the pandemic was a significant decrease in the rate of VAP caused by Acinetobacter baumannii; from 39 to 17% in total VAP episodes. The rate of VAP associated with other microorganisms remained relatively unchanged from 14.2 cases in pre-pandemic period to 14.3 cases per 1000 MV-days during the pandemic (P = 0.801). Pre-pandemic incidence of CLABSI was 7.3 cases and, in pandemic period, was 6.5 cases per 1000 device-days (IRR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.43-1.73, P = 0.703). Pre-pandemic incidence of CAUTI was 2 and in pandemic period, was 1.4 cases per 1000 device-days (IRR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.22-1.98, P = 0.469). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study showed a decrease in the incidence of VAP in critically ill non-COVID-19 patients during the pandemic compared to before the pandemic, especially regarding Acinetobacter baumannii.

The impact of central line bundles on the timing of catheter-associated bloodstream infections and their microbiological distribution in critically ill children.

Catheter-associated bloodstream infection, also known as CLABSI, is the most serious consequence of central venous access devices. These infections increase the risk of mortality and morbidity. The use of central line bundles in clinical settings is increasing worldwide with the purpose of lowering the risk of catheter-associated bloodstream infections. In this study, we investigated the effect of implementing a central line bundle for the prevention of CLABSIs, the distribution of pathogens, and the duration of time it took for CLABSIs to develop in patients who had subclavian-inserted central venous catheters. This research project was a cross-sectional study investigation carried out in a pediatric tertiary teaching hospital. Participants consisted of children who had been admitted to the pediatric critical care unit with subclavian catheters during a period of 13 years. We compared the prebundle period with the bundle period for CLABSI specifically focusing on the time to infection, the number of polymicrobial infections, the proportion of Candida parapsilosis, and the percentage of Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). The "prebundle period" included the period from May 2007 to May 2013, and the "bundle period" included the period from June 2013 to June 2020. Throughout the course of the study, a total of 286 cases of CLABSI were documented. Among these patients, 141 (49.3%) had CLABSIs associated with subclavian catheters. During the prebundle period, 55 CLABSIs were diagnosed in 5235 central line days, with an overall rate of 10.5 CLABSIs per 1000 central line days; after the implementation of central line bundle, 86 CLABSIs were diagnosed in 12,450 CL days, with an overall rate of 3.6 CLABSIs per 1000 CL days. This showed a statistically significantly lower rate in the bundle period (p = 0.0126). In the prebundle period, the mean time to develop CLABSI was 15 days, whereas during the bundle period, the mean time to develop CLABSI was 27.9 days, a significantly longer time to onset (p = 0.001). While the percentage of other microorganisms was not statistically different between the prebundle and bundle periods (p > 0.05), the percentage of C. parapsilosis was significantly higher in the prebundle period (p = 0.001).   Conclusion: The results of this study imply that the use of central line bundles not only reduces the incidence of CLABSI but also delays the time to which CLABSI patients acquire an infection. In addition, as a direct consequence of the CLB, the number of CLABSIs caused by gram-positive cocci did not increase, while the proportion of CLABSIs caused by C. parapsilosis decreased. What is Known: • The most significant negative consequence of central venous access devices is catheter-associated bloodstream infections. • "Care bundles" for CLABSI prevention have been reported to reduce the CLABSI rate. What is New: • Consider what would happen if the "Care bundle" failed to prevent CLABSI. • The findings of this study imply that using central line bundles not only reduces the risk of CLABSI but also extends the time it takes for patients to develop CLABSI. While the number of CLABSIs caused by gram-positive cocci did not increase as a direct result of CLB, the rate of CLABSIs caused by C. parapsilosis, which has recently become a major problem, has decreased.

Cyanoacrylate glue as part of a new bundle to decrease neonatal PICC-related complications.

A "bundle" is defined as a combination of evidence-based interventions that, if followed collectively and reliably, improve patient outcomes. The aim of this quasi-experimental study, conducted in a level-III NICU in Belgium, was to assess the impact of central line dressing and maintenance bundle implementation on the rate of catheter-related mechanical complications. We performed a quality improvement (QI) project. Prior to bundle implementation, neonatal PICC lines were secured by Steri-Strip® and occlusive dressing. We implemented a new PICC bundle consisting of the use of glue, sutureless device (Griplock®), and a transparent dressing to secure the catheter to the skin. We compared the rate of infections, mechanical complications, and dislocations before and after bundle implementation (periods 1 and 2, respectively). The use of glue resulted in a significantly decreased rate of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) (p < 0.001), dislocations, and mechanical complications (p < 0.0001). During period 2, there was a significant increase for the average number of days the catheter stayed in place (p < 0.05). We did not observe catheter breakage or patient skin irritations attributable to the use of glue (not even in ELBW infants). CONCLUSION: The implementation of the new bundle to secure neonatal PICCs in our NICU was associated with a significant reduction in CLABSI and dislodgment rates, without glue-related complications. Active surveillance of CVC placement procedure, positioning, and management, as well as analysis of related complications is crucial for improving patient safety. Continuous implementation of up-to-date central line bundles based on best practice recommendations is a key for quality improvement in NICUs. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Stable vascular access is crucial in the NICU. Neonatal PICC securement issues can have serious consequences and are associated with device failure. WHAT IS NEW: • Catheter securement with tissue adhesive is safe and effective in reducing failure and complication rates in the neonatal population.

Venous Access: National Guideline and Registry Development (VANGUARD): Advancing Patient-Centered Venous Access Care Through the Development of a National Coordinated Registry Network.

There are over 8 million central venous access devices inserted each year, many in patients with chronic conditions who rely on central access for life-preserving therapies. Central venous access device-related complications can be life-threatening and add tens of billions of dollars to health care costs, while their incidence is most likely grossly mis- or underreported by medical institutions. In this communication, we review the challenges that impair retention, exchange, and analysis of data necessary for a meaningful understanding of critical events and outcomes in this clinical domain. The difficulty is not only with data extraction and harmonization from electronic health records, national surveillance systems, or other health information repositories where data might be stored. The problem is that reliable and appropriate data are not recorded, or falsely recorded, at least in part because policy, payment, penalties, proprietary concerns, and workflow burdens discourage completeness and accuracy. We provide a roadmap for the development of health care information systems and infrastructure that address these challenges, framed within the context of research studies that build a framework of standardized terminology, decision support, data capture, and information exchange necessary for the task. This roadmap is embedded in a broader Coordinated Registry Network Learning Community, and facilitated by the Medical Device Epidemiology Network, a Public-Private Partnership sponsored by the US Food and Drug Administration, with the scope of advancing methods, national and international infrastructure, and partnerships needed for the evaluation of medical devices throughout their total life cycle.

Impact of intensified prevention measures on rates of hospital-acquired bloodstream infection in medical-surgical intensive care units, Israel, 2011 to 2019.

BackgroundCentral line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is among the most common preventable infectious complications in patients in intensive care units (ICU). In 2011, the Israel National Center for Infection Control initiated a nationwide CLABSI prevention programme.AimTo evaluate the impact of different components of the programme on CLABSI and non-CLABSI rates in medical-surgical ICUs.MethodsWe included data collected from all 29 medical-surgical ICUs in Israel from November 2011 to December 2019. The study period was divided into three phases: I (baseline, initial CLABSI prevention guidelines introduced, initial feedback on rates provided), II (initial guidelines widely implemented, surveillance undertaken, feedback continued) and III (after implementation of additional prevention measures). Interrupted time series analysis was used to compare CLABSI and non-CLABSI rates during the three phases.ResultsThe pooled mean (SD) incidence of CLABSI per 1,000 central line-days dropped from 7.4 (0.38) in phase I to 2.1 (0.13) in phase III (p < 0.001). The incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.51-0.79) between phases I and II, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.59-1.02) between phases II and III. The pooled mean (SD) incidence of non-CLABSI per 1,000 patient-days declined from 5.3 (0.24) in phase I to 3.4 (0.13) in phase III (p < 0.001).ConclusionNational CLABSI prevention guidelines, surveillance and feedback resulted in significant reductions in CLABSI and non-CLABSI rates. In the wake of further interventions, significant reduction was achieved in ICUs reporting improvement in the uptake of additional prevention measures.

Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) foam improves adherence, satisfaction, and maintains central line associated infection rates compared to CHG wipes in pediatric hematology-oncology and bone marrow transplant patients.

CHG-based hygiene methods are often a component of daily hygiene bundles to prevent central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs) in pediatric hematology-oncology patients; however, adherence with 2% CHG wipes was inconsistent within our institution, risking infection for immunocompromised patients. A new 4% CHG foam method offers an alternative and is applied while bathing, as opposed to wipes used 1 h after bathing. An initial cohort of 24 high-risk oncology and bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients agreed to use 4% CHG foam in place of wipes, and then answered surveys to describe their experiences. Ninety-two percent preferred foam over wipes and were more likely to use the foam moving forward. CHG foam was then made available as an option to all patients in need of central line care upon admission to the hospital. Hygiene bundles in the electronic medical record were reviewed to measure baseline adherence rates. Random audits by nursing administration prospectively assessed CHG adherence. CLABSI data were collected prospectively with routine quality metric reports. Results were analyzed using run charts and u-charts, respectively. Hematology-Oncology unit adherence rates remained at a higher rate of adherence, and BMT unit adherence rates increased from an average of 55%-81.6% (p < 0.001). Primary CLABSIs remained rare events (average <1/1000 CVL days). On cost analysis, utilizing CHG foam results in an annual savings estimate of $40,000 for a 24-bed unit. In conclusion, 4% CHG foam provides a cost-effective and patient-preferred option for daily hygiene that maintains CLABSI preventative efforts.

Evaluating the efficacy of a programme to educate nurses on CLABSI linked to total parenteral nutrition administration.

BACKGROUND: There is a major need to improve the knowledge and practice of critical care nurses in India regarding central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), which is a serious potential complication of total parenteral nutrition (TPN). OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a skills competency programme; assess knowledge and practice of critical care nurses regarding prevention of CLABSI due to TPN administration; evaluate the effectiveness of the programme; find correlation between knowledge and practice scores. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental: non-equivalent pre-test post-test design. SETTINGS: Two hospitals in Meerut, India. PARTICIPANTS: 80 nurses (40 in the control group in one hospital, 40 in the experimental group in another hospital). Inclusion criteria: staff nurses from critical care units only, who were present at the time of data collection and willing to participate. Exclusion criteria: staff nurses with <6 months' work experience. METHOD: Knowledge was assessed using a structured knowledge questionnaire and interpretation scoring. To assess practice, the OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) method was used with four stations and interpretation scoring. The skills-competency programme was delivered to the experimental group only. The post test was conducted with both groups. RESULTS: The post-test knowledge and practice scores in the control group were: mean=12.55; SD=2.57 and mean=21.82; SD= 5.13 respectively. In the experimental group, the post-test knowledge and practice scores were: mean=23.75; SD=1.75 and mean=38.9; SD=2.02 respectively. The unpaired t-test in post-test knowledge between the control and experimental groups was t=22.78, with P=0.0001 at df 39, 0.05 level of significance, 95% CI; for post-test practice the results were, t=19.59, with P=0.0001 at df 39, 0.05 level of significance, 95% CI. Correlation between post-test knowledge and the practice score was r=0.7 (P<0.05), 95% CI. CONCLUSION: There was a significant difference in post-test knowledge and practice scores, therefore, the skills competency programme was effective. It also highlighted areas that institutions should focus on for effective training and professional development programmes.

The Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on Healthcare-Associated Infections.

BACKGROUND: The profound changes wrought by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on routine hospital operations may have influenced performance on hospital measures, including healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). We aimed to evaluate the association between COVID-19 surges and HAI and cluster rates. METHODS: In 148 HCA Healthcare-affiliated hospitals, from 1 March 2020 to 30 September 2020, and a subset of hospitals with microbiology and cluster data through 31 December 2020, we evaluated the association between COVID-19 surges and HAIs, hospital-onset pathogens, and cluster rates using negative binomial mixed models. To account for local variation in COVID-19 pandemic surge timing, we included the number of discharges with a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis per staffed bed per month. RESULTS: Central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSI), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia increased as COVID-19 burden increased. There were 60% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23-108%) more CLABSI, 43% (95% CI: 8-90%) more CAUTI, and 44% (95% CI: 10-88%) more cases of MRSA bacteremia than expected over 7 months based on predicted HAIs had there not been COVID-19 cases. Clostridioides difficile infection was not significantly associated with COVID-19 burden. Microbiology data from 81 of the hospitals corroborated the findings. Notably, rates of hospital-onset bloodstream infections and multidrug resistant organisms, including MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococcus, and Gram-negative organisms, were each significantly associated with COVID-19 surges. Finally, clusters of hospital-onset pathogens increased as the COVID-19 burden increased. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 surges adversely impact HAI rates and clusters of infections within hospitals, emphasizing the need for balancing COVID-related demands with routine hospital infection prevention.

Incidence of central line associated bloodstream infection following central venous catheter placement in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are costly and can be lifethreatening. Many efforts have been taken to minimize the rates of infection, including sterile technique, pre-packaged sterile kits, site selection, and replacing infected or potentially infected lines. This study aims to identify the incidence of CLABSI following catheter placement in the ED, and to compare rates of CLABSI among ED and ICU placed catheters. METHODS: This retrospective chart review was conducted at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Eligibility criteria included patients who had CVC placed in the ED or ICU from January 1st, 2018, through July 31st, 2019 who were 18 years or older. RESULTS: Among 1810 patients with central lines, 1254 met eligibility criteria. There was no significant difference in infection rates when comparing lines placed in the ED (2.5 per 1000 catheter days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8 to 5.8) compared to those placed in the ICU (4.6 per 1000 catheter days, 95% CI 3.0 to 6.8). The odds of CLABSI was not associated with age, sex, indication, site, location nor which type of health care professional (HCP) placed the line. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the incidence of infection was no different between lines placed in the ED compared to the ICU.

The impact of nurse practice environment on patient outcomes and mediation effects of registered nurse outcomes in Middle Eastern acute care hospitals: A cross-sectional study.

AIMS: Examining associations between unit nurse practice environment and four patient outcomes (catheter-associated urinary tract infections [CAUTIs], central line-associated bloodstream infections [CLABSIs], falls, and pressure injuries) and mediation effects of three RN unit workgroup outcomes (job enjoyment, psychological safety, and intent to stay at 1 and 3 years) on these relationships. METHODS: A cross-sectional correlational design, using the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators® (NDNQI®) unit-level data from 2018 on inpatient units from seven Middle Eastern hospitals. Ninety units were included, where the sample of units for each patient outcome varied (n = 73-90) based on outcome data availability. RESULTS: Higher unit nurse practice environment scores were significantly associated with higher CLABSIs (exp(b) = 8.181, 95 % CI = [2.204, 30.371], p = .002) and lower pressure injuries (exp(b) = 0.153, 95 % CI = [0.032, 0.730], p = .018). However, mediation analysis showed no significant direct effects of unit nurse practice environment on patient outcomes. Mediation analysis showed that nurses' psychological safety-respect significantly mediated the relationship between unit nurse practice environment and CAUTIs (ß = 2.620, p = .013, 95 % bcb CI = [0.837, 5.070]). Nurses' intent to stay at 1-year and psychological safety-respect had significant direct effects (ß = -4.784, p = .017 and ß = 3.073, p = .012, respectively) on CAUTIs. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse practice environment was significantly associated with two patient outcomes and a mediation role of RN outcomes was supported when examining one patient outcome. Future research should examine these relationships in a larger sample for replication. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Although nurse practice environment can impact patient outcomes directly, nurse outcomes play a crucial role in mediating this relationship.

Chlorhexidine (di)gluconate locking device for central line infection prevention in intensive care unit patients: a multi-unit, pilot randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are at risk for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) with significant attributable mortality and increased hospital length of stay, readmissions, and costs. Chlorhexidine (di)gluconate (CHG) is used as a disinfectant for central line insertion; however, the feasibility and efficacy of using CHG as a locking solution is unknown. METHODS: Patients with a central venous access device (CVAD) in situ were randomized to standard care or a CHG lock solution (CHGLS) within 72 hours of ICU admission. The CHG solution was instilled in the lumen of venous catheters not actively infusing. CVAD blood cultures were taken at baseline and every 48 hours. The primary outcome was feasibility including recruitment rate, consent rate, protocol adherence, and staff uptake. Secondary outcomes included CVAD colonization, bacteraemia, and clinical endpoints. RESULTS: Of 3,848 patients screened, 122 were eligible for the study and consent was obtained from 82.0% of the patients or substitute decision makers approached. Fifty participants were allocated to each group. Tracking logs indicated that the CHGLS was used per protocol 408 times. Most nurses felt comfortable using the CHGLS. The proportion of central line colonization was significantly higher in the standard care group with 40 (29%) versus 26 (18.7%) in the CHGLS group (P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Using a device that delivers CHG into CVADs was feasible in the ICU. Findings from this trial will inform a full-scale randomized controlled trial and provide preliminary data on the effectiveness of CHGLS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03309137, registered on October 13, 2017.

Chlorhexidine gluconate bathing in children with cancer or those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial from the Children's Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, information regarding whether daily bathing with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) reduces central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in pediatric oncology patients and those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is limited. METHODS: In the current multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients aged ≥2 months and <22 years with cancer or those undergoing allogeneic HCT were randomized 1:1 to once-daily bathing with 2% CHG-impregnated cloths or control cloths for 90 days. The primary outcome was CLABSI. Secondary endpoints included total positive blood cultures, acquisition of resistant organisms, and acquisition of cutaneous staphylococcal isolates with an elevated CHG mean inhibitory concentration. RESULTS: The study was stopped early because of poor accrual. Among the 177 enrolled patients, 174 were considered as evaluable (88 were randomized to the CHG group and 86 were randomized to the control group). The rate of CLABSI per 1000 central line days in the CHG group was 5.44 versus 3.10 in the control group (risk difference, 2.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-4.69 [P = .049]). Post hoc conditional power analysis demonstrated a 0.2% chance that the results would have favored CHG had the study fully enrolled. The rate of total positive blood cultures did not differ between groups (risk difference, 2.37; 95% confidence interval, -0.41 to 5.14 [P = .078]). The number of patients demonstrating the new acquisition of resistant organisms did not differ between groups (P = .54). Patients in the CHG group were found to be more likely to acquire cutaneous staphylococcal isolates with an elevated CHG mean inhibitory concentration (P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: The data from the current study do not support the use of routine CHG bathing in children with cancer or those undergoing allogeneic HCT.

Central venous catheter-related infections in hematology and oncology: 2020 updated guidelines on diagnosis, management, and prevention by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO).

Cancer patients frequently require central venous catheters for therapy and parenteral nutrition and are at high risk of central venous catheter-related infections (CRIs). Moreover, CRIs prolong hospitalization, cause an excess in resource utilization and treatment cost, often delay anti-cancer treatment, and are associated with a significant increase in mortality in cancer patients. We therefore summoned a panel of experts by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) and updated our previous guideline on CRIs in cancer patients. After conducting systematic literature searches on PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases, video- and meeting-based consensus discussions were held. In the presented guideline, we summarize recommendations on definition, diagnosis, management, and prevention of CRIs in cancer patients including the grading of strength of recommendations and the respective levels of evidence. This guideline supports clinicians and researchers alike in the evidence-based decision-making in the management of CRIs in cancer patients.