Impact of comorbidities in COPD clinical control criteria. The CLAVE study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) frequently coexists with other chronic diseases, namely comorbidities. They negatively impact prognosis, exacerbations and quality of life in COPD patients. However, no studies have been performed to explore the impact of these comorbidities on COPD clinical control criteria. RESEARCH QUESTION: Determine the relationship between individualized comorbidities and COPD clinical control criteria. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Observational, multicenter, cross-sectional study performed in Spain involving 4801 patients with severe COPD (< 50 predicted forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1%]). Clinical control criteria were defined by the combination of COPD assessment test (CAT) scores (≤16 vs ≥17) and exacerbations in the previous three months (none vs ≥1). Binary logistic regression adjusted by age and FEV1% was performed to identify comorbidities potentially associated with the lack of control of COPD. Secondary endpoints were the relationship between individualized comorbidities with COPD assessment test and exacerbations within the last three months. RESULTS: Most frequent comorbidities were arterial hypertension (51.2%), dyslipidemia (36.0%), diabetes (24.9%), obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (14.9%), anxiety (14.1%), heart failure (11.6%), depression (11.8%), atrial fibrillation (11.5%), peripheral arterial vascular disease (10.4%) and ischemic heart disease (10.1%). After age and FEV1% adjustment, comorbidities related to lack of clinical control were cardiovascular diseases (heart failure, peripheral vascular disease and atrial fibrillation; p < 0.0001), psychologic disorders (anxiety and depression; all p < 0.0001), metabolic diseases (diabetes, arterial hypertension and abdominal obesity; all p < 0.001), sleep disorders (p < 0.0001), anemia (p = 0.015) and gastroesophageal reflux (p < 0.0001). These comorbidities were also related to previous exacerbations and COPD assessment test scores. INTERPRETATION: Comorbidities are frequent in patients with severe COPD, negatively impacting COPD clinical control criteria. They are related to health-related quality of life measured by the COPD assessment test. Our results suggest that comorbidities should be investigated and treated in these patients to improve their clinical control. TAKE-HOME POINTS: Study question: What is the impact of comorbidities on COPD clinical control criteria? RESULTS: Among 4801 patients with severe COPD (27.5% controlled and 72.5% uncontrolled), after adjustment by age and FEV1%, comorbidities related to lack of clinical control were cardiovascular diseases (heart failure, peripheral vascular disease and atrial fibrillation; p < 0.0001), psychologic disorders (anxiety and depression; p < 0.0001), metabolic diseases (diabetes, arterial hypertension and abdominal obesity; p < 0.001), obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (p < 0.0001), anaemia (p = 0.015) and gastroesophageal reflux (p < 0.0001), which were related to previous exacerbations and COPD assessment test scores. INTERPRETATION: Comorbidities are related to health-related quality of life measured by the COPD assessment test scores and history of exacerbations in the previous three months.

Chronic Airways Assessment Test: psychometric properties in patients with asthma and/or COPD.

BACKGROUND: No short patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments assess overall health status across different obstructive lung diseases. Thus, the wording of the introduction to the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) was modified to permit use in asthma and/or COPD. This tool is called the Chronic Airways Assessment Test (CAAT). METHODS: The psychometric properties of the CAAT were evaluated using baseline data from the NOVELTY study (NCT02760329) in patients with physician-assigned asthma, asthma + COPD or COPD. Analyses included exploratory/confirmatory factor analyses, differential item functioning and analysis of construct validity. Responses to the CAAT and CAT were compared in patients with asthma + COPD and those with COPD. RESULTS: CAAT items were internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha: > 0.7) within each diagnostic group (n = 510). Models for structural and measurement invariance were strong. Tests of differential item functioning showed small differences between asthma and COPD in individual items, but these were not consistent in direction and had minimal overall impact on the total score. The CAAT and CAT were highly consistent when assessed in all NOVELTY patients who completed both (N = 277, Pearson's correlation coefficient: 0.90). Like the CAT itself, CAAT scores correlated moderately (0.4-0.7) to strongly (> 0.7) with other PRO measures and weakly (< 0.4) with spirometry measures. CONCLUSIONS: CAAT scores appear to reflect the same health impairment across asthma and COPD, making the CAAT an appropriate PRO instrument for patients with asthma and/or COPD. Its brevity makes it suitable for use in clinical studies and routine clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02760329.

The predictive value of baseline symptom score and the peripheral CD4CD8 double-positive T cells in patients with AECOPD.

BACKGROUND: Accurate prediction of acute exacerbation helps select patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for individualized therapy. The potential of lymphocyte subsets to function as clinical predictive factors for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) remains uncertain. METHODS: In this single-center prospective cohort study with a 2-year follow-up, 137 patients aged 51 to 79 with AECOPD were enrolled. We examined the prognostic indicators of AECOPD by analyzing lymphocyte subsets and baseline symptom score. Furthermore, a predictive model was constructed to anticipate the occurrence of respiratory failure in patients experiencing AECOPD. RESULTS: The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score combined with home oxygen therapy and CD4+CD8+ T cells% to predict respiratory failure in AECOPD patients were the best (the area under the curves [AUC] = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.70-0.86, P < 0.0001, sensitivity: 60.4%, specificity: 86.8%). The nomogram model, the C index, calibration plot, decision curve analysis, and clinical impact curve all indicate the model's good predictive performance. The observed decrease in the proportions of CD4+CD8+ T cells appears to be correlated with more unfavorable outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram model, developed to forecast respiratory failure in patients with AECOPD, utilizing variables such as home oxygen therapy, CAT score, and CD4+CD8+ T cells%, demonstrated a high level of practicality in clinical settings. CD4+CD8+ T cells serve as a reliable and readily accessible predictor of AECOPD, exhibiting greater stability compared to other indices. It is less susceptible to subjective influences from patients or physicians. This model facilitated personalized estimations, enabling healthcare professionals to make informed decisions regarding preventive interventions.

The adherence to and utility of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines for treating COPD among pulmonary specialists: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the evidence-based guidelines promoted by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), the overuse of prescription drugs to manage COPD, particularly inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), remains a persistent challenge. In this real-world study, we evaluated how patients with COPD were divided into ABCD groups based on the 2017 GOLD guidelines, determined the rate of adherence to the GOLD treatment recommendations, described the rate of ICS usage, and determined the rate of triple therapy (TT) prescription. METHODS: The charts of 2291 patients diagnosed with COPD were retrospectively analyzed, of which 1438 matched the eligibility criteria. RESULTS: The average patient age was 69.6 ± 10.9 years; 52% of patients were female. The average COPD assessment test (CAT) score was 18.3 ± 9.1. The ABCD breakdown was as follows: group A 19.5%, group B 64.1%, group C 1.8%, and group D 14.6%. All groups, except group D, showed discordance in COPD treatment relative to the proposed GOLD guidelines. Only 18.9% of group A and 26% of group B were treated in concordance with the guidelines. TT was primarily used in group D (63.3%) and overused in groups A (30.6%) and B (47.8%). ICS was overused in all groups, particularly in groups A (56.2%) and B (67.3%). CONCLUSION: Studies from the last decade have consistently revealed a lack of conformity between what physicians prescribe and what GOLD guidelines recommend. The excessive usage of ICS, which continues despite all the associated adverse effects and the attributable costs, is concerning. The awareness of GOLD guidelines among primary care physicians (PCPs) and respiratory specialists needs to be improved.

COPD exacerbations and patient-reported outcomes according to post-bronchodilator FEV1 - a post-hoc analysis of pooled data.

BACKGROUND: Management strategies of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) need to be tailored to the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), exacerbations, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of individual patients. In this study, we analyzed the association and correlation between the FEV1, exacerbations, and PROs of patients with stable COPD. METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from two cross-sectional studies that were previously conducted in Malaysia from 2017 to 2019, the results of which had been published separately. The parameters measured included post-bronchodilator FEV1 (PB-FEV1), exacerbations, and scores of modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD (SGRQ-c). Descriptive, association, and correlation statistics were used. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-four patients were included in the analysis. The PB-FEV1 predicted was < 30% in 85 (22.7%), 30-49% in 142 (38.0%), 50-79% in 111 (29.7%), and ≥ 80% in 36 (9.6%) patients. Patients with PB-FEV1 < 30% predicted had significantly more COPD exacerbations than those with PB-FEV1 30-49% predicted (p < 0.001), 50-79% predicted (p < 0.001), and ≥ 80% predicted (p = 0.002). The scores of mMRC, CAT, and SGRQ-c were not significantly higher in patients with more severe airflow limitation based on PB-FEV1 (p = 0.121-0.271). The PB-FEV1 predicted had significant weak negative correlations with exacerbations (r = - 0.182, p < 0.001), mMRC (r = - 0.121, p = 0.020), and SGRQ-c scores (r = - 0.114, p = 0.028). There was a moderate positive correlation between COPD exacerbations and scores of mMRC, CAT, and SGRQ-c (r = 0.407-0.482, all p < 0.001). There were significant strong positive correlations between mMRC score with CAT (r = 0.727) and SGRQ-c scores (r = 0.847), and CAT score with SGRQ-c score (r = 0.851) (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In COPD patients, different severity of airflow limitation was not associated with significant differences in the mMRC, CAT, and SGRQ-c scores. Exacerbations were significantly more frequent in patients with very severe airflow limitation only. The correlation between airflow limitation with exacerbations, mMRC, and SGRQ-c was weak.

COPD Assessment Test as a Screening Tool for Anxiety and Depression in Stable COPD Patients: A Feasibility Study.

Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients but are often under-diagnosed. We aimed to assess the suitability of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) in screening anxiety and depression in patients with COPD. Stable COPD patients from a cross-sectional observational study were assessed by CAT. Anxiety and depression were identified using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), respectively. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used to identify factors associated with anxiety or depression and to calculate the predictive values. A total of 530 stable COPD patients were enrolled and of those, the proportions of anxiety and depression were 17.0% and 21.5%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratios of the CAT for the presence of anxiety and depression were 1.094 (95%CI: 1.057-1.131) and 1.143 (95%CI: 1.104-1.183), respectively. The CAT score had a significant predictive value for the presence of anxiety (AUC = 0.709) and depression (AUC = 0.791) with an optimum cutoff score of 15. However, the psychometric properties of CAT were undesirable, presenting high negative predictive value (NPV) but low positive predictive value (PPV). Among CAT items, analysis further showed that non-respiratory CAT components were superior to respiratory components in identifying both anxiety and depression. Our results indicated that CAT is more useful to exclude anxiety and depression rather than detect them.

Association between annual change in FEV1 and comorbidities or impulse oscillometry in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation. The decline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) is considered to be one of the most important outcome measures for evaluating disease progression. However, the only intervention proven to improve COPD prognosis is smoking cessation. This study therefore investigated the factors associated with annual FEV1 decline in COPD. METHODS: This retrospective study followed up 65 patients treated for COPD for 5 years: 13 current smokers and 52 former smokers, 25 with pneumonia, 24 with asthma, 18 with cancer, and 17 with cardiovascular disease. The patients were divided into groups based on clinical cutoff parameters of the impulse oscillometry system (IOS): 11 high and 54 low R5, 8 high and 57 low R20, 21 high and 44 low R5-R20, 26 high and 39 low X5, 38 high and 27 low Fres, and 36 high and 29 low AX. We investigated whether the decline in FEV1 was associated with comorbidities and IOS parameters. RESULTS: The annual change in FEV1 over 5 years was significantly affected by smoking status (current - 66.2 mL/year vs. former - 5.7 mL/year, p < 0.01), pneumonia (with - 31.5 mL/year vs. without - 8.9 mL/year, p < 0.05), asthma (with - 30.2 mL/year vs. - 10.8 mL/year, p < 0.01), but not by cancer and cardiovascular disease. In the groups defined by IOS results, only the high AX group had significantly more annual decline in FEV1 and %FEV1 than the low AX group (- 22.1 vs. - 12.8, p < 0.05 and - 0.20 vs. 0.40, p < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Continuing smoking as well as complications in pneumonia and asthma would be risk factors for the progression of COPD. AX might be a suitable parameter to predict the prognosis of patients with COPD.

Prediction of exercise-induced desaturation in COPD patients without resting hypoxemia: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: There is no universally accepted criterion for assessing exercise-induced desaturation (EID). The purpose of this study is to compare the two methods regularly used for determining EID in COPD patients, as well as to explore the risk factors and predictors related to EID. METHODS: The 6MWT was performed with continuous SpO2 monitoring on patients with stable COPD. Using two methods (method A: "SpO2rest-SpO2min ≥ 4% and/or SpO2min < 90%", method B: "SpO2rest-SpO2end ≥ 4% and/or SpO2end < 90%") as EID determination criteria to assess the incidence of EID. The differences and consistency of the two methods are compared. Moreover, we collected data through the pulmonary function test, mMRC dyspnea score, COPD assessment test, BODE index and CT-defined emphysema. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors affecting the EID. For the parameters that predict EID in 6MWT, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed. RESULTS: The analysis included 124 patients. The overall incidence of EID was 62.1% by using method A as the criterion and 51.6% by method B. All of the EID patients found by method B were included in the EID patients identified by method A, as well as 13 new-EID patients. The difference in diagnostic outcomes between the two approaches was not statistically significant (P > 0.05), but they were in excellent agreement (Kappa = 0.807, P = 0.001). Logistic regression analyses found that DLCO SB% pred, DLCO/VA% pred, CAT score, mean density, PD15, emphysema volume and %LAA were significant determinants of the EID. For predicting EID, the ROC analysis produced AUC and cutoffs of 0.689 and 50.45% (DLCO SB% pred), 0.707 and 75.0% (DLCO/VA% pred), 0.727 and 15 points (CAT score), 0.691 and - 955.00HU (PD15), 0.671 and - 856.46HU (mean density), 0.668 and 338.14 ml (emphysema volume) and 0.656 and 7.63% (%LAA), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Two methods evaluating EID in this research are in a good agreement, method A can find more EID patients by focusing on SpO2min. When conditions are constrained, it is also sufficient to assess EID in COPD patients by method B. In terms of the predictors of EID, DLCO SB% pred, DLCO/VA% pred, CAT score and CT-defined emphysema are all statistically significant test variables to determine EID.

Telehealth mitigates COPD disease progression compared to standard of care: a randomized controlled crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: We showed excellent adherence and satisfaction with our telehealth care (TC) approach for COPD. Here, the results of a consecutive randomized controlled trial are presented. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to TC or standard care (SC). During TC, patients answered six daily questions online, and focused on the early recognition of exacerbations, in addition to SC. RESULTS: The mean increase in COPD assessment test (CAT) was 1.8 vs. 3.6 points/year in the TC and SC groups, respectively (P = 0.0015). Satisfaction with care (VAS) at baseline was 8.2; at the end of SC, 8.5 (P = 0.062); and after TC, 8.8 (P < 0.001). We detected significantly more moderate exacerbations during TC. CONCLUSION: Whilst receiving TC, the slope of the CAT increase - an indicator of the naturally progressive course of COPD - was reduced by 50%. Satisfaction with care increased with TC. The higher number of detected moderate exacerbations probably indicates a higher diagnostic sensitivity than without TC.

Association between body mass index and patient-reported-outcome questionnaire scores (CAT™, ACT™, mMRC dyspnoea scale, IPAQ) in Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan: results of the CORE study.

BACKGROUND: The overweight/obese population (evaluated by a body mass index, BMI) represents a global health problem and contributes to the development of various chronic diseases. In this epidemiological study we evaluated this relationship by analyzing patient-reported questionnaires related to respiratory function, physical activity and BMI. METHODS: In 2013-2015, adult residents of selected cities were enrolled to this study in: Ukraine (M/F: 403/561), Kazakhstan (M/F = 348/597) and Azerbaijan (M/F: 389/544). Height was measured using a vertical measuring board, and body weight was measured by using portable digital scales. All participants were interviewed using CAT™, mMRC scale and IPAQ; respondents who also reported wheezing or whistling chest sounds during the previous 12 months additionally ACT™. RESULTS: 45.4% of respondents in Ukraine, 47.6% in Kazakhstan and 54.9% of respondents in Azerbaijan were found to be overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2). The mean CAT™ total score among this population versus those respondents with a normal weight was 5.2 versus 3.6 (Ukraine, p < 0.001), 4.2 versus 2.9 (Kazakhstan, p < 0.001) and 5.9 versus 4.3 (Azerbaijan, p < 0.001). The number of respondents without airflow limitations (mMRC score 0) among overweight/obese respondents versus normal weight respondents was 298 (68.2%) versus 456 (86.7%) in Ukraine, 261 (58.1%) versus 387 (78.2%) in Kazakhstan and 343 (67.1%) versus 345 (82.3%) in Azerbaijan. The ACT™ total score between overweight/obese respondents and normal weight respondents was not statistically different. IPAQ showed a tendency towards a higher proportion of "low activity" results (compared to "moderate" and "high") in the overweight/obese subgroup (24.7% vs. 23.8% in Kazakhstan, 18.5% vs. 14.6% in Azerbaijan), and in Ukraine this difference was significant (12.4% vs. 5.2%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: CAT™ and mMRC are widely used tools for respiratory function assessment. Despite CAT™ scores being close to a normal value (< 5), the relationship of both CAT™ and mMRC scores with being overweight/obese was demonstrated in the general adult population of three CIS countries. IPAQ may also be a useful instrument for measuring activity level however, more objective studies are required to evaluate the relationship between BMI and physical activity.

Investigating Patient and Family Satisfaction with the Respiratory Status in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

The current chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management aims to improve the patients' quality of life and healthy life expectancy; however, few studies have evaluated the level of satisfaction with the patients' current respiratory status in COPD patients and their families. This study aimed to examine the level of patient and family satisfaction with the patients' current respiratory status and to identify the clinical factors closely linked to dissatisfaction.This multicenter, cross-sectional study included 454 outpatients with COPD and 296 family members. Patients and families were allocated to the satisfied and dissatisfied groups based on their satisfaction with the patients' current respiratory status. Patients' health status, dyspnoea, appetite, respiratory function, and mood disorders were assessed.Among the participants of this study, 67% of patients and 60% of their families were dissatisfied with the patients' current respiratory status. The COPD assessment test (CAT) was the most sensitive marker of dissatisfaction compared to other clinical factors (p < 0.01). The statistical cut-off value of CAT for predicting patient dissatisfaction was 11. CAT reflected patient dissatisfaction independent of age, sex, dyspnoea, appetite, mood disorders, body mass index, and respiratory function (odds ratio: CAT; 1.12 (1.07-1.19): p < 0.01).Many patients and families are dissatisfied with the patients' respiratory status, and the patients' CAT score is useful to predict dissatisfaction. Our findings are consistent with the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease indicating that treatment should be enhanced in patients with a CAT score ≥10. Furthermore, treatment strategies targeting CAT may contribute to an improved patient satisfaction.

Increased levels of inflammatory biomarker CX3CL1 in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the concentration of CX3CL1 in serum of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and to evaluate the associations between the CX3CL1 level and systemic inflammation, small airway obstruction, and COPD assessment test (CAT) scores in COPD patients. METHODS: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were utilized to detect the CX3CL1 protein in serum separately from 64 patients with COPD and 53 healthy controls. RESULTS: Compared with healthy non-smokers, healthy smokers and COPD non-smokers, serum CX3CL1 protein levels were significantly elevated in COPD smokers (258.33 ±â€¯56.27 pg/mL versus 177.32 ±â€¯43.21 pg/mL, 185.64 ±â€¯47.03 pg/mL, and 226.55 ±â€¯51.79 pg/mL, P < 0.05). Correlation analysis indicated that serum CX3CL1 in COPD smokers was negatively correlated with FEV1/FVC (justified r = -0.319, P < 0.001), FEV1/Pre (justified r = -0.476, P < 0.001), FEV3/FVC (justified r = -0.354, P < 0.001), MMEF25-75/Pre (justified r = -0.428, P < 0.001), but positively correlated with CRP (justified r = 0.331, P < 0.001) and MMP-12 (justified r = 0.352, P < 0.001). However, our results showed no significant correlation between serum CX3CL1 of COPD smokers and the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (justified r = 0.0397, P = 0.6025), but a positive correlation with COPD assessment test (CAT) scores (justified r = 0.367, P < 0.001). Finally, through multivariate linear analysis, statistical results demonstrated age (ß = -0.2694, P = 0.005), FEV1/Pred (ß = -0.2653, P = 0.003), CRP (ß = 0.1427, P = 0.0478) and MMP-12 (ß = 0.430, P < 0.001) are independent parameters associated with CX3CL1. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that elevated circulating CX3CL1 level is associated with the systemic inflammation, small airway obstruction, and CAT scores in COPD patients, suggesting that CX3CL1 may play crucial roles in the pathogenesis of COPD. Blocking CX3CL1 might prevent the progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

The impact of a personalised action plan delivered at discharge to patients with COPD on readmissions: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Self-management interventions in COPD, including action plans, have the potential to increase quality of life and to reduce respiratory-related hospitalisations. However, knowledge is still sparse of the effectiveness of a personally tailored action plan introduced at or right after discharge from hospital. AIM: This pilot study aimed to test whether a personalised, stepwise action plan supported with a short instruction provided at or postdischarge after an acute exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admission as an addition to usual care reduces readmissions and symptom burden, including anxiety and depression levels at 3-month follow-up. METHODS: The study was carried out in a randomised controlled design with follow-up after 3 months. In all, 75 participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention group that received an action plan, including the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), or to a control group that received usual care. The incidence of COPD-related readmissions was measured as the primary outcome. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, the action plan group significantly reduced the incidence of readmissions. The action plan group showed a trend towards a significant decrease in HADS-depression, but none in HADS-anxiety. Significant improvements in CAT scores were observed for the participants in the intervention group. Only inferior minor differences were found in use of inhalation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A personally tailored action plan introduced at or postdischarge combined with follow-up support is an effective self-management tool to support recovery and to reduce unnecessary readmissions. In future follow-up care, the healthcare professional must initiate the action plan at discharge and immediately after having the opportunity to follow the patient at home. This might require healthcare professionals working across healthcare sectors, who support patients until they have the needed confidence and competence in using the plan.

Effect of doxycyline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - An exploratory study.

PURPOSE: Various mechanisms, including oxidative stress, inflammation, and protease-antiprotease imbalance are proposed for the progressive decline in lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Doxycycline, a broad spectrum tetracycline antibiotic, is reported to have non-antimicrobial matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) inhibitory action in various inflammatory conditions. The effect of doxycycline in COPD is hereby assessed in the present randomized prospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The first group of COPD patients (n = 30; mild (n = 3), moderate (n = 6), severe (n = 7), very severe (n = 14) as per GOLD II & III criteria was prescribed the standard therapy, a combination of (i) short acting anti-muscarinic agent (SAMA) + short acting ß2 agonist (SABA) inhaled and (ii) corticosteroid inhaled (ICS) + long acting ß2 agonist (LABA) (iii) ICS + LABA + LAMA. Whereas doxycycline (100 mg), was used daily once or twice as per Body Mass Index (BMI), as an add-on to existing standard therapy for the second group of patients (n = 30; mild (n = 2), moderate (n = 7), severe (n = 8), very severe (n = 13). All recruited patients were followed-up after 3 months of treatment. Lung function index FEV1(%) predicted, FEV1/FVC (%), quality of life status including COPD Assessment Test (CAT), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were assessed. Routine blood cell count also was performed. RESULTS: Biochemical analysis included estimation of oxidative stress markers, inflammatory cytokines and proteases in plasma of both the groups. Reduction in oxidative stress is evidenced by a significant decrease in Lipid hydro peroxides (LPO), total oxidative stress (TOS) and increase in glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX), reduced glutathione (GSH) and total anti-oxidant capacity (TAO) nitrite and nitrate (NOx) along with peroxynitrate following 3 months of add-on doxycycline treatment. Reduced levels of cytokines such as interleukin IL-6, TNF-α, IL-8 were also observed. Multivariate analysis identified TNF-α major effective discriminant among pre and post doxycycline treated COPD patients. The expression of TNF-α was inversely correlated with FEV1/FVC (%) changes. The levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9/tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1 ratio (MMP-9/ TIMP-1), also decreased significantly and the decline could be associated with TOS. A significant increase in bilirubin and reduced glutathione (GSH) level was noticed in standard therapy group. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the improvement in lung function and quality of life in COPD patients may probably be attributed to the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-MMP activity of doxycycline. The potential therapeutic role of long-term doxycycline, in addition to its traditional antibiotic effect, definitely warrants further attention.

Contribution of individual COPD assessment test (CAT) items to CAT total score and effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on CAT scores.

BACKGROUND: The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) contains eight items (cough, phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness, limited activities, confidence leaving home, sleeplessness and energy). The current study aimed 1) to better understand the impact of the respiratory and non-respiratory CAT item scores on the CAT total score; and 2) to determine the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on CAT items and CAT total score. METHODS: CAT total score of ≥10 or ≥ 18 points was used to classify patients as highly symptomatic, a decrease of 2 points was considered as clinically relevant improvement. 'Cough', 'phlegm', 'chest tightness', 'breathlessness' were defined as respiratory items; ≥3 points on each item was defined as highly symptomatic. RESULTS: In total, 497 clinically stable patients (55% male, age 64.0 (57.5-71.0) years, FEV1 46.0 (32.0-63.0)% predicted, CAT total score 22.0 (17.5-26.0) points) were included. 95% had CAT score ≥ 10 points and 75% ≥18 points. Respectively, 45% and 54% of subjects scored high on 3 or 4 of the respiratory CAT items. Following PR, 220 patients (57.7%) reported an improved health status as assessed by CAT total score (- 3.0 (- 7.0-1.0) points). Change in CAT item scores ranged from 0.0 (- 1.0-0.0) to - 1.0 (- 2.0-0.0) points) with best improvements in 'energy' (- 1.0 (- 2.0-0.0)points). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of patients classified as highly symptomatic did not report a high level of respiratory symptoms, indicating that non-respiratory symptoms impact on disease classification and treatment algorithm. The impact of PR on CAT item scores varied by individual item. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands National Trial Register ( NTR3416 ). Registered 2 May 2012.

Assessing health status over time: impact of recall period and anchor question on the minimal clinically important difference of copd health status tools.

BACKGROUND: The Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) assesses what change on a measurement tool can be considered minimal clinically relevant. Although the recall period can influence questionnaire scores, it is unclear if it influences the MCID. This study is the first to examine longitudinally the impact of the recall period of an anchor question and its design on the MCID of COPD health status tools using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). METHODS: Moderate to very severe COPD patients without respiratory co-morbidities were recruited during 3-week Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR). CAT, CCQ and SGRQ were completed at baseline, discharge, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. A 15-point Global Rating of Change scale (GRC) was completed at each follow-up. A five-point GRC was used as second anchor at 12 months. Mean change scores of a subset of patients indicating a minimal improvement on each of the anchor questions were considered the MCID. The MCID estimates over different time periods were compared with one another by evaluating the degree of overlap of Confidence Intervals (CI) adjusted for dependency. RESULTS: In total 451 patients were included (57.9 ± 6.6 years, 65% male, 50/39/11% GOLD II/III/IV), of which 309 completed follow-up. Baseline health status scores were 20.2 ± 7.3 (CAT), 2.9 ± 1.2 (CCQ) and 50.7 ± 17.3 (SGRQ). MCID estimates for improvement ranged - 3.1 to - 1.4 for CAT, - 0.6 to - 0.3 for CCQ, and - 10.3 to - 7.6 for SGRQ. Absolute higher - though not significant - MCIDs were observed for CAT and CCQ directly after PR. Significantly absolute lower MCID estimates were observed for CAT (difference - 1.4: CI -2.3 to - 0.5) and CCQ (difference - 0.2: CI -0.3 to -0.1) using a five-point GRC. CONCLUSIONS: The recall period of a 15-point anchor question seemed to have limited impact on the MCID for improvement of CAT, CCQ and SGRQ during PR; although a 3-week MCID estimate directly after PR might lead to absolute higher values. However, the design of the anchor question was likely to influence the MCID of CAT and CCQ. TRIAL REGISTRATION: RIMTCORE trial # DRKS00004609 and #12107 (Ethik-Kommission der Bayerischen Landesärztekammer).

Impact of cataract on health-related quality of life in a longitudinal Japanese chronic obstructive pulmonary cohort.

Cigarette smoking increases the risk of developing both cataract and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The prevalence of cataract and the clinical characteristics of COPD patients with cataract were retrospectively investigated in a 2-year observational COPD cohort. We analyzed 395 patients with complete data on ophthalmologic evaluation (319 subjects with COPD and 76 subjects at risk of COPD). There was no difference in the prevalence of cataract between COPD patients and those at risk (47.0% vs. 42.1%, p = 0.44). Age ≥ 75 years, low body mass index, and hypertension were independently associated with cataract as a comorbidity in COPD. The incidence of exacerbation within 2 years was significantly higher in COPD patients with cataract than those without cataract (36.6% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.0019). COPD patients with cataract exhibited significantly higher COPD assessment test score compared to those without cataract (13.7 ± 8.9 vs. 11.5 ± 7.2, p = 0.0240). Overall St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score and each component were significantly worse in COPD patients with cataract compared to those without cataract. COPD patients with cataract exhibited poor health-related quality of life and frequent exacerbations. The association between cataract and exacerbations of COPD deserves further attention.

GOLD Classification of COPD: Discordance in Criteria for Symptoms and Exacerbation Risk Assessment.

The new A-B-C-D Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification of severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is based on combined symptoms and exacerbation risk assessment. The assumed equivalence between dyspnoea modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) grade ≥2 and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score ≥ 10 to identify more symptoms has been questioned. Whether the exacerbation risk assessment criteria, old GOLD spirometry staging and frequency of exacerbations, are equivalent has not been examined. We evaluated the extent of agreement between these alternative criteria and whether it improved by redefining the equivalence between mMRC grade and CAT score. CAT scores, mMRC grades of dyspnoea, frequency of exacerbations and spirometry stages were computed in 400 patients with COPD. Receiver operating characteristic curve was analysed to determine the best CAT score to identify more symptoms. CAT scores across mMRC grades and the frequency of exacerbations across spirometry stages showed substantial overlaps. The symptoms criteria gave discordant classification in 88 (22%) patients (kappa 0.62) and the exacerbation risk assessment criteria in 181 (45%) patients (kappa 0.12). A CAT score of ≥10 had 82% sensitivity but 24% specificity to identify mMRC grade ≥ 2, while a score of 17 had 98% specificity but a low sensitivity of 52% and did not improve the agreement. We conclude that symptoms and exacerbation risk assessment criteria of the new GOLD classification yield discordant group categorisations. Lack of any satisfactory equivalence between CAT score and mMRC grades implies that the former cannot be used alone. Using the higher of mMRC ≥ 2 and CAT score ≥ 17 to identify more symptoms would avoid discordant categorisation.

The predictive value of an adjusted COPD assessment test score on the risk of respiratory-related hospitalizations in severe COPD patients.

We evaluated whether a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT) with adjusted weights for the CAT items could better predict future respiratory-related hospitalizations than the original CAT. Two focus groups (respiratory nurses and physicians) generated two adjusted CAT algorithms. Two multivariate logistic regression models for infrequent (≤1/year) versus frequent (>1/year) future respiratory-related hospitalizations were defined: one with the adjusted CAT score that correlated best with future hospitalizations and one with the original CAT score. Patient characteristics related to future hospitalizations ( p ≤ 0.2) were also entered. Eighty-two COPD patients were included. The CAT algorithm derived from the nurse focus group was a borderline significant predictor of hospitalization risk (odds ratio (OR): 1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.14; p = 0.050) in a model that also included hospitalization frequency in the previous year (OR: 3.98; 95% CI: 1.30-12.16; p = 0.016) and anticholinergic risk score (OR: 3.08; 95% CI: 0.87-10.89; p = 0.081). Presence of ischemic heart disease and/or heart failure appeared 'protective' (OR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.05-0.62; p = 0.007). The original CAT score was not significantly associated with hospitalization risk. In conclusion, as a predictor of respiratory-related hospitalizations, an adjusted CAT score was marginally significant (although the original CAT score was not). 'Previous respiratory-related hospitalizations' was the strongest factor in this equation.

The Correlation of Serum Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Interleukin-6 with Quality of Life Using the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the levels of serum pro-brain natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP) and interleukin (IL)-6 in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to correlate these markers with health-related quality of life using the COPD assessment test (CAT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum pro-BNP and IL-6 levels were measured in 82 patients with stable COPD. Serum pro-BNP and serum IL-6 levels, pulmonary function, and oxygen saturation (SpO2) were measured according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage and CAT score. Also, the associations of both pro-BNP and IL-6 with the clinical parameters of patients were tested. RESULTS: The serum levels of IL-6 (7.57 [5-11.16] pg/mL) and pro-BNP (120.55 [92.89-144.20] pg/mL) were higher with enhancing disease severity based on the GOLD classification (p = 0.034 and 0.068, respectively). Also, serum levels of pro-BNP (120.55 [89.50-147.90] pg/mL) and IL-6 (6.68 [4.40-11.97] pg/mL) were increased in patients with high CAT scores (p = 0.004 and 0.017, respectively). There was a significant positive correlation between plasma pro-BNP and IL-6 levels (r = 0.332, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that with increased severity of obstruction based on the GOLD criteria both IL-6 and pro-BNP were elevated. This increase in inflammatory markers was associated with a reduced quality of life and the severity of hypoxia. These findings indicated that lowering IL-6 and pro-BNP could be useful in the management of COPD patients.